Log in

View Full Version : America Going Socialist



Bud Struggle
23rd July 2008, 16:05
11 reasons America's a new socialist economy

How free market ideology backfired, sabotaging capitalistic democracy


By Paul B. Farrell, MarketWatch

Last update: 11:47 a.m. EDT July 22, 2008

ARROYO GRANDE, Calif. (MarketWatch) -- Welcome to the conservative's worst nightmare: The law of unintended consequences. Why? Nobody wants to admit it, folks, but the conservatives' grand ideology is backfiring, actually turning the world's greatest capitalistic democracy into the world's newest socialist economy.

A little history: The core principles of conservative economic ideology are grounded in Nobel economist Milton Friedman's 1962 classic "Capitalism and Freedom." Too late to stop President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society, those principles became the battle cries energizing conservatives since Reagan: Unrestricted free markets, free enterprise and free trade; deregulation, privatization and globalization; trickle-down economics and trickle-up wealth to an elite plutocracy destined to rule the new American capitalist utopia.

So what happened? Are you guys nuts? Hey, I'm talking to all you blind Beltway politicians (in both parties) ... plus the Old Boys Club running Wall Street (into the ground) ... plus all you fat-cat CEOs (with megamillion parachutes) ... and all your buddies scamming everybody else to get on the Forbes 400. You are proof of Lord Acton's warning: "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

It's backfiring! You folks turned our America from a great capitalistic democracy into a meddling socialist economy. Still you don't get it. You're acting like teen addicts tripping on an overdose of "greed-is-good" testosterone while your caricature of conservative economics would at best make a one-line joke on Jay Leno.

Here are 11 reasons your manipulations are sabotaging the great principles of leaders like Friedman and Reagan:

1. Dumber than a fifth grader with cognitive dissonance

Kids know what it means. They know most adults today can't see past the end of their noses. Liberals tune out candidate McBush for being lost in the past. Conservatives can't hear Obama without seeing that turban.

Cognitive dissonance simply means most brains cannot see past their own narrow ideologies. They dismiss any data that contradicts their old ideologies. Whether you're a conservative Republican or liberal Democrat, you only hear what you already know is "true." All else is tuned out.
2. Where did all the leaders go with their moral character?

Friedman's economics requires leaders of moral character. Did it run into Lord Acton's warning: "Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely?" Former Ford and Chrysler CEO Lee Iacocca said yes in "Where Have All the Leaders Gone?"

Friedman's great conservative principles have been commandeered by myopic ideologues whose idea of leadership is balancing the demands of self-interest lobbyists with the need for campaign donations. Unfortunately, a new "change" president won't be enough; there are 537 elected officials in Washington controlled by 42,000 special interest lobbyists.

3. Fed and U.S. Treasury adopted Enron accounting tricks
Bad news: Enron failed several years ago because of its off-balance-sheet accounting scam. The Fed's doing the same thing: Dumping Bear's $30 billion liabilities onto the taxpayer's "balance sheet." Next Treasury proposes adding $5.3 trillion more from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Unfortunately clever accounting tricks by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke aren't going to fool foreign lenders analyzing America's creditworthiness. Worse-case scenario: U.S. Treasury bills with less than a triple-A rating.

With 90 banks on the brink and already too many bail-outs, our so-called leaders are running out of magic bullets. So now the taxpayer's "balance sheet" has become the all-purpose "dumping ground" and it's overcrowding fast as our leaders raise the white flag of socialism.

4. Deregulation creating new socialist housing system

Back in 1999 a Democratic president and Republican Congress were in love with a fantasy called the "new economics." Enthusiastic lobbyists invented the brilliant idea of dismantling the wall between commercial and investment banking: They killed the Glass-Steagall Act that was keeping the sleazy hands of short-term hustlers out of the pockets of long-term lenders.

Flash forward: We lost 85-year-old Bear Sterns and $32 billion IndyMac. Lehman's iffy. And 90 banks. With the virtual takeover of Freddie and Fanny, Wall Street's grand experiment with free-market ideology is backfiring, having socialized the housing market. They have nobody to blame but their self-centered greed.

5. Trade deficits outsourced more of America's wealth than jobs

One look at Forbes lists of fat cats and you know the 21st Century doesn't just belong to Asia, it belongs to everyone but America. Why? Once again, remember Warren Buffett's famous "Farmer's Story" in Fortune: "We were taught in Economics 101 that countries could not for long sustain large, ever-growing trade deficits ... our country has been behaving like an extraordinarily rich family that possesses an immense farm. In order to consume 4% more than they produce -- that's the trade deficit -- we have, day by day, been both selling pieces of the farm and increasing the mortgage on what we still own."

Friedman was right: Congressional spending is the biggest cause of inflation, and, wow, those conservatives sure did love blank-check deficit spending the past eight years!

6. Banking system in meltdown, minting penny stocks The Friedman conservatives apparently understand Joseph Schumpeter's "creative destruction." Yet, our free-market ideologues can't seem to accept that America is now on the "destructive" downside leg of the cycle, in the economy, markets, trade, politics and, yes, sadly, even with their conservative ideology.

You don't have to be smarter than a fifth grader to figure out that our leaders are clueless about the reality of our crumbling banking system, with many banks trading as penny stocks, while the Fed still panders to conservative pre-election politics rather than getting serious about inflation.

7. Ideologues preach savings, but still push spending

A core principle of conservatism is frugality, saving for the future. Grandparents raised me, struggled during the Depression, passed on strong ideals.

Somewhere over the past generation conservatives forget frugality. This distortion peaked in 2003 when consumers were told to spend, not sacrifice, and fuel the economy even as government spent excessively on war. That was a clear breach of every conservative leader's position in earlier wars.
As a result, in one brief generation, as the power of conservative ideologues grew, America's savings rate dropped precipitously from 11% in 1980 to less than zero today.

8. Warning, the market's under 2000 peak, losing money

Imagine you're on Jeff Foxworthy's fabulous show competing to see if you really are smarter than a fifth grader. Question: "If you put $10,000 in the market in March of 2000 when the Dow peaked at 11,722, how much money would you have today if the market's 10% under 11,722?" So you guess $9,000.
But then two fifth graders raise their hands: One asks if the CPI inflation rate should be considered? If so, maybe $5,000 is closer to the right answer. The other kid wants to know if you're buying stuff in Chicago or Singapore.

The truth is, the best answer for most adults is: "You've lost a hell of a lot of money in the market under the grand conservative ideology the past eight years."

9. Inflation and dollars: Is Zimbabwe the new model for the U.S.?

The Los Angeles Times ran a photo of a Zimbabwe $500 million bank note, worth $20 at noon, less at dinner. Why? Inflation's there is running 32 million (yes million!) percent annually. The German company printing their banknotes finally cut them off.

Things may be worse in America, psychologically. Our ideological obsession with "growth" is not working because there is too much collateral damage, namely inflation. Our dollar has lost substantial value to the euro because our dysfunctional leaders are convinced that a trade policy funded by debt makes sense.

Now we owe China $1.3 trillion, sovereign funds want equity not cheap dollar IOUs, and still our clueless Treasury and the Fed continue debasing our currency, printing money like Zimbabwe.

10. Free-market health care failing 47,000,000 Americans

Big Pharma loves free-market conservatism and no-compete Medicare drug programs. Nobody else is happy. Taxpayers get stuck with the bill.

"The Coming Generational Storm" tells us that without massive reforms and big lifestyle changes for taxpayers (especially retirees), within a couple short decades America's entitlement programs will eat up the entire federal budget. Medicare is the biggest cost item in your future, over $50 trillion in unfunded liabilities.

Conservative ideologues naively believe the answer is more pay-out-of-pocket insurance plans, even with 47 million already uninsured because they can't pay. Here as in so many areas of our economy, free-market junkies really are suffering a severe case of cognitive dissonance, as blind to the facts about the uninsured as they are to their outdated free-market fantasies.

11. Conservative free-market policies inflated oil 300%!

Yep, oil inflated 300% in eight short years under the "leadership of two oil men." But, you can't blame them. We put the foxes in the henhouse, knowing full well "real" oil men love digging holes on the supply side, supporting ethanol subsidies and blaming speculators -- it's in their genes! Talk about cognitive dissonance; real oil men thrive on cowboy images of Marlboro Men in Hummers, Navigators and F-150 trucks.

Net result? Another perfect example of "creative destruction" in action as conservative ideology meets "law of unintended consequences," driving GM, the symbol of America capitalism, closer to bankruptcy ... while turning America into a socialist economy. End of Story


http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/eleven-reasons-america-new-top/story.aspx?guid=%7BD23E1901%2D728E%2D4A3C%2D99D1%2 D7E80F74C3AE3%7D&dist=msr_2

Die Neue Zeit
24th July 2008, 05:59
^^^ You really don't believe this narrow-minded shit (talking about corporate bailouts), do you?

Schrödinger's Cat
24th July 2008, 07:40
My favorite part: 4. Deregulation creating new socialist housing system.

Can't get around being blamed for everything, I guess. :D

IcarusAngel
25th July 2008, 01:22
^^ Nice avatar.


Anyway, the article is actually not that bad although somewhat muddled.

Furthermore, America has never been a bastion of capitalism. Always the government has been directing industry, although none of these new, more "progressive" programs are really socialist.

They do, however, tend to help working people more than the corporate elite, and weakening corporate power is a good thing.

Frankly, corporations have gotten so powerful now it's likely nothing will stop them, though.

Comrade Rage
25th July 2008, 01:35
This crap isn't socialism.

This is one of the big problems that we face, people thinking of bloated capitalist beauracracy as 'socialist'. We should be actively countering crap like this.

Bud Struggle
25th July 2008, 01:43
This crap isn't socialism.

This is one of the big problems that we face, people thinking of bloated capitalist beauracracy as 'socialist'.

That's an excellent point Brick. Here in America we think we "own" every sort of ideology--Socialists are what we say they are. But it's really a big world and Socialists are really quite different than the home grown American variety.

One of the nice things about RevLeft is that it brings out the worldview of Socialist thought.

trivas7
25th July 2008, 01:52
But it's really a big world and Socialists are really quite different than the home grown American variety.

How so?

Bud Struggle
25th July 2008, 01:58
How so?

In America "Socialists", by the use of the term are just Liberals--no where near any sort of Communism. In the rest of the world--there is a tinge of Communism.

freakazoid
25th July 2008, 02:05
In America "Socialists", by the use of the term are just Liberals--no where near any sort of Communism. In the rest of the world--there is a tinge of Communism.

It tires me out trying to get that through some peoples heads. Like Obama constantly being called a socialist. :rolleyes:

IcarusAngel
25th July 2008, 02:27
And are you a Socialist freakazoid? In leftist theory, a lot of the paradigms are probably, and most likely, modifications of socialism.

Remember what the Haymarket martyr Fischer said: "All anarchists are socialists, but not all socialists are anarchists."

Fairly or not, socialism is a word like "liberalism," it can be used to described many different things.

IcarusAngel
25th July 2008, 02:30
I actually think that liberals reject the term "socialist" by the way, and only a few far-right, American crazies call Liberals "socialists." They should have the right to come up with their own term.

Anyway, here is a better article on America and the free-market:

http://econc10.bu.edu/economic_systems/Theory/Famous/noam_chomsky_on_the_free_market.htm

Here's another one:

"Because the "free market" doesn't exist. There is no such thing. All markets are constructed. Think of the stock exchange. It has rules. The WTO [World Trade Organization] has 900 pages of regulations. The bond market has all kinds of regulations and commissions to make sure those regulations carried out. Every market has rules. For example, corporations have a legal obligation to maximize shareholder profit. That's a construction of the market. Now, it doesn't have to be that way. You could make that rule, "Corporations must maximize stakeholder value." Stakeholders - as opposed to shareholders, the institutions who own the largest portions of stock - would include employees, local communities, and the environment. That changes the whole notion of what a "market" is.

Suppose we were to change the accounting rules, so that we not only had open accounting, which we really need, but we also had full accounting. Full accounting would include things like ecological accounting. You could no longer dump your stuff in the river or the air and not pay a fee. No more free dumping. If you had full accounting, that constructs the market in a different way. It's still a market, and it's still "free" within the rules. But the rules are always there. It's important for progressives to get that idea out there, that all markets are constructed. We should be debating how they're constructed, how they should be constructed, and how are they stacked to serve particular interests.
"

http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/10/27_lakoff_p2.shtml


These two guys are linguists. They know how language is used.

Read and learn, friends, read and learn.

freakazoid
25th July 2008, 02:35
Remember what the Haymarket martyr Fischer said: "All anarchists are socialists, but not all socialists are anarchists."

I've heard that phrase before, didn't know who said it, :)


Fairly or not, socialism is a word like "liberalism," it can be used to described many different things.

True, but it also gets thrown around a lot, kind of like the word fascist seems to here sometimes, even when it doesn't apply. It becomes annoying when you here it constantly being thrown around in a derogatory manner when it doesn't even apply to something.

534634634265
25th July 2008, 05:53
i personally welcome america's new "socialist" overlords.:D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGxdgNJ_lZM

ChristianV777
25th July 2008, 06:16
It tires me out trying to get that through some peoples heads. Like Obama constantly being called a socialist. :rolleyes:

Socialists is a very varied term.
America's mainstream political thought is so narrow that anything that goes anywhere close to the Left of Democrats gets termed "Socialist". It has no connection to reality.
There are actual Socialists and Communists in the United States though.
Most people in the United States have no idea what the term "Socialism" actually means though. I hear constantly from working class people that "America is going Socialist!" in a negative manner. If this were the reality, these people should be wishing it was the truth, since it'd be to their benefit. Instead, it's knee-jerk reactionary attitudes about "Obama is a Socialist".

Freakazoid is also right about "fascism". America is the only country in the world where both the Left and the Right (other than the actual fascists, of course) decry that the government is "fascist".
But, it's not just in America where people don't understand the term fascism or just misuse it for anything they don't like.

I believe Ralph Nader has even used Socialist in this connotation. Not about Obama, but in the context of this article. I saw his article on CounterPunch talking about what the Socialists in the American government have done to save Capitalism and the effects it has had on the economy.

I've always said if you want to get Conservatives and Liberals to agree with each other, just start talking about Socialism, and all of a sudden, you see just how much they share in common.
So, Liberals catergorically deny the label Socialist.
Liberals being called Socialists or vice-versa makes me sick.

trivas7
25th July 2008, 15:17
Indeed, all I see on cable tv are talking heads coming out pink -- not.

Bilan
25th July 2008, 15:51
That's an excellent point Brick. Here in America we think we "own" every sort of ideology--Socialists are what we say they are. But it's really a big world and Socialists are really quite different than the home grown American variety.

One of the nice things about RevLeft is that it brings out the worldview of Socialist thought.

America has a lot to answer for for just that reason.

Motherfuckers bastardise language to the core.

And your spelling.
UGH

Favorite.

^ What the fuck is that shit?
It's favourite.

mom

^ WHAT THE HELL!? It's mum.
However, mother, has an 'o', so that's fair, but mum is not the shortened version of mother, in the same way Kate is the shortened version of Katherine.
They're separate words, that mean the same thing (Monty Python is creeping into my head).

Now. Learn to spell, or I'll come over there and teach you all (note: two words) a lesson.

I love you, and this post is totally inane.

Chapter 24
25th July 2008, 16:39
Now. Learn to spell, or I'll come over there and teach you all (note: two words) a lesson.


So what you're saying is that you'll beat him so that he's the color of your RevLeft username?

freakazoid
25th July 2008, 19:50
but mum is not the shortened version of mother

Seriously?

Kami
25th July 2008, 19:52
So what you're saying is that you'll beat him so that he's the color of your RevLeft username?
You have a bad sense of humour :P

Bright Banana Beard
25th July 2008, 20:44
On the Mississippi River, labor are still working. Generalization is possible in Marxist sense. Dive in to see how many different kind of work they have to do in this center.

I got 2 cars, I got to go to the repair shop. I advise myself to be careful with my license and not to go on offense to paralyze & get myself diarrhea.

Mr. Tomk is awesome. He got a bathroom and bedroom of his own. He is a funny capitalist at least. Uh oh, it 3:40 PM here and my hair is only 5 inches long, got to go to the hair program and let it check my hair.

Now what I said doesn't make any sense. It is because I emphasizing American English rather than British English.

Chapter 24
25th July 2008, 22:20
You have a bad sense of humour :P

I don't like yor tone.

534634634265
26th July 2008, 00:50
On the Mississippi River, labor IS still working. Generalization is possible in the Marxist sense. Dive in to see how many different kinds of work they have to do in this center.

I'VE got 2 cars, and I'VE got to go to the repair shop. I advise myself to be careful with my license, and not to go on offense to paralyze & get myself diarrhea.(wtf?)

Mr. Tomk is awesome. He's got a bathroom and bedroom of his own. He is a funny capitalist at least. Uh oh, its 3:40 PM here and my hair is only 5 inches long, got to go to the hair program and let them check my hair.

Now what I said doesn't make any sense. It is because I emphasizing American English rather than British English.
Fix'd...sort of