I'm no Baby Killer! - c'mon guys!!!

[M1 Abrams]

To whom it may concern,
I'm not sure who is responsible for refering to be as "baby killer". However, this couldn't be more off base. I have a profound respect for life. I am genuinly saddened by the way the Iraqi people are forced to live. If it were up to me we (America) would use our considerable power to ensure not one person on earth is oppressed. It is this reason that I support this war so strongly. Prior to the war I was a strong advocate of diplomacy. The time for deplomacy is over. It is as unfortunate as it is necessary. Despite my support for this war, I assure you "baby killer" is the worst thing you could call me. I'm pro freedom and nothing else. I only ask that perhaps you get to know me before making such a bold statement. A more accurate name would be aspiring freedom fighter or masked vigilante. Please take this into consideration.

[Saint-Just]

Surely there was a specific comment you made that incited the alteration to your subtitle, any idea what it was?

[canikickit]

Maybe it was something to do with your sig. It said something along the lines of:

"MOAB meet Saddam, Saddam meet MOAB. Oh that wasn't Saddam, who cares?"

It was fucking disgusting, and so is your current sig.

[Xvall]

GOD BLESS THE TROOPS!

According to religion; entrance to heaven was among the most wonderful blessings. I hope that they recieve it.

[Anonymous]

I don't think M1 should be labelled like this simply for supporting a war of liberation. How you guys got "baby killer" out of this, God only knows...

(Edited by Dark Capitalist at 5:28 am on Mar. 21, 2003)

[knowledge]

Quote: from M1 Abrams on 10:09 pm on Mar. 20, 2003
To whom it may concern,
I'm not sure who is responsible for refering to be as "baby killer". However, this couldn't be more off base. I have a profound respect for life. I am genuinly saddened by the way the Iraqi people are forced to live. If it were up to me we (America) would use our considerable power to ensure not one person on earth is oppressed. It is this reason that I support this war so strongly. Prior to the war I was a strong advocate of diplomacy. The time for deplomacy is over. It is as unfortunate as it is necessary. Despite my support for this war, I assure you "baby killer" is the worst thing you could call me. I'm pro freedom and nothing else. I only ask that perhaps you get to know me before making such a bold statement. A more accurate name would be aspiring freedom fighter or masked vigilante. Please take this into consideration.


agreed.

[KRAZYKILLA]

God Bless us all---- I really do mean it. it aint no suckup or bullshit statement. even you atheists are blessed!!! :)

[canikickit]

I don't want the blessing of god.

[redstar2000]

"I'm no Baby Killer."

YES YOU ARE!

:cool:

[synthesis]

I don't think M1 should be labelled like this simply for supporting a war of liberation.Liberation? Bullshit! What's to stop us from installing a new dictator which was as bad or worse than the old one, just like all the other countries we've fucked with? Brazil, Chile, Nicaragua, the Congo, Afghanistan, Libya... the list goes on.

Anyone who supports U.N. sanctions on Iraq is supporting, ideologically, the murder of innocent babies. Over a million innocent infants have died directly to these sanctions, and five hundred and forty more are dying every day. Anyone who supports Israel financially, indeed anyone who pays taxes to the United States government, is supporting the intentional murder of innocent babies.

http://free.freespeech.org/americanstatete...rismPhotos.html (http://free.freespeech.org/americanstateterrorism/palestine/IsraeliTerrorismPhotos.html)

[Capitalist Imperial]

[quote]Quote: from DyerMaker on 2:49 am on Mar. 21, 2003
"Bullshit! What's to stop us from installing a new dictator which was as bad or worse than the old one, just like all the other countries we've fucked with? Brazil, Chile, Nicaragua, the Congo, Afghanistan, Libya... the list goes on."

You are listing previously oppressed regimes that were liberated by benevolent american action.

"Anyone who supports U.N. sanctions on Iraq is supporting, ideologically, the murder of innocent babies."

No they're not

"Over a million innocent infants have died directly to these sanctions, and five hundred and forty more are dying every day."

Actually, DyerMaker conveniently leaves out that the US has created certain provsional concessions within said sanctions that allow for food, medicine, and other key supplies to be distributed to the Iraqi people. Saddam himself has chosen to ursurp these supplies for his own malicious use.

So, as usual, it is Saddam Hussein who is responsible for his people's problems, not the USA. However, as usual, brilliant leftist logic dictates that we must blame the US for just about everything, and not the man directly responsible for denying his people's children their US-alotted supplies.

"Anyone who supports Israel financially, indeed anyone who pays taxes to the United States government, is supporting the intentional murder of innocent babies."

Give me a fucking break.

[synthesis]

You are listing previously oppressed regimes that were liberated by benevolent american action.

Oppressed regimes? Benevolent fucking American action?! What the fuck are you on about?

The presidents of Chile and the Congo were democratically-fuckin'-elected! The government in Afghanistan was dedicated to the women's rights your Taliban so barbarically removed! What ARE you talking about?


Actually, DyerMaker conveniently leaves out that the US has created certain provsional concessions within said sanctions that allow for food, medicine, and other key supplies to be distributed to the Iraqi people. Saddam himself has chosen to ursurp these supplies for his own malicious use. And typical right-wing logic dictates that America can never be blamed for anything. Can I see your source?


Give me a fucking break. No.

And will somebody please fix this damn quoting bug?

[Capitalist Imperial]

Dyermaker, you know as well as I do that we did not install the taliban. They and the mujahadeen were different factions.

Besides, we addressed the taliban and liberated afghani women anyway.

[synthesis]

We did, effectively, install the Taliban because we funded the coup of the progressive government, and then when the country was thrust into internal turmoil, we did fund the Taliban. Are you denying that the bin Laden family and the Bush family are bed buddies?


Besides, we addressed the taliban and liberated afghani women anyway. LOL, and of course, America had only the best interests of the women of Afghanistan in mind. :angry:

(Edited by DyerMaker at 7:37 am on Mar. 21, 2003)

[American Kid]

Okay, I'm drunk.

Now, to the meat of the matter: M1 Abrams and this business of him being a baby-killer.

First of all, as I type this, he's in my living room. It's clearly against my policy to allow baby-killers in my living room. Particularly right-wing baby-killers.

But he's there, and god bless him he's right wing, but he's no baby-killer. He's a good guy. I'll be the first to admit, the sig is fucked up. He changed it. The new one's not so bad. I'm all for it. I question my leaders...but I support my troops.

Now, who's behind it? Well it's either D DAY, Red Celtic, Peacceniked, or Malte. Whoever it is, kudos. Because it's pretty fuckin' funny. I don't care. What's he gonna do? He's down the hall. :)

So yeah.
-Ak

[Ghost Writer]

Baby Killers! Baby Killers! Baby Killers!

Oh, the cry of a loon. Yes this is the cry of our enemy. To me it sounds like wishful thinking on the part of the liberal. Who else is responsible for the death of millions of babies, be it through starvation, genocide, politicide, abortion, and drug use, which results in crippling handicaps for thousands of babies annually. Baby Killers? If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black.

[synthesis]

Who else is responsible for the death of millions of babies?I think we all know who is responsible, for the deaths of many babies in Afghanistan, Palestine, Libya, Brazil, and Iraq, and it sure ain't the pinkos.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from DyerMaker on 7:36 am on Mar. 21, 2003
We did, effectively, install the Taliban because we funded the coup of the progressive government, and then when the country was thrust into internal turmoil, we did fund the Taliban. Are you denying that the bin Laden family and the Bush family are bed buddies?


Besides, we addressed the taliban and liberated afghani women anyway. LOL, and of course, America had only the best interests of the women of Afghanistan in mind. :angry:

(Edited by DyerMaker at 7:37 am on Mar. 21, 2003)


"progressive government"? Don't you mean "Soviet invasion and attempted occupation"?

[redstar2000]

"I support my troops" -- American Kid.

Didn't know you had your own army, AK, but since you do, would you mind lending it to Iraq for a few weeks...they've been attacked by U.S. imperialism and need all the help defending themselves that they can get.

Thanks.

:cool:

[M1 Abrams]

I didn't want to incite another Iraq debate in in this thread. Instead I wish to be vindicated and have the baby killer name lifted immediatly. So either support me or flame me.

[RedCeltic]

Damn what a party pooper.. ;)

I was just fucking with you man relax... I took it off.

[Invader Zim]

Quote: from redstar2000 on 3:28 pm on Mar. 21, 2003
"I support my troops" -- American Kid.

Didn't know you had your own army, AK, but since you do, would you mind lending it to Iraq for a few weeks...they've been attacked by U.S. imperialism and need all the help defending themselves that they can get.

Thanks.

:cool:


:)

Classic

:)

[M1 Abrams]

Thank you RedCeltic.

[Moskitto]

Saying the Russians "invaded" Afghanistan is incorrect use of the word "invade" since the Afghan government and the Soviets were fighting on the same side, not against each other, so calling it the "Soviet invasion of Afghanistan" is like calling the Vietnam was the "American invasion of South Vietnam."

[synthesis]

"progressive government"? Don't you mean "Soviet invasion and attempted occupation"? No.

[canikickit]

the US has created certain provsional concessions within said sanctions that allow for food, medicine, and other key supplies to be distributed to the Iraqi people. Saddam himself has chosen to ursurp these supplies for his own malicious use.

So, as usual, it is Saddam Hussein who is responsible for his people's problems, not the USA.

That is absolutely ridiculous logic. Saddam would not have any concessions to usurp if it wasn't for the sanctions.

[Moskitto]

and annother thing, I totally agree with AK47, that was absolutely classic :)