Log in

View Full Version : South Africa after apartheid.



Anonymous
10th February 2003, 03:06
South Africa after apartheid (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/walterwilliams/ww20020109.shtml)
By Walter Williams

http://www.townhall.com/graphics1/s-cpwalter.gif Moral crusaders have the habit of heading off to their next crusade without bothering to see whether anything went wrong on their last one. During the '80s, TransAfrica, NAACP, Black Congressional Caucus, Hollywood glitterati, college students, and other groups held massive protests on college campuses and at the South African Embassy, built shanty towns, and called for disinvestment and sanctions against South Africa for its racist apartheid system.

There's no longer apartheid and there's black rule in South Africa, but what's the story there now? Andrew Kenny writes about it in his article, "Black People Aren't Animals." The article appears in the December 15 issue of the British magazine The Spectator, the world's oldest continuously published English language magazine (est. 1838).

Each South African day sees an average of 59 murders, 145 rapes and 752 serious assaults out of its 42 million population. The new crime is the rape of babies; some AIDS-infected African men believe that having sex with a virgin is a cure. Twelve percent of South Africa's population is HIV-positive, but President Mbeki says that HIV cannot cause AIDS.

In response to growing violence, South Africa's minister of safety and security, Steve Tshwete, says: "We can't police this; there's nothing more we can do. South Africa's currency, the rand, has fallen about 70 percent since the African National Congress (ANC) came to power in 1994. Emigration from South Africa (mainly of skilled people) is now at its highest level ever."

Kenny asks, "Is South Africa doomed to follow the rest of Africa into oblivion?" He says no, but I'm not as optimistic because of the pattern nearly everywhere else in sub-Saharan Africa. The tragic fact of business is that ordinary Africans were better off under colonialism. Colonial masters never committed anything near the murder and genocide seen under black rule in Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, Nigeria, Mozambique, Somalia and other countries, where millions of blacks have been slaughtered in unspeakable ways, which include: hacking to death, boiling in oil, setting on fire and dismemberment. If as many elephants, zebras and lions had been as ruthlessly slaughtered, the world's leftists would be in a tizzy.

When Zimbabwe, then Southern Rhodesia, was under white rule, the ANC demanded the ouster of Prime Minister Ian Smith and the installation of black rule. Today, Zimbabwe's Minister Robert Mugabe commits gross violations of black and white human rights. With the help of lawless thugs, Mugabe has undertaken a land-confiscation program from white farmers. Instead of condemning Zimbabwe human-rights abuses, the South African government has given Mugabe its unqualified support.

Kenny says that whites treat blacks like animals. When a dog misbehaves, we don't blame the dog -- we blame the owner for improper training. In Africa, when blacks behave badly, Kenny says colonialism, imperialism, apartheid, globalization or multi-nationalism is blamed for not bringing up blacks properly. Liberals saw South Africa's apartheid and other human-rights abuses as unjust because blacks were suffering at the hands of whites. They hold whites accountable to civilized standards of behavior. Blacks are not held to civilized standards of behavior. From the liberal's point of view, it might even be racist to expect blacks to adhere to civilized standards of behavior.

During South Africa's apartheid era, I visited several times and lectured at just about every university. In a 1987 syndicated column, I wrote: "Africa's past experience should give Western anti-apartheid activists some pause for thought. Wouldn't it be the supreme tragedy if South African blacks might ponder at some future date, like the animals of Jones' Manor (George Orwell's Animal Farm), whether they were better off under apartheid? That's why blacks must answer what's to come after apartheid? Black rule alone is no guarantee for black freedom."


-------------------------------------------------------------------


While I don't really agree with the system of apartheid, I am in full favor of reinstituting imperial rule amongst the African nations.

synthesis
10th February 2003, 03:25
I am in full favor of reinstituting imperial rule amongst the African nations.


Doesn't surprise me in the least.

Hampton
10th February 2003, 04:08
That's completely ridiculous. Know what also was good? Slavery. I know how those white Southers hate to work.




(Edited by Hampton at 1:37 pm on Feb. 10, 2003)

Guest1
10th February 2003, 04:18
That's utter bullshit. No system is perfect, South African democracy is very young, and has some maturing to do. There's alot of problems, but it doesn't mean we give up on it and reinstate racial exploitation.

Scratch that, I agree with you, if whites ruled the country with that just and fair colonial rule you Europeans are so well known for, it would be a much better system. I mean, look at India, Palestine, the Americas, Australia, the aboriginal peoples of all those colonial regions are so much better off now than before colonialism. Before that, they beat the shit out of each other. European masters brought them a river of red bl... of peace!


Fuck colonialism!

RedComrade
10th February 2003, 04:21
Is this articles purpose to somehow attack the newfound democracy of south africa. Perhaps i am missing something but i came away from this article with the feeling that it was endorsing colonialism and the rascist regime of apartheid south africa. DC i thought you were a firm patriot of America. Most supporters of America list freedom from discrimination and the like as what makes this country so great. Dozens of nations on this earth our devoid of rascist or colonialist governments without having economic or social injustice. The idea that the new freedoms in South Africa are bad and somehow make the people worse off is a joke. If in anyway the economic troubles are linked to the new freedoms it is because of a near universal law that is when there is drastic social change or unrest there tends to be a period of economic instability. This does not mean the freedoms are the cause or are a problem that needs to be removed.

Anonymous
10th February 2003, 06:00
I don't support apartheid or racial discrimination.

And I only support imperial rule among a few nations such as Zimbabwe, Angola, Somalia, Congo, Mozambique, and others like them. These colonies are not yet worthy of self rule.

Umoja
10th February 2003, 21:08
The problem in nearly every African Nation (Maybe not Ethiopia) is that the borders are completely unnatural. It is similar to what had happened in Europe, different ethnic groups have terrible problems living in harmony currently. The best case of this would be Zimbabwe, because the Bantu Tswanna people are basically the dominant people in the region, with all other peoples especially the ones that aren't Bantu suffering discrimination, and without a common enemy, we can see the problem.

Angola was a Soviet and United States playground. Communism was tried here, both sides supplied rebels. The United States bought Diamonds from rebel factions.... blah... blah... a mess. I'm glad Savimbi was killed last year.

Somalia is a similar story even worse. Soviets sold the Marxist government in Somalia and the Marxist government in Ethiopia many weapons. It doesn't help that the two countries hated each other. Do the math.

Congo, and Mozambique, I am not nearly as knowledgeable on, but I do sense a common thread between these conflicts. Africa was organized by other people under other rules, well now they left, and most of their rules don't exist..... I would never support Colonialism again, because Colonialism is the root of the problems, not the solution.

Mazdak
10th February 2003, 21:12
Umoja, once again communist HASNT BEEN TRIED ANYWHERE. NO where. NEVER. except for small experimental communes during the 19th century, no one has attempted communism. if anything socialism was attempted.

Red Liberation
10th February 2003, 21:22
Sorry guys, but you guys wont let anything go against your belifs which is good, however im from Zimbabwe and im afraid DC is right, ever since independance most African countries have gone violently down hill.

Dont call me heretical, after all this has nothing to do with socialism.

The african govts need educating and the corrupt ones (Mugabe) need to be axed.

Xvall
10th February 2003, 21:35
You're funny Mazdak. :)

Guest1
11th February 2003, 00:34
Sure, there's problems, but it's because these democracies never had the chance to mature politically, they were jsut thrown into the current situation. It doesn't mean that the colonial system was better.

When rich white men leeched off of 90% of the people of these nations, of course their living standards where much better, their economy much stronger, etc... When you suddenly have to give education, healthcare, welfare and an actual wage to that other 90%, well guess what, you're gonna be a LITTLE cash strapped till the economy can recover. Take into consideration that the rich white men here are much more comfortable giving money to other rich white men in africa rather than aboriginals, and you've got further shrinkage of the economy. Still better than subjugation.