Log in

View Full Version : Catalyst Empiricist - Yes you!



El Che
24th December 2002, 14:01
Capitalist Imperialist, C.I to his friends, is like a hooligan. He doesn`t really care about whats going on, you know, Capitalism, Imperialism and so on... He just cares that his team is winning. YaY!

Stormin Norman
24th December 2002, 15:01
That was pretty dumb.

MaxB
24th December 2002, 15:16
Stormin Norman---I LIKE THAT ANSWER.
:-)

Stormin Norman
24th December 2002, 15:20
What else could one say about such bullplop?

Xvall
24th December 2002, 15:54
Quote: from Stormin Norman on 3:01 pm on Dec. 24, 2002
That was pretty dumb.


Yes. And making posts titled 'Communist Filth!' and 'God First!' are so much more intelligent, Norman.

Corvus Corax
24th December 2002, 16:06
from Stormin Norman on 3:01 pm on Dec. 24, 2002
That was pretty dumb.

You don't even back your insult.

How much more pathetic can you get.
So I want reasons as to why it was dumb?

Or don't you have any?
lol

I bet you only read up to the hooligan part before coming to the rescue like a 'good intellectual capitalist'


That was pretty dumb.

lol

Dr. Rosenpenis
24th December 2002, 17:18
a 'good intelectual Capitalist?' What the hell is that?!?!
Good Capitalist? What?
Intelectual Capitalist? What?
hahahahahahahhahahahahahahhaha
funny

(Edited by Victorcommie at 11:19 pm on Dec. 24, 2002)

Corvus Corax
24th December 2002, 17:47
Exactly, that is why i placed the word in 'these'. Because only the dillusional cappy's think they exist.

El Che
25th December 2002, 02:33
I don`t think it`s dumb at all. That is a superficial take on the matter. The form might be light, and yes silly if u like, but the content is deep. As are numerous the permisses upon which my above conclusion is based. This is not a groundless slander, that is not my style.

Capitalist Imperial
3rd January 2003, 01:17
#1: Thanks SN and MaxB


#2: The funny thing is that you pinko gadflys scrutinize SN's response, which was merely a simple retort to the original post, which was truly dogmatic, unsupported conjecture at best, and in far greater need of addressing than SN's comment.

SN's comment needed no further expanding! It summed up exactly what ocuured, it was a dumb and simplistic (albiet incorrect anyway) submission on the part of El Che.

El Che
4th January 2003, 17:25
Do you deny thou sees the world through the distorted prisma that is Nationalism!?

Is not National Interest, in all matters, your foremost consideration!?

Wait, his answer is irrelevant. If you want the answer to the questions go read his posts up to date. I have mine.

antieverything
4th January 2003, 17:48
Nobody will take you seriously if you post ridiculous crap like this. Goes for you too, MaxB.

El Che
4th January 2003, 23:05
Care to explain your qualification or should I just take your word for it?1

Capitalist Imperial
4th January 2003, 23:12
El Che, it is no secret here that I am among the greatest proponents of American sovereignty. In America, Nationalism (We call it Patriotism)is a good thing, regardless of what Lenin, Marx, or Trotsky said about it.

Nationalism is part of what has made the United States history's greatest empire.

It is why Americans are pretty much #1 at almost anything we want to be #1 at.

El Che
4th January 2003, 23:19
Nationalism is not a good thing. Infact it isn`t anything buts it`s consequences are very real.