Log in

View Full Version : '08 Election--Obama in Paris--"No alternative to war"



sixdollarchampagne
26th July 2008, 16:40
[From www.aporrea.org]

Afghanistan, "the war we must win," says Obama--he asks Bush to send more troops

By: The Independent, AFP, DPA and Reuters 26/07/08

Paris, July 25: "Afghanistan is the war we must win," the virtual
Democratic candidate for the US presidency, Barack Obama, stated
today, in a press conference where he asked the reporters not to
question him as if he were President already, one day after the
historic welcome that some 200,000 people gave him in Berlin,
comparable only to those that Presidents John F. Kennedy in 1963 and Ronald Reagan in 1987, got.

"We have no alternative. We must finish the job" in Afghanistan
because the Taliban must not be permitted to establish places where they may plan "terrorist attacks that could affect Paris or New York," said Obama, after meeting with President Nicolas Sarkozy in the Elysee Palace.

"War is never easy, but there is no alternative. We have to finish
the job" in the Central Asian country, Obama said after thanking
Sarkozy for his willingness to increase the number of French troops
allocated to the NATO military force, that has some 35,000 uniformed men and has suffered over the past year the recovery of the guerrillas of the Taliban, deposed from power in November 2001, two months after the attacks of Al Qaeda in New York and Washington.

"The more NATO allies commit themselves, the less obligated the US
will be to send more troops," he said.

The Democrat also insisted on his demand that Bush immediately send at least two more brigades to Afghan territory as a US reinforcement.

Despite the insistence of reporters that Obama question the war in
Iraq and George W. Bush, he declined to comment on Bush and appealed to what he called a "great tradition" of U.S. politics, under which no criticism should be made of the holder of the White House when a politician travels abroad.

Obama offered [the comment] that if he wins the November 4
election, the US will have a "foreign policy that is not only based
on the ability to project our power, but also on listening and
building consensus."

"We are interested in people's prosperity and peace and not only in
seeing our foreign policy through the lenses of our own security,"
he said.

[Standing] next to Sarkozy, the Democrat said he had broad
agreements with the Frenchman regarding the dispute with Iran and
its nuclear development project, that, according to the West, has no
goals aimed at energy production, but at the production of nuclear
weapons.

Obama asked Iran to accept an offer of commercial and technological incentives to suspend its uranium enrichment program for the production of atomic fuel, that in turn serves to activate nuclear reactors and the manufacture of weapons of mass destruction.

At night Obama arrived in London, where he planned to meet with
Prime Minister Gordon Brown, his predecessor Tony Blair, and the
head of the Conservative Party, David Cameron.

Q
26th July 2008, 19:23
Obama is no friend of the working class, so this doesn't surprise.

Random Precision
26th July 2008, 21:03
Moved to Politics.

GPDP
26th July 2008, 21:29
Good article. It really goes to show Obama's true colors for those that are still optimistic about his presidency.

Perhaps I'll show this to a liberal friend of mine, who is increasingly disappointed with Obama, but refuses to capitulate over to the leftist side. :lol:

Hessian Peel
26th July 2008, 22:37
Obama, unlike Bush and Reagan, will win over the liberals in this world. It doesn't even matter how much of a war mongering imperialist pig he turns out to be, he's Black and isn't brash and so people will be creaming themselves. Look at Bill Clinton. He's particularly revered in Ireland for some reason. The people of this country never seize to amaze in how much they're willing to buy into the lies of imperialism. :blushing::(

disobey
28th July 2008, 22:33
To understand the policies and the true intentions of any presidential candidate, you need only look at his or her backers; for example:

John McCain - Arms Industry, Petrochemical Industry, Oil Industry, Banking Sector
Barack Obama - Arms Industry, Health/Insurance Sector, Oil Industry, Banking Sector
Hillary Clinton - Pharmaceutical Industry, Arms Industry, Oil Industry, Banking Sector
Ron Paul - Hillbillies, Alex Jones, Mimes, Anti-Immigration nut-jobs..

Admittedly I may have played a little fast and loose regarding Ron Paul - the Hillbillies and Mimes couldn't give two hoots.

Joking aside, the claims from the Obama/McCain camps fairly early on that the lobbyists no longer had control over either campaign has no signifigance. Corporations are easily able to donate to either party as they please with little oversight. The public always ignores the paymasters of the candidates, even though it is their donors for which all decisions are made.

In this system, the bankers, shareholders and other investors have the power and the president has the means to execute their plans with a veneer of democratic respectability.

Pick a colour - red or blue; then choose a war - Pakistan first, or Iran? Depends whose side you're on. Shell, BP, Chevron or Total? :D

Lost In Translation
28th July 2008, 23:51
I doubt this article will convince anybody to not vote for Obama...He's on a roll here, and it doesn't seem like these things will slow him down.

KC
29th July 2008, 00:51
Could someone link to the original article please?

Winter
29th July 2008, 02:36
It makes me sick how many people are fooled by Obama. It really sucks becsause he is playing on people's emotions. People really would like to see a black president, and unfortunately this one aspect is blinding them of the massive amounts of damage he can do. Liberals and hippies need to wake up, this is no friend of the working man.