WHY ARE THE AUTHORITARIAN COMRADES GONE - I leave for a few

[RGacky3]

If you have an explenation Malte please tell me, becouse that really sucks that TS and who ever else you banned are banned.

[Xvall]

TS knows the rules. He was banned because he is a nazi. I'm with this whole 'community unity' thing too, but he's a nazi. The rest of the authoriatarian communist obviously left because they couldn't handle it.

[Michael De Panama]

They are not our "comrades", God damn it. The don't represent my movement. Fuck off with your community unity bullshit.

[Nateddi]

If they are not on the board, I wouldn't expect them to answer to this. lol

[Nateddi]

btw gacky, wtf happened to your computer? trying to wank it for money?

[Xvall]

Quote: from Michael De Panama on 10:23 pm on Aug. 30, 2002
They are not our "comrades", God damn it. The don't represent my movement. Fuck off with your community unity bullshit.


I never said they were 'comrades'.

[Michael De Panama]

No, Gacky did.

But yeah, if you want to see all your old fascist friends again, go to The Phora.

[new democracy]

Quote: from Drake Dracoli on 9:15 pm on Aug. 30, 2002
The rest of the authoriatarian communist obviously left because they couldn't handle it.

mazadak didn't leave. and the fact that malte ban ts doesn't matter because he can still(and he does)post as a guest.

(Edited by new democracy at 10:57 pm on Aug. 30, 2002)


(Edited by new democracy at 11:47 pm on Aug. 30, 2002)

[American Kid]

This is an interesting dilemma.

Good evening, I'm the- aw, fuck it.

I have to admit my first reaction is to favor letting the authorative fellows stay. As bizarre as this sounds, they're interesting. Now it goes without saying you'd sooner find me sucking cock for crack before you'd ever find me subscribing in any way to any of their ideaologies, but it's fascinating to pick their brains nonetheless. Their ilke aren't exactly a dime a dozen over here on the eastern coast of MA.

But I'm reminded that this is, to a degree, a "private" forum, run by a guy who retains the power to disinvite anyone he chooses to, at anytime, for any reason. We all know this (or should), and we all have to respect it.

But that's minor, and to a certain degree, worth fighting against. After all, just because Malte makes a judgement, doesn't mean we should accept it unequivocally. Not that he's some horrible, omniscient, oppresive presence hovering over and exploiting us for his own devices. But we should, if given good reason, be able to second guess him, and, if merited, hopefully influence him in some way.

That said, I sort of believe that if I'm so eager (or anyone else is) to debate (prod?) authoratarian psuedo-nazis on-line, then your place is some dungeon like the Lyceum. Which is a place I don't like to go to.

If you don't like that the authoratarians got the boot, it's worth making a stink about. Just don't stink too bad; look where it got them.

Personally, I'd let 'em. But it's not my site. Fin.

Welcome back Gacky. Watch what you say :)

-AK

(Edited by American Kid at 12:01 am on Aug. 31, 2002)

[Michael De Panama]

Actually, Gacky, you've got a new bunch of authoritarians to play grab-ass with now that Maoist3 and the other new Stalinists I can't remember are here.

You know, If I started calling capitalists "communists", you'd probably defend them too, wouldn't you?

[new democracy]

the new stalinists is called cassius klay.

[new democracy]

and redrevolutionary said that communists have to execute right wingers. i hate stalinists!!!! long live democracy!!!!

[Mazdak]

RGacky3 Is back. Welcome back. Yes, Thine
stalin was one banned and i am surprised SS hasn't been already. Well, we are in a stalinist shortage so it is good to have a defender of the cause.