Log in

View Full Version : "Stormin’ Marxist is toast of the neocons"



Unicorn
19th April 2008, 04:52
AN OBSCURE Marxist professor who has spent his entire academic life in Manchester has become the darling of the Washington right wing for his outspoken support of the war in Iraq.

Despite his leanings Norman Geras, who writes a blog diary on the internet, has praised President George W Bush and says the invasion of Iraq was necessary to oust the tyrannical regime of Saddam Hussein.

His daily jottings have brought him the nickname of “Stormin’ Norm” from the title of his diary, Normblog. The Wall Street Journal has reprinted one of his articles in its online edition and American pundits often cite his words.

But the British left has turned on Geras, a veteran of demonstrations against the Vietnam war. He has been denounced as an “imperialist skunk” and a “turncoat” in e-mails to his blog, which has up to 9,000 readers a day.

Most mornings Geras, 61, the author of such obscure books as Solidarity in the Conversation of Humankind: The Ungroundable Liberalism of Richard Rorty, sits in the upstairs study of his Edwardian semi in Manchester to type his latest entry.

Last week he gave thanks to Bush, quoting an Iraqi who wants to build a statue to the American president as “the symbol of freedom”.

He also lambasted “all those conflicted folk who would like to remain true to their values and be pleased about the Iraqi election, but don’t want George Bush to be able to take any credit for it”. He picked Simon Kelner, editor of The Independent newspaper, for special mention.

In another posting he imagined awakening from a nightmare to see Ken Livingstone, Harold Pinter, George Galloway, John Pilger and other opponents of the war advancing upon him — only to raise a finger stained with the purple dye of an Iraqi voter.

Stephen Pollard, David Blunkett’s biographer and another avid blogger, describes him as “unmissable”. Andrew Sullivan, The Sunday Times’s columnist in Washington, said: “He’s fearless, intellectually honest and actually cares about democracy in Iraq and the degeneracy of the Euro-left.

“The medium of blog has made his ideas transmissible across the Atlantic. He’s a genuine man of the left, which means he barely recognises the quislings and cynics who now make up much of it.”

Glenn Reynolds, a law professor at the University of Tennessee, whose instapundit.com has become one of the most influential websites in American politics, said: “He writes well, and what he writes makes sense. Unlike too many on the left these days, his moral sense hasn’t been obliterated by hostility towards the West in general and America in particular.”

Geras, who was born in what was then Southern Rhodesia, earns no money from his blog and pays about £3 a month to post it on the internet. He started it in July 2003 after he retired from Manchester University, where he is still a professor emeritus of politics.

He intersperses his political writings with salutes to the Australian cricket team and polls among readers to find the greatest rock’n’roll band — the Rolling Stones came top.

“I am part of the 1960s generation,” he said last week. “I was no Tariq Ali but I took part in demonstrations against the Vietnam war and other issues. Luckily I was never arrested.

“I was at an academic conference in Italy the day the left-wing Allende regime was overthrown by a coup in Chile in 1973. I left the conference to join a march in the streets.”

He added: “Everybody and his brother has had a go at me. But I started the blog because I was fed up with the prevailing left and liberal consensus that the war in Iraq was wrong.

“If those people who marched against the war had been successful they would have prolonged a brutal regime responsible for 300,000 deaths. They could have chosen not to support the war, but they chose to oppose it.

“I do not see myself sharing Bush and Tony Blair’s outlook, but that doesn’t mean there cannot be common elements.”

He believes any controversy over the British and US government’s use of flawed evidence on weapons of mass destruction was secondary to the humanitarian grounds for removing Saddam.

Andrew Burgin of the Stop the War Coalition, which is organising a rally in Trafalgar Square on March 19 to mark the second anniversary of the outbreak of the war, said: “I don’t think Bush wakes up and thinks ‘How can the Iraqi people be free?’ Those like Geras who take him at face value need to go back and look at their ABC of Marxism.”

But Liam Byrne, Labour MP for Birmingham Hodge Hill and one of Geras’s former students, said: “As a skilled Marxist, Norman Geras is clearly pursuing a very clever entryist strategy to the American neocon movement. I await with bated breath the overthrow of every last one of them.”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article511174.ece

Unicorn
19th April 2008, 05:09
Geras tells about his Marxist views in this interview:



Here, in any case, are the reasons that are decisive to my still thinking of myself as one. First, I believe historical materialism is true. The claim invites misunderstanding, but I put it thus, categorically, to counter the enormous, indeed all but smothering, weight of contemporary intellectual and cultural fashion, according to which historical materialism is – just obviously – outmoded and wrong. I will moderate the claim, though, by saying that I think the materialist conception of history is more true than not. For all of the one-sidedness in its original formulation, and the qualifications that are needed to it, and the ways in which Marxists have historically neglected, understated or misconstrued other important bases of social identity or factors of historical causation, it is nevertheless true that one will understand an amount ranging between very little and next to nothing about the social and political world if one does not give central attention to the distribution of economic wealth and power and the class relations which flow from it. Second, there is Marxism's enduring commitment to the goal of an egalitarian, non-exploitative society, a commitment I see as being stronger and less qualified than it has been within any competing intellectual and political tradition. Third – and an index of that strength of commitment – I value Marxism's focus upon what is sometimes called the problem of agency: the problem of finding a route, the active social forces, between existing historical tendencies and the achievement of a substantially egalitarian society.

If one has been a Marxist for some 40 years, this is how the alternatives to continuing to be one can look. Either one gives up on utopian hope, or one cleaves to some other version of it. As to the first alternative, although I am not and have never been much of an optimist politically, I think there is a moral responsibility not to give up hope, so far at least as this remains personally possible. There may be features of an individual's life that make hope difficult or eventually crush it. But I should like to think that if I ever did give up on social hope I would fall silent rather than seeking to undermine the same hope in others. With regard to other versions of progressive hope, the most attractive one for me would have to be egalitarian liberalism. However, notwithstanding the common ground I recognize with this strand of the liberal tradition, the egalitarianism there seems to me to be always diluted or compromised by some large degree of indulgence towards the structures and relations of capitalism. Also available are various 'post-ist' versions of radical hope: post-Marxist, post-structuralist, post-modern. But these strike me as options – and spaces – of, at best, well-meaning incoherence and, at worst, intellectual obscurity tending towards out-and-out obscurantism.
http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~plcdib/imprints/normangerasinterview.html

Geras is also an ardent Zionist. Real leftists don't support imperialism. Geras is to Marxism what Joe Lieberman is to the Democratic Party.

Marsella
19th April 2008, 05:12
Over three years old.

'Humanitarian grounds for removing Saddam?!' :lol:

Do they believe everything their dear leaders tell them to?

Unicorn
19th April 2008, 05:36
Over three years old.

'Humanitarian grounds for removing Saddam?!' :lol:

Do they believe everything their dear leaders tell them to?
Geras is a founding member in the Euston Manifesto Group which is a coalition of "leftist" supporters of Zionism and the War in Iraq.

http://eustonmanifesto.org/

"Many of the signatories of the manifesto are, or until recently were, some variety or other of Marxist. Its main author, for example, is Norman Geras, a professor emeritus of government at the University of Manchester. His work includes Literature of Revolution, a volume of astute essays on Leon Trotsky and Rosa Luxemburg. (Full disclosure: Geras and I once belonged to the same worldwide revolutionary socialist organization, the United Secretariat of the Fourth International, and probably both choke up a little when singing “The Red Flag”)."

http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2006/05/24/mclemee

Herman
19th April 2008, 09:07
Of course, when a marxist supports a right-wing agenda, he is praised as a "skilled marxist".

Colonello Buendia
19th April 2008, 11:21
and the prize for most idiotic leftist goes to..... the creator of a zionist "left" group who supports Iraq, christ isn't it the right that's full of hypocritical skuzzbags of the highest order?