Is George W. Bush a Chimpanzee? - Say what you wish [Archive]

View Full Version : Is George W. Bush a Chimpanzee? - Say what you wish

Comrade Trave

11th March 2003, 22:56

Yes President bush may appear and speak like a chimpanzee, but he needs to lay off the iraq a little and focus attention towards ole' north korea. May i add that N. korea is communist. Just the other day N. Korea tested a nuclear warhead. I don't care if your a commie or a cappie if Kim Jong Il has long range missile i would feel a bit uncomfortable. The guy is crazy enough to nuke anybody.

Zelena Hracka

11th March 2003, 23:04

Is George W. Bush a Chimpanzee?

Well, this is a possibility..............

(Edited by Zelena Hracka at 11:05 pm on Mar. 11, 2003)

Palmares

11th March 2003, 23:05

I like the topic name.

Saint-Just

11th March 2003, 23:13

Quote: from Comrade Trave on 10:56 pm on Mar. 11, 2003
Yes President bush may appear and speak like a chimpanzee, but he needs to lay off the iraq a little and focus attention towards ole' north korea. May i add that N. korea is communist. Just the other day N. Korea tested a nuclear warhead. I don't care if your a commie or a cappie if Kim Jong Il has long range missile i would feel a bit uncomfortable. The guy is crazy enough to nuke anybody.

That was a Cruise Missile (UAV), its range is relatively limited, comparative to any ICBM. They do of course have ICBMs, that have a range of up to 3,500km, possibly more.

I am not worried about the nuclear capabilities of the DPRK except to any extent that the U.S. may provoke their use. Nevertheless they would only be used if necessary, and I am not one too contend the necessity of their use by the DPRK.

The DPRK has no will to make a pre-emptive attack anywhere, therefore they are highly safe as a peace-loving nation. The U.S. states who have suggested pre-emptive attack on Korea is far more dangerous.

I would have to contend that Kim Jong Il is in fact not dangerous. I have never read or heard anything of him to remotely suggest such a notion.

Old Friend

11th March 2003, 23:18

"The DPRK has no will to make a pre-emptive attack anywhere, therefore they are highly safe as a peace-loving nation. The U.S. states who have suggested pre-emptive attack on Korea is far more dangerous."

Moron.

Anonymous

11th March 2003, 23:59

Bush, the most stupid creature ever has the bigest nuclear arsenal ever...
and hes crazy enough to use it...

so i say focus on America and attack the country..

see how stupid you all sound when you do this irracional coments?

the bigest terrorist and enemy of peace right now (and for the last couple years) is USA...
USA has nuclear bombs, yet renounces otehr countrys the right to have theyr own nuclear equipment... saying tehyr too dangerous...
well facts are taht North Korea hasnt entered almost every fucking war and civil war opf the last century nor has it destroyed and rased intire countrys like USA has...

USA is the most corrupt and destructive force in the planet.. it has a arsenal big enough to destroy the world acouple times.. it is the only country that ACTUALLY USED the nuclear bombs in the past...

and surprisingly they are heros becuase they used those filthy bombs.. they are heros becuase they killed children in cambodja and vietnam... they are heros becuase they tryed to hold almost all revolutions known in the world, and most world tyrans were trained by CIA..
so when thinking in wich country to attack, think USA...´
because honestly USA is the bigest threat to peace...

Tkinter1

12th March 2003, 00:04

"they are heros becuase they used those filthy bombs.. they are heros becuase they killed children in cambodja and vietnam... they are heros becuase they tryed to hold almost all revolutions known in the world, and most world tyrans were trained by CIA."

You're right anarchist they are heroes. I'm glad you've finally come to realise this.

PunkRawker677

12th March 2003, 04:43

North Korea has repedeatly stated that it will think about using a pre-emptive strike against the U.S. if they believe that the U.S. is poised to attack them (pre-emptive strike may include nuclear attack). I do not support the U.S., but i also do not support North Korea's desire to fire Nukes at the innocent people of the United States. They seem to be on a power trip, or an attention trip, and i don't really believe that they ARE an imminent threat, but if they continue threatening pre-emptive nuclear attacks, i believe we can all agree that they are a threat.

Saint-Just

12th March 2003, 20:24

Quote: from Old Friend on 11:18 pm on Mar. 11, 2003
"The DPRK has no will to make a pre-emptive attack anywhere, therefore they are highly safe as a peace-loving nation. The U.S. states who have suggested pre-emptive attack on Korea is far more dangerous."

Moron.

Why ever is the DPRK not peace loving? They only desire the reunification of their own country. The U.S. occupies the south of Korea with its troops. The U.S. created the corrupt military dictatorships that ruled the country until 1992 at the expense of the Korean people.

The U.S., for 50 years, has scuppered the developement of the North with international blocade, and attempts to hamper the North's self-sufficiency.

'North Korea has repedeatly stated that it will think about using a pre-emptive strike against the U.S. if they believe that the U.S. is poised to attack them (pre-emptive strike may include nuclear attack). I do not support the U.S., but i also do not support North Korea's desire to fire Nukes at the innocent people of the United States. They seem to be on a power trip, or an attention trip, and i don't really believe that they ARE an imminent threat, but if they continue threatening pre-emptive nuclear attacks, i believe we can all agree that they are a threat.'

They have threatened to remove U.S. forces from their own country if the U.S. continues to move forces in, it is only the U.S. that can provoke war by suggesting that they will themselves make a pre-emptive attack on DPRK.

The U.S. has suggested that if the DPRK proceeds with its nuclear programme, then they may make a pre-emptive attack. It is the U.S. that is suggesting a pre-emptive attack, not the DPRK. The DPRK has the right to develope its nuclear programme, it also has the right to trade with foreign countries, the U.S. attempts to scupper these rights of the nation.

Larissa

12th March 2003, 20:27

"Is George W. Bush a Chimpanzee?"

Definitely not! A chimpanzee has got a brain and uses it in a clever way. Please, do not use this forum to offend chimpanzees.

:smile:

Old Friend

12th March 2003, 20:55

Definitely not! A chimpanzee has got a brain and uses it in a clever way. Please, do not use this forum to offend chimpanzees.

Gasp! And to think that I respected you, Larissa. Just kidding, I never really respected you.

Political Suicide

12th March 2003, 22:41

Mao, i did not intend to say that the DPRK has no right to develop a nuclear program or trade with other countries. I strongly do not support any pre-emptive strike, or military buildup around the North by the U.S., but i will also refuse to support North Korea's desire to put the world on the brink of Nuclear war.

Comrade Trave

13th March 2003, 03:00

Dear old friend

What country are you from?

Comrade Trave

13th March 2003, 03:07

dear mao
i would also like to know what country you are from..?

Saint-Just

13th March 2003, 19:02

Quote: from Political Suicide on 10:41 pm on Mar. 12, 2003
Mao, i did not intend to say that the DPRK has no right to develop a nuclear program or trade with other countries. I strongly do not support any pre-emptive strike, or military buildup around the North by the U.S., but i will also refuse to support North Korea's desire to put the world on the brink of Nuclear war.

The DPRK has no desire to put the world on teh brink of nuclear war. It has a nuclear programme to make its country more sufficient. It has the right to possess nuclear weapons. It has never suggested any plans for a pre-emptive nuclear attack. It is a relatively small nation, interested in its sovereignity and development, for it to wage a nuclear war would ensure its own destruction.

'dear mao
i would also like to know what country you are from..?'

United Kingdom

CubaVictoria1983

13th March 2003, 19:53

hahaaha...I was about to agree with the fact that GWB was a chimp, but then Larissa made a really good point. So I would say that NO, GWB is NOT a chimp, but maybe the chimps processed dinner.....:)

Comrade Trave

13th March 2003, 22:11

Ok...
Mao you are just as close to North Korea as the US.
The US has no reason to attack The United Kingdom...WE are allies. so why are you worried that the US has nuclear weapons. now since the US could be in range of a nuclear missile strike from N. Korea guess what that means... the United Kingdom is in range also. now i don't know about you but i wouldn't want any crazed national leader to have a nuclear arsenal in firing range of my country. a couple of nukes would wipe the UK of the map. President Bush has no intentions of using nuclear weapons unless some radical leader decides to launch a nuclear warhead at american soil. If this event were to occur then i fell that Mr. Bush would have the right to launch a counter strike at the waring nation just for their stupidity of trying to destroy us. the retaliation the US would use against a nuclear strike against the us would be catastrophic for the other nation.

Saint-Just

13th March 2003, 22:58

Quote: from Comrade Trave on 10:11 pm on Mar. 13, 2003
Ok...
Mao you are just as close to North Korea as the US.
The US has no reason to attack The United Kingdom...WE are allies. so why are you worried that the US has nuclear weapons. now since the US could be in range of a nuclear missile strike from N. Korea guess what that means... the United Kingdom is in range also. now i don't know about you but i wouldn't want any crazed national leader to have a nuclear arsenal in firing range of my country. a couple of nukes would wipe the UK of the map. President Bush has no intentions of using nuclear weapons unless some radical leader decides to launch a nuclear warhead at american soil. If this event were to occur then i fell that Mr. Bush would have the right to launch a counter strike at the waring nation just for their stupidity of trying to destroy us. the retaliation the US would use against a nuclear strike against the us would be catastrophic for the other nation.

'why are you worried that the US has nuclear weapons.'

I am not worried that the U.S. has nuclear weapons.

The DPRK's ICBM's have a range that can only hit as far as Chicago possibly, at the very farthest.

'i wouldn't want any crazed national leader to have a nuclear arsenal in firing range of my country.'

Kim Jong Il is not a 'crazed national leader', of all the people in the world I would suggest nuclear weapons are safest in his hands. I will give you these links:

http://www.kdvr.de/english/dictator.html

http://www.kdvr.de/english/dictator.html

'President Bush has no intentions of using nuclear weapons unless some radical leader decides to launch a nuclear warhead at american soil. If this event were to occur then i fell that Mr. Bush would have the right to launch a counter strike at the waring nation just for their stupidity of trying to destroy us.'

Bush has not said he will nuke the DPRK, however he has stated he would initiate a pre-emptive attack on its nuclear facilities if it did not abandon its nuclear programme, which of couse is a programme that it under international law has a right to since there are no UN restrictions on this for the DPRK and the DPRK has clearly stated its withdrawal from the NPT. I would articulate that present to the start of a U.S. DPRK conflict (which I have already stated the U.S. has made clear it may initiate) the U.S. could then use Nuclear weapons, under no pretense have I made the assumption that the U.S. will make a pre-emptive nuclear attack as of yet.

What about the U.S. illegitimate presence if South Korea, its placement of military dictatorships and oppressive national security laws in the country for decades? What about its international blocades of the DPRK for decades and the constant threats to the country?

Are these not scuppering peace and development?

Larissa

14th March 2003, 01:04

Quote: from Old Friend on 5:55 pm on Mar. 12, 2003

Definitely not! A chimpanzee has got a brain and uses it in a clever way. Please, do not use this forum to offend chimpanzees.

Gasp! And to think that I respected you, Larissa. Just kidding, I never really respected you.
I'm honoured by your lack of respect Norman.

Kapitan Andrey

14th March 2003, 07:06

Comrade Trave...
>The guy is crazy enough to nuke anybody<

Bush is more crazy!!!

Hey, Faka-boy-yankee!!! Change your avatar if you speaking such things!!!

Chairman Mao...I'm wondered and confused by your location,.,.,.,...,but I agree with you!

Old Friend...It is you moron!!! Did you forgot your ex-rank!? Stormin-Moron!!! Malte was right!!!

Let N.Korea defend itself against yankee's imperialism!!! I'm sure, that only defence is in their plans!!!

Comrade Trave

1st April 2003, 03:45

f all of you!!!!!!!!!!!!! comunist bastards!

synthesis

1st April 2003, 03:58

Typical bourgeois reactionary rhetoric.

Comrade Trave

2nd April 2003, 03:45

i'll Typical your bourgeois reactionary rhetoric

Beotch! get your communist ass outta my room

down with saddam!!!!

hasta la vitoria siempre!

Invader Zim

2nd April 2003, 13:09