Log in

View Full Version : Anarachie



Rommel
25th March 2002, 12:17
Many of you che admires, also support a anarchie but, at the same time che and che was part of the communitic army of russia, russia know as a great EMPIRE in the time, so you are anti-goverment but you like a man that served in a great empire, quite confusing isn't it? Second, you guys want a anarchie, no goverments, good for every one, so when that happens, you will be on the power so you will be then the goverment, but no goverments means no social security, no safety measures, it will be a total choas and then you guys will rule it like dictators, pretty lame isn't it?

Fires of History
25th March 2002, 16:13
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

1. Why do you assume that all the people here are anarchists?

2. Why do claim to know anything about Che? Russian empire of Che? What are you talking about?

3. It's 'ANARCHY,' not 'anarchie,' is that like anarchie bunker?

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Thanks, needed a good laugh before I started the week.

komsomol
25th March 2002, 16:17
I support anarchy but not anarchie as a political "system", ITS JUST AN ACT OF DEFIANCE. I support it as it gives us a sense of self-respect, can't get that from being controlled.

Rommel
25th March 2002, 19:25
F o H, you as great che admirerer, must know that he had contacts with russia (a big bad empire). About your comment Moloch your a completly for it or you hate it, at the end it comes to this two choices ...

PunkRawker677
25th March 2002, 22:11
Second time i catch you makes a plain out stupid comment.. pick up a book about che, and read it.. he had some russian friends, but he did not support trading with russia, matter of fact, he hated the idea..

read Companero, by Jorge Castenada - afterwards, talk about che...

and he was not part of the 'comunitic army of russia' for a few reasons..
one - its communistic
two - soviet union
three - he was never directly associated with russia in battle..

RedRevolutionary87
25th March 2002, 22:29
ok first of all che critisized the ussr on many ocasions and he was never in any batle with them. anarchy does not mean no social security, it means people providing eachother social security and other things without the need of a government to do it for the people. i am a marxist and just like marx i belive anarchy is the beter system but cannot be brought about before the communist global revolution simply because it would be destroyed by other nations. but communism is a little stronger and can maintain a stance untill communism is global then it can fade into anarchy.

sabre
26th March 2002, 12:23
ROMMEL - THE USSR WASN'T COMMUNIST AND PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT ARE IGNORANT AND OBVIOUSLY DONT UNDERSTAND COMMUNISM (like you)

and learn how to spell anarchy

Anarcho
26th March 2002, 20:01
Just as there are many forms of Socialism with a common theme, there are many branches in the tree of Anarchism. Most here on this board will be, by definition, Anarcho-Socialists.

Please do not mistake Nihilism for Anarchy, as they are two different things... much like communism v. Socialism.

flames of the flag
27th March 2002, 01:57
Rommel,
you obviously cant be too seriously knoledgeable about what us folks believe in because your sig uses capitalism and eqaul in the same sentence
-flames

Raztro
27th March 2002, 23:11
Quote: from flames of the flag on 1:57 am on Mar. 27, 2002
Rommel,
you obviously cant be too seriously knoledgeable about what us folks believe in because your sig uses capitalism and eqaul in the same sentence



lol...