What I did for the school walkout

[Old Friend]

Well, another day of liberalism, another attack on our school institutions. What happened today for the walkout? On my campus, nothing eventful. Nobody walked out of any of my classes today. Perhaps this is a function of the level of intelligence of the people who take the kind of classes I do. Whatever the case, there was a small demonstration. A couple dred-headed losers who are either flunking out, or don't even attend my school were on the scene apparently organizing this sporatic poorly thought out rally. Of course the art majors and the journalism majors were out in full force.

What was my response to this suicidal lunacy? I had been talking to this history major, who is antiwar all the way. As I debated him about the war, he told me about the event in advance. Since I had time, I revised my anti-American definition, which I had posted here. Subsequently, I handed out a few of my papers to the most staunch opponents of the war. I think they will get the idea that I think they are un-American, and are increasing their chances of initiating a reactionary movement against them. I certainly, hope they like the slew of subtle insults and sarcastic inferences in my piece. I know I sure enjoyed writing them. Freakin useful idiots.

[socialist2000]

Unamerican. But surely only the Indians are the only true Americans. Surly all the rest of you are mearly next generation economic migrants. So you are probably, Un Irish or Unjewish ,or Unpolish or, Un english or UnGerman or unSpanish.

[Liberty Lover]

Quote: from Old Friend on 11:19 am on Mar. 6, 2003
Perhaps this is a function of the level of intelligence of the people who take the kind of classes I do.


What classes do you take?

[Exploited Class]

What was my response to this suicidal lunacy?
To be a hyprocrit?


I had been talking to this history major, who is antiwar all the way. As I debated him about the war,
Afterwards the history major had to go find somebody with an ounce of a human soul to speak to so as to regain some type of sanity.


Since I had time, I revised my anti-American definition
Which before didn't include people against the killing of innocent children, babies, women and men but now does. Also now includes people that don't believe Might Makes Right.


which I had posted here.
And still wastes the internet's bandwidth to this day.


Subsequently, I handed out a few of my papers to the most staunch opponents of the war.
Just to show those people that stand up for their beliefs how stupid they are for not just going with flock.


I think they will get the idea that I think they are un-American, and are increasing their chances of initiating a reactionary movement against them.
Sure they got the idea, they were speaking their minds and protesting like the American Bill of Rights allotes them to do and anybody against America would have a problem with that. All fascists have problems with people having different opinions than themselves, they understood I am sure.


I certainly, hope they like the slew of subtle insults and sarcastic inferences in my piece. I know I sure enjoyed writing them.
You are such a rebel, such a bad bad boy. Look at you! Woohoo such a toughy, watch out kids the guy that can make fun of you is going to pass out some papers! Oh man it is the Alpha male that uses his emotional responses to control his actions, not his logic! Get out quick before he picks up a bone and hurls it at you.


Freakin useful idiots.
Yes, because I am sure somebody handing out thier little papers of dissatisfaction with a popular peace movement and their definition of anti-american to a group of people not wanting to see innocent people die is very, very useful. Bravo for being the bully of dynamic progress once again.

And as we all know, the only useful people in society are those that drop bombs on people thousands of miles away. Because, nothing is more useful than finding that one out of every thousand that have no issue with taking a unique and innocent life on the will of the few.

[Capitalist Imperial]

SN, I appreciate that you take your policy of truth-distribution to the street as well as the internet.

As I would expect, you said that all of the art majors and journalists were out in droves (All the art majors at once? how did you stand the smell?) I'm sure the liberal-arts majors were probably out there as well, just as were many of the "baby-majors" (you know, psyche, communications, LOL).

I would bet dollars to donuts that representation from the actual relevant majors that will comprise this nation's next generation of true leadership was minimal. The science, business, and engineering majors have much clearer grasps on reality than those other jokers, as well as have better things to do than waste their time on benign demonstrations that constitute little more that frivolous bantering on a subject which has alraedy been resolved.

Endgame in imminent.

[The Sniper]

Dammit there was a walkout at my school as well but as fate woulkd have it i was getting stoned round my mates house so we missed it!!

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from The Sniper on 6:30 pm on Mar. 9, 2003
Dammit there was a walkout at my school as well but as fate woulkd have it i was getting stoned round my mates house so we missed it!!

and you want to start a revolution?

[Anonymous]

"and you want to start a revolution?"

we dont want we will

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from the anarchist on 7:25 pm on Mar. 9, 2003
"and you want to start a revolution?"

we dont want we will

And then you'll wake up and your mom will change the sheets for you.

Where are you going to start this revolution? Not in the USA, because you don't have popular support here. You don't even have marginal support here.

[canikickit]

Not in the USA, because you don't have popular support here.

That's why George W. Bush is such an inspirational figure.

[Eastside Revolt]

By Stormin' Normin's deffinition Thomas Paine was un-american.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from redcanada on 8:39 pm on Mar. 9, 2003
By Stormin' Normin's deffinition Thomas Paine was un-american.

That is not really a fair comparison as it was a totally different time back then. Economics, communications, transportation, commerce, information exchanges, dominating markets, almost everything was totally different.

This is why I object to any comparisons between contemporary leaders/politics and founding father leaders/politics.

[Eastside Revolt]

Philosophy hasn't changed, therefore most of what Thomas Paine said still applies. Your founding fathers probably would have been sickened by what they created. It doesn't matter about idustralized/ post-industrialized, what they viewed as freedom, was not freedom to exloit, or freedom to harm all others in the name of greed.

[Smoking Frog II]

Quote: from socialist2000 on 7:07 pm on Mar. 6, 2003
Unamerican. But surely only the Indians are the only true Americans. Surly all the rest of you are mearly next generation economic migrants. So you are probably, Un Irish or Unjewish ,or Unpolish or, Un english or UnGerman or unSpanish.


WhiteAngloSaxonProtestants

[RedComrade]

The founding fathers were not heroes, they were slave owners, they were if anything more honest about there evils and lived and condoned a society in which people were much more open about there exploitation. The attempt by leftists to turn some of our founding fathers into revolutionaries is a joke many of them were greedy slave owning monsteres. Take Thomas Jeferrson for example. Not to discredity all of them of course, some were admirable men, but I do not feel any of them had a problem with exploitation if anything it was imperialism. Even thats questionable when you look honestly at mad men like Jefferson ranting about "an empire of liberty" its not hard to see they condoned empire.

[Anonymous]

Quote: from RedComrade on 12:14 am on Mar. 11, 2003
The founding fathers were not heroes, they were slave owners, they were if anything more honest about there evils and lived and condoned a society in which people were much more open about there exploitation. The attempt by leftists to turn some of our founding fathers into revolutionaries is a joke many of them were greedy slave owning monsteres. Take Thomas Jeferrson for example. Not to discredity all of them of course, some were admirable men, but I do not feel any of them had a problem with exploitation if anything it was imperialism. Even thats questionable when you look honestly at mad men like Jefferson ranting about "an empire of liberty" its not hard to see they condoned empire.


You have to try and see it through their perspective. For thousands of years slavery was a respected institution. Many of them were raised in a slave holding environment, and as such the majority did not really see the inherent evils of slavery. Thoms Jefferson himself was torn between his beliefs regarding the practice. You can't simply condemn the man as evil and monstrous because he owned slaves.

Personaly, I think he was a great man regardless.

[Eastside Revolt]

Thomas Paine was against slavery. I'm sorry, I've just been reading lots of Thomas Paine lately.

[antieverything]

Your founding fathers probably would have been sickened by what they created.We know that Jefferson would be, despite how cappies misrepresent him, Jefferson was against the rise of corporations and believed that government should be used for equitable wealth distribution. Madison, on the other hand, would probably quite like what he saw...he was, after all, quite clear during the constitutional convention that democracy was unacceptable because wealth must rule. I quote: "surely the wealthy are a better class of men."

All of them would probably be appalled at our foreign policy.

[timbaly]

I bet Alexander Hamilton would love to see all the green in the USA. That guy is appauling. I can't belive he wanted to side with the monarchies to fight the French. He also got his wish with the elite ruling over the people. Where were his morals?

[Exploited Class]

Quote: from canikickit on 7:52 pm on Mar. 9, 2003

Not in the USA, because you don't have popular support here.

That's why George W. Bush is such an inspirational figure.

hahahahaha Perfect! Perfecto!

[Pete]

"Thoms Jefferson himself was torn between his beliefs regarding the practice. "

Jefferson wanted to include an anti slavery clause in the declaration of independance and only didn't becuase he felt that it would not go over well with many of the colonials. The legacy of anti-corportatism ended in America in the 1898 Santa Maria vs Somecompany (Its been awhile since I read it,...it is at the adbusters site) case where the US supreme court granted Corporations the legal rights of a person.

"That's why George W. Bush is such an inspirational figure. "

The man responisble for the start of the 7 years war by a failed attack on Fort Duquains (spl). He tried to stay out of the post-revolution politics but was sucked back in by exagerated stories of a revolution inside the new union.

I remember Gouvernor Morris, the most outspoken member of the Constitutional Convention, spoke sharply against slavery, and then called for a 3 house system. 1 rep by pop 1 equal rep and 1 rep by $$. So the money based system was in the mind of some revolutionaries. This man lost his family (who fled to Canada) his friends (who joined the Brits) and his leg (in battle) during the revolution.