Chit chat

[American Kid]

The clock was ticking for a long time anyway. I knew it. Fuck it.

-AK

[Anonymous]

damn.

[Capitalist Imperial]

what happened?

[Capitalist Imperial]

WTF Malte?

We didn't bring politics into that forum! We used language and tones comensurate with the atmosphere in chit-chat! What is the problem?

What is the grounds for reversing your decision?

[guerrillaradio]

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 10:45 pm on Aug. 6, 2002
what happened?


Let's see...you were an insensitive twat.

[Dynatos]

well i think it was mostly CI that pissed of everyone by constently making fun of others and the comments you cappies made about suicide wasn't exactly smart on your part.

[Anonymous]

I think what happened in the thread "The Revolution will not be televised" was the straw that broke the camels back.

[Capitalist Imperial]

So, basically, no one is accountable for insults to cappies, but we are accountable for retorts in kind.

Incredible.

[I Will Deny You]

But what did AK do?

Lindsay

[Capitalist Imperial]

Actually, I think AK still has access. Go look, he posted there after the ban was effective. Perhaps malte considers him moderate enough to allow him to stay.

Oh, well, more power to him.

[Capitalist Imperial]

This is just ridiculous.

If it was over the "Revolution will not be televised" thread, then I must cry injustice!

Mentalbunny comes onto this board, and gets right into the fray of this board, with a graphic, suggestive avatar, she talks mess, hurls insults, and then comes out with this freakin' sob-story!

Of course the wussy-ass leftists here just eat it up, and even though she volunteered this information in what she had to have known was a no-holds barred board, all of these whining liberals make me the bad guy for mentioning it.

Not in an unprovoked attack, mind you, but in a response to her blatantly insulting me!

The situation is laughable, to say the least.

[vox]

"with a graphic, suggestive avatar" (from CI's post)

Really, does anyone here have any use for this guy anymore?

vox

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from vox on 11:59 pm on Aug. 6, 2002
"with a graphic, suggestive avatar" (from CI's post)

Really, does anyone here have any use for this guy anymore?

vox

Forget you, Vox, I was indicating that by her very posture she was far from a hapless victim.

(Edited by Capitalist Imperial at 12:18 am on Aug. 7, 2002)

[American Kid]

Capitalist Imperial commands as much respect here as most lefties (and I'm not talkin' 'bout pemanship). They even say so themselves, often. This is based on direct quotes I've read here (I'll try to go back and site some; irresponsible journalism, I know).

The point is, he's bright and can bust out with the numbers and stats, cowboy style, clearly and effeciently. So, I would say a number of people have use for him. Even you vox, as his presence here provides a convenient crutch to gauge your own ignorance and inadequacy.

Ohh.......The Kid and Vox are goin' back and forth again.....Ohh.........

No lookit vox, (ugh, I hate this) I don't.......................I don't.....................lookit, just listen...................I um, you see what it is, is................................I uh......................I don't....I don't ........just shut up and listen! ............I don't ..........................uh, see............................................... ..I don't..........hate you.

Okay there it is. I said it. You're still a monotnous, one-trick pony, no-longer-interesting wiseass. Really, you're worse than me. But anyway, see you in Chit Chat. :)

No, I apologize. It was infantile. I severely dislike you, but I couldn't hate anyone of whom all I know is text I've read written by them on the information superhighway. I may have moderately right-wing leanings, but I'm not fucking------retarded. I'll take it you were intelligent enough to not take it personally. I tremble at the thought, but in "real-life" for all I know you might be a good guy. For all I know you're my hemotologist.

Then again for all I know it's the drugs talking.

-AK

(btw, if you're wondering what our friend Bush has planned for Iraq, just check out old WW2 stock -footage of Cologne being bombed by thousand plane fleets from England. Hopefully. Praise allah)

(Edited by American Kid at 12:33 am on Aug. 7, 2002)


(Edited by American Kid at 12:34 am on Aug. 7, 2002)

[vox]

AK,

Huh? Uh, yeah....

I will, however, take you up on your offer to provide some quotes from CI that show how "bright" he is. Better yet, just leave links to the appropriate pages of whatever threads you find, adding any clarification you feel is necessary. That way you won't have to explain the situation for the quote to make sense. See how nice I am?

vox

[Capitalist Imperial]

Thanks, AK

[IzmSchism]

AK have you been naughty since I have been away, what is this all about???

ps: I am a provaceteur.....wink!

[American Kid]

Schizm, how-the-fuck-are-you, my man? Fuckin' A, nice to see my bud back.

Actually, ACTUALLY, I've toned my act down a bit, and it's my bunkmates (SN, CI) who've been writing the inflammatory counterrevolutionary propaganda lately. Hell, I just posted in Chit Chat.

vox,

zah.....?

You read what I said. And you can consider it done and done. I'll do quotes later (seriously, this is going to be a project, and I want to watch 7 Samurai on DVD).

But they're there (I can think of things James and Nateddi have said off the top of my head. I'll go back and more and put em up later.)

see how nice I can be?

-AK

[IzmSchism]

I just got 7 Samurai on criterion last month, grrrrrrrrreeeat movie, Akira is god. well he is my god.

[new democracy]

cappis should be allowed in to chit-chat. and not only chit-chat but also politics, history, music, thory, etc........ this is the most undemocratic that i ever seen!!!(james if you are going to say something about your avatar, i told you: I CANGED MY MIND ABOUT IT!!!!

[vox]

Sure, AK.

I'm not sure, however, what James and Nateddi have to do with this. Mind explaining your reasons to the class? I mean, I could pick a couple of people at random and quote them, too, but I really don't understand the purpose of it. So, if you don't mind, a bit of explanation would be appreciated.

vox

[Anonymous]

I suport Malte´s action, i was against the idea of capitalist beiong in the Chit chat since the begining!

[PunkRawker677]

Vox,

You can qoute me!

CI and SN are fucking morons!

[new democracy]

che lives=undemocratic forum

[vox]

PunkRawker,

Hee! I'm actually really looking forward to seeing some proof of CI's brightness. Perhaps I just missed those threads? Maybe.

Or maybe AK is on a wild goose chase. We'll see.

Hopefully, it will be fun at least.

vox

[PunkRawker677]

New Democracy: Don't talk about what you don't know. We all vote on issues concerning the board in the Commie Club. And Chit Chat was just an experiment, so to speak, to see if the right-wingers could contain themselves. Ak, as we all know, can contain himself.

[Dan Majerle]

Shouldn't everybody participate in these elections, not just us privileged members of a forum that can not be accessed by all. Of course Malte decides but if he wants to ascribe to democracy he should in my opinion do it properly. It's like us voting on whether there should be fox hunting, and all those in favour of it are barred from voting. That doesn't make sense. But hten again this isn't a government so you can't really do much about it.

[new democracy]

your right!!!

[vox]

Right-wingers used to have access to all of the forums. The current situation is a response to the problems that they created. The original reason for the Commie Club was so people would be able to get away from right-wing trolls who disrupted every thread. That was before they were simply restricted to one forum on the board.

As for democracy, feel free to start your own message board, or your own site, for that matter.

vox

[new democracy]

"I suport Malte´s action, i was against the idea of capitalist beiong in the Chit chat since the begining!". why would an anarchist support anti democratic policies?

[Brian]

Malte, you whore.


(Edited by Brian at 8:01 pm on Aug. 9, 2002)

[PunkRawker677]

Well, i see it as being democratic for a fucking message board. This isnt a god-dammed country. If we vote ban the cappies, should we ask the cappies "should we ban you".. ? lol.. The commie club is for all left wingers (considering this is a LEFTIST message board) that post over 50 times (i am sure in order to make sure they are actually dedicated members and not just one day members)... Like Vox said, if you don't like it, start your own message board.

[PunkRawker677]

Go away Brian.

[Brian]

Go to hell!

[PunkRawker677]

Damn Brian. I was supporting you for the past few days, thinking you had changed. But as i see it, your still a troll.

[concerned]

And why am I being banned from chit-chat?

I don't even go there that often and have never posted anything political in there. Why????


(Edited by concerned at 4:58 am on Aug. 7, 2002)

[PunkRawker677]

That may have been a mistake. Or perhaps Malte just banned Right-Wingers as a whole, save AK, from chit chat.

[Anonymous]

"why would an anarchist support anti democratic policies? "

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
let me laugh!

[new democracy]

"HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
let me laugh!"
translation: i have no legitimate response(to the cappis sorry for stiling your joke).

[Stormin Norman]

Why would an anarchist support such undemocratic policies? I think by anarchy he means the murder, mayhem, and starvation caused by communist ideology. That is the sort of chaos he supports.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from PunkRawker677 on 1:31 am on Aug. 7, 2002
Vox,

You can qoute me!

CI and SN are fucking morons!


Shut up, dude, I can tell by your posts that you are ignorant, and you have never submitted one thing of substance on this board.

You, sir, are the imbecile.

[Stormin Norman]

Come to think of it I can't think of one outstanding post of PunkRawker's.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from vox on 1:42 am on Aug. 7, 2002
PunkRawker,

Hee! I'm actually really looking forward to seeing some proof of CI's brightness. Perhaps I just missed those threads? Maybe.

Or maybe AK is on a wild goose chase. We'll see.

Hopefully, it will be fun at least.

vox


Oh, of course, rest assured Vox will be an unbiased, objective judge of weather or not my posts warrant a rating of "bright" or "intelligent".

I guess he is the omnipotent judge of all intelligence.

I could submit a working theory and application for cold fusion, and most leftists here would still refuse to acknowledge any intelligence on my part.

Thats ok, it is typical of commies and other leftists on this board. I don't agree with their political stance , so I am an "idiot".

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from Stormin Norman on 4:41 pm on Aug. 7, 2002
Come to think of it I can't think of one outstanding post of PunkRawker's.


There isn't one, he is among the most irrelevant, benign menbers of the board.

SN, my friend, apparently they have re-caged us, auschwitz-style.

Of course, I'm not suprised. Apparently they can't take it as good as they dish it out.

[PunkRawker677]

You've never seen a post by me, because i dont post in this piece-of-shit section of the board. I don't support this forum being here and therefore dont come in here.

You can tell by a post that was a "joke" (ever heard of those?) that i am the most ignorant person on the board? Who is the fucking right-winger who spends his free time on a Che board?

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from PunkRawker677 on 11:23 pm on Aug. 7, 2002
You've never seen a post by me, because i dont post in this piece-of-shit section of the board. I don't support this forum being here and therefore dont come in here.

You can tell by a post that was a "joke" (ever heard of those?) that i am the most ignorant person on the board? Who is the fucking right-winger who spends his free time on a Che board?


He is the right winger who likes a challenge, instead of going to a board full of people that agree with you so you can talk mess unopposed.

[PunkRawker677]

You assume that all of us are in complete agreement (all of us leftists), well I guess you werent here for the rivalry betwee peace and vox or the battles between the socialists and the stalinists, or maybe you werent here when it was the zionist jews vs. the non-zionist jews. We dont need you here to debate.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from PunkRawker677 on 12:36 am on Aug. 8, 2002
You assume that all of us are in complete agreement (all of us leftists), well I guess you werent here for the rivalry betwee peace and vox or the battles between the socialists and the stalinists, or maybe you werent here when it was the zionist jews vs. the non-zionist jews. We dont need you here to debate.

Yeah, debates between the liberals and stalinists were weak, that would be like a debate between the electric chair and the gas chamber. They use different operating principles, but acheive the same ends.

[Michael De Panama]

What the hell do you mean "the same ends"? The authoritarian commies wanted to have a society of permanent class division, the libertarian commies want to have a society of no class divisions. They're complete opposite goals. Come on, you can't be THAT stupid.

[Mazdak]

No.. They have the same goals,just different methods.

One uses realism and logic, the other uses a "magic cauldron" of gambling, bad logic, and a complete lack of understanding Human behavior.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from Michael De Panama on 1:24 am on Aug. 8, 2002
What the hell do you mean "the same ends"? The authoritarian commies wanted to have a society of permanent class division, the libertarian commies want to have a society of no class divisions. They're complete opposite goals. Come on, you can't be THAT stupid.


It is you, MDP, that can't be stupid enough to think the libreral dream won't evovlve into the authortarian reality.

[vox]

Hmmm. I know that AK was here tonight, but I don't see the "threads of brilliance" that I was promised. Why is that, I wonder. Perhaps AK is a typical right-winger and simply lied, or perhaps he just couldn't find any examples.

Whatever the case, I can't say that I'm surprised that there was no follow through. Not surprised at all.

vox

[Shyne]

this is gay.. im not a capitalist.. im a democratic socialist.. malte please let me in to cc and chit chit

[Stormin Norman]

Mazdak,

That is the best thing I have ever heard you say. It is entirely true.

[Mazdak]

Wow, thank you stormin norman...... i guess....

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from vox on 5:16 am on Aug. 8, 2002
Hmmm. I know that AK was here tonight, but I don't see the "threads of brilliance" that I was promised. Why is that, I wonder. Perhaps AK is a typical right-winger and simply lied, or perhaps he just couldn't find any examples.

Whatever the case, I can't say that I'm surprised that there was no follow through. Not surprised at all.

vox


Of courese, as I said in a previous post, it is good to know that Vox will be the absolute judge of what is and is not intelligent, brilliant, or relevant.

Rest assured his analysis and opinion will be objective and without prejudice.

[Michael De Panama]

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 4:58 am on Aug. 8, 2002
It is you, MDP, that can't be stupid enough to think the libreral dream won't evovlve into the authortarian reality.

It's a shame you're too stubborn and arrogant for me to even have a chance to cure your own ignorance. Apples are not going to evolve into oranges. What kind of logic is that?

[Capitalist Imperial]

Quote: from Michael De Panama on 6:47 pm on Aug. 8, 2002

Quote: from Capitalist Imperial on 4:58 am on Aug. 8, 2002
It is you, MDP, that can't be stupid enough to think the libreral dream won't evovlve into the authortarian reality.

It's a shame you're too stubborn and arrogant for me to even have a chance to cure your own ignorance. Apples are not going to evolve into oranges. What kind of logic is that?

MDP, we've gone over this several times.

The liberals insist that the capitalists don't undestand the difference betwen Marx's utopia and Stalin's regime.

We do.

We undestand that the liberals' view of what communism should be is very different than what it has been in reality. We understand that.

What we are saying is that whenever a nation attempts the utopian paradise, human nature (yes, i am using that term, however you want to define it) takes over, and it evolves into an authoritarin regime.

I doubt any workers supporting revolution intend to prop up an oppresive totalitarian state, but that is what seems to happen.

History shows us this.

[American Kid]

vox, the Kid has a life, and so therefore must unfortunately sometimes put aside his "cyber-adventures" in order to live it. So, relax. I haven't forgotten.

Don't let you're envy hit you on the toe, as a structure of that size and mass would surely shatter it. Dick.

-AK

[Stormin Norman]

Ahh, hatred in its purest form. God I love it. Really, what is with you and Vox, AK? Was it his critique of your review on "Fight Club"? Could it possibly be his magnanimous nature that you love so much?

[Michael De Panama]

CI, no nation has attempted to do what Marxist theory advocates. Every single so-called "communist" revolution has taken place in a nation of little industrialization and a very small or nonexistant proletariat. It isn't about human nature, it's about bourgeois nature. Not one so-called "communist" nation has attempted democracy. Every single one intentionally propped up the authoritarian regime.

[Moskitto]

I don't know what happened, I just returned from the land of no internet.