Log in

View Full Version : Venezuela Sidor workers continue action



Dominicana_1965
27th February 2008, 23:49
Caracas, February 27, 2008 (venezuelanalysis.com) - Thousands of workers at Venezuela's largest steel plant, the Argentine-controlled Ternium Sidor, activated staggered strikes today as part of an ongoing dispute for a collective contract, which has dragged on for more than a year.


The dispute involves 5,400 permanent workers and a further 9,000 contract workers outsourced from 350 small and medium businesses that service the steel industry. In addition to improved health and safety conditions, the workers are demanding a salary increase to put them on par with workers in similar industries.


The salary increase is the most contentious point of the negotiations - the company claims the demand of the workers is "unreasonable" and the workers have characterized the Sidor management as "intransient."
The latest demand by the union was for a raise of 68 Bs. (US$31.6) per day, down from their initial demand of 80 Bs (US$37.2). The company has offered a 24 Bs. (US$11.15) raise, and the intermediary proposal of the Labor Ministry is 45 Bs (US$20.9).


Labor Minister José Ramón Rivero recognized Monday that the salary and conditions of workers in the steel industry are "backwards", but he said the 16-hour strike that paralyzed Sidor last Thursday was an "error," and called on Sidor workers to agree to form of an arbitration committee to resolve the conflict, ABN reported.


The proposal of the Labor Ministry involves the creation of a binding arbitration committee consisting of three members who have no direct relation to the conflict: One chosen by the company from a shortlist of three presented by the union, one chosen by the workers from a shortlist presented by the company and the other jointly designated by the company and the union.


According to the minister, "if the workers decide to deepen the measures of pressure, the executive - in keeping with article 504 of the [labor] law - has the authority to call on the workers to resume work and submit the conflict to arbitration," if it determines that the conflict, "affects the normal functioning of the country."


The minister also accused some of the worker representatives at the negotiating table, of being emissaries of the opposition and of being responsible for maintaining the conflict in Sidor.


"They are the same people that supported the sabotage stoppage [of the oil industry], the same who during the stoppage worked against Sidor," he claimed.


However, the United Steel Industry Workers Union (SUTISS) has categorically rejected the minister's claims.


"We defend this revolutionary process, we are with the policies of the President of the Republic, Hugo Chávez Frías, but we reject the policy that the Minister of Labor is applying against us, trying to impose an arbitration committee," SUTISS Finance Secretary and member of the Marea Socialista union current, José Meléndez, declared.


SUTISS President, José Rodríguez questioned, "Who will guarantee benefits for the workers in an arbitration committee?"


"We will not delegate the responsibility that has been assigned to us by the workers. We were elected by the workers and in this sense we are going to continue the struggle until the final consequences," Rodríguez told Correo del Caroni on Monday.


"If they take us away handcuffed, they take us away, but we're not going to rest until we achieve better working conditions," he added.
At first the workers welcomed the initiative of the Labor Ministry to participate in negotiations between SUTISS and Ternium Sidor to avoid a major conflict, Rodriguez recounted.


"But today we note certain coincidences between the functionaries of the Labor Ministry and the representatives of Ternium Sidor against the Sidor workers movement," he explained.


Meléndez, was more emphatic, saying of the Labor Minister, "the mask has fallen, he has jumped ship towards the endogenous rightwing," and insisted in declaring him "persona non grata."


The position of the Labor Ministry "follows the bosses representation and therefore is a betrayal of the struggle of the workers," Meléndez said.
Meléndez called for "solidarity at a national level in this struggle against exploitation."


Eduardo Sanchez, a spokesperson for the National Union of Workers (UNT) and member of the Collective of Workers in Revolution union current, affirmed the UNT's support for the Sidor workers in an interview with Union Radio yesterday


The official position of establishing an arbitration mechanism supervised by the Labor Ministry corresponded to the practice of previous governments and does not contribute to or fulfill the demands of the workers, Sanchez said.


Sánchez reiterated that the position of the UNT is for the nationalization of Sidor, which he compared to the nationalizations in the Orinoco oil fields last year.


Last year, in the framework of President Chavez's call to "re-nationalize everything that was privatized," sections of the Sidor workforce called for the company to be nationalized and put under worker's control.

Chavez also threatened to nationalize the company if it did not prioritize production for the domestic market and pay more for the raw materials, which it had obtained at a subsidized rate from a state-owned mining company. However, the company later reached an agreement with the government to avoid nationalization.


Sidor, which manufactures wire and metal piping, is the number one steel production plant in the Andean region and the fourth largest in Latin America. Management has estimated that the company has lost an estimated US$7 million for each day of strike action.

Located in the state of Bolivar in the south of Venezuela, Sidor was privatized in 1997. Argentina's Trechint now owns a 60% controlling stake, 20% belongs to workers and retirees, and the remaining 20% is owned by the Venezuelan state.

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/3205

RNK
28th February 2008, 02:50
I think this is a clear indication of both the promise of revolutionary thinking in Venezuela and the inevitable roadblock that beauraucratic reformism represents. Time and time again I'm hearing stories of radicalized workers in Venezuela having their aspirations halted by the beauraucracy of the Venezuelan government -- it's come to the point that little more progress can be made without the overthrow of the state. The people need to stop thinking they need their hands held by Chavez's government.

VukBZ2005
28th February 2008, 09:14
Time and time again I'm hearing stories of radicalized workers in Venezuela having their aspirations halted by the bureaucracy of the Venezuelan government -- it's come to the point that little more progress can be made without the overthrow of the state. The people need to stop thinking they need their hands held by Chavez's government.I would furthermore add on to this that if they do not stop thinking that they need their hands held by Chavez's government, then, this is what is going to happen; eventually, this situation will practically allow Chavez to do what Allende did in the months before he was overthrown by the Chilean Army in 1973; compromise the working class revolutionary struggle for a settlement with the Capitalist and Small Capitalist classes, effectively allowing these classes to activate those forces in the Venezuelan army that are still loyal to them and set into motion the launch of a coup that could, if it is successful, result in another Sacudon.

BIG BROTHER
28th February 2008, 16:11
indeed, it seems like the burgoise of venezuela keeps clashing with the workers.

RNK
28th February 2008, 18:16
Exactly. This could alienate Chavez from the people, at which point it would be very easy for ultra-reactionary elements in the government, business sector and army to bring Chavez down. The working class need to be able to survive without Chavez's hand-holding; they need to act on their own, and stop begging the Venezuelan government for hand-outs which are very often rejected.

BIG BROTHER
28th February 2008, 19:22
That's true, the working class musn't depend on one person, and in this case they shouldn't depend on Chavez, but do you really think they army would betray him? I had the notion that they were loyal to him.

RNK
28th February 2008, 22:53
Some aspects are, some aren't. Remember, the army played a key role in the oppositionist coup back in 2002 or whenever it was. It was also loyal army tendencies which pledged support to Chavez.

But the people can not rely on one person, nor can they rely on an army; both may be important, but in the end, real change must come by the people rising up.

BIG BROTHER
28th February 2008, 23:08
Some aspects are, some aren't. Remember, the army played a key role in the oppositionist coup back in 2002 or whenever it was. It was also loyal army tendencies which pledged support to Chavez.

But the people can not rely on one person, nor can they rely on an army; both may be important, but in the end, real change must come by the people rising up.

True, true, true.

Black Cross
1st March 2008, 22:29
I suppose that is the downfall of a vanguard who does not share the working classes situation. Chavez may have their best interests at heart, but he most definitely doesn't live in poverty, nor does he have hazardous or less than desirable working conditions, and therefore cannot truly sympathize with them.