Brian-here's to you, my boy!!!!!!!!!! - suckin'-my-dick!

[American Kid]

I'd put this in Chit Chat, but- well, well you know......


Mmmm, I'm a suck up to authority......? Um, right. Yeah, uh, righttt......Mmmm, yeah, um, righttttt. Yeah, in regards to the "sucking up to authority" thing...yeah....

I can count on one hand the number of times I've ever actually addressed Malte personally. This number is so low, I believe it would be equal to, if not (then hardly) greater to the number of times you've probably felt a female breast. It's that low.

ps, they're soft.

Anyway, good moves. The one time you personally address me, you do it as time-delay bomb; drop it, then run like hell. The definition of courage if you ask me. Anyway, fuck it. You were, unequivocally, unmatchedly the most uninteresting, least consequential member to ever post here. I'm being serious.

And you're not even funny. It's not even funny.

Um, and you suck. And as far as me "ass-kissing" authority, go back and read my responses to the great "cappie-Chit Chat purge of 07/02" when it first happened. I believe I was one of the first to respond, and I believe my response was somewhere along the lines of: "fuck it."

To this day I still have no idea what I'm doing there. It has something to do with J and Guerillaradio or something and that's all I know. So, go fuck yourself.

Good riddance. You are the only person here who I ever truly wished would leave. I'm perfectly serious about this. When I read the name of your thread it was the first thought in my head and I decided that's what I was going to write in response.

Then you had to go and embarass yourself even further. Oh, well. You're used to that.

-AK


(Edited by American Kid at 10:38 pm on Sep. 5, 2002)

[American Kid]

By the way, omg, Malte I almost forgot:

xoxoxoxo ;) AK

(Edited by American Kid at 10:51 pm on Sep. 5, 2002)

[Felicia]

lol :)

[RedCeltic]

I've wondered for a very long time why people think that Malte is some sort of leader or something. I mean... the guy has a website on the internet. Yea... ok that's nice. But yea know what people... you don't live at Che-Lives.com.

Malte actually has less power in your life than your teacher/boss, bus driver, or the girl behind the counter at your local fast food joint.

[Sasafrás]

Quote: from RedCeltic on 6:57 pm on Sep. 5, 2002
Malte actually has less power in your life than... the girl behind the counter at your local fast food joint. Or the Russian girl behind the counter at your local CVS Pharmacy. :)

[Lardlad95]

Quote: from La Rainbeaux on 1:15 am on Sep. 6, 2002

Quote: from RedCeltic on 6:57 pm on Sep. 5, 2002
Malte actually has less power in your life than... the girl behind the counter at your local fast food joint. Or the Russian girl behind the counter at your local CVS Pharmacy. :)

or that chinese/black girl in my bed

[American Kid]

"Yana"......:)

Previet! My name is-
aw, fuck it! Forget it! Just forget!

*scampers off*
-AK

[new democracy]

Quote: from American Kid on 10:35 pm on Sep. 5, 2002

I can count on one hand the number of times I've ever actually addressed Malte personally. This number is so low, I believe it would be equal to, if not (then hardly) greater to the number of times you've probably felt a female breast. It's that low.

ps, they're soft.

don't take as an insult, but that is immature. and yes i felt that more than you.

[American Kid]

First of all you contradicted yourself (?)

And second of all, who asked?????

And thirdly, uh, why?
-AK

[new democracy]

i contradict myself???? how?

[American Kid]

By turning this into "our" fucking "tit" contest of which even I, the distinguished "American Kid" (crowd guffaws), refuse to fucking be a part of.

After all, this is Brian's party.

-AK

(Edited by American Kid at 2:58 am on Sep. 6, 2002)

[new democracy]

o.k sorry. i didn't understand you so well, but so what. and brian sucks.

[American Kid]

Hey, yeah! Brian does suck!

*cheers!*

*New Democracy and AK dance a jig, friends again*

"Hey, Brian? Fuck you, Tony!!!!!!!!!"

-AK

[Sasafrás]

Where the fizz-uck is Brian anyway?

[American Kid]

six words: NAMBLA

[Sasafrás]

Quote: from American Kid on 9:12 pm on Sep. 5, 2002
six words: NAMBLAWords?

[American Kid]

Somebody explain this to her because................because I just don't want to :)

*gags*

-AK

(no offense, Shayla)

(try it on a browser---eyeet! Second though, DON'T try it on a browser :) )

[I Will Deny You]

National Association of Man-Boy Lovers, I think.

Lindsay

[American Kid]

:) AK

(yuck, huh?)

[I Will Deny You]

What does the A on the end stand for though?

(I can't believe we're actually talking about this.)

Lindsay

[American Kid]

Okay, here we go.....(uh, somebody told me this....uh, and that's how I know):

it is *ahem* the North American Man/Boy Love Association. And I'm not saying this is verified, I'm not saying this is a FACT (though we all KNOW it is) but it's just that what I've heard is.......Brian is chairman of the Canandian sector.

HEY! It's just what I heard........

-AK

[Anonymous]

Quote: from American Kid on 8:58 am on Sep. 6, 2002


it is *ahem* the North American Man/Boy Love Association.



Thats sick. I wasn't even aware that such an organization existed. :shocked:

[RedCeltic]

I didn't know that existed myself. I thought Southpark made it up.

They have a website obviously.

http://www.nambla1.de/

(Edited by RedCeltic at 9:45 am on Sep. 6, 2002)

[new democracy]

yuck!!!! i saw that on south park but i thought it is only a joke.

[Sasafrás]

That's horrible... I never saw it on South Park though.

[American Kid]

And to think, the Canadian chairman was a patron of this board..........

-AK

[Felicia]

Quote: from American Kid on 7:26 pm on Sep. 6, 2002
And to think, the Canadian chairman was a patron of this board..........

-AK
shit? really! (or are you referring to Brian?)

[American Kid]

Felicia.......c'mon!

Didn't you see how Brian was looking at I Bow 4 Che?

-AK

[I Bow 4 Che]

looking at me? what?? Im a girl...Im so confused!!! Dont use my name when referring to such an organizaton

[American Kid]

You're right...........The fuck was I thinking?

Well, here's how I rectify it: Brian thought you were a boy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-AK

(Laura, you are but a victim in this; fret not)

[I Bow 4 Che]

*cry* WHY ME????

:(
:(

In its relevence please don't use "that" prefix...Im getting all paranoid now....

[Anonymous]

A gay Canadian pedophile......my god.


(Edited by Dark Capitalist at 11:03 am on Sep. 7, 2002)

[Stormin Norman]

NAMBLA is the perfect example of what sort of perversions the left would have us accept in our society. The ACLU has defended them on many occasions concerning free speech issues. I agree with free speech, but this organization goes above and beyond simply talking about pedophilia, they engage in it. The ACLU has no obligation to defend their claim, as they could refuse to take NAMBLA's case. Being a leftist organization, their true agenda lies in defiling the American judicial system until it is no longer recognizable, and degrading the morale fabric of our society until we destroy ourselves from the inside. I don't know which is worse NAMBLA or the ACLU. Either way our children get fucked.

[vox]

"I agree with free speech, but this organization goes above and beyond simply talking about pedophilia, they engage in it."

Does the ACLU defend the actions or the speech? The ACLU has also defended the KKK's right to free speech. Is the KKK now a "liberal" organization?

The first amendment protects even the most vile rhetoric. Indeed, that may be the most important speech of all to defend, for the encroachment on that right begins at the fringes but ends up in the middle.

Don't hurt yourself trying to understand this, SN.

vox

[Stormin Norman]

I understand your argument, Vox. No need to resort to personal insults like you always do. In fact, I will concede that the ACLU has taken up some good causes. More and more, it seems that they go out of their way to defend the utterly ridiculous. I would say 35% of the time I find myself agreeing with their positions.

Do you really think that I would jump to the conclusion that the KKK is a liberal organization, simply because a liberal group defended their position? That would be almost as ridiculous as adopting your worldview, Vox.

My argument lies in the fact that NAMBLA is more than an organization devoted to talking about child porn. They are engaged in the dissemination of such material and commit crimes against children. Are you defending such activity, Vox? If so you are definitely coming down on the wrong side on this one. Do you consider child pornography to be a free speech issue as well? It amazes me how blind you liberals are sometimes. I would expect more from even you, Vox.

[vox]

As I already posted, and you, as usual, ignored: "Does the ACLU defend the actions or the speech?"

See, SN, I already drew the distinction you claim I didn't.

This has nothing to do with porn, and you know that. I think you're desperately trying to change the subject, but those days are over.

The subject here is whether the ACLU is defending speech or not. I say yes. SN, are you denying that? You even said that they were. The problem, as you seem to see it if, perhaps, you could write more clearly, is that you don't like the group. Either do I. That's not the issue.

You wrote: "Being a leftist organization, their true agenda lies in defiling the American judicial system until it is no longer recognizable, and degrading the morale fabric of our society until we destroy ourselves from the inside. I don't know which is worse NAMBLA or the ACLU. Either way our children get fucked."

That's clearly prejudicial and not backed up by any facts at all. It's nothing but rhetoric.

Which is why I brought up the Klan, which, by the way, has been known to kill black people, so one could say that this organization doesn't just "talk" about white superiority but acts on it, too. It's not about Left or right, but about the first amendment.

That's what the ACLU defends.

Your McCarthyite "guilt by association" doesn't fly here.

vox

[Stormin Norman]

You dipshit. If you can not see the ethical dilemma that a organization concerned with civil rights and upholding justice would face when accepting the case of an group that routinely infringes on the rights of children, then their is no hope for you. What about that kid's right not to be raped by grown men? Whose rights do you suppose are of greater importance to me? There are countless other free-speech cases that the ACLU could have taken instead NABMLA's. If free speech were the true agenda, the ACLU could have sought other avenues. I hold true to my original stance on the subject, and continue to find you to be a despicable human being. Your days of pretending to care for humanity are over, Vox. You care more about the rights of NAMBLA then the children you claim to hold dear.

[Storman Normin]

Yes, dipshits.
I shalt kick thy sorry arses for your treason and tratorship. You see, it is acceptable for I, the upper class to use freedom of speech,but the lower class may not talk, due to their inferiority.

-----
Whatever the answer, we should refuse to let science become the dogma that subjugates the masses like the religion of the Dark Ages. Every legitimate claim should have evidence to support its claim, but if further investigation rules that theory improbable that theory should be abandoned and replaced with a better explanation.
-Stormin Norman 2002-2002

[vox]

SN,

Has the ACLU ever said that child molesters should not be prosecuted? Have I?

You're filthy lies have now gone beyond a casual disregard for the truth and into a disgusting arena of personal villification for which there is no excuse. Do you understand that? NO EXCUSE AT ALL.

So desparately are you flailing at me now that you've become a joke. You can try to obfuscate the issue, but anyone can see through your idiotic attempt at what I've already pointed out is McCarthyite "guilt by association."

I support the ACLU when it defends the KKK. Does that make me a member of the Klan?

vox

SN's post, lest he delete it:

You dipshit. If you can not see the ethical dilemma that a organization concerned with civil rights and upholding justice would face when accepting the case of an group that routinely infringes on the rights of children, then their is no hope for you. What about that kid's right not to be raped by grown men? Whose rights do you suppose are of greater importance to me? There are countless other free-speech cases that the ACLU could have taken instead NABMLA's. If free speech were the true agenda, the ACLU could have sought other avenues. I hold true to my original stance on the subject, and continue to find you to be a despicable human being. Your days of pretending to care for humanity are over, Vox. You care more about the rights of NAMBLA then the children you claim to hold dear.

[American Kid]

Nevermind, Malte

:) AK

[I Will Deny You]

I understand that most of what I say will simply be a reiteration of what vox has already said. But since Stormin Norman keeps misinterpreting what vox says, we just have to keep repeating ourselves.
Quote: from Stormin Norman on 8:34 am on Sep. 7, 2002
You dipshit. If you can not see the ethical dilemma that a organization concerned with civil rights and upholding justice would face when accepting the case of an group that routinely infringes on the rights of children, then their is no hope for you. What about that kid's right not to be raped by grown men? Whose rights do you suppose are of greater importance to me? There are countless other free-speech cases that the ACLU could have taken instead NABMLA's. If free speech were the true agenda, the ACLU could have sought other avenues. I hold true to my original stance on the subject, and continue to find you to be a despicable human being. Your days of pretending to care for humanity are over, Vox. You care more about the rights of NAMBLA then the children you claim to hold dear.The ACLU does not decide to take cases based on how much they like the defendants. They take cases based on how much the First Amendment is threatened. If an orphanage's free speech were threatened more than NAMBLA's, the orphanage would get more help from ACLU lawyers.

The ACLU is not a civil rights organization. It is a civil liberties organization. The right to molest a child and the right to burn a black person alive are not guaranteed by the First Amendment, but those things also don't violate it. But the ACLU has also worked with children's rights organizations and civil rights organizations. It doesn't only work against them.

Lindsay

[Brian]

It's obvious American Kid was a homosexual.

[Anonymous]

You know what they say about those who constantly accuse other people of being gay......

[American Kid]

And what's "was".....?

And I'm not. :)

-AK