kidicarus20
6th August 2002, 05:59
Which do you think is worse out of these two systems: conservatism--Like what the modern day republicans support, or anarcho-capitaism--fuckin nonsense.
It's a tough Choice, technically in conservatism we keep a government, and keep the constitution, and keep the voting system, meaning people could vote to change things (only conservatism kills off the opposition by whatever means or policy necessary and gives us a far right or center right choice). Of course conservatives say they will protect the constitution but they trample all over it to get their way; the religious right of america led by fuckin nazi's such as Pat Robertson and Jerry falwell have worked hard to ban anything and everything that they dont like--mainly art, music, and video games--in the early 90's the religious right blamed the Sega corporation for the sins of their children and called for an all out ban on violent video games, interestingly Nintendo is the one that provided the videos of the violent parts of video games like mortal kombat and night trap for the hearings, trying to wreck segas image to make a profit, so conservatives support banning things and putting corporatiosn that produce things that they like on top, there are countless other areas where they attack free speech, somehow buying politicians and installing htem in office is simple "free speech" but video games, music, and art are not; Conservatives are also pro-death penalty, including the execution of the mentally retarded with the only exception being if you've been mentally retarded since the age of 12 or something (the same kind of policy certain states have on funding the mentally challenged), thus someone who became mentally challenged from a drug over dose could be executed--the worst of it is a mentally challenged person obviously isn't going to have any kind of message sent to him by the state, and for the fact that the death penalty isn't a deterrent; Conservatives are also anti-abortion, and they are against many other social freedoms.
They are nazi's.
But then theres anarcho-capitalists, who actually believe in freedom of choice (like abortion, free speech or whatever), or do they? Things like abortion would only be availble to the rich, the poor would have to their back alley abortion clinic is clean and safe, free speech means corporations can own 90 percent of the media, or 100 percent, there is no conflict of interest, it's about brainwashing people into their system. It's a system based on private property with the capitalist government there to protect it, if you can't get a job according to your skills your either fucked or you have to submit your life to something you do not want to do, just because there is no current market for what you're god at, althought it may be important in the long run. It allows various monopolies to control peoples lives and it puts the greedy people (the cheats, the thieves, the liars, etc..) on top, just because they knew how to market. it's high inequality, a dumb fuck on wal-street could be making more than a hard working coal minor. I think it takes away peoples freedom and allows one person at the top "freedom" to destroy.
I also hate libertarians like the ones at lp.org, they are jsut nerds, it's a philosophy 100 percetn for nerds by nerds, there is no culture is music to it, they put business ahead of art and stuff, even though art and music have been shown to benefit humans. It's everything monly.
The people who support it are scum.
For me it's a really hard choice, techincally conservatives are anarcho-capitalists but they just want the government to enforce the rules (private property, the protection of patents, etc..) instead of private corporations, and they have a war machine to annhilate whoever they want, but still i wouldn't think conservatives would gain the power to complete abolish free speech, or libraries or public schools, like capitalism would.
so it's a tough choice but overall i hate anarcho-capitalism, it's ultra-rightist bullshit, i'd say it's the exact opposite of what i support and my most hated political system or philosophy (if you can call it that).
It's a tough Choice, technically in conservatism we keep a government, and keep the constitution, and keep the voting system, meaning people could vote to change things (only conservatism kills off the opposition by whatever means or policy necessary and gives us a far right or center right choice). Of course conservatives say they will protect the constitution but they trample all over it to get their way; the religious right of america led by fuckin nazi's such as Pat Robertson and Jerry falwell have worked hard to ban anything and everything that they dont like--mainly art, music, and video games--in the early 90's the religious right blamed the Sega corporation for the sins of their children and called for an all out ban on violent video games, interestingly Nintendo is the one that provided the videos of the violent parts of video games like mortal kombat and night trap for the hearings, trying to wreck segas image to make a profit, so conservatives support banning things and putting corporatiosn that produce things that they like on top, there are countless other areas where they attack free speech, somehow buying politicians and installing htem in office is simple "free speech" but video games, music, and art are not; Conservatives are also pro-death penalty, including the execution of the mentally retarded with the only exception being if you've been mentally retarded since the age of 12 or something (the same kind of policy certain states have on funding the mentally challenged), thus someone who became mentally challenged from a drug over dose could be executed--the worst of it is a mentally challenged person obviously isn't going to have any kind of message sent to him by the state, and for the fact that the death penalty isn't a deterrent; Conservatives are also anti-abortion, and they are against many other social freedoms.
They are nazi's.
But then theres anarcho-capitalists, who actually believe in freedom of choice (like abortion, free speech or whatever), or do they? Things like abortion would only be availble to the rich, the poor would have to their back alley abortion clinic is clean and safe, free speech means corporations can own 90 percent of the media, or 100 percent, there is no conflict of interest, it's about brainwashing people into their system. It's a system based on private property with the capitalist government there to protect it, if you can't get a job according to your skills your either fucked or you have to submit your life to something you do not want to do, just because there is no current market for what you're god at, althought it may be important in the long run. It allows various monopolies to control peoples lives and it puts the greedy people (the cheats, the thieves, the liars, etc..) on top, just because they knew how to market. it's high inequality, a dumb fuck on wal-street could be making more than a hard working coal minor. I think it takes away peoples freedom and allows one person at the top "freedom" to destroy.
I also hate libertarians like the ones at lp.org, they are jsut nerds, it's a philosophy 100 percetn for nerds by nerds, there is no culture is music to it, they put business ahead of art and stuff, even though art and music have been shown to benefit humans. It's everything monly.
The people who support it are scum.
For me it's a really hard choice, techincally conservatives are anarcho-capitalists but they just want the government to enforce the rules (private property, the protection of patents, etc..) instead of private corporations, and they have a war machine to annhilate whoever they want, but still i wouldn't think conservatives would gain the power to complete abolish free speech, or libraries or public schools, like capitalism would.
so it's a tough choice but overall i hate anarcho-capitalism, it's ultra-rightist bullshit, i'd say it's the exact opposite of what i support and my most hated political system or philosophy (if you can call it that).