View Full Version : Al Gore opposes war - will bush listen hmmm No!
peaccenicked
24th September 2002, 15:36
http://www.smh.com.au/cgi-bin/common/popup...2734161501.html (http://www.smh.com.au/cgi-bin/common/popupPrintArticle.pl?path=/articles/2002/09/24/1032734161501.html)
John Difool
24th September 2002, 15:47
hehe .. Gore gores bush ...
hmmm
sorry :)
Stormin Norman
25th September 2002, 08:13
Only an idiot like Peacenicked would use Al Gore as a spokesperson for their position. I have an idea. Why don't you campare and contrast the Al Gore speech to the one made by Tony Blair yesterday. Blair made a similar case to the one I presented earlier last week, but he also had British Intelligence reports to back his assertions. Gore's speech was very weak and offered little insight into the matter. This guy is a moron who has just sealed his political fate. Even his own party members are distancing themselves from this dirt bag. Like Gore, the politics of the left represent a dying breed of ignorance and miscalculation. Soon there will be no liberals left. What a shame. The Republicans will own the Senate and Daschelle will no longer be the Majority leader. Its sad, I know. Historically one party ends up dominating and the other becomes extinct. So long demorats. You are becoming transparent to the entire nation. Democrats=Communists.
vox
25th September 2002, 08:22
SN,
You're stupider than I thought. Using the Blair "dossier" (http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/topic.pl?forum=11&topic=2135) is truly laughable!
So come on, right-winger, where's the evidence that Iraq is a threat to the USA?
I keep asking, and I keep waiting.
vox
Stormin Norman
25th September 2002, 08:29
I heard the whole speech myself. Therefore I don't need left leaning European 'film critics' to tell me what to think. I will leave that kind of non-thinking to you, Vox, who is willing to believe anything as long as it is anti-American. I have already investigated both sides of the issue and have formed my own rational opinions on the matter. I did not need the Guardian of NPR to break it down for me. I was fully capable of understanding the importance of what Blair presented. If you fail to see what is obvious, I can not help you. You choose to remain blind, yet another symptom of your ideological zealotry.
vox
25th September 2002, 08:33
SN,
Once again, where is the proof that Iraq is an imminent threat to the USA?
Where?
Nowhere, of course. Your bloodlust is blinding you to the obvious, which is typical of anti-human right-wingers. Bush hasn't made a case, though he keeps on saying he will, sometime.
Being against an unprovoked attack on Iraq isn't anti-American, it's anti-needless death.
vox
Stormin Norman
25th September 2002, 08:40
Vox,
I presented my case under "Saddam must go". It has plenty of sources, which I am sure you will ignore. I don't need Bush to make the case for me, for I have sought it out myself. Look at the case, I present with credible sources to back my assertions. Look at the facts surrounding the case and then tell me with a straight face that of credible threat does not exist. Fact is you know the truth, but believe the U.S. should be the loser in the world-wide conflict. That is why you take the stance that you do. You are subversive and lust for a time when America has been overthrown and dismantled. You are the one lacking credibilty, not the Prime Minister of England, or the President of the United States of America.
vox
25th September 2002, 08:44
The threat does not exist.
But let's say it does. Then why not allow wepaons inspectors? But you don't want that, do you? You want death and death and more death. I sometimes think that you war-mongers must masturbate over pictures of corpses, so high on killing you are.
Containment has been more than successful, killing people on a daily basis through sanctions. Now, you want more killing.
How very patriotic of you.
vox
Stormin Norman
25th September 2002, 08:57
The rantings of someone who has no concept of the gravity of the current situation. Read the situation reports then come talk to me. Your claim that no evidence exists is getting tiresome. No matter how large the mountain of evidence gets you will still be left with your same pathetic argument. I through talking at you. You don't have the capacity to understand.
vox
25th September 2002, 09:02
SN,
So where is the evidence? Does Iraq have an ICBM? Everyone seems to agree that the answer is no. Has Iraq threatened anyone? Again, everyone seems to agree that the answer is no. Is Iraq's military as large as it was when the Gulf War was started? Once again, everyone seems to believe that the answer is no.
Yet, somehow, Iraq is the biggest threat to the USA out of all the countries in the world? All rational people agree that the answer is no, but you say that the answer is yes.
Nope. Zero credibility. Go back to reading the paper of a religious cult, right-winger. Your bullshit is no good here.
vox
Stormin Norman
25th September 2002, 09:06
Tell me where I said the are 'the biggest' threat out of all the nations?
vox
25th September 2002, 09:08
If they aren't the biggest threat, then where do you rank the threat, war-monger? And, of course, why aren't inspections effective against a country that isn't a threat?
vox
(Edited by vox at 4:09 am on Sep. 25, 2002)
Stormin Norman
25th September 2002, 09:13
I got homework, *****. I thought I made it clear that I had to quit hanging out with the ghetto crowd. Use your imagination. Tell me where you thik it lies, and I will tell you if you are correct. Let's see if you know your opponent well enough to deduce that about me. So long.
vox
25th September 2002, 09:22
Yet another non-response from the boy who expects us to take him seriously when he offers nothing in the way of fact.
How funny.
vox
RedCeltic
25th September 2002, 17:08
Quote: from Stormin Norman on 3:13 am on Sep. 25, 2002
I got homework, *****. I thought I made it clear that I had to quit hanging out with the ghetto crowd. Use your imagination. Tell me where you thik it lies, and I will tell you if you are correct. Let's see if you know your opponent well enough to deduce that about me. So long.
Translation: I have no idea what I'm talking about, can ya throw me a bone here Vox? ... ha ha ha ha.....
Stormin Norman
25th September 2002, 17:53
Yeah right, Red Celtic, that must be it.
Michael De Panama
25th September 2002, 23:40
Quote: from Stormin Norman on 3:13 am on Sep. 25, 2002
I got homework, *****. I thought I made it clear that I had to quit hanging out with the ghetto crowd. Use your imagination. Tell me where you thik it lies, and I will tell you if you are correct. Let's see if you know your opponent well enough to deduce that about me. So long.
I think this right here is clear evidence that Vox knows his opponent well enough. You have no proof. Now you're asking the left to find it for you. This is by far the most pathetic thing I've ever seen a rightwinger do.
If you don't yourself even know what your own reasons are for supporting homicide, don't say you support it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.