Log in

View Full Version : Raul Castro Outlines Changes



letsgetfree
30th April 2008, 20:16
Raul Castro Outlines Changes

The Cuban Communist Party must continue to improve its performance and strengthen its authority. The Cuban Council of State commuted death penalties of a group of inmates. Food production is a national security issue. Three new members of the Political Bureau were elected.

HAVANA, Cuba, April 29 (acn) Cuban President Raul Castro presided on Monday over the Sixth Plenary Session of Cuba’s Communist Party Central Committee, which focused on the role of the Party, the country’s development and the international panorama.

Shortly before the meeting concluded, Raul Castro told participants that the Political Bureau had agreed to propose to the Central Committee that the Sixth Congress of the Communist Party of Cuba be held some time near the end of 2009.

IMPROVING THE ROLE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY. REINFORCING INSTITUTIONAL
ORGANIZATION.

Raul Castro, who is also the second secretary of the Central Committee, said that as difficulties increase, so should order and discipline; and he insisted on the need to reinforce the country’s institutions.

The Cuban president said that the country’s Communist Party must continue to improve its performance and strengthen its authority in society, and affirmed that a major step in that direction had been taken. He added that the Party’s role as the leading organization in Cuba had also been consolidated and that this will allow it to face future challenges and guarantee the continuity of the Revolution, as
Fidel Castro had said, once the older generation of leaders is not present.

Raul Castro announced that Vice President Jose Ramon Fernandez would be taking over the role of overseeing the Ministries of Education and Higher Education, and the Institute of Sports, Physical Education and Recreation, along with other activities related to education such as military universities and educational centers.

The Cuban president told the party leaders that food production is a national security issue that needs to become one of their principal focuses. He especially insisted that Communist Party leaders at the municipal and provincial levels give their full support and attention to new government initiatives in agriculture and that they go out and talk directly with food producers, so that that their efforts are hands on and not just bureaucratic.

DEATH PENALTY COMMUTED TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT FOR A GROUP OF INMATES

In his final address of the plenary session, Raul Castro announced that the Cuban Council of State had decided to commute the death penalty to life imprisonment for a group of inmates. He recalled that in 2000 the country had decided not to apply the death penalty, but that this decision was overturned in 2003 to stop a violent wave of more than 30 plans and attempts to hijack planes and boats —activities that were encouraged by US policy, just after Washington launched its war on Iraq.

Raul Castro said that the decision was in tune with the humanitarian and ethical conduct of the Cuban Revolution, in a spirit of justice and not revenge, and was a sovereign act, free from external pressures. He added that Fidel Castro also favors the elimination of the death penalty once the country has the right conditions to do so. He said that the agreement reached by the Council of State is not an elimination of the death penalty from the Cuban Penal Code: “We can not appear to be disarmed in the face of an empire that continues to harass and attack
us.”

ELECTION OF THREE NEW MEMBERS TO THE POLITICAL BUREAU

The Sixth Plenary Session elected Commander of the Revolution Ramiro Valdes, Salvador Valdes Mesa and Army General Alvaro Lopez Miera to the Political Bureau of Cuba’s Communist Party Central Committee. Also approved was the establishment of a Central Committee Commission made up of the president, first vice president and vice presidents of the Council of State in order to streamline the decision-making process. The Commission members are: Raul Castro, Jose Ramon Machado Ventura, Juan Almeida Bosque, Abelardo Colome Ibarra, Carlos Lage Davila, Esteban Lazo Hernandez and Julio Casas Regueiro.

ESTABLISHMENT OF SEVEN PERMANENT COMMISSIONS

The Plenary Session also agreed to set up seven permanent commissions subordinated to the Political Bureau and each one presided by a member of the Secretariat of the Central Committee in the areas of: ideology and culture, the economy, agriculture, substituting imports and increasing exports, education, science and sports, and international relations.

The commissions will analyze important issues and make suggestions, recommendations and proposals at the request of the Communist Party leadership.

BIG BROTHER
1st May 2008, 01:27
it seems like for good or for bad this will make more bureocracy(i know i spelled it wrong) in cuba.

Severian
7th May 2008, 04:12
it seems like for good or for bad this will make more bureocracy(i know i spelled it wrong) in cuba.

Why?

1. It's good there will be a Communist Party Congress, the period before them usually involves a fair bit of public political discussion through all the mass organizations. I wish they had Congresses more often, that'd be a step forward for workers' democracy.

2. Agriculture moving to more provincial and local rather than national government control, also good: as I commented in another thread local government is more directly elected. May involve reducing whole layers of agriculture department officialdom; see article in this thread:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/cuba-transfer-control-t77650/index.html

3. Commutation of death sentences, also good: capital punishment is barbaric and should be avoided whenever practical. Largely making official something that's already a reality: Cuba's carried out few executions since 2000, primarily (only?) some hijackers in 2003, as Raul mentions.

4. New members of Political Bureau: leadership turnover generally good. I don't know of the individuals other than Ramiro Valdes being a historico, "commander of the revolution", i.e. leader of the revoluton since before '59.

5. "Also approved was the establishment of a Central Committee Commission made up of the president, first vice president and vice presidents of the Council of State in order to streamline the decision-making process." Probably not so great, having party and government leadership bodies with the same members; it's important to separate party and state functions and structures.

This is unfortunately not a new problem, however, in fact it's an inevitable one with a single party. Important problem and factor in bureaucracy, yes: new, no. At most this proposal will make the problem slightly worse.

6. "The Plenary Session also agreed to set up seven permanent commissions subordinated to the Political Bureau and each one presided by a member of the Secretariat of the Central Committee in the areas of: ideology and culture, the economy, agriculture, substituting imports and increasing exports, education, science and sports, and international relations.

The commissions will analyze important issues and make suggestions, recommendations and proposals at the request of the Communist Party leadership."

Dunno if this is good or bad; probably not major. It's not a major expansion of the administrative apparatus. And making proposals on overall policy is the kind of thing party leadership bodies are supposed to do, so it's not an expansion of party/state entanglement.

Overall, I'd say Raul Castro's been making a lot of proposals which tend to expand space for discussion among working people on how to defend and deepen the revolution.

There may also be some market-oriented retreats like the bourgeois press keeps hoping for - probably a lot less than they hope for, since their hopes spring eternal and aren't supported by much evidence.

But I'd say the expanded discussion, and potentially expanded workers' democracy, are more important in the long run.

In any case, that kind of proposal accounts for most of those actually implemented so far.

TC
7th May 2008, 04:41
5. "Also approved was the establishment of a Central Committee Commission made up of the president, first vice president and vice presidents of the Council of State in order to streamline the decision-making process." Probably not so great, having party and government leadership bodies with the same members; it's important to separate party and state functions and structures.

I'm not sure, thats true in some situations, but here they're adding state leaders to party leadership rather than the other way around. The most politically problematic scenario is where an assembly elected state president is politically subordinate to a central committee elected party general secretary. Party leadership are not democratically accountable as such in the same way that state leadership are so you want them to be the same people in a one party dominated state (in which case they're accountable to both the population as a whole and the party) with changes in party leadership following changes in state leadership rather than the other way around (the party attempting to dictate to the state instead of being an ideological forum as the Cuban party is).

Severian
8th May 2008, 12:47
I'm not sure, thats true in some situations, but here they're adding state leaders to party leadership rather than the other way around. The most politically problematic scenario is where an assembly elected state president is politically subordinate to a central committee elected party general secretary.

That scenario is already the case. The most important political post in Cuba is First Secretary of the Communist Party. Government subordination to the CP is well established and this won't change it. This has been true of all ruling parties calling themselves "Communist", BTW.

And IMO, the main problem with party-state entanglement is not the one you describe - not the violation of formal state democracy.

The main problem is the corruption and bureaucratization of a revolutionary workers' party in power. The more the party gets involved in all kinds of state administrative decisions, the larger party administrative apparatus is needed, and also the closer its connections to the state administrative apparatus.

The class composition of the party membership and leadership tends to get worse, and it loses its politically leading function. This has not gone as far in Cuba as in other ruling parties calling themselves "Communist". Those were not even parties, let alone communist - they were clubs that people joined to advance their careers, especially through the state and party bureaucracy.

The Communist Party of Cuba still includes a lot of politically committed workers, nominated by their coworkers in workplace meetings BTW. Most of its central political leaders remain revolutionaries. But all kinds of class interests try to find expression through the single officially recognized and ruling party, especially the bureaucracy.

Allowing the state structures to choose one of its political leadership committees doesn't help this, unless your goal is some kind of one-party counterfeit of formal bourgeois democracy. The most meaningful elements of workers' democracy in Cuba operate through the mass organizations, including the Communist Party, and to some extent through local government. Workers' democracy cannot be reduced to choosing a few top leaders every few years even if the election of top state leaders were far more open and direct than it presently is in Cuba.

As I said originally, I don't think the formation of this committee is a huge change; but the broader point about party-state entanglement is important. It reflects whether one orients to the workers or the bureaucracy in the class struggle within Cuba....

Hoxhaist
11th April 2009, 03:42
This 6th Party Congress that Raul talks about will be an incredible opportunity to purge Khruschevite revisionists and Dengist reformers. Hopefully they reaffirm their roots in the Marx-Engels-Lenin-Stalin path and restore that path with the example of Enver Hoxha

Wakizashi the Bolshevik
11th April 2009, 17:57
The USA must withdraw its embargo.
Only after that we can talk further.

Hoxhaist
11th April 2009, 18:01
although the embargo is a hardship, why should Cuba seek economic activity with the US? what good will come from Cuba entangling itself in the capitalist world economy? China is an example of the error that arises from capitulating to the West

Communist
11th April 2009, 18:48
although the embargo is a hardship, why should Cuba seek economic activity with the US? what good will come from Cuba entangling itself in the capitalist world economy? China is an example of the error that arises from capitulating to the West

Sadly, however, many also point out that if the current Cuban leadership doesn't go with a minor economic structural enmeshing (if indeed the US does) the next generation will go too far in that direction. If that's a valid point or not, it's a very frightening prospect.

robbo203
11th April 2009, 19:08
although the embargo is a hardship, why should Cuba seek economic activity with the US? what good will come from Cuba entangling itself in the capitalist world economy? China is an example of the error that arises from capitulating to the West

For the very simple reason that Cuba, like every other state in the world, is a capitalist state and the dynamic of capitalism is inevitably outwards and expansionist , towards entanglement and enmeshment, towards the development of global capitalism. Why do you think Cuba is busily promoting tourism for example as a means of obtaining foreign exchange?

Josef Balin
12th April 2009, 16:04
For the very simple reason that Cuba, like every other state in the world, is a capitalist state and the dynamic of capitalism is inevitably outwards and expansionist , towards entanglement and enmeshment, towards the development of global capitalism. Why do you think Cuba is busily promoting tourism for example as a means of obtaining foreign exchange?
Or the proletariat runs the State and it is in the interest of the Cuban proletariat to for this to happen. But then again, why learn about something when you can just use rhetoric?


This 6th Party Congress that Raul talks about will be an incredible opportunity to purge Khruschevite revisionists and Dengist reformers. Hopefully they reaffirm their roots in the Marx-Engels-Lenin-Stalin path and restore that path with the example of Enver Hoxha
Hoxha ran Albania pretty bad even if you accept that he was the only socialist leader left (although I've never seen an intelligent person argue that this was the case). Not to mention that Fidel currently holds himself out to be a Fellow Traveller-esque Trot.

EDT: Also, you'd have to be ridiculous to even take your post seriously, you talk like a Stalinist-era propaganda memo. Tone it down ffs, no independent adult talks like that.

Revy
12th April 2009, 16:19
Yeah, that's just what Cuba needs. An even more nutty management, around "Hoxhaism" (regurgitated Stalinism).

What needs to happen is a real and meaningful move toward socialism, because the Stalinist roots of their ideology were what prevented that in the first place!

Killfacer
12th April 2009, 17:31
This 6th Party Congress that Raul talks about will be an incredible opportunity to purge Khruschevite revisionists and Dengist reformers. Hopefully they reaffirm their roots in the Marx-Engels-Lenin-Stalin path and restore that path with the example of Enver Hoxha
:huh:

Who with the what now?

Communist Theory
13th April 2009, 02:38
Voodoo majic!!!