Why MaxB should be banned! - =)

[Politrickian]

MaxB's 5 steps to making a post.

www.truth.gov
right-click
copy
http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/pos...on=new&forum=22 (http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/post.pl?action=new&forum=22)
paste

[Exploited Class]

Quote: from Politrickian on 11:23 pm on Nov. 23, 2002
MaxB's 5 steps to making a post.

www.truth.gov
right-click
copy
http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/pos...on=new&forum=22 (http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/post.pl?action=new&forum=22)
paste

I do agree that MaxB's 5 or 6 new posts starts from clicking one web site then copying and pasting it into his new posts has severaly crippled this specific forum. It is getting ridiculous to click on soc vs. cap and see 6 new posts in a row by MaxB and all just articles from other web sites, written by other authors. It is mudding up the forum much like a radio broadcast amplified to go over any other broadcasts. It is an attack on the web site.

I do not however believe a ban is in order. Ban's should be reserved for different cyber activities on bulletin boards. One lines replies over and over, personal attacks over and over, discussions to an idividual that you would not have if you were face to face with that person.

I would suggest that we disallow him from creating new topics. It should be made clear that the actions we are doing, are not behind the ideals that he holds, but his approach and his tactics at ramming and clouding up the forum to get his ideals across. He might as well email spam each and every one of us. I would say the samething about those that come to debate in this forum and sit opposite of MaxB's idealogies. If they did the same actions so should the same acts.

Let it be a 2 month ban on creating new topics. Perhaps if he wishes to still be on this forum, he will then start contributing to replies of other's posts and come up with ideas. Then with that practice post a new topic with his own words rather than those copied and pasted from others.

[Guest]

If that was done it would be only fair that peaccenicked be banned from making new topics. I say drop it.

[Exploited Class]

Quote: from Guest on 12:43 am on Nov. 24, 2002
If that was done it would be only fair that peaccenicked be banned from making new topics. I say drop it.

Peacenicked doesn't do 4 or so in one day in one forum, with just one word different in each title. A flood is a flood.

[Exploited Class]

When I went into SOC vs. Cap all from Max B all right at about the same time. That is flooding and they are all the same title.

Why Socialism Fails
Why Socialism can only fail
One more Reason why Marxism fails
Why Socialism Will ALWAYS fail.

[Kehoe]

Ban MaxB? ... let us consider the existing situation .... is not the socialist ideology suppressed and ridiculed in the capitalist society?Should we give voice to those who support a system that stifles ours?Is this forum a vehicle for the common exchange of socialist ideas or the sounding board for dumbfuck capitalist shits?However,were the moderators to ban and censor those who do not share our views would this not make them as vile as those who ban and censor us?Isnt this a trait of the one-party system wherein all opposing parties are outlawed and persecuted?To take take such measures would surely be indicative of authoritarianism and the strength of the collective will in the struggle for ideological dominance by assuming a leadership role and thus imposing that which the community collectively believes to be the basic principles of socialist thought.What in hell does a capitalist think he will achieve in a community such as this?Hes as out of place in here as a nun in a brothel. - Karo

[Kehoe]

Personally I view MaxB as no threat to the community in that we socialists will never allow ourselves to be turned away from the socialist path.In my previous post I stated,"To take take such measures would surely be indicative of authoritarianism and the strength of the collective will in the struggle for ideological dominance by assuming a leadership role and thus imposing that which the community collectively believes to be the basic principles of socialist thought"in regard to the ban and censorship of those opposed to our common ideology and I very much believe this to be an accepted mode of expression for the establishment and preservation of a socialist society;however,at present our endeavor is concentrated in the realm of thought and people like MaxB merely serves as a reminder of the system we wish to overthrow and replace.Were MaxB to become an unbearable nuisance by cluttering up the forum with repeated cut and pastes and other such tactics so as to distract members from worthy issues then disciplinary actions may be in order and any such action depends entirely on the discretion of the moderators themselves. - Karo


(Edited by Kehoe at 5:49 am on Nov. 24, 2002)

[Stormin Norman]

Ever since we berated peacenicked a couple months back he has gotten better. Now he will simply provide a link, usually. What MaxB does is ridiculous. I think he should learn how to synthesize other people's ideas rather than post them verbatum. Perhaps he could start to generate some of his own ideas as well. Whatever the answer, I am sure banning isn't it. He should be ostracized and criticized until he learns that his tactics are annoying. Like the left wingers who have used the same tactics, I generally ignore anything posted by MaxB.

Come on, you are making yourself look like an imbecile. Why don't you show that you are capable of thought? Quit the copy and paste antics already. Join in discussion and quit the bullshit. Even those of us that agree with some of 'your' positions are getting rather tired of it.

[El Brujo]

MaxB = spammer who is only trying to piss people off because he has nothing else to do. Nuff said. I believe others have been banned for spamming before so I have nothing against MaxB being banned.

[suffianr]

*Blink, blink*

My goodness, SN, was that a productive post I just saw?
Finally, we agree on something. Not that it really matters anyway, Professor Moriarty...

[Stormin Norman]

I guess it depends on who you ask. MaxB might not like it, but it was meant purely as constructive criticism.

Perhaps I spoke too soon. I saw the two posts on Islam that were taken from Frontpage.org and automatically assumed that all his new posts were other people's article. I then went back and looked at some of the others and they appeared to be written by MaxB. He does use too many articels, but I think he is capable of writing his own remarks. Maybe we are being too hard on him. Maybe you want him banned for the same reasons that you want to ban me, because we disagree with socialism.

(Edited by Stormin Norman at 6:06 pm on Nov. 24, 2002)

[peaccenicked]

Maxb is an education in dumbness. That makes him quite valuable to me. No-one outside SN and the flatearth stalinists does it better.

[MEXCAN]

Listen,when you go to your favorites and you clic che-lives.com you actually know where you are going !!!????
If i hate stalin and i know enough about him to know why i hate him.I'm not gonna go on 'his' site!!!MaxB comes to che-lives.com with an avatar that says anti-che!!And bashes Che because he has nothing else to do !!If he really wanted to bash someone that attaked the U.S then he would go on a forum that talks about Bin Laden!!!!So if you want a site that talks about THE BIN MAN GO HERE (http://www.almuhajiroun.com/)

(Edited by MEXCAN at 8:48 am on Nov. 24, 2002)

[redstar2000]

<cough> I find myself in <choke> agreement with <gasp> Stormin Norman. <sigh>

If MaxB wants to TALK to us in his OWN words, fine. Even an OCCASIONAL article is ok.

Otherwise, he's just spamming and ought to get the boot.

[new democracy]

his copy and pasting is pathetic, but that's not why he should be banned. in his first days, before he was restricted to soc vs. cap, he posted the same article in all the forums. every few days, he come with a loads of propaganda, then leaves for a few days. lately, he brought articles from the past that he already posted. and he also made two thread saying that you cannot micro-manage the entire economy. couldn't he just stick to the original one? i say that if he will post every article and topic only once instead of one million, i think he should stay. if he keep spamming, then ban him.

[Xvall]

He should not be banned. He has broken no major rules.

[Anonymous]

bah his existence is alredy a braked rule, the natural selection one.... hehehe

[suffianr]

LOL, that was funny, man... :)

No, really, MaxB, we think you're the greatest! Now, piss off...

[Moskitto]

MaxB makes me laugh, I find it most humerous that a self professed anarchist could also follow objectivist websites like it's gospel, obviously he didn't read the Deadly Politics - Anarchism section

[new democracy]

moskitto, where did he say he is an anarchist?

[Anonymous]

all cappies are anarchists, economical anarchists, defenders of the free market and the rfree right to enslave and explore the people...