53% of 10 year olds prefer play to school

[Guest]

Given a choice between peace and war, we would all choose peace. As long as Saddam is in power, peace is not one of the choices. We must choose between a small war now or a large war later.

[synthesis]

This is exactly what I meant by my post in the Commie Club.

Don't feed the trolls, guys. It just makes them hungrier.

[Stormin Norman]

Given a choice between peace and war, we would all choose peace. As long as Saddam is in power, peace is not one of the choices. We must choose between a small war now or a large war later.

Excellent post. It was short, succint, and most importantly accurate. Good job, guest. If you decide to register, we would be glad to have you on our team. We could use more rational individuals in this fight against suicidal idiocy.

[RedCeltic]

Quote: from Guest on 1:48 am on Feb. 1, 2003
Given a choice between peace and war, we would all choose peace. As long as Saddam is in power, peace is not one of the choices. We must choose between a small war now or a large war later.


Total Bull... and worst of all you know it.

No one outside Bagdad thinks Saddam is a swell guy. If any "Leftist" here thinks Saddam or the rest of his thugs in the Bath party are great... they need help of a head shrinker.

The fact is that if... Saddam has WMD... and we attack... he will be more likely to use them.

Also... if... other nations that have a WMD prgram going on see our attack on Saddam.. they will be more likely to speed up prodiction to obtain a warhead.

Terrorists also have more of a reason to attack the United States, as each time the US asserts its power in the Middle East, more and more Arabic childeren learn that the Imperialistic West wants nothing but to see the blood of their brethren flow in the streets.

So go.. make more terrorists...

[guerrillaradio]

Quote: from RedCeltic on 9:33 am on Feb. 1, 2003
Total Bull... and worst of all you know it.

No one outside Bagdad thinks Saddam is a swell guy. If any "Leftist" here thinks Saddam or the rest of his thugs in the Bath party are great... they need help of a head shrinker.

The fact is that if... Saddam has WMD... and we attack... he will be more likely to use them.

Also... if... other nations that have a WMD prgram going on see our attack on Saddam.. they will be more likely to speed up prodiction to obtain a warhead.

Terrorists also have more of a reason to attack the United States, as each time the US asserts its power in the Middle East, more and more Arabic childeren learn that the Imperialistic West wants nothing but to see the blood of their brethren flow in the streets.

So go.. make more terrorists...

Excellent post. Said everything I was gonna say. :)

[Blibblob]

i like that

[Non-Sectarian Bastard!]

good note.

We should destroy American Imperialism now before it conquers each inch of the earth.

Fucker. A lil anonymus posting. Remember what ever happens to Iraq can happen to you to. Imagine how do like to be bombed. That note was complete rubbish if you talk about Iraq. The only ones justified to kill Saddam are the Iraqi people and not some war eagerd bastard behind his Washington Desk.

[Guest]

We should destroy American Imperialism now before it conquers each inch of the earth.
Fucker.


We should destroy American Imperialism before the world is destroyed by corporations.

[deimos]

We should destroy American Imperialism before the world is destroyed by corporations.

Given a choice between peace and war, we would all choose peace. As long as Saddam is in power, peace is not one of the choices. We must choose between a small war now or a large war later.
Agree 50%. War yes. But if the US would not attack, saddam would torture his people for another decade...