Woman files lawsuit against President

[Michael De Panama]

Woman files lawsuit against President
By LeaAnne Klentzman

A Fort Bend County woman files a lawsuit on former Governor and current sitting President George W. Bush.

Margie Schoedinger of Missouri City, Texas has filed a lawsuit against George W. Bush in Fort Bend County Court. In her suit she is alleging "race based harassment and individual sex crimes committed against her and her husband." The suit lists numerous offenses and asks for actual damages, punitive damages and judgments against George W. Bush.

In her suit, among the many allegations, she has stated, "On or about, October 26, 2000, an attempt was made to abduct Plaintiff (Schoedinger) by three unknown assailants. Because of the actions of these assailants, Sugar Land police officers were dispatched to the scene. In the end, no report was taken. The assailants were treated respectfully and allowed to go free while Plaintiff (Schoedinger) was repeatedly and aggressively questioned. After filing a lawsuit, the Plaintiff’s family and past contacts were questioned and harassed." As a result, Plaintiff dismissed Plaintiff’s lawsuit. Irrespective of Plaintiff dismissing the lawsuit, the harassment continued." Schoedinger, goes on to allege "at some point, she contacted the Houston office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, filing a raced based harassment complaint, advising that the Sugar Land Police Department may or may not be harassing Plaintiff on behalf of her neighbors in Sugar Land or possibly on behalf of the First Colony Community Services Association."

Schoedinger further states in her lawsuit, "The (FBI) agent in question advised her that the situation appeared to be highly organized and most likely higher level, such as a racist organization." Furthermore she states, "Throughout this conversation, she learned that there was no time that the Defendant (Bush) ever stopped watching Plaintiff’, nor did he stop having sex with Plaintiff. The sole concern of the Defendant and his representatives was whether Plaintiff could actually recall whether Plaintiff could actually recall, the individual sex crimes committed against Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s husband, utilizing drugs.

Section VII of the lawsuit states; "Whether or not Plaintiff’s husband was raped remains in question, as Plaintiff was drugged after she was raped and her husband was drugged before her rape. Plaintiff can only state that these men purported to be FBI agents raping her for the purpose of covering for how many times they had drugged her and allowed the Defendant to rape her in the same manner."

She also alleges that in writing letters directly to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Houston Office," instead of assisting Plaintiff with her concerns, the FBI took on the same demeanor as the Sugar Land Police Department. Eventually, Plaintiff learned, via telephone conversations, that both the Sugar Land Police Department, and the Houston Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation were acting at the behest of the Defendant, George W. Bush. As a part of their defense, the Sugar Land Police Department conducted a background investigation into Plaintiff’s past activities. In the end, this investigation yielded the following information: Plaintiff had seven dates, (which became seven lovers), had told no lies, committed no crimes, gotten 2 traffic tickets and dated George W. Bush as a minor."

Sugar Land Police Department Captain Marcaurele said his department has no record of any complaints by Ms. Margie Schoedinger. Several attempts were made to contact Ms Schoedinger, she never returned any calls.

Ms. Schoedinger’s law suit was filed on December 2, 2002 and is currently in the Fort Bend County system in County Civil Court at Law 3. Schoedinger is listed as her own legal representative.

From here:
http://www.fortbendstar.com/121102/n_Woman...20President.htm (http://www.fortbendstar.com/121102/n_Woman%20files%20lawsuit%20against%20President.ht m)

[Michael De Panama]

38 views and not a single reply from you people. The next person who sees this is the 39th. This is the president's penis we're talking about here. It's important stuff.

[Ian]

enthralling stuff eh Mike?
I wish I could get enthused except it is quite confusing hwat she is accusing him of, she sounds like a wacko herself but who am I to say who's a wacko or not!?

[Exploited Class]

Quote: from Michael De Panama on 6:30 am on Dec. 15, 2002
38 views and not a single reply from you people. The next person who sees this is the 39th. This is the president's penis we're talking about here. It's important stuff.

You would think it was important stuff after the whole country went goo goo ga ga after Clinton's Penis. I am begining to think that in America the President can deystroy the bill of rights, have the whole world hate him, break peace keeping treaties, support death squads, reject world courts, take us into a war, create secret agencies, shadow government, invade privacy, tax breaks to the rich, slumping economy, get China and Russia to sign a friendship accord - something they didn't do through 50 years of cold war, lock documents up of past administrations so they can't be seen by the public. We can even give rides out to the rich public in our submarines and run over and kill jappanesse civilians when we let them take the helm. Now none of that matters to the general population but if it comes down to his Penis doing something they don't like - heads will roll!!! They will probably even try to find some weazelly way of impeaching the son of a *****. Even if we have to spend 65 million dollars to find out if he slept with somebody by god, we will get to the bottom of this dirty buisness.

Its all about perspective.

But I guess it was what the Repubs had to do to get at Clinton's approval ratings. So maybe now the Dems are using the same dirty party tactics. Not that I am suprised if they do.

BTW, I thought it was okay for guys to have sex with tons of women but not okay for women. hmmmm. Society is so funny.

[Michael De Panama]

She's saying that Dubya raped her. His goons drugged her and her husband, and he might have raped her husband too.

Nothing is a scandal with Bush, though. Not the Karl Rove CD, not the history of cocaine use and alcoholism, his charge of drunk driving a year prior to his election, none of that shit.

It's all about Clinton getting a blowjob, and how somehow that makes him unfit to be the president of a country full of people giving each other blowjobs right now as you are reading this. Probably even more creative things too.

[Guest]

Whats funny about this...... is the fact that as soon as I read it on english.pravda.ru I sent it to all the major news networks reporters and got 0 replies.

This whole subject of Bush's actions has been 100% blocked from being reported to the American people.

Talk about lack of freedom of speech/information... oh.. right with the freedom of information act releasing any information that would potentially be a threat to the US Government is against the law... Either that or one of the many rights of speech we lost with the homeland security(and constitutional rights removal)act... OK, then I guess it never happened and I never said anything. lmao.

It’s a sad day when I have to turn to the RUSSIAN newspaper to get a more honest view on what’s happening in America. I’m starting to think they have more rights there than we do in regard to freedom of the press and freedom of speech.

http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/12/13/40786.html

_-Jile-_

[Capitalist Imperial]

what's really funny is that you leftists have tried, sentenced, and executed the president off of an article

wait, thats not funny, its the commie way!

[Exploited Class]

The funny thing about this is, if it was Clinton, it would be on Fox news from start of the morning to the end of the day. Only taking breaks now and then to show Michael Jacksdn holding his child over the railing.

[Michael De Panama]

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 6:59 pm on Dec. 16, 2002
what's really funny is that you leftists have tried, sentenced, and executed the president off of an article

wait, thats not funny, its the commie way!

Why are you saying that? I am just hoping that Bush gets caught with his pants down, to be honest. I want him to get the boot.

[Stormin Norman]

Let me get this straight. The woman filing this claim never pressed criminal charges, has no evidence to support her allegations, is somewhat crazy, and expects the American people to turn against the president based upon her fibs. Yeah, this is exactly like Clinton getting his intern to suck him off, and then lying about it under deposition. Your uncorroborated story has convinced even me that it is time for another impeachment trial and independent investigation into the affairs of the sitting president.

No really, do you think everyone is dumb enough to buy into this slanderous story published only by the worst rags on the internet. I searched everywhere for a credible media outlet that was discussing this bogus story. No one is touching it except the Fort Bend County paper that admits it published prematurely, and other 'sources' with questionable reputations. The closest thing I could find was a story by worldnetdaily.com that blasts the various internet 'sources' that hastily posted the story without checking the background of the woman filing the claim. I read the original subpena and it was an embarassment to the civil court system. Looks like the president has a counter-suit for liable.

It just goes to show you how little fact finding these leftist engage in before they post a story and present it as being absolute fact. Sorry pal, I'm not buying. I know bullshit when I see it.

Here is the worldnetdaily story:http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29990

LAW OF THE LAND
Suit claims Bush conspired
to cover up rape
Unsubstantiated report goes online prematurely

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 13, 2002
5:46 p.m. Eastern


By Jon Dougherty
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

A news report about a court filing by a Missouri City, Texas, woman who claims President Bush raped her was posted on the Internet prematurely and without sufficient fact-checking, says the editor of the paper.

The story, published Wednesday by the Fort Bend Star, said Margie Schoedinger also claims that Bush conspired with the FBI and local police to cover up his alleged crime.

"This report wasn't supposed to go up yet," Jean Sandlin, an editor for the paper, told WorldNetDaily. Speaking of Schoedinger, Sandlin added: "I had heard she was a nutcase."

Repeated attempts to contact the reporter who wrote the story, LeaAnn Klentzman, were unsuccessful.

Rumors of the alleged rape circulated rapidly across the Internet today, but little in the way of details emerged.

Upon further investigation, however, WorldNetDaily discovered that indeed Schoedinger filed court papers with the Fort Bend County court Dec. 2 alleging the sexual abuse. Editor's note: The linked document above is in .pdf format; you must have an Adobe Acrobat reader to open it.

According to her account, which was confusing, rambling and incomplete, she also alleged that she has been harassed and threatened by federal agents, her bank accounts looted, her husband fired from his job, and that she had a miscarriage after being beaten. In court papers, she intimated that Bush "might have been the father of the child that was lost."

Also, she claimed that when she went to a hospital for treatment she was further threatened by federal agents "on behalf of the Defendant [Bush]."

Additionally, Schoedinger claims she has been placed on a "watch list" for AIDS and is being monitored by the National Security Agency, Secret Service and CIA. She said her home is under surveillance as well.

"Defendant [Bush] took personal responsibility for these decisions," the court papers say, "explaining to Plaintiff [Schoedinger] that committing suicide would be her best option … in his opinion. …"

"Plaintiff is essentially dead in any case," the filing said.

She said throughout a conversation she had with Bush – for which she gave no time frame – he allegedly never "stopped watching" her, "nor did he stop having sex" with her while she was under the influence.

"The sole concern of the Defendant and his representatives was whether Plaintiff could actually recall the individual sex crimes committed against Plaintiff and Plaintiff's husband, utilizing drugs," said the court papers. "Whether or not Plaintiff's husband was raped remains in question, as Plaintiff was drugged after she was raped and her husband was drugged before her rape."

Schoedinger's husband is not identified in the papers.

The suit seeks $1 million in actual damaged plus an additional $49 million in punitive damages and emotional distress.

A spokeswoman at the Fort Bend County Court at Law 3, where the suit was filed, told WorldNetDaily she could not discuss particulars of the case.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment by press time.

In court papers, Schoedinger also hinted that the alleged dalliances with Bush may have occurred when she was a minor, though she did not specify her age at the time of the alleged assaults. Also, her present age was not listed in court papers.

It was unclear whether Bush had been served with the suit, though court papers filed Dec. 4 gave Bush 20 days to respond or appear in a Fort Bend County courtroom.

The notice to appear was initialed by Becky Kasper, Fort Bend County deputy clerk.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jon E. Dougherty is a staff reporter and columnist for WorldNetDaily, and author of the special report, "Election 2000: How the Military Vote Was Suppressed."

[Capitalist Imperial]

Right on, SN, I can add nothing more than what you've already said here.

As usual, SN is a beacon of logic, truth, and sanity in this pool of desperate gadflys, who in this thread are all too predictable in their exploiting of an article of questionable validity, reliability, and reputability in the 1st place.

Give it up, pukes. This is obviously a lame-duck story.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Right on, SN, I can add nothing more than what you've already said here.

As usual, SN is a beacon of logic, truth, and sanity in this pool of desperate gadflys, who in this thread are all too predictable in their exploiting of an article of questionable validity, reliability, and reputability in the 1st place.

Give it up, pukes. This is obviously a lame-duck story.

[Guest]

Well while I'm by no means a commie as the one user seems to dub me for having doubt in our current warmonger of a president..... I did search for the woman's name "Margie Schoedinger" on http://www.google.com to find 383 hits.

Its obvious that our Press censors us a lot more than many wish to admit…. our press (imho) has been told to keep quiet and while I agree, there has been no conviction as of yet; lets be honest here guys.... this is the President of the United States... NO way on earth will he allow what happened to Clinton to happen to him - plain and simple there is a gag order on this.

With the new laws stating its illegal to make public demonstrations and loiter in front of any business in any kind of protest (see Homeland Security Act) I suspect that if anyone does decide Bush (who should not be President as he did not have majority vote and bought and paid for the position) need be removed from office and protests his continued Presidency they will be arrested for being a "national terrorist".

All of that said, if she is lying, then she should be arrested for any damage done to the Presidency and America's still falling worldwide appearance.

For anyone interested here is a poor copy of the legal filing of this in court:
http://www.brazosriver.com/bushsuit.htm

_-Jile-_

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from Guest on 9:44 pm on Dec. 17, 2002
Well while I'm by no means a commie as the one user seems to dub me for having doubt in our current warmonger of a president..... I did search for the woman's name "Margie Schoedinger" on http://www.google.com to find 383 hits.

Its obvious that our Press censors us a lot more than many wish to admit . our press (imho) has been told to keep quiet and while I agree, there has been no conviction as of yet; lets be honest here guys.... this is the President of the United States... NO way on earth will he allow what happened to Clinton to happen to him - plain and simple there is a gag order on this.

With the new laws stating its illegal to make public demonstrations and loiter in front of any business in any kind of protest (see Homeland Security Act) I suspect that if anyone does decide Bush (who should not be President as he did not have majority vote and bought and paid for the position) need be removed from office and protests his continued Presidency they will be arrested for being a "national terrorist".

All of that said, if she is lying, then she should be arrested for any damage done to the Presidency and America's still falling worldwide appearance.

For anyone interested here is a poor copy of the legal filing of this in court:
http://www.brazosriver.com/bushsuit.htm

_-Jile-_

the government is not ordering a gag on this, and even if they did, the media wouldn't listen. the media does not answer to the US government. that is what freedom of the press is about.

its just not a credible story, and no reputable media outlet is interested in touching it

guest, how do you figure that this is the result of a "gag order"? do you have evidence of this,or is it merely speculation?

[canikickit]

All of that said, if she is lying, then she should be arrested for any damage done to the Presidency and America's still falling worldwide appearance.

Absolutely, the US is perfectly capable of doing that on it's own, thank you very much.


the media does not answer to the US government. that is what freedom of the press is about.

Good to see you haven't lost your knack for comedy, Comrade.

But not only has the government tried to control people's minds, they've copped to controlling the media, too. Operation Mockingbird, the CIA's plan to infiltrate America's newsrooms, was such a success that former CIA director William Colby boasted, "the Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any major significance in the major media." Carl Bernstein substantiated this, revealing that hundreds of journalists and news organizations were involved in this subversion. And though officials have admitted to planting fabrications in the past, it seems they're still at it. Remember the story about the terrorist's passport surviving the fiery crash into the World Trade Center? What could that be but government-issued pabulum? And what else but full-scale public brainwashing accounts for the rash of Stepford Citizen Syndrome spreading throughout the country? (http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/topic.pl?forum=22&topic=1338)

[Stormin Norman]

Are you saying it is a bad idea from a intelligence stand-point to maintain operatives in the press? However, I find myself agreeing with your general assertion that the current relationship between intelligence agencies and the news rooms might be unhealthy for the free press we have a habit of extolling.

Have you heard of the plan to spike the media outlets of or enemies? We would basically put foreign reporters on U.S. government payroll and encourage them to spread pro-American sentiment. Hopefully this new plan has a measure to cut into Al-Jazera and give viewers the other (non-fanatical) side of the story. I think people inside the agencies are actually coming up with good ideas for the execution of a major propaganda campaign in hot spots around the world. Hell, if I were asked, I would suggest pulling the plug on all of our enemies propaganda outlets and running the History and Discovery channel 24-7 in places like Saudi Arabia.

Most disturbing is how we might being loosing the propaganda campaign on our own soil. Really, listen to yourselves. How can you be convinced that war is such a bad option, when we face an enemy that has openly stated that westerners must convert to Islam or die. If we had your attitudes during WWII we would all be speaking German and celebrate diversity would have never been an acceptable rallying cry. Perhaps its time we do a little less celebrating of the enemies who wish to exterminate western culture. Fucking lemmings. How many of you are going to follow the Hollywood degerates, like Sean Penn, to your deaths? It time to start celebrating the things that actually made this country great. It time to look to the resiliency and determination that made this society strong. It's time to apply those characteristics to a world that wishes to confront us and test those limits.

(Edited by Stormin Norman at 10:24 pm on Dec. 18, 2002)

[Guest]

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 12:45 am on Dec. 18, 2002
[quote]the government is not ordering a gag on this, and even if they did, the media wouldn't listen. the media does not answer to the US government. that is what freedom of the press is about.

its just not a credible story, and no reputable media outlet is interested in touching it

guest, how do you figure that this is the result of a "gag order"? do you have evidence of this, or is it merely speculation?


Don’t tell me you can honestly believe the Government has no ability to silence something like this. From your posts in the past I take you to be smarter than that.

I'm simply saying I do believe the Government has told the media this is something to be left alone; as they have done before when more then a couple of our Presidents have had this happen. Clinton's was the worst for being kept under wrap but with the advent of greater controls in the Government, yes I do believe they are in a greater position now to approve items of 'National importance/security' prior to it meeting print.. Regardless of its accuracy...

Its not that I believe or disbelieve the President did this... Its that it's getting 0 press on the TV and minimal press on the internet.

Anyone who does not question the world around them is a victim of its power.


_-Jile-_

[Stormin Norman]

Or maybe its a bogus lie generated by a raving psychopath and no credible news agency will touch it for fear of destroying their credibility. What's more likely, a press driven by mass mania and ratings would pass up the story of the century in order to tow the party line, or that they have checked into the valdity of the story and made a wise decision not to hurt their of profits and credibilty?

[Guest]

Granted, this could be a faked claim of rape.

Wouldnt it be realistic then that she would be slammed all over the news for attempting to slander the President and perhaps a mug-shot of her being arrested for placing a fraudulent charge against the President???

There is more here than meets the eye. Eventually either this story is going to disappear or be shown true...

Out of curiosity though, how many times have you seen 100% of tv stations avoid a topic... even if its thought to be false? They would preface it with "Slander attack against the President...." whatever, so that brings me back to, if there was nothing true about it, it would have been on TV.... ratings would have gone up, regardless of truth.... they would just have to be careful on what they call fact until its done in court.

_-Jile-_