ITS OFICIAL WAR STARTS MONDAY!! - grab your gun and kill for

[Anonymous]

Its oficial the war is starting on Monday...

the council helded in Azores (Portuguese island) was made with only one objective... WAR


even without NATO and UN aid the Morons Cohaliation (Britain, USA, Spain, and the pathetic efort of help of Portugal) are going to attack Iraque this Monday...
acording to Bush "Monday is the last window of opurtunity"

"we are before the last effort" like Stupid Aznar said

and as our eloquent and equaly stupid president said "Its always worth fight for peace"...

so my fellow comrades, cappies and motherfuckers grab your gun and get your share of oil...

because war is on and only the weak will die....

ONWARDS!!! FOR THE MOTHERLAND AND OIL WE DIE....




(Edited by the anarchist at 1:01 am on Mar. 17, 2003)

[man in the red suit]

please don't start with the oil shit. I know your being sarcastic but fighting for oil is so fucking stupid it makes me laugh. I don't know how anyone can buy into that nonsense that America is in this war for oil.

[Pete]

Part of it is oil. Although the American warmachine can run for 20 years after the oil reserves run out because of their stock pile...

[Anonymous]

please don't start with the oil shit. I know your being sarcastic but fighting for oil is so fucking stupid it makes me laugh. I don't know how anyone can buy into that nonsense that America is in this war for oil.
are you trying to tell me that america isnt in for the oil?

are you trying to tell me that this war is being helded for world peace and prosperety and to end the iraquian people problems with the elemination of Sadam?.....

nice dreams my friend... too bad theyr only dreams.....

this war is based almost interely on oil, plus the ida of eleminating a enemy of america is also good....
but yes i would say that the oil is almost the sole aspect of this war..

[Anonymous]

:shocked:

I'd better get my tapes ready then...but seriously it's about damn time.

[Pete]

Sadyl I must agree with DC. It is about time that America does what it said it would do. Even if I do not agree with it at all.

[man in the red suit]

Quote: from the anarchist on 1:17 am on Mar. 17, 2003
[quote]please don't start with the oil shit. I know your being sarcastic but fighting for oil is so fucking stupid it makes me laugh. I don't know how anyone can buy into that nonsense that America is in this war for oil.

are you trying to tell me that america isnt in for the oil?

yes. that is what I am telling you. The profits of Iraqi oil refinerys will not make nearly enough money to compensate for the war costs. What sense does it make? none. If we wanted oil, it would be much much much more cheaper and pr4ofitable to either make a deal with sadam or another major oil producing country


are you trying to tell me that this war is being helded for world peace and prosperety

uh no......nobody is arguing with you there. ridding the world of Sadam is not going to bring world peace is it?




this war is based almost interely on oil, plus the ida of eleminating a enemy of america is also good....
but yes i would say that the oil is almost the sole aspect of this war..


would you care to substantiate this claim with some PROOF. Tell me how it would make any sense at all for America to start a war with another country to get oil when it would be much cheaper and I say again, more profitable to make a deal with them.

rethink your little oil scenario please. A war oil would be an economic blunder on America's behalf. this war is for MONEY isn't it? guess not.

[Anonymous]

we are talking about bush here...

bush is capable of anything for any stupiod reason...

but the propose of this war isnt to get the oil directly...

ites rather simple, now USA has to deal with iraque to get its oil, but the oil isnt just that cheap and acessible is it? so if they eleminate Sadam, and put anotehr guy in charge, this time someone that is loyal to america, and then theyu will havemuch more cheaper oil...

why do you think France didnt wanted to go into this shit? they alredy had a good deal, yet USA wants a even bether one...
plus they have the oportunity to eleminate Sadam and replace him by a American Puppet to control the middle east...

simple coup D'Etat trough a almost global war...

[Capitalist Imperial]

How many opportunities have we given Iraq to comply with thw security council resolution?

Countless opportunities.

Endgame is imminent.

[Tkinter1]

Yeah anarchist, you know what you're talking about....

[Pete]

CI...I remember quite clearly how America assured everyone that the resolution would in no way justify war.

[Palmares]

If the war does happen, I hope it is without the UN, then Dubya will be breaking international law and can be tried as a war criminal.

[GuErRrIlLa]

That would be good, to see bush getting put on trial for war crimes. Thats like a dreame come true!

[KRAZYKILLA]

Boys and Girl, get ready!!! Get the meat cleavers ready, cocked my sniper rifle,) its WorldWar3!!!!! Get the oil, get the money, it's a full-frontal assault now! Time to storm, time to fight time for DEFENSE.

Man I hope we don't go to war.

[Palmares]

Quote: from GuErRrIlLa on 12:13 pm on Mar. 17, 2003
That would be good, to see bush getting put on trial for war crimes. Thats like a dreame come true!


You can say that again. Maybe Dubya would even declare war on the world if they attempt to try him in the international court.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from GuErRrIlLa on 2:13 am on Mar. 17, 2003
That would be good, to see bush getting put on trial for war crimes. Thats like a dreame come true!


That would not happen. American leaders will never be tried for war crimes.

Besides, what Bush is doing is not defined as a war crime.

[peaccenicked]

THERE IS A LITTLE THING THE GENOCIDE PARTY HAS TO CLEAR UP FOR ME.
http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/top...c=1784&start=60 (http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/topic.pl?forum=22&topic=1784&start=60)

[Zombie]

That would not happen. American leaders will never be tried for war crimes.

Besides, what Bush is doing is not defined as a war crime.

shut the fuck up man, and read the definition of what a war crime basically is :

"Article 147 of the Fourth Geneva convention defines war crimes as: "Wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, including . . . wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement of a protected person, compelling a protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile power, or wilfully depriving a protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial, . . . taking of hostages and extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly."

rest of article here
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1420133.stm

i'm sure Bush is as innocent as a 10 year old girl and commited none of these actions (read the full article dealing with that) eh?

"america leader will never be tried for war crimes"

please elaborate on that, i'd love to see where u think u're going with this.

[M1 Abrams]

Can we all agree on something please? The Iraqi people are suffering. Fact or fiction? Saddam is not winning any morality contests. Fact or fiction? Question the United States motives all you want, but good will come of this. I don't believe that even the rightest of righties are singing the praises of Bush. However this cannot be demeaned to the point where it is bush and Saddam. This is Iraq and the rest of the world. Even those opposed to war speak of Saddams treachery. If America is the only country that will do anything about it then so be it. Send in the M.O.A.B! Blood will be spilled on BOTH sides, and in the end an EVIL man will no longer be in a position to hurt people. And that will be entirly due to the heroics of "our guys" GOD BLESS THE TROOPS and GOD BLESS AMERICA!

[Show me the Money]

I don't believe that even the rightest of righties are singing the praises of Bush.
oh, yes they are!!:angry:

[Eastside Revolt]

I hope you capitalist yanks are hurt severely by this war.

[Zombie]

Quote: from M1 Abrams on 1:44 am on Mar. 17, 2003
Send in the M.O.A.B! GOD BLESS THE TROOPS and GOD BLESS AMERICA!


another fine example of the ignorant capitalist schmuckhead...

" and in the end an EVIL man will no longer be in a position to hurt people"

yes we all know that Bush is gonna get it in the head any day soon...:angry:

[HankMorgan]

Wouldn't it be easier to just steal Kuwaiti oil since the US Army is already in the country? Or how about taking oil from the Gulf States who don't have strong defenses? If the US is going to do a smash and grab for oil, why not Saudi Arabia where the real prize is? Or better yet, why not take the oil from Canada, Mexico or Venezuala? After all those fields are a short drive away from the US and not on the other side of the globe. Why didn't the US steal Iraq's oil after the first Gulf war? Why steal Iraq's oil when there are other larger and easier sources of oil? Why spend billions using the military to obtain a resource that would be far cheaper to buy?

The answer to all of those questions is the same: IT'S NOT ABOUT THE OIL.

Mr. Anarchist you may sway lesser minds to your side with the argument that the US's motive for attacking Iraq is oil. Is that who you want on your side?

[man in the red suit]

Quote: from HankMorgan on 7:09 pm on Mar. 17, 2003
Wouldn't it be easier to just steal Kuwaiti oil since the US Army is already in the country? Or how about taking oil from the Gulf States who don't have strong defenses? If the US is going to do a smash and grab for oil, why not Saudi Arabia where the real prize is? Or better yet, why not take the oil from Canada, Mexico or Venezuala? After all those fields are a short drive away from the US and not on the other side of the globe. Why didn't the US steal Iraq's oil after the first Gulf war? Why steal Iraq's oil when there are other larger and easier sources of oil? Why spend billions using the military to obtain a resource that would be far cheaper to buy?


Exactly! another good reason as to why your "war for oil" statement is more leftist drivel. And please don't start with the statement about America needing justification for economic imperialism because you will only make a further fool of yourself.

[KRAZYKILLA]

Canadians and Americans (the majority) are stupid and don't know it.

[man in the red suit]

Quote: from KRAZYKILLA on 1:58 am on Mar. 18, 2003
Canadians and Americans (the majority) are stupid and don't know it.

actually I agree with you most expecially when it comes to americans who are more often than not, very stupid if not the dumbest country on the face of the planet. However I still think that the opinion of the vast majority of Americans who support the war is actually an intelligent one for once.

[4514]

wether you think this war is for oil or not,
the only truth/fact is war is coming and thousands of innocent people all over this world will be subjected to its brutaility and misery, so all there really is left to do is grab your gun and choose your side and fight!
the frontline is everywhere,
the red flag, the red star this is what i live for,this is what id die for!
down with USA!
4514

[Pete]

Canadians are not stupid. The plutocrats are. The majority of the population is Anti War. The government is Anti War. Don't lump us in with the easily swayed dumbasses to the south (not all of them...but too man yo fthem)

[Totalitarian]

There are many possible reasons for this war, here are a few of them

* Bush's personal grudge against saddam hussein
* Bush distracting attention from the failure of the terrorwar to solve any of the root problems which helped cause 9/11
* Zionist aspirations in the region.
Iraq was one of the most powerful countries in the region prior to gulf war, yet israeli zionists agitated for a war after iraq invaded kuwait. Now iraq is of little threat, but if the regime was a little more jew friendly...then, sharon & his american collaborators would have even more dominance over the arab region, so that israelis would be better equipped to solve their 'arab problem' in supposed 'jewish land'
* American imperialism, an economic and/or political takeover of iraq so as to achieve geopolitical goals relating to world hegemony
* A collusion of oil companies, usurers and moneyed secret societies to control the world's resources
* White America's social need to "get tough" with dirty little "sandn***ers" in order to feel more in control and "dominant".
* Preparing Earth for the Second Coming of the Messiah
* Making the world safe for democracy