capi's-whats wrong with anarchy?

[red head]

think about it-in a state of anarcy, the a government of some sort would form based on the natural tendencies of human beings. if capitalism is natural, than a capitalist government would form. whats wrong with this logic?

[reagan lives]

Capitalism depends on an authority that can enforce property laws and protect contracts.

And, by your argument, it seems reasonable that the current capitalist system grew out of some original state of anarchy. What's the sense in returning to one just to prove a point?

[Nateddi]

RL, what do you think of the neo-anarchi$ts (the american libertarian party) lol

[anarchoveganLAM]

Well, I think if anarchism were to happen, It would not be a capitalist system. Capitalism does require an authoritive person, the boss. It would be more socialist or communist, with no boss to enslave you. It would have nobody to push you around-and you would live in a brother/sisterhood, where we would have to share to survive. That's not capitalistic, but more of collective/altruism. Uh oh, the objectivists might jump on that one!

[MindCrime]

Neo-anarchist? More like anarcho-capitalists. You think that we Commies are deluded just look at Harry Brown and HIS people!

[Moskitto]

I think neo-anarchy (like libertarian party) was actually the first state of human existance. I mean some animals live as individuals.

Then people decide "I make copper, you make bows, let's share." so people start living in tribes.

Then someone goes, "Hey me making these high quality arrows is more important than that guy who cleans the walls, I want more" Then we get capitalism

Then someone goes "I've got lots of men with arrows, you give me what I want and i'll protect you, if not, you die" then we get fuedelism

Then someone goes "Hey, This guy can't force us to do this stuff, I'll get rich and form a big bad deathsquad, then people will look to me for protection." Then we get capitalism again.

Then someone goes "No the way this is working doesn't work, why can't people share?" Then someone thinks of communism.

Then someone goes "Maybe, if I got everyone to share things except me, I could become much more powerful" Then we get Stalinism.

Then someone goes "leadership is not sharing" and we get the good old Capitalism Vs Socialism debate.