MY AGENDA FOR SUMMARY EXECUTION

[Capitalist Imperial]

I was thinking about President Bush's initiative with foreign poilcy based on preemption. I think this a strong, courageous stance by one of our world's boldest contemporary heroes.

In line with this new, aggreessive policy, I would like to submit for your approval a list of individuals that should in fact be brought before the people of the United States of America to face immediate trial and execution for crimes against America.


And, the losers are...

Osama Bin Laden: For (among other things) Masterminding the hijacking of 4 US commercial Jets, the killing of 3000+ people, destroying of the World Trade Center, Attacking and damaging the US Military Headquarters at the Pentagon, and downing American Airlines flight 93.

Saddam Hussein: For continuing to proliferate a Weapons of Mass Destruction program in violation of both the UN security council resolution and a United States Mandate for dissolution of all Iraqui WMD's, as well as continuing to foster and proliferate a rougue state that seeks to compromise American interests.

DPRK leader Kim-Jong-il: For threats to US sovereignty and re-initiation of a nuclear weapons program in violation of a non-proliferation treaty by which North Korea is bound. Kim Jong-il is a Stalinist hold out who is unable to feed his own people, but, in classic communist fashion, that is not as important as maintaining a dictatorial regime and snubbing his nose at the U.S. North Korea will soon get its come-uppance, and Kim Jong-il will be at the epicenter of the heavily wielded strike of the hammer of American Justice


John Walker Lindh: For taking up arms against the United States with intent to kill American soldiers and compromise American interests, thus committing treason.


Jane Fonda: For political treason during the police action in Vietnam, and anti-American propoganda spreading, illustrated by her sitting at a NVA anti-aircraft battery among numerous NVA personel, and suggesting that she would derive enjoyment from shooting down Amrican assets.


Michael Moore: For spreading anti-capitalist, anti-american sentiment in convoluted pieces of leftist propoganda such as "Bowling for Columbine" and "Roger & Me". These and other of Mr. Moore's works are little more than frivoulous leftist rhetoric devoid of any substance or a grasp on reality, and they seek to compromise faith in American principles.

German Chancellor Schroeder: You would think that this guy would give the US at least 1 iota of respect after we rebuilt their nation after WWII, and made them one of our largest trade partners. Modern day Germany would be nothing without the United States, yet Mr. Schroeder continues to throw wrenches in the machine of US sovereignty, dragging his feet on action in Iraq, not committing german forces to assist in the war on terror, questioning US foreign policy, and questioning US trade practices. Perhaps Mr. Schroeder should look at history to see who is indebted here, and maybe then he can manage a shred of courage in that spineless leftist vertabrae and step up for his greatest ally!

[Non-Sectarian Bastard!]

Looks like a death list from Stalin orso.

Everyone who has other thoughts should be killed and that's democracy.

Atleast that's what you are suggesting.

[Lardlad95]

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 7:52 pm on Jan. 3, 2003
I was thinking about President Bush's initiative with foreign poilcy based on preemption. I think this a strong, courageous stance by one of our world's boldest contemporary heroes.

In line with this new, aggreessive policy, I would like to submit for your approval a list of individuals that should in fact be brought before the people of the United States of America to face immediate trial and execution for crimes against America.


And, the losers are...

Osama Bin Laden: For (among other things) Masterminding the hijacking of 4 US commercial Jets, the killing of 3000+ people, destroying of the World Trade Center, Attacking and damaging the US Military Headquarters at the Pentagon, and downing American Airlines flight 93.

Saddam Hussein: For continuing to proliferate a Weapons of Mass Destruction program in violation of both the UN security council resolution and a United States Mandate for dissolution of all Iraqui WMD's, as well as continuing to foster and proliferate a rougue state that seeks to compromise American interests.

DPRK leader Kim-Jong-il: For threats to US sovereignty and re-initiation of a nuclear weapons program in violation of a non-proliferation treaty by which North Korea is bound. Kim Jong-il is a Stalinist hold out who is unable to feed his own people, but, in classic communist fashion, that is not as important as maintaining a dictatorial regime and snubbing his nose at the U.S. North Korea will soon get its come-uppance, and Kim Jong-il will be at the epicenter of the heavily wielded strike of the hammer of American Justice


John Walker Lindh: For taking up arms against the United States with intent to kill American soldiers and compromise American interests, thus committing treason.


Jane Fonda: For political treason during the police action in Vietnam, and anti-American propoganda spreading, illustrated by her sitting at a NVA anti-aircraft battery among numerous NVA personel, and suggesting that she would derive enjoyment from shooting down Amrican assets.


Michael Moore: For spreading anti-capitalist, anti-american sentiment in convoluted pieces of leftist propoganda such as "Bowling for Columbine" and "Roger & Me". These and other of Mr. Moore's works are little more than frivoulous leftist rhetoric devoid of any substance or a grasp on reality, and they seek to compromise faith in American principles.

German Chancellor Schroeder: You would think that this guy would give the US at least 1 iota of respect after we rebuilt their nation after WWII, and made them one of our largest trade partners. Modern day Germany would be nothing without the United States, yet Mr. Schroeder continues to throw wrenches in the machine of US sovereignty, dragging his feet on action in Iraq, not committing german forces to assist in the war on terror, questioning US foreign policy, and questioning US trade practices. Perhaps Mr. Schroeder should look at history to see who is indebted here, and maybe then he can manage a shred of courage in that spineless leftist vertabrae and step up for his greatest ally!


What the hell did Micheal Moore do you you?

THe man writes booksand makes movies.

His choice as an american he has a right to.

YOu guys have propaganda why aren't we allowed anything.

And one more thing

it isn't anti-american it's anti-american government

[Socialist Pig]

You're going to kill writers? For writing?
*sigh*
Perhaps everyone of us deserves to die acording to you.

[Xvall]

Osoma Bin Laden. Wow. Here's something interesting your hero George said about him.

"I don't know where he is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- George Bush on March 13, 2002

[Disgustipated]

Hey CI...you forgot about the one book Michael Moore wrote about you and your ilk...."Stupid White Men"

[Umoja]

We need to kill Sharon then because he has broken more UN resolutions then Saddam.

[Stormin Norman]

If Bush were a real hero we would not be operating out of weakness when it comes to N. Korea. I heard recently that Bush plans to continue shipments of food to those monsterous bastards. The administration said something to the effect that 'we will not use food as a method of negotiating'. Fine and dandy, go ahead and feed the fucking enemies army! They have never given any of the food to their people, why should we expect that to change now.

If Bush were taking the necessary steps, we would have bombed N. Korea's nuclear infrastructure by now. We need bolder action on the part of the administration. Also, Bush signed a nuclear nonproliferation treaty with the Russians against the advice of Rumsfeld.

I have to tell you, I am not impressed. Looks like Edwards or Liberman will be getting my vote next election (kidding). I might go third party since the Republicans are starting to look a little feeble. I hope they prove me wrong in the next two years.

[guerrillaradio]

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 7:52 pm on Jan. 3, 2003
Jane Fonda: For political treason during the police action in Vietnam, and anti-American propoganda spreading, illustrated by her sitting at a NVA anti-aircraft battery among numerous NVA personel, and suggesting that she would derive enjoyment from shooting down Amrican assets.

Michael Moore: For spreading anti-capitalist, anti-american sentiment in convoluted pieces of leftist propoganda such as "Bowling for Columbine" and "Roger & Me". These and other of Mr. Moore's works are little more than frivoulous leftist rhetoric devoid of any substance or a grasp on reality, and they seek to compromise faith in American principles.


LMAO...land of the free anyone??



German Chancellor Schroeder: You would think that this guy would give the US at least 1 iota of respect after we rebuilt their nation after WWII, and made them one of our largest trade partners. Modern day Germany would be nothing without the United States, yet Mr. Schroeder continues to throw wrenches in the machine of US sovereignty, dragging his feet on action in Iraq, not committing german forces to assist in the war on terror, questioning US foreign policy, and questioning US trade practices. Perhaps Mr. Schroeder should look at history to see who is indebted here, and maybe then he can manage a shred of courage in that spineless leftist vertabrae and step up for his greatest ally!

Right...so you're suggesting the assassination of a Western civilised capitalist stable democratically elected leader for failing to tow the line on US foreign policy?? You're fucking stupid.

[Xvall]

Jane Fonda? Micheal Moore? You want them executed for their beliefs? Give me a break. Then you must want all the other thousands of Americans who protested in Vietnam executed too? I guess you wanna hunt down the Beatles, and get them too right? Maybe you just think you are so unreal.

Ahh, I see...

So you think you are so much better, eh?

So you think you are tough, eh?

I will give you a taste of my Kung Fu stylez!

http://drakedracoli.netfirms.com/johnnie.gifhttp://drakedracoli.netfirms.com/johnnie.gifhttp://drakedracoli.netfirms.com/johnnie.gifhttp://drakedracoli.netfirms.com/johnnie.gifhttp://drakedracoli.netfirms.com/johnnie.gif

(Edited by Drake Dracoli at 10:40 pm on Jan. 3, 2003)

[Xvall]

German Chancellor Schroeder?

Was he even alive during WWII? If you think him and the modern day German people owe you for something back in the 1950's; then you must also agree that the United States should compensate for the treatment of minorities and communists back in the 1950's, right? And slavery back in the 1800's, right? RIGHT!?

[RedComrade]

Looks like your the real stalinist pal I'm really quite surprised on your choices of osama,kim ill jong, and sadaam it seems that you have really taken many of their tactics to heart and are emulating them with every filthy, polluted word you utter. Kill Michael Moore ? You truly are one sick son of a stalinist. Michael Moore is an ideal American excersising his duty to dissent which any real PATRIOT does in a DEMOCRATIC society. The values of free speech are the only and i repeat only thing that makes living in america worth it. Sick little nazis like you and your right wing friends are the real anti-americans. You and your ilk have ruined my country and are destroying everything that is good about it. You speak of these men breaking u.n treaties yet i bet you yourself are against a u.n backed international court and evironmental laws such as the kyoto treaty. For semi-nazi stalinists such as yourself the only time international law matters is when it applies to opponents. Opponents are defined as anyone with a weak military force but potentially profitable resources such as petoleum and a disciplined workforce(cough iraq cough). Get a life you sick stain on the so called land of the frees history.

[RedComrade]

Good point Dracoli its to bad ignorant misguided creeps such as CI never respond to good points such as this one and will gloss over everything we say and respond with some rambling nonsense about leftist rhetoric and how big and manly his cowboy draft dodging hero mr bush is and how we should all be executed for free speech. If theirs a ban on stalinist tho CI should definately be included considering his strong convictions in authoritarian nationalism and his hatred and contempt for free speech and dissent. Not that i literally want him banned im against the bannings its just mr CI's positions are very similar to that of a stalinist excluding economic issues of course.

[Lardlad95]

Quote: from Disgustipated on 9:06 pm on Jan. 3, 2003
Hey CI...you forgot about the one book Michael Moore wrote about you and your ilk...."Stupid White Men"


I love that book


oh and Norman...wouldn't bombing a nuclear reactor cause even more unnecassary damage?

[Socialist Pig]

Quote: from Lardlad95 on 10:56 pm on Jan. 3, 2003

Quote: from Disgustipated on 9:06 pm on Jan. 3, 2003
Hey CI...you forgot about the one book Michael Moore wrote about you and your ilk...."Stupid White Men"


I love that book


oh and Norman...wouldn't bombing a nuclear reactor cause even more unnecassary damage?

I think that's the point. :(

[Capitalist Imperial]

People, people calm down.

Red Comrade, you are obviously new here, as you have yet to distinguish between my actual serious, debating, patriotic self and my dark humor, mccarthyesque/authoritarian caricature.

Your personal attack is indicative of both your ignorance of who I am as well as your reactionary, mostly emotional stance that lacks any real substance.

I would warm up in the waters a little bit before I try to dive too deep there, tiger.

This whole post was the caricature, and a joke, and nmost of the leftists who know mwe understand this (though OBL, Saddam, Kim-Jong, and lindhe should legitimately die)

(Edited by Capitalist Imperial at 12:48 am on Jan. 4, 2003)

[Umoja]

You post just to get people angry, which does get annoying.

[Xvall]

It got me quite angry. So now I suppose I'll just have to cast my vote!

http://drakedracoli.netfirms.com/stop.jpg

[Anonymous]

What the hell are you talking about?

[Guest]

you pitiful loser

[RedComrade]

"Red Comrade, you are obviously new here, as you have yet to distinguish between my actual serious, debating, patriotic self and my dark humor, mccarthyesque/authoritarian caricature.

Your personal attack is indicative of both your ignorance of who I am as well as your reactionary, mostly emotional stance that lacks any real substance"

Yes Capitalist Imperial I am new here and no im not a mindreader and being new i am not going to know your individual humor and when and when not you are joking, dont expect me to. As to being emotional about freedom your goddamned right I am and writing my emotions off as lacking substance is further insight into your sick capitalistic/mechanistic mind that sees passion and individual convictions as foolish and innefficient, how sad it must be to see other ppls stong convictions on freedom and liberty in such a low regard but then again being for a sytem of profit over people that benifits few at the expense of many its understandable and i feel pity for your misguided soul

(Edited by RedComrade at 9:28 am on Jan. 4, 2003)

[guerrillaradio]

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 12:47 am on Jan. 4, 2003
My dark humor, mccarthyesque/authoritarian caricature.

Does Bush do the same or is he really that stupid??

[truthaddict11]

just one thing about Jane Fonda, who cares about her !she is married to fucking Ted Turner.

[nz revolution]

Fonda another sellout? All radical in the years gone by now just filth...

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from RedComrade on 9:27 am on Jan. 4, 2003
"Red Comrade, you are obviously new here, as you have yet to distinguish between my actual serious, debating, patriotic self and my dark humor, mccarthyesque/authoritarian caricature.

Your personal attack is indicative of both your ignorance of who I am as well as your reactionary, mostly emotional stance that lacks any real substance"

Yes Capitalist Imperial I am new here and no im not a mindreader and being new i am not going to know your individual humor and when and when not you are joking, dont expect me to. As to being emotional about freedom your goddamned right I am and writing my emotions off as lacking substance is further insight into your sick capitalistic/mechanistic mind that sees passion and individual convictions as foolish and innefficient, how sad it must be to see other ppls stong convictions on freedom and liberty in such a low regard but then again being for a sytem of profit over people that benifits few at the expense of many its understandable and i feel pity for your misguided soul

(Edited by RedComrade at 9:28 am on Jan. 4, 2003)


But RC, it is in capitalism and democracy that individualism, persobnal responsibility and freedom flourish.

It is in communism (something that your avatar and name supports) that seeks to abolish individualism and approach centrist collectivism.



So, I believe that the entire premise of your arguement is backwards.

[honest intellectual]

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 7:52 pm on Jan. 3, 2003
I was thinking about President Bush's initiative with foreign poilcy based on preemption. I think this a strong, courageous stance by one of our world's boldest contemporary heroes.It's amazing how no one in America has heard this, but pre-emptive war is illegal.

[RedComrade]

My avatar is a zapatista guerilla they're hardly commies, and while I am a communist sympathizer I see the doctrines of Marx having nothing in common with your negative utopia. What you have describded to me is a state based on the Leninist model and I never claim to be a Lenninist. Communist does not equal Leninist. While I have heard over and over again how marxism is destined to fail I have yet to see a state based exclusively on the Marxist model. All of these negative authoritarian communist dictatorships have been based on a lenninist model and i would argue that it is this Leninist model that is doomed to failure not the model proposed by marx. I think Leon Trotsky said it best and speaks for my feelings when he said "Democracy is to socialism what oxygen is to the human body"...

[Umoja]

CI, we had this discussion in my history class a while back. Does freedom entail being able to opress others or is their a mutual freedom that can't be harmed by anyone else?