Log in

View Full Version : Mostly Americans take Nobel prizes (By Capitalist Imperial)



Guest
11th October 2002, 18:13
I guess you leftist pukes can quote stats about the american education system all day, but, as usual, we (USA) have more nobel prize recipients than any other nation.

Another #1 for America, but I'm not surprized.

would some nation please provide us with some competition?

LOIC
11th October 2002, 18:30
It shows how fucked up nobel prize is.
This has got nothing to do with american superiority.
Moreover Jimmy Carter who have nobel prize for peace is a critic of how bush's administration actually act.
So don't say such bullshit.

oconner
11th October 2002, 19:00
hmmm and who are the prizes controlled by?

canikickit
11th October 2002, 19:51
Big deal. You've got a big population and control most of the money.

#1 in arrogance as well.

Capitalist
11th October 2002, 20:23
Unfortunately all the million dollar nobel peace prize winners are also mostly communists - and leftists.

Jimmy Carter - Leftist Moron (Nice Guy, Bad President)

Nelson Mandela (How many of his own fellow brother black Africans died to the wrath of his ANC - Amenesty Inernational also refused to recognize Mandela as a political prisoner in 1985 - citing that the violence he and the ANC used against their own people disqualified him. I find it very ironic that blacks consider this man to be their hero, when he is responsible for so many black deaths in Africa)

Hitler was nominated for the peace prize in 1936 for his efforts with the Olympics.

Nobel Peace Prize is something I would like to see the USA distance itself from.

Give me the million bucks - you can keep the stupid prize.

canikickit
12th October 2002, 01:00
CI (or anyone else for that matter), do you have a source for that, or can you tell me how many they have won?

Xvall
12th October 2002, 02:16
lol, the capitalists are both contradicting each other! Nobel Peace prize for the country with the biggest military! Great idea!

Guest
12th October 2002, 03:58
Well.. I imagine hitler was nominated for it.

He wasn't the instigator in WWII you do know that, though I bet he was itching for an excuse to take over europe.

Goldfinger
12th October 2002, 17:36
I really don't think the peace prize should be given to politicians, as they all "want" peace, but they've never really done anything to achive it. It should only be given to activists.

LeonardoDaVinci
12th October 2002, 17:51
CI, weren't you the same moron that called Carter a weak and pathetic president in one of your previous posts.

Boy, you cappies sure change your opinions fast.

Anonymous
12th October 2002, 20:59
LOL you cappies are geting stupidier everyday!

By the way the nobel prize of peace (my favorite!) is hardly touched by american hands, and when a american wins that prize he normaly unapreciated by normal puritan/right winger classes in america! go read a book CI (and when i say a book i say a BOOK something that really teaches you something not some novel or some stupid romance ) and then talk about american "superiority" with me!

Capitalist
12th October 2002, 21:34
Quote: from the anarchist on 12:59 pm on Oct. 12, 2002
(and when i say a book i say a BOOK something that really teaches you something not some novel or some stupid romance ) and then talk about american "superiority" with me!

Why don't you try reading a NEWSPAPER.

Maybe that is your problem - you read too many books - try reading the NEWSPAPER and get in sync with PRESENT DAY REALITY.

Thats the difference between communists and capitalists.

Capitalist are up on current events.

Communist are living in the past, they fail to see the present day oppressive results and destruction of their psuedo-revolutions,

new democracy
12th October 2002, 21:39
pseudo revolution!? i failed to understand that.

Capitalist
12th October 2002, 22:19
http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=1977

Psuedo Revolution

Example #1
The Bolshevik Revolution, which basically stole the revolution from the democratic Mensheviks, replaced the oppressive Czar with Lenin and later Stalin which were more oppressive.

Example #2
Batista, a less oppressive tyrant, was overthrown by a revolution that replaced him with Fidel Castro, a more oppressive tyrant.

This is false revolution. True Revolution should lead to a more free society, not a more oppressive one.

Anonymous
12th October 2002, 22:29
"Example #1
The Bolshevik Revolution, which basically stole the revolution from the democratic Mensheviks, replaced the oppressive Czar with Lenin and later Stalin which were more oppressive. "

This is what happens when you dont actually read! actually stalin had nothing to do with lenin, and lenin never truly ruled since he only made the revolution possible and died right after it, stalin on the other hand was a bloody bonapartist, he rised to power using fascist theorys and became the leader with the start of WWII,

"Example #2
Batista, a less oppressive tyrant, was overthrown by a revolution that replaced him with Fidel Castro, a more oppressive tyrant. "

Huummmm you could be fired and arrested just for being commie or for reading marx in USA, plus USA made severall sabotages in Cuban lands yet Fidel is the bad guy?

And you forgot some other revolutions, that actually worked! and one of them is the portuguese revolution in 1974! it worked, it was made by comunists, and it proved that socialism can work, yet today capitalism took possession of portugal, yet no one died in this revolution see you newspapper doenst teach you this does it? go read a book you ignorant fuck!

ID2002
12th October 2002, 22:56
Carter...Noble Peace Prize winner....

Ok, not a bad choice if you ask me.

Lardlad95
12th October 2002, 23:06
Quote: from Capitalist on 9:34 pm on Oct. 12, 2002

Quote: from the anarchist on 12:59 pm on Oct. 12, 2002
(and when i say a book i say a BOOK something that really teaches you something not some novel or some stupid romance ) and then talk about american "superiority" with me!

Why don't you try reading a NEWSPAPER.

Maybe that is your problem - you read too many books - try reading the NEWSPAPER and get in sync with PRESENT DAY REALITY.

Thats the difference between communists and capitalists.

Capitalist are up on current events.

Communist are living in the past, they fail to see the present day oppressive results and destruction of their psuedo-revolutions,


oh thats right reading books means you know nothing of current events...yeah lets burn all books because what has happened doesn't matter

jackass

Anonymous
12th October 2002, 23:48
lol and plus they speak like cnn gives a whole lot of information to them! the last "information" i saw at cnn was about antrax and it was the most incorrect and sstupid report i have ever seen in my life! it even said that a single men could put anthrax in a river and contaminate an intire city! men that was stupid!

Sulla the Dictator
13th October 2002, 02:02
This is what happens when you dont actually read! actually stalin had nothing to do with lenin


No one who says, "Stalin had nothing to do with Lenin" should ever tell someone else they don't read enough.

peaccenicked
13th October 2002, 02:09
''Psuedo Revolution

Example #1
The Bolshevik Revolution, which basically stole the revolution from the democratic Mensheviks, replaced the oppressive Czar with Lenin and later Stalin which were more oppressive.

Example #2
Batista, a less oppressive tyrant, was overthrown by a revolution that replaced him with Fidel Castro, a more oppressive tyrant.

This is false revolution. True Revolution should lead to a more free society, not a more oppressive one.''

Hey capitalist, though I disagree with your assessment,
it is an over simplification. Welcome to the club of true revolutionaries, perhaps Malte should let you into the commie club.

Anonymous
13th October 2002, 16:11
"No one who says, "Stalin had nothing to do with Lenin" should ever tell someone else they don't read enough. "

Shut up dirty roman emperorīs lover! lenin expressed his distrust for stalin in his testement!

Lardlad95
13th October 2002, 16:14
Quote: from the anarchist on 4:11 pm on Oct. 13, 2002
"No one who says, "Stalin had nothing to do with Lenin" should ever tell someone else they don't read enough. "

Shut up dirty roman emperorīs lover! lenin expressed his distrust for stalin in his testement!




I think he meant that Stalin and Lenin new each other

Capitalist Imperial
13th October 2002, 17:19
Quote: from the anarchist on 8:59 pm on Oct. 12, 2002
LOL you cappies are geting stupidier everyday!

By the way the nobel prize of peace (my favorite!) is hardly touched by american hands, and when a american wins that prize he normaly unapreciated by normal puritan/right winger classes in america! go read a book CI (and when i say a book i say a BOOK something that really teaches you something not some novel or some stupid romance ) and then talk about american "superiority" with me!


LOL, this quote does not make a whole lot oif sense.

1) Anarchist, I'm pretty confident that I am probably more well read than you and...

2) Why would reading a book change my opinion of american superiority?

canikickit
13th October 2002, 19:13
How many Noble Prizes did US citizens win?

Anonymous
13th October 2002, 19:51
"LOL, this quote does not make a whole lot oif sense.

1) Anarchist, I'm pretty confident that I am probably more well read than you and...

2) Why would reading a book change my opinion of american superiority? "

Have you ever read any Noam Chomsky book? that will give you a hint abouit american "superiority", i bet you read the called "Cnn" books, that teach you that the commies are evil, the chinese are attacking you, liberals are pussys, and Marx was evil, and stalin was a perfect comunist therefore comunism is evil, capitalism is perfect etc... the only good cappie magazine is National Geographic, and i sugest you read it at least read national geographic!

canikickit
13th October 2002, 22:19
National Geographic is great indeed.

antieverything
14th October 2002, 00:28
Carter did what had to be done to save the American economy...then Reagan came in and made things even worse.

Tkinter1
14th October 2002, 01:49
LoL

"i bet you read the called "Cnn" books, that teach you that the commies are evil, the chinese are attacking you, liberals are pussys, and Marx was evil, and stalin was a perfect comunist therefore comunism is evil, capitalism is perfect etc..."

WELL PUT!

What is a Cnn book anyway?

antieverything
14th October 2002, 16:52
Why didn't he just say, "Whites get more Nobel Prizes than non-whites...therefore, whites are superior."

Goldfinger
14th October 2002, 17:36
Ok, cappies, I'm convinced, you made your point. All Americans are superior, exept the leftist ones. I realize now that it's right to kill, as long as you don't kill Americans. And oh, all girls should look like Barbie dolls.*










































































sarcasm

guerrillaradio
14th October 2002, 19:42
You're all forgetting the most important part of this episode: the Norwegian head judge explicitly said that the award of the prize was a deliberate snub to Bush over his Iraq policy. Carter won it for befriending Castro and being anti-war. Haha...even former Presidents of the mickey mouse state are making a stance now. The writing's on the wall...

Moskitto
14th October 2002, 19:52
Hitler was nominated for the peace prize in 1936 for his efforts with the Olympics.

So was Fidel Castro...

canikickit
15th October 2002, 00:28
CI, you little punk, you still haven't told me how many of these pox bucket awards the United States has won.