Log in

View Full Version : Statistics about the Vietnam War



Anonymous
8th January 2003, 22:06
http://www.vhfcn.org/stat.htm

From the VHFCN.

Statistics about the Vietnam War


"No event in American history is more misunderstood than the Vietnam War. It was misreported then, and it is misremembered now. Rarely have so many people been so wrong about so much. Never have the consequences of their misunderstanding been so tragic." [Nixon]

The Vietnam War has been the subject of thousands of newspaper and magazine articles, hundreds of books, and scores of movies and television documentaries. The great majority of these efforts have erroneously portrayed many myths about the Vietnam War as being facts. [Nixon]

Myth: Most American soldiers were addicted to drugs, guilt-ridden about their role in the war, and deliberately used cruel and inhumane tactics.

The facts are:

91% of Vietnam Veterans say they are glad they served [Westmoreland]

74% said they would serve again even knowing the outcome [Westmoreland]

There is no difference in drug usage between Vietnam Veterans and non veterans of the same age group (from a Veterans Administration study) [Westmoreland]

Isolated atrocities committed by American soldiers produced torrents of outrage from antiwar critics and the news media while Communist atrocities were so common that they received hardly any attention at all. The United States sought to minimize and prevent attacks on civilians while North Vietnam made attacks on civilians a centerpiece of its strategy. Americans who deliberately killed civilians received prison sentences while Communists who did so received commendations. From 1957 to 1973, the National Liberation Front assassinated 36,725 South Vietnamese and abducted another 58,499. The death squads focused on leaders at the village level and on anyone who improved the lives of the peasants such as medical personnel, social workers, and schoolteachers. [Nixon] Atrocities - every war has atrocities. War is brutal and not fair. Innocent people get killed.

Vietnam Veterans are less likely to be in prison - only 1/2 of one percent of Vietnam Veterans have been jailed for crimes. [Westmoreland]

97% were discharged under honorable conditions; the same percentage of honorable discharges as ten years prior to Vietnam [Westmoreland]

85% of Vietnam Veterans made a successful transition to civilian life. [McCaffrey]

Vietnam veterans' personal income exceeds that of our non-veteran age group by more than 18 percent. [McCaffrey]

Vietnam veterans have a lower unemployment rate than our non-vet age group. [McCaffrey]

87% of the American people hold Vietnam Vets in high esteem. [McCaffrey]

Myth: Most Vietnam veterans were drafted.

2/3 of the men who served in Vietnam were volunteers. 2/3 of the men who served in World War II were drafted. [Westmoreland] Approximately 70% of those killed were volunteers. [McCaffrey]

Myth: The media have reported that suicides among Vietnam veterans range from 50,000 to 100,000 - 6 to 11 times the non-Vietnam veteran population.

Mortality studies show that 9,000 is a better estimate. "The CDC Vietnam Experience Study Mortality Assessment showed that during the first 5 years after discharge, deaths from suicide were 1.7 times more likely among Vietnam veterans than non-Vietnam veterans. After that initial post-service period, Vietnam veterans were no more likely to die from suicide than non-Vietnam veterans. In fact, after the 5-year post-service period, the rate of suicides is less in the Vietnam veterans' group." [Houk]

Myth: A disproportionate number of blacks were killed in the Vietnam War.

86% of the men who died in Vietnam were Caucasians, 12.5% were black, 1.2% were other races. (CACF and Westmoreland)

Sociologists Charles C. Moskos and John Sibley Butler, in their recently published book "All That We Can Be," said they analyzed the claim that blacks were used like cannon fodder during Vietnam "and can report definitely that this charge is untrue. Black fatalities amounted to 12 percent of all Americans killed in Southeast Asia - a figure proportional to the number of blacks in the U.S. population at the time and slightly lower than the proportion of blacks in the Army at the close of the war." [All That We Can Be]

Myth: The war was fought largely by the poor and uneducated.

Servicemen who went to Vietnam from well-to-do areas had a slightly elevated risk of dying because they were more likely to be pilots or infantry officers.

Vietnam Veterans were the best educated forces our nation had ever sent into combat. 79% had a high school education or better. [McCaffrey]



Here are statistics from the Combat Area Casualty File (CACF) as of November 1993. The CACF is the basis for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial (The Wall):
Average age of 58,148 killed in Vietnam was 23.11 years. (Although 58,169 names are in the Nov. 93 database, only 58,148 have both event date and birth date. Event date is used instead of declared dead date for some of those who were listed as missing in action) [CACF]

Deaths Average Age
Total 58,148 23.11 years
Enlisted 50,274 22.37 years
Officers 6,598 28.43 years
Warrants 1,276 24.73 years
E1 525 20.34 years
11B MOS 18,465 22.55 years
Five men killed in Vietnam were only 16 years old. [CACF]
The oldest man killed was 62 years old. [CACF]
11,465 KIAs were less than 20 years old. [CACF]
Myth: The average age of an infantryman fighting in Vietnam was 19.
Assuming KIAs accurately represented age groups serving in Vietnam, the average age of an infantryman (MOS 11B) serving in Vietnam to be 19 years old is a myth, it is actually 22. None of the enlisted grades have an average age of less than 20. [CACF] The average man who fought in World War II was 26 years of age. [Westmoreland]


Myth: The domino theory was proved false.

The domino theory was accurate. The ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand stayed free of Communism because of the U.S. commitment to Vietnam. The Indonesians threw the Soviets out in 1966 because of America's commitment in Vietnam. Without that commitment, Communism would have swept all the way to the Malacca Straits that is south of Singapore and of great strategic importance to the free world. If you ask people who live in these countries that won the war in Vietnam, they have a different opinion from the American news media. The Vietnam War was the turning point for Communism. [Westmoreland]

Democracy Catching On - In the wake of the Cold War, democracies are flourishing, with 179 of the world's 192 sovereign states (93%) now electing their legislators, according to the Geneva-based Inter-Parliamentary Union. In the last decade, 69 nations have held multi-party elections for the first time in their histories. Three of the five newest democracies are former Soviet republics: Belarus (where elections were first held in November 1995), Armenia (July 1995) and Kyrgyzstan (February 1995). And two are in Africa: Tanzania (October 1995) and Guinea (June 1995). [Parade Magazine]



Myth: The fighting in Vietnam was not as intense as in World War II.

The average infantryman in the South Pacific during World War II saw about 40 days of combat in four years. The average infantryman in Vietnam saw about 240 days of combat in one year thanks to the mobility of the helicopter.

One out of every 10 Americans who served in Vietnam was a casualty. 58,169 were killed and 304,000 wounded out of 2.59 million who served. Although the percent who died is similar to other wars, amputations or crippling wounds were 300 percent higher than in World War II. 75,000 Vietnam veterans are severely disabled. [McCaffrey]

MEDEVAC helicopters flew nearly 500,000 missions. Over 900,000 patients were airlifted (nearly half were American). The average time lapse between wounding to hospitalization was less than one hour. As a result, less than one percent of all Americans wounded who survived the first 24 hours died. [VHPA 1993]

The helicopter provided unprecedented mobility. Without the helicopter it would have taken three times as many troops to secure the 800 mile border with Cambodia and Laos (the politicians thought the Geneva Conventions of 1954 and the Geneva Accords or 1962 would secure the border) [Westmoreland]

More helicopter facts:

Approximately 12,000 helicopters saw action in Vietnam (all services). [VHPA databases]

Army UH-1's totaled 7,531,955 flight hours in Vietnam between October 1966 and the end of 1975. [VHPA databases]

Army AH-1G's totaled 1,038,969 flight hours in Vietnam. [VHPA databases]


Myth: Air America, the airline operated by the CIA in Southeast Asia, and its pilots were involved in drug trafficking.

The 1990 unsuccessful movie "Air America" helped to establish the myth of a connection between Air America, the CIA, and the Laotian drug trade. The movie and a book the movie was based on contend that the CIA condoned a drug trade conducted by a Laotian client; both agree that Air America provided the essential transportation for the trade; and both view the pilots with sympathetic understanding. American-owned airlines never knowingly transported opium in or out of Laos, nor did their American pilots ever profit from its transport. Yet undoubtedly every plane in Laos carried opium at some time, unknown to the pilot and his superiors. For more information see http://www.air-america.org

Myth: The American military was running for their lives during the fall of Saigon in April 1975.
The picture of a Huey helicopter evacuating people from the top of what was billed as being the U.S. Embassy in Saigon during the last week of April 1975 during the fall of Saigon helped to establish this myth.

http://www.vhfcn.org/pics/aahuey.gif

This famous picture is the property of Corbus-Bettman Archives. It was originally a UPI photograph that was taken by an Englishman, Mr. Hugh Van Ess.

Here are some facts to clear up that poor job of reporting by the news media.

Facts about the fall of Saigon

It was a "civilian" (Air America) Huey not Army or Marines.

It was NOT the U.S. Embassy. The building is the Pittman Apartments. The U.S. Embassy and its helipad were much larger.

The evacuees were Vietnamese not American military.

The person that can be seen aiding the refugees is Mr. O.B. Harnage. He was a CIA case officer and now retired in Arizona.



Another famous picture.

http://www.vhfcn.org/pics/kim.jpg

Myth: Kim Phuc, the little nine year old Vietnamese girl running naked from the napalm strike near Trang Bang on 8 June 1972, was burned by Americans bombing Trang Bang.

No American had involvement in this incident near Trang Bang that burned Phan Thi Kim Phuc. The planes doing the bombing near the village were VNAF (Vietnam Air Force) and were being flown by Vietnamese pilots in support of South Vietnamese troops on the ground. The Vietnamese pilot who dropped the napalm in error is currently living in the United States. Even the AP photographer, Nick Ut, who took the picture was Vietnamese. The incident in the photo took place on the second day of a three day battle between the North Vietnamese Army (NVA) who occupied the village of Trang Bang and the ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam) who were trying to force the NVA out of the village. Recent reports in the news media that an American commander ordered the air strike that burned Kim Phuc are incorrect. There were no Americans involved in any capacity. "We (Americans) had nothing to do with controlling VNAF," according to Lieutenant General (Ret) James F. Hollingsworth, the Commanding General of TRAC at that time. Also, it has been incorrectly reported that two of Kim Phuc's brothers were killed in this incident. They were Kim's cousins not her brothers.



Myth: The United States lost the war in Vietnam.

The American military was not defeated in Vietnam. The American military did not lose a battle of any consequence. From a military standpoint, it was almost an unprecedented performance. (Westmoreland quoting Douglas Pike, a professor at the University of California, Berkley a renowned expert on the Vietnam War) [Westmoreland] This included Tet 68, which was a major military defeat for the VC and NVA.


THE UNITED STATES DID NOT LOSE THE WAR IN VIETNAM, THE SOUTH VIETNAMESE DID.

Facts about the end of the war:

The fall of Saigon happened 30 April 1975, two years AFTER the American military left Vietnam. The last American troops departed in their entirety 29 March 1973. How could we lose a war we had already stopped fighting? We fought to an agreed stalemate. The peace settlement was signed in Paris on 27 January 1973. It called for release of all U.S. prisoners, withdrawal of U.S. forces, limitation of both sides' forces inside South Vietnam and a commitment to peaceful reunification. [1996 Information Please Almanac]

The 140,000 evacuees in April 1975 during the fall of Saigon consisted almost entirely of civilians and Vietnamese military, NOT American military running for their lives. [1996 Information Please Almanac]

There were almost twice as many casualties in Southeast Asia (primarily Cambodia) the first two years after the fall of Saigon in 1975 then there were during the ten years the U.S. was involved in Vietnam. [1996 Information Please Almanac]

POW-MIA Issue (unaccounted-for versus missing in action)

Politics & People, On Vietnam, Clinton Should Follow a Hero's Advice, Sen. John Kerrey is quoted as saying about Vietnam, there has been "the most extensive accounting in the history of human warfare" of those missing in action. While there are still officially more than 2,200 cases, there now are only 55 incidents of American servicemen who were last seen alive but aren't accounted for. By contrast, there still are 78,000 unaccounted-for Americans from World War II and 8,100 from the Korean conflict.
"The problem is that those who think the Vietnamese haven't cooperated sufficiently think there is some central repository with answers to all the lingering questions," notes Gen. John Vessey, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Reagan and Bush administration's designated representative in MIA negotiations. "In all the years we've been working on this we have found that's not the case." [The Wall Street Journal]

More realities about war: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) - it was not invented or unique to Vietnam Veterans. It was called "shell shock" and other names in previous wars. An automobile accident or other traumatic event also can cause it. It does not have to be war related. The Vietnam War helped medical progress in this area.

Myth: Agent Orange poisoned millions of Vietnam veterans.

Over the ten years of the war, Operation Ranch Hand sprayed about eleven million gallons of Agent Orange on the South Vietnamese landscape. (the herbicide was called "orange" in Vietnam, not Agent Orange. That sinister-sounding term was coined after the war) Orange was sprayed at three gallons per acre that was the equivalent of .009 of an ounce per square foot. When sprayed on dense jungle foliage, less that 6 percent ever reached the ground. Ground troops typically did not enter a sprayed area until four to six weeks after being sprayed. Most Agent Orange contained .0002 of 1 percent of dioxin. Scientific research has shown that dioxin degrades in sunlight after 48 to 72 hours; therefore, troops exposure to dioxin was infinitesimal. [Burkett]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Restraining the military in Vietnam in hindsight probably prevented a nuclear war with China or Russia. The Vietnam War was shortly after China got involved in the Korean war, the time of the Cuban missile crisis, Soviet aggression in Eastern Europe and the proliferation of nuclear bombs. In all, a very scary time for our country.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


SOURCES

[Nixon] No More Vietnams by Richard Nixon

[Parade Magazine] August 18, 1996 page 10.

[CACF] (Combat Area Casualty File) November 1993. (The CACF is the basis for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, i.e. The Wall), Center for Electronic Records, National Archives, Washington, DC

[All That We Can Be] All That We Can Be by Charles C. Moskos and John Sibley Butler

[Westmoreland] Speech by General William C. Westmoreland before the Third Annual Reunion of the Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association (VHPA) at the Washington, DC Hilton Hotel on July 5th, 1986 (reproduced in a Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association Historical Reference Directory Volume 2A)

[McCaffrey] Speech by Lt. Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, (reproduced in the Pentagram, June 4, 1993) assistant to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to Vietnam veterans and visitors gathered at "The Wall", Memorial Day 1993.

[Houk] Testimony by Dr. Houk, Oversight on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, 14 July 1988 page 17, Hearing before the Committee on Veterans' Affairs United States Senate one hundredth Congress second session. Also "Estimating the Number of Suicides Among Vietnam Veterans" (Am J Psychiatry 147, 6 June 1990 pages 772-776)

[The Wall Street Journal] The Wall Street Journal, 1 June 1996 page A15.

[VHPA 1993] Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association 1993 Membership Directory page 130.

[VHPA Databases] Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association Databases.

[1996 Information Please Almanac] 1995 Information Please Almanac Atlas & Yearbook 49th edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston & New York 1996, pages 117, 161 and 292.

[Burkett] Stolen Valor: How the Vietnam Generation was Robbed of its Heroes and its History by B.G. Burkett and Glenna Whitley, Verity Press, Inc., Dallas, TX, 1998. Book review.




(Edited by Dark Capitalist at 10:23 am on Jan. 9, 2003)

Moskitto
8th January 2003, 22:40
Myth: Kim Phuc, the little nine year old Vietnamese girl running naked from the napalm strike near Trang Bang on 8 June 1972, was burned by Americans bombing Trang Bang.

No American had involvement in this incident near Trang Bang that burned Phan Thi Kim Phuc. The planes doing the bombing near the village were VNAF (Vietnam Air Force) and were being flown by Vietnamese pilots in support of South Vietnamese troops on the ground. The Vietnamese pilot who dropped the napalm in error is currently living in the United States.

This one I knew about,

I saw a very interesting television program about this where Kim was talking about her life and she went to the US to meet the pilot (who by now had turned into an alcoholic because he couldn't handle how everyone else in the world saw him) and to forgive him.

Capitalist Imperial
8th January 2003, 23:55
Excellent, DC, Absolutely magnificent job.

Rob
9th January 2003, 02:56
Although I may not believe that we should've been involved in the war, I will always hold our veterans in high esteem.

(Edited by Rob at 3:00 am on Jan. 9, 2003)

Umoja
9th January 2003, 03:02
No war is just. You honestly could say you'd go out and kill a person DC? Or do you just like to commend those who do? I would never kill anyone, and I think anyone who does is sick. Serving my country doesn't involve killing other poor people.

queen of diamonds
9th January 2003, 03:24
Quote: from Umoja on 7:02 pm on Feb. 19, 2003
No war is just. You honestly could say you'd go out and kill a person DC? Or do you just like to commend those who do? I would never kill anyone, and I think anyone who does is sick. Serving my country doesn't involve killing other poor people.

What if someone was trying to kill you? Would you kill then?
I think you underestimate the fanaticism of most people. I think anyone, if you can convince them strongly enough of something, will kill for it. It then follows, that the best way to peace is through education. Which usually doens't involve ostracising people by telling them they're sick. At least, not where I come from.

Anonymous
9th January 2003, 03:34
Quote: from Umoja on 8:02 am on Jan. 9, 2003
No war is just. You honestly could say you'd go out and kill a person DC? Or do you just like to commend those who do? I would never kill anyone, and I think anyone who does is sick. Serving my country doesn't involve killing other poor people.


Yes, I will kill if the killing is justified.

Anonymous
9th January 2003, 03:35
Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 4:55 am on Jan. 9, 2003
Excellent, DC, Absolutely magnificent job.


Thanks CI.

Ian
9th January 2003, 04:16
Sure America may have not lost the war, but they were on the losing side!
You omitted the fact that 30% of all homeless people are veterans of foreign wars, a large percentage Vietnam veterans.

synthesis
9th January 2003, 05:25
Of course, the apologist article completely neglects to mention the death toll in the war.

Let's look at the facts for a moment.

Vietnam: 3,000,000 deaths of innocent civilians
Cambodia: 2,500,000 deaths of innocent civilians
Laos: 500,000 deaths deaths of innocent civilians
America: 0 deaths of innocent civilians

Face the facts, you money-grubbing motherfuckers. The war in Vietnam was an unjust one - a war not only on the government but on the people of Indochina.

The U.S. had no right at all to land or business in Indochina. If one Western country could semi-legitimately claim any right to Vietnam, it would have been France - but they withdrew after losing like the cowards they have proven themselves to be time and time again.

This was no war of defense, as all wars carried out by Enlightened countries ought to be. This was no war of ideas, although it may seem that way even to the most careful observer. The suggestion of saving the Indochinese people from an oppressive regime is absolutely ridiculous - no government could have killed as many people per capita as America did in those 30 years or so.

This was a war of money - the protection of that inalienable right endowed upon us by our Creator. The right to send in a brainwashed (or drafted) army in the name of capitalism to rape, slaughter, and burn 6,500,000 innocent men, women, and children so that the rich can hire two more manservants apiece.

This is a crime which forever condemns the government of America to the state of bloodthisty savages posing themselves as "Enlightened thinkers" while killing millions of innocent people all around the world.

My fellow socialists, ask yourselves this.

Do you really care who got on a helicopter one day in 1975?

Do you really care if an airplane service was involved in drug smuggling?

Do any of the above cause your soul to cease burning because of the horrible atrocity the U.S. government carried out in your name?

Or are you a capitalist - are they just soulless gooks to you?

Show me the Money
9th January 2003, 16:26
DyerMaker he's the man!! If he can't write it, no one can!! Let the truth be told, my men! That was just dynamite... let we all cheer for DyerMaker... hip hip huray!

Moskitto
9th January 2003, 17:18
Yes, I will kill if the killing is justified.

this is what we decided for which wars to fight in (we're in the UK and we've fought less wars)

Boar - No
WW1 - No
WW2 - Yes
Faulklands - No
Gulf - No

Anonymous
9th January 2003, 18:56
this statistics are pure american propaganda....

the counter revolutionary tactics madebyboth americ, france and england in asian countrys are known for being very bruta not this clean and worthy like you are trying to show...

Were are the statistics about the napalmed villages?
the families of the guerrillas that were often caught and tortured?were are them in your pathetic demonstration of west propaganda?If the anerican soldiers were that smart and instructed tell mywhy there are several reports about rapings and civilian executions madeby american troops?And the massecre of Mi Lie? you hidethe facts very well....

Capitalist Imperial
9th January 2003, 19:20
America took just action and did its best to prevent the evils of communism spreading to another corner of the world.

Although a withdrawl from police action in vietnam was inevitable, it was merely a setback in the war of ideologies that was eventually won by capitalism.

Umoja
10th January 2003, 02:51
How is killing justified? You'd kill for an artificial entity called a "country"? Your sick, it's better to die peacefully, then to live a life shedding blood. You seem to put so little value on the actual lives of other people, the fact that these people had families to, and they had hope, aspirations and dreams.

synthesis
10th January 2003, 04:08
America took just action and did its best to prevent the evils of communism spreading to another corner of the world.

You are truly a fool. I am sorry that I cannot help you.

Stormin Norman
10th January 2003, 11:06
You are the fool, because you are trying to use your tired old paintbrush in order to paint U.S. serviceman, both voluntary and drafted alike, as murdering rapists. You and Jane Fonda would get along fine, because you are in the enemy's camp. People who serve their duty for the country they love and support are murderers, huh? I hope you die in a avalanche while you are doing your communist duty of serving in the Peace Corps. I say this because you would rather travel to third world countries to spread your communist propaganda than defend your own freedom. Looks like my signature is right, some socialists truly are yellow-bellies.

Capitalist Imperial
10th January 2003, 17:53
Quote: from DyerMaker on 4:08 am on Jan. 10, 2003
America took just action and did its best to prevent the evils of communism spreading to another corner of the world.

You are truly a fool. I am sorry that I cannot help you.


LOL, sir, it is you who are a fool. No, actually maybe an idiot, or perhaps lunatic would be a more appropriate definition.

By the way, if you call your frivolous, rehashed rhetoric help, then I elect to remain in dire peril.

Perhaps when you join the peace corps, you will make it a one way trip.

I bet that you would have sympathize with the british pacifists in early WWII, simply contented to letting the Nazi's overun western europe in the name of "peace".

You, sir, are truly incredible, an an atrocity personified.


(Edited by Capitalist Imperial at 5:58 pm on Jan. 10, 2003)

Capitalist Imperial
10th January 2003, 17:54
Quote: from Stormin Norman on 11:06 am on Jan. 10, 2003
You are the fool, because you are trying to use your tired old paintbrush in order to paint U.S. serviceman, both voluntary and drafted alike, as murdering rapists. You and Jane Fonda would get along fine, because you are in the enemy's camp. People who serve their duty for the country they love and support are murderers, huh? I hope you die in a avalanche while you are doing your communist duty of serving in the Peace Corps. I say this because you would rather travel to third world countries to spread your communist propaganda than defend your own freedom. Looks like my signature is right, some socialists truly are yellow-bellies.


Word up, SN, Word up

Moskitto
10th January 2003, 20:37
I think someone should raise a privateer army to bash magabe up, but my brother goes "that's illegal" well what the fuck is GB going to do about it then?

PRIVATE ARMY!

Anonymous
11th January 2003, 21:15
DyerMaker, your gratuitous remarks and insipid diatribes concerning U.S. servicemen, and this country's roll in the defense of the free world, are in my opinion not deserving of any type of meaningful response. So you'll just have to settle for a good 'ol fashioned FUCK YOU instead. :smile:

antieverything
11th January 2003, 22:57
Um...last time I checked, the Cong were still in control in Vietnam. How did we "not lose"?

Eastside Revolt
12th January 2003, 01:33
[quote]Quote: from Dark Capitalist on 10:06 pm on Jan. 8, 2003
http://www.vhfcn.org/stat.htm

From the VHFCN.

Statistics about the Vietnam War


The Vietnam War has been the subject of thousands of newspaper and magazine articles, hundreds of books, and scores of movies and television documentaries. The great majority of these efforts have erroneously portrayed many myths about the Vietnam War as being facts. [Nixon]

Ha!!!!! The only myth was that they are never portayed as having LOST the war.

synthesis
12th January 2003, 04:42
this country's roll in the defense of the free world

So I suppose raping and murdering millions of people is preferable to communism?