To Stormin Norman - In your new manifistation what ever that

[Invader Zim]

As i know you will re-join because your a sad person, with no life except pissing us off... (sigh) Why not have a fresh start. Go back to how you were before, when you put up a good argument, instead of all this "commi ***** slap" crap.

Dont you think that would be better.

Just a suggestion.

But they will probably ban you again, (quite rightly), but you will come back again, so why not reach a compromise.

[KRAZYKILLA]

hey! don't hate him too much. i have not had a chance to flame him yet! rofl. anyways agitators aren';t neccsarily bad people. like me at www.oltl.net/forums i got banned there because a whole bunch of atheists there were fucking around and were the usual assholes anyways; damn, i missed some good flame wars. :(

[Invader Zim]

so what did you do?

[Ghost Writer]

As i know you will re-join because your a sad person, with no life except pissing us off... (sigh) Why not have a fresh start. Go back to how you were before, when you put up a good argument, instead of all this "commi ***** slap" crap.

Dont you think that would be better.

Just a suggestion.

But they will probably ban you again, (quite rightly), but you will come back again, so why not reach a compromise.

Well, thanks for the advice. I am back now, only to demand that these Stalinists try me, for whatever crimes they feel I have committed, out in the open. If they wish to rid my thoughts and ideas from this debate forum, they should have to lay out their arguments in an appropriate fashion. Otherwise, they prove my assertions about their general cowardly nature, and expose their hypocrisy. Banning me without first giving me the opportunity to defend my positions, or without laying out there own argument is weak. As this is a debating society, I feel that the merits of their case should have to be debated before they expunge me from opposing ideologies. By banning me without doing this they demonstrate the weakness of their argument and confirm my suspicions that this move was made out of fear. I have called for an impartial judge to hear both sides of the case, and would like to get the opinions of those who may not have had a voice in this decision. Perhaps you can be the first person to chime in on whatever side you choose.

By the way, my arguments were just as good under the name Commie ***** Slapper, as they were under Stormin Norman. Although I would like the benefit of having my old name, instead of something as silly as Commie ***** Slapper, I was rather fond of my latest manifestation, silly looking snake and all.

The choice is not in my hands, nor should it be in the hands of those who have such a clear bias against me. Let's see how this plays out, and if the communists are willing to refute my claims about their general cowardice. Let's see if they hold true to the principles of fairness, as they claim. I am not holding my breathe for a rational decision on the part of these people. However, I think maybe some of them have some semblance of decency, and would be willing to try me in a fair manner. Otherwise, the claims that these so called "democratic socialists" make, which state they respect the doctrines of fairness and justice, will be as bogus as I have claimed from the get go.