Log in

View Full Version : The Soviet Woman- a Full and Equal Citizen of her country -



Cassius Clay
6th November 2002, 10:47
It is a well-known fact that the Soviet Union has achieved exceptional successes in drawing women into the active construction of the state. This generally accepted truth is not disputed even by our enemies. The Soviet woman is a full and equal citizen of her country. In opening up to women access to every sphere of creative activity, our state has simultaneously ensured all the conditions necessary for her to fulfil her natural obligation--that of being a mother bringing up her children and mistress of her home.

From the very beginning, Soviet law recognised that motherhood is not a private matter, but the social duty of the active and equal woman citizen. This proposition is enshrined in the Constitution. The Soviet Union has solved one of the most important and complex of problems how to make active use of female labour in any area without this being to the detriment of motherhood.

A great deal of attention has been given to the organisation of public canteens, kindergartens, Young Pioneer camps, playgrounds and creches--those institutions which, as Lenin wrote, facilitate in practice the emancipation of women and are able, in practice, to reduce the female inequality vis-a-vis men. More than seven thousand women's and children's consultation centres have been established in the USSR, of which half are in rural areas. Over 20 thousand creches have been organised. It should be pointed out here that in tsarist Russia in 1913 there existed only 19 creches and 25 kindergartens, and even these were not maintained by the state, but by philanthropic organisations.

The Soviet state provides increasing material assistance to mothers. Women receive allowances and paid leave before and after the birth of the child and their post is kept open for them until they return from leave.

Large and one-parent families receive state allowances to help them provide for and bring up their children. In 1945 the state paid out more than two thousand million roubles in such allowances. The title 'Mother-Heroine' has been awarded to more than 10 thousand women in the RSFSR alone, while the order of'Maternal Glory' and the 'Medal of Motherhood' have been awarded to 1,100 thousand women.

Soviet women have justified the trust and concern shown to them by their state. They have shown a high degree of heroism both in peaceful, creative labour before the war, during the years of armed battle against the nazi invaders, and now, in the efforts to fulfil the monumental tasks set by the new five-year plan. Many branches of industry in which female labour is predominant are among the first to fulfil their plans. Equally worthy of mention are the enormous achievements of the Soviet peasant women, who bore on their shoulders the greater part of the burden of agricultural labour during the war years.

Our women have mastered professions that have long been considered the exclusive domain of men. There are women engine-drivers, women mechanics, women lathe operators, women fitters, well-qualified women workers in charge of the most complex mechanisms.

The women of the Soviet Union work on an equal footing with men to advance science, culture and the arts; they occupy an outstanding place in the national education and health services.

In a country where, 30 years ago, out of 2,300 thousand working women 1,300 thousand worked as servants in the towns and 750 thousand as farm labourers in the countryside, in a country where there were almost no women engineers, almost no scientists, and appointment to a teaching post was accompanied by conditions insulting to female dignity, in that country there are now 750 thousand women teachers, 100 thousand women doctors, and 250 thousand women engineers. Women make up one half of the student body in institutions of higher education. Over 33 thousand women are working in laboratories and in research institutes, 25 thousand women have academic titles and degrees, and 166 women have been awarded the State Prize for their achievements in science and work.

The women of the Soviet Union are implementing their political rights in practice. The Supreme Soviet of the USSR has 277 women deputies, while 256 thousand women have been elected to rural, urban, regional and republican organs of state power...

The women of the Soviet Union do not have to demand from their government the right to work, the right to education, the right to the protection of motherhood. The state itself, the government itself, draws women into work, giving them wide access to every sphere of social life, assisting and rewarding mothers.

During the years of invasion by nazi aggressors, Soviet women, and the women of other democratic countries, saw with their own eyes the need to wage a tireless battle against nazism until every trace of it had been removed. Only this will spare the world the threat of new wars.

The struggle for democracy and lasting peace, the struggle against reaction and fascism, is the main task we face today. To cut women off from this basic and important task, to attempt to confine them within 'purely female', feminist organisations, can only weaken the women's democratic movement. Only the victory of democracy can ensure women equality.

We, the women of the Land of Soviets, are devoting all our energy to creative labour, to the fulfilment of the monumental tasks set by the five-year plan, knowing that in so doing we are strengthening the bulwark of peace throughout the world--the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

At the same time we must be on the alert for intrigues by the reactionaries and expose their plans and intentions, their attempts to divide the ranks of democracy.

The unity of all the forces of democracy is our most reliable weapon in the struggle against reaction, in the struggle for freedom and peace throughout the world.


Now I wonder whether the same could be said about American women in 1945 or even today. And for all of you who say it's just propaganda take note that Kollantai was a critic of both Lenin and Stalin.

new democracy
6th November 2002, 10:53
Quote: from Cassius Clay on 10:47 am on Nov. 6, 2002
note that Kollantai was a critic of both Lenin and Stalin.
so what? lenin was some sort of god that cannot make mistakes? back to the topic, what she said is completely true. here is the source: http://www.marxists.org/archive/kollonta/w.../works/full.htm (http://www.marxists.org/archive/kollonta/works/full.htm) .

(Edited by new democracy at 10:56 am on Nov. 6, 2002)

Cassius Clay
6th November 2002, 17:27
'So what' well perhaps if you quoted the whole sentence rather than just that bit you might get it.

If you still don't then the point I was making was that she had criticised Lenin and Stalin so therefor she is not the type of person who would just write a load of 'Propaganda' because she felt the need to.

genniva
6th November 2002, 17:51
First: the name ought to be Alexandra Kollontai.

This remarkable woman came from an aristocratic family deeply involved in the Dekabrist anti-Tzar movement. She got away with criticism of Lenin because Lenin liked her as a person and a friend; she got away with quiet disapproval of Stalin because she was the Soviet ambassador in Sweden during Stalin's reign. And besides, she was just a woman. Who'd take a woman seriously in good old autocratic USSR?;)

redstar2000
7th November 2002, 14:37
"her natural obligation--that of being a mother and bringing up her children and mistress of her home"

"motherhood is not a private matter but the social duty of...the woman citizen"

Comrade Clay, I do not know how familiar you are with nazi/fascist pro-natal propaganda...but these sentences could have been easily clipped from the daily press of the 3rd Reich or fascist Italy.

On their face, they are howling absurdities and outrageously insulting to women. They essentially say that a woman's obligation to society is FIRST have and raise children, and second, go ahead and do something interesting with your life in your spare time.(!)

How would you feel if some asshole told you in no uncertain terms that "your first duty and primary social obligation was to father and raise children...and if you have any time left over, you can do politics or engineering or whatever"???

I don't criticize comrade Kollontai for the statement; at the time it was written, Stalin signed her paycheck, she was an old lady and didn't want to cause a fuss, etc. In her "glory years" however, I'm sure she would have vomited at such victorian horseshit. In her day, she was a strong feminist, thought the institution of marriage sucked, believed in "free love" and birth control and abortion, etc.

In fact, I'm not sure that Stalin didn't make her sign that piece of shit as a cruel "joke" on an old enemy...I've heard stories about Stalin's last years that suggest he was not above that sort of thing.

But her reputation as one of the great communist revolutionaries will, if I have anything to say about it, outlive his!

new democracy
7th November 2002, 14:58
Quote: from redstar2000 on 2:37 pm on Nov. 7, 2002
But her reputation as one of the great communist revolutionaries will, if I have anything to say about it, outlive his!
yeah, i liked the ideas of her faction in cp, workers opposition (http://www.marxists.org/glossary/orgs/w/o.htm#workers-opposition)

Ian
8th November 2002, 20:22
I use the psuedonym Zikan Kollontai... I like Alexandra although she does say some fascistic things.

She did not criticise Lenin, but rather criticised his actions. She didn't support the signing of the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, she preffered to continue the war but make it a revolutionary war. In Hindsight this would have been very difficult as the Civil war would have been at about the same time although it was a nice concept.

Cassius Clay
9th November 2002, 09:56
You know what Redstar 2000 youv'e got a point there. I should of read the thing in more detail. However I still think the rest of the article is more favourable (I wouldn't of posted it otherwise) and some of the stats quoted there ought to show that things improved alot. Also most of the article I feel is far more 'Progressive' than Victorian England or Fascist Italy.