Log in

View Full Version : Race a factor in shooting of black cop?



blackstone
29th January 2008, 15:47
http://boxstr.com/files/804930_gz2wu/amd_christopherridley.jpg

BY MELISSA GRACE
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

The black Mount Vernon cop shot to death by Westchester County police officers had run into a government building and called for backup before he was killed Friday, his pastor said Sunday.

"He went in and asked for assistance," said the Rev. Franklyn Richardson of Mount Vernon's Grace Baptist Church.

"The police who came ended up killing him."

Richardson also said the slain off-duty cop, Officer Christopher Ridley, 23, was given no medical attention for as long as 20 minutes after the shooting.

"This is an outrageous execution of a young African-American man who'd chosen to do the right thing," Richardson said after a jammed memorial service at his church.

"This same situation would not have occurred if he was not African-American."

By all accounts, Ridley had stopped to help after spotting an assault outside a homeless shelter as he drove through downtown White Plains.

The White Plains cops could not confirm Richardson's claim that Ridley had gone into the Westchester County Department of Social Services for help - and a law enforcement source suggested the family had "misunderstood" what they were told happened immediately before the shooting.

Ridley's father, Stanley, the church custodian, and his mother and stepfather, Felita and Ron Bouche of New Jersey, attended the service, but said they were too devastated to speak.

"Christopher died a hero," said Ridley family friend Danielle Scholar, her voice breaking in sorrow. "We are sad but extremely proud of his display of courage."

The slain officer had spent summers working at the church and continued to mentor youth there after he became a cop in 2006 - something he had dreamed of since he was a kid, Scholar said.

"Always, his shoes were polished and he was proud to be a police officer," Richardson said.

The pastor was joined by the Rev. Al Sharpton, who demanded that the cops be suspended and called for an independent investigation.

"They've done it again," Sharpton said of the shooting, likening it to the 2006 slaying of Sean Bell, a black bridegroom shot dead by cops in Queens.

Ridley's family and Sharpton met with police and prosecutors in Westchester for more than two hours on Saturday.

Sharpton said they were told cops fired nine bullets. Of these, four to five slugs struck the cop in the back of his head, his chest, hip and wrist, Richardson said.

County officials have not explained why the Westchester cops who responded to the scene fired at Ridley, who was armed but not in uniform.

A witness said Ridley and a uniformed Westchester County officer chased a mugger, and that Ridley had tackled the mugger and had him on the ground when the officers arrived, according to WABC-TV.

"I heard them saying, freeze, freeze, freeze," and then the cops fired, the witness, who was not identified, said.

Richardson said yesterday there were four cops involved. At least one of the responding officers was black, a law enforcement source confirmed.

All the officers involved will be placed on administrative duty when they return to work, another law enforcement source said.

commiecrusader
29th January 2008, 16:34
That's a tragic story but where is the evidence that his colour had anything to do with him being shot? The article seems to draw this conclusion based on quotes from an understandably distraught church parish. Obviously though his race could be a factor, I was just wondering if you know whether it definitely is or not?

RedAnarchist
29th January 2008, 17:10
Surely this guy worked with them, so why wouldn't they have recognised him? Or did they just see a black person, decide he did it and murder him?

RNK
29th January 2008, 17:31
I do not think the act was malicious and directly related to race (one of the cops responsible was black, afterall). It was an act of ignorance indirectly related to race; American society, and inparticular the police department, hold a very racist view that all young black men are inherently criminal. So when cops come upon a scene in which an armed black man is in a struggle with another person and their first thought is that it is a "thug gangster" robbing someone.

I don't think the policemen involved are directly responsible (I'm sure they didn't go there saying "Hey, let's shoot us up some blacks!"), however I do think that the entire system of organized police departments is. More than likely, the officers involved will be given a light slap on the wrist, or maybe given a desk job, where they'll live out the rest of their comfortable lives and eventually collect a nice fat pension. The only responsible thing that can be done at this point is for all four officers to be immediately discharged without compensation. The racial ignorance prevelent throughout the police force can only be curbed by harsh measures by giving our harsh punishment which this occurs. But we all know how this will play out; white conservative reactionaries will start crying that Al Sharpton is trying to turn everything into a race issue, that racism doesn't exist and is merely a paranoid figment of the "left's" imagination, and that the rule of authority of the police department should not be questioned under any circumstances else American society will surely break down into anarchy. And most will probably believe it.

blackstone
29th January 2008, 17:57
Surely this guy worked with them, so why wouldn't they have recognised him? Or did they just see a black person, decide he did it and murder him?

If they recognized him, why did the shoot him?

Sleeping Dog
29th January 2008, 18:10
What ever the case is (or might be) Rev. Sharpton will contribute so much!

RedAnarchist
29th January 2008, 18:12
If they recognized him, why did the shoot him?

I know - he was a police officer as well, so surely they would have been able to find that out and/or know who he was.

Sleeping Dog
29th January 2008, 18:23
Maybe without their uniforms "all cops look alike". Of course, in the middle of a fire fight stopping and examining identification cards is always a viable option.

rouchambeau
29th January 2008, 18:36
RNK:

I do not think the act was malicious and directly related to race (one of the cops responsible was black, afterall).So that removes any posibility of the killing being racist? Really?


It was an act of ignorance indirectly related to race; American society, and inparticular the police department, hold a very racist view that all young black men are inherently criminal. So when cops come upon a scene in which an armed black man is in a struggle with another person and their first thought is that it is a "thug gangster" robbing someone.Yet you don't believe that the murder was "malicious" or "directly related to race".


I don't think the policemen involved are directly responsible...however I do think that the entire system of organized police departments is.The police who pulled the triggers were the ones responsible. By blaming the whole police system for a particular incident rather than these particular officers, you end of absolving the murderers for what they did.


(I'm sure they didn't go there saying "Hey, let's shoot us up some blacks!")That doesn't make what they did any more excusable.


The only responsible thing that can be done at this point is for all four officers to be immediately discharged without compensation. Dude, they murdered this guy. They should be on trial.


The racial ignorance prevelent throughout the police force can only be curbed by harsh measures by giving our harsh punishment which this occurs.Somehow firing the officers doesn't seem to cut it for me.

Sleeping Dog
29th January 2008, 18:44
So that removes any posibility of the killing being racist? Really?


Yet you don't believe that the murder was "malicious" or "directly related to race".


The police who pulled the triggers were the ones responsible. By blaming the whole police system for a particular incident rather than these particular officers, you end of absolving the murderers for what they did.


That doesn't make what they did any more excusable.


Dude, they murdered this guy. They should be on trial.


Somehow firing the officers doesn't seem to cut it for me.Do you actually see the entity to whom your addressing in this post?

RedAnarchist
29th January 2008, 18:45
Do you actually see the entity to whom your addressing in this post?

He's responding to the quoted bits.:confused:

Sleeping Dog
29th January 2008, 18:52
He's responding to the quoted bits.:confused:Upon re-reading thread I see he's addressing RNK.

rouchambeau must have some omniscience that I do not possess.

RedAnarchist
29th January 2008, 18:54
Upon re-reading thread I see he's addressing RNK.

rouchambeau must have some omniscience that I do not possess.

I see why you thought that - if someone has just pasted it into their post and put quote tags around it, it won't say who posted the quoted parts.

Sleeping Dog
29th January 2008, 18:59
I see why you thought that - if someone has just pasted it into their post and put quote tags around it, it won't say who posted the quoted parts.What I think is strange - the clarity of hind sight.