Log in

View Full Version : Marxists' Apartment a Microcosm Of Why Marxism Doesn't Work



Guest
19th November 2002, 00:03
Marxists' Apartment a Microcosm Of Why Marxism Doesn't Work
By TheOnion.com
TheOnion.com | November 18, 2002


AMHERST, MA—The filthy, disorganized apartment shared by three members of the Amherst College Marxist Society is a microcosm of why the social and economic utopia described in the writings of Karl Marx will never come to fruition, sources reported Monday.


Above: Marxists Kirk Dorff and Josh Foyle.
"The history of society is the inexorable history of class struggle," said sixth-year undergraduate Kirk Dorff, 23, resting his feet on a coffee table cluttered with unpaid bills, crusted cereal bowls, and bongwater-stained socialist pamphlets. "The stage is set for the final struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, the true productive class. We're well aware of that here at 514 W. Elm Street, unlike other apartments on this supposedly intellectual campus."

Upon moving in together at the beginning of the fall 2001 semester, Dorff, Josh Foyle, and Tom Eaves sat down and devised an egalitarian system for harmonious living. Each individual roommate would be assigned a task, which he would be required to carry out on a predetermined day of the week. A bulletin board in the kitchen was chosen as the spot for household announcements, and to track reimbursements for common goods like toothpaste and toilet paper.

"We were creating an exciting new model for living," said Dorff, stubbing his cigarette into an ashtray that had not been emptied in six days. "It was like we were dismantling the apparatus of the state right within our own living space."

Despite the roommates' optimism, the system began to break down soon after its establishment. To settle disputes, the roommates held weekly meetings of the "Committee of Three."

"I brought up that I thought it was total bullshit that I'm, like, the only one who ever cooks around here, yet I have to do the dishes, too," said Foyle, unaware of just how much the apartment underscores the infeasibility of scientific socialism as outlined in Das Kapital. "So we decided that if I cook, someone else has to do the dishes. We were going to rotate bathroom-cleaning duty, but then Kirk kept skipping his week, so we had to give him the duty of taking out the garbage instead. But now he has a class on Tuesday nights, so we switched that with the mopping."

After weeks of complaining that he was the only one who knew how to clean "halfway decent," Foyle began scaling back his efforts, mirroring the sort of production problems experienced in the USSR and other Soviet bloc nations.

At an Oct. 7 meeting of the Committee of Three, more duties and a point system were added. Two months later, however, the duty chart is all but forgotten and the shopping list is several pages long.


Above: Dishes and seminal Marxist tracts pile up in the kitchen sink.
The roommates have also tried to implement a food-sharing system, with similarly poor results. The dream of equal distribution of shared goods quickly gave way to pilferage, misallocation, and hoarding.

"I bought the peanut butter the first four times, and this Organic Farms shit isn't cheap," Eaves said. "So ever since, I've been keeping it in my dresser drawer. If Kirk wants to make himself a sandwich, he can run to the corner store and buy some Jif."

Another failed experiment involves the cigarettes bought collectively. Disagreements constantly arose over who smoked more than his fair share of the group's supply of American Spirit Blues, and the roommates now hide individually purchased packs from each other—especially late at night when shortages are frequent.

The situation is familiar to Donald Browning, author of Das Kouch: A History Of College Marxism, 1970-1998.

"When workers willfully become less productive, the economy of the household suffers," Browning said. "But in a society where a range of ability naturally exists, someone is bound to object to picking up the slack for others and end up getting all pissy, like Josh does."

According to Browning, the group's lack of productivity pervades their lives, with roommates encouraging each other to skip class or work to sit on the couch smoking pot and talking politics.

"A spirit of free-market competition in the house would likely result in better incomes or better grades," Browning said. "Then, instead of being hated and ostracized by the world at large as socialist countries usually are, they could maintain effective diplomacy with their landlord, their parents, and Kirk's boss who cut back his hours at Shaman Drum Books."

The lack of funds and the resulting scarcity breeds not only discontent but also corruption. Although collectivism only works when all parties contribute to the fullest extent, Foyle hid the existence of a $245 paycheck from roommates so he would not have to pay his back rent, in essence refusing to participate in the forced voluntary taxation that is key to socialism. Even worse, Dorff, who is entrusted with bill collection and payment, recently pocketed $30, a theft he claimed was "for the heating bill" but was put toward buying drinks later that night.

"As is human nature, power tends to corrupt even the noblest of men," Browning said. "The more power the collective has over the lives of the individuals, as is the case in this household, the more he who is in charge of distribution has to gain by being unscrupulous. These Marxists will soon realize they overestimated how much control they would like 514 W. Elm as an entity to have."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hahahahaha. hittin home anyone?
yes it is from the onion.

Xvall
19th November 2002, 01:39
I hope you know that anything the onion posts is for comical relief, and is not to be taked seriously.

Blackberry
19th November 2002, 03:53
Too late Comrade Guest. This was posted in CHIT CHAT days ago.

canikickit
19th November 2002, 22:26
"Comrade guest" ha ha ha...

That bullshit isn't funny.

Stormin Norman
20th November 2002, 12:02
Pretty intelligent humor. The Onion kicks ass. They did an excellent job of representing today's American communist, some dipshit college drug addict hippies living in a filthy apartment. Its funny because its true.

suffianr
20th November 2002, 16:48
Yes, The Onion does kick ass.

But SN, who died and made you the freakin' American Census Bureau? The whole point of satire isn't representation, however you may wish to see it, but misrepresentation: to ridicule, parody, spoof, or lampoon.

The whole point of satire is humour, something of which is, unfortunately, beyond your emotional capacity to comprehend or appreciate.

But it's not too hard, really. Just look out for the difference between a factual representation of reality, and the humourous ridicule of it. The former is to be believed, the latter to be enjoyed.

Good luck; you may still discover a sense of humour within this lifetime. Or not.

Stormin Norman
22nd November 2002, 19:44
Hey CI,

Did you read this 'article'? What did you think of it?

Capitalist Imperial
22nd November 2002, 20:17
Man, I just read it SN, it was great!

Suffanir is 1/2 right, it was good satire, but he leaves out that the whole point of satirical humor is that it is deeply embedded in reality. This is why people relate to and respond well to satire (case in point: the onion). This "apartment" is a total microchasm of applied communism.

And, SN, you are totally accurate in your assessment of modern communists in America.

Xvall
22nd November 2002, 21:21
The onion has posted some articles making fun of bush. You do not take those seriously. Why do you take this seriously then? Because you are hypocrites.

Stormin Norman
22nd November 2002, 22:32
Do you know how stupid it makes you sound when you claim to know my stance on the current administration without ever having heard me speak on the matter. This is a common tactic among you left wingers. You automatically assume that because we support capital markets we all bow down to our King Bush.

How about this. Why don't you give me a decent critique of the man? Furthermore, quit assumming that I am a full fledge lemming whose cares nothing about policy or execution as long as I like the party in power. That sounds more like something a communist would be forced to do in a communist world.

canikickit
23rd November 2002, 02:17
Do you know how stupid it makes you sound when you claim to know my stance on the current administration without ever having heard me speak on the matter. This is a common tactic among you left wingers. You automatically assume that because we support capital markets we all bow down to our King Bush.

How about this. Why don't you give me a decent critique of the man? Furthermore, quit assumming that I am a full fledge lemming whose cares nothing about policy or execution as long as I like the party in power. That sounds more like something a communist would be forced to do in a communist world.

Practice what you preach. How many times have you posted crap like, "at least Mazdak accepts the true nature of communism"?

"You automatically assume that because we support capital markets (socialism) we all bow down to our King Bush (Stalin/Mao/Castro/whoever else you care to mention)."

canikickit
24th November 2002, 22:45
Norm, you little hippie punk, why don't you address what I percieve to be blatant hypocriticism? Maybe you could explain yourself? :bigcheesyfuckoffgrin:

Edit: Fuck off, Tkhinkherer.


(Edited by canikickit at 11:45 pm on Nov. 24, 2002)

antieverything
24th November 2002, 22:49
I think that the article does point out a lot of the shortcomings of scientific socialism as described in Das Kapital.

Tkinter1
24th November 2002, 23:35
hypocriticism - that looks a Bush word to me.

canikickit
24th November 2002, 23:44
ah....who gives a fuck? - hypocrisy. Anyway, his emperial majesty Norm knows better than to criticise my language capabilities.

Stormin Norman
26th November 2002, 12:15
Mispelling a word is very different than picking one out of thin air.

I wouldn't have, but you just had to rub salt in the old wound didn't you.

canikickit
26th November 2002, 19:04
You wound fairly easy. I'm only messing around anyway, your right, making up words is not on at all.

Stormin Norman
27th November 2002, 13:54
I was only messing around too, friend. By the way, that Peter Tosh album used on your avatar is good shit.

(Edited by Stormin Norman at 1:55 am on Nov. 28, 2002)

canikickit
27th November 2002, 19:39
Yes it is! It's the business.

canikickit
28th November 2002, 01:43
But you have to admit, Norm, you comparing Peaccenikked (or whoever) to Stalin is the same as someone comparing you to Bush. [Or saying you must support him because you don't like communism].

I know you probably only do that to piss people off, but still...

Stormin Norman
28th November 2002, 02:48
I never compared peacenicked to Stalin. I did say that the worldview he supports leads to those types of regimes gaining and abusing power. The correlation between Marxism and Stalinism, Maoism, Castroism, Ho Chi Mihnism, and SWAPOism is undeniable. That fact I assert Marxist socialism inevitabley leads to catastrophe is very different than assumming that someone who is patriotic provides unquestioning support to the government in power. Sorry, but I do not agree with your comparison of the two. One remains a generalization that holds true and was arrived through thoughtful study of the relationship between Marxism and totalitarianism. The other remains a thoughtless, off the cuff remark with no supporting facts to back the conclusion.

canikickit
28th November 2002, 03:04
Furthermore, quit assumming that I am a full fledge lemming whose cares nothing about policy or execution as long as I like the party in power.

I didn't mean a comparison, I meant you assume that because someone does not support free markets they support mass murder. I find that quite ridiculous. I'd ask you to post some evidence, but I feel this would turn into something the same as the rest of the bullshit which permeates this forum.

I'm sure Peaccenikked (or whoever) cares about the policy and excecution of the party that is in power. The policies which you talk about often (mass excecutions and what not) would be covered by that, right?

canikickit
28th November 2002, 03:07
You should read some of the argument made by Peacce, Vox and El Che against Stalinism, and why it goes against socialism.


How do you feel about Peter Tosh's lyrics? Sureley you would not enjoy the music, if you had distaste for the lyrics?