Log in

View Full Version : Oil workers in Venezuela



Devrim
11th December 2007, 06:31
This is a translation from an article in the Venezuelan paper "Internacionalismo" (November 19, 2007, International Communist Current), which contains information about recent struggles of the oil workers as well as some information and analysis about the proposed constitutional amendments which were defeated on December 2.


Originally posted by Internacionalismo
We are publishing our response to a letter sent by a reader from Brazil (T), who asks our opinion about an article he received, from which we are publishing some extracts, and which covers the struggles and mobilizations of the workers against the state oil company "Petroleos de Venezuela" (PDVSA) last September, demanding better wages and contractual benefits. The comrade also asks for our commentary about the reduction in the working day, which is proposed by President Chavez in the constitutional reforms that will be voted upon on December 2.

Letter from Comrade T
Hello comrade...
I'm forwarding an article I received from a comrade in Venezuela, so that you can send me your thoughts. I'm also asking you for details on Chavez' proposed reduction of the working day, because that has sparked a lot of discussion over here.
Regards,
T
Quote:

Venezuelan Oil Workers Clash with Police Over Collective Contract

September 30th 2007, by Kiraz Janicke – Venezuelanalysis.com

Caracas, September 29, 2007, (venezuelanalysis.com) - Venezuela's Energy Minister and president of the state owned oil company PDVSA, Rafael Ramirez, assured that the collective contract for oil workers, which has been under negotiation since April, would be finalised in the next two weeks after clashes between oil workers and police in Anzoátegui state on Thursday left several people injured.

Some 150 workers from the oil refinery of Puerto La Cruz, together with workers from the Jose Industrial Complex were marching to the offices of the Venezuelan Oil Corporation (CVP) in Urbaneja municipality to present a document to Ramirez, who was meeting with a negotiating commission of the United Oil Workers Federation of Venezuela (FUTPV), when they were intercepted by Immediate Response Group - Police Force of Anzoátegui.

In the resulting clashes, which lasted three hours, 40 workers were arrested and three were injured, including Richard Querecuto, who was shot in the left shoulder...With news of the police repression 4,000 workers from Petroanzoátegui, Petrocedeño, and the project San Cristóbal immediately stopped work.

...in a statement in solidarity with the oil workers of Anzoátegui, repudiating the police violence, the Federation of Workers UNT-Zulia said, "We consider that this situation has been generated by the intransigence of the state company PDVSA that has drawn out the discussion over the contract for months, offered conditions below the aspirations of the workers and arbitrarily imposed a junta [the FUTPV negotiating commission] to discuss the contract without having been elected by the workers."

C-CURA is calling for a change in the negotiating commission and for immediate elections within FUTPV, otherwise they say they will "radicalize" their actions. However, similar calls by C-CURA and Fedepetrol for radical actions and a general stoppage to "paralyze" the oil industry at "zero hour" on August 6 mobilized less than 1,500 workers throughout the country.

After widespread coverage and promotion of "zero hour" in the opposition private media, the dispute took on a political dimension, with other sectors of oil workers and urban poor subsequently rallying in "defense" of PDVSA.

The statement by the Federation of Workers UNT-Zulia said yesterday, "We think that some of these situations [in the oil industry] are a result of a manouvre by sectors of the rightwing within Chavismo [Chavez supporters], aimed at generating situations of conflict in the country to propagate destabilisation of the process of constitutional reform."

However, the workers in Anzoátegui rejected this claim with a banner which read,
"We are not violent protesters [guarimberos], we are oil workers." (A guarimba is an orchestrated protest aimed at provoking violence to achieve political aims.)

The oil workers in Anzoátegui have announced that they will continue their protests in the streets and remain in a state of alert, despite the promises from Ramirez for the finalization of an improved collective contract within the next two weeks.

Dear comrade T,

We greet the arrival of your letter, to which we are responding briefly and we will try to speak with you about the situation of the class struggle in Venezuela.

About the struggle of the oil workers

The article that you were sent describes part of what took place in a struggle which, between last September and October, was carried out by the workers of the state oil company PDVSA, the most important in the country, who laid off several injured workers (one of whom was pregnant) along with some arrested workers. The struggle owed to a delay of more than 8 months in the discussion over the collective contract that regulates the wages and benefits of the workers. The workers struck and demonstrated in the facilities of PDVSA in the state of Anzoategui, in eastern Venezuela, and Zulia, south of Lake Maracaibo in the west. The company, in a shady deal with the unions, which were mostly controlled by pro Chavez tendencies, delayed the discussion of the wage clauses. The workers struggle put pressure on several union bosses, such as those of C-CURA (the Unitary Autonomous Revolutionary Classist Current) of the UNT (Unitary Union of Workers), or those of FEDEPETROL (Federation of oil, chemical, and related workers of Venezuela), who were forced to "radicalize" against PDVSA and the government, so as not to be unmasked in front of the workers.

In the end, the unions and PDVSA obtained approval of a miserable wage increase of 12,000 bolivars per day, which had been rejected by the workers, who had demanded an increase of 30,000. Because of this, the monthly salary of an oil worker rose to approximately 1,320,000 Bolivars (equivalent to $610, according to the official exchange rate, and as low as $300, if we use the unofficial exchange rate, which is calculated by defining the real price of various products and services).

To give you a reference point, this salary is equivalent to a bit more than the cost of a basket of basic goods for a family of 5 (as of Oct 2007), which comes to 1 million Bolivars. Even adding the 'bonos' [unclear - either treasury bonds, or vouchers] which oil workers receive, they don't make enough to lead a dignified life; to the low salaries, we must factor in both the continual increase of the price of goods (around 25% annually)[1] and the shortages, which according to the Central Bank of Venezuela are 30% with respect to basic products. And the oil workers are some of the best paid in the country!!

Without a doubt, we think this struggle has had a political and moral victory for the oil workers and the Venezuelan proletariat as a whole:

-In the first place, the oil workers have brought the struggle back up onto their own class terrain; after having been one of the sectors hit hardest by the bourgeoisie, to being the center of the polarization between Chavistas and the opposition, who permitted the state to lay off 20,000 PDVSA employees in 2003 (at least half of whom were low-ranked workers or employees), without any sort of compensation. This struggle has a major significance at times when the Chavistas and opposition are trying to reinforce political polarization, through the campaigns for or against the constitutional reform proposed by Chavez. The workers, at least during these mobilizations, have placed themselves in the terrain of their own demands, despite the weight of the bourgeoisie's efforts to force any workers' or social struggle onto the terrain of the polarization.

-The struggle has made obvious the bourgeois, anti-worker character of the Chavez government: just as with all of the preceding governments (to which Chavismo assigns all of the social ills), the Chavez government also responds with repression, tear-gas bombs, lead, and jail against the workers who "dare" to fight for a dignified life.

An important fact: the oil workers of Puerto La Cruz, in the east of the country, some of whom were sympathizers of Chavismo, have denounced the high wages of the "socialist" bosses of PDVSA who earn more than 50 times the basic monthly salary (much higher than the wages of the industry bosses during preceding governments), while they deny raises to the workers which would allow them to cover at least the basic basket of goods (the exploitation of their labor power being the primary source of the salaries and kickbacks of the upper state bureaucrats and of the profits of various sectors of the national bourgeoisie; we factor this in).

-These struggles, which were preceded by others last May in which the oil workers mobilized to obtain the reinstatement of more than 1000 workers of the recently nationalized oil companies whom the "socialist" government of Chavez had tried to throw to the street, are genuine and important expression of workers' solidarity, in which the families of the affected workers also participated.

-As we've said, the workers found themselves unsatisfied with this agreement. There is a feeling of discontent, which could awaken at any moment.

It is important to add that the reaction of the oil workers is beginning to develop with a certain force in other sectors. The doctors, teachers, and some other sectors of public service workers have started mobilizations for wage demands; they have created assemblies where, apart from demanding wage increases, they have denounced the high level of deterioration of public services. In a recent assembly of doctors in Caracas, who were part of the Health Ministry, they identified themselves as "medical proletarians".

Its important to say that those who are for and against the government have tried to divide and polarize the movement, succeeding in many cases. Moreover the government mobilizes its organizations (bolivarian circles, communal councils, the social ombudsman, and armed groups when necessary) to intimidate and even physically assault the workers.

Another aspect which is no less important, is that the impoverished masses (many of whom are sympathizers of the government) express their indignation almost daily, protesting the housing shortage, the crime, the lack of services, etc., and ultimately the shortage of products such as milk, sugar, cooking oil, etc. In some cases, they have been repressed. This situation is in contrast to the high officials of the regime (called the "boliburguesia", or bolivarian bourgeoisie), who are strutting their opulence[2] with the most open frankness; they have made massive investments in armaments, which will be unleashed against the proletarians and the impoverished masses sooner rather than later; and they've invested major resources from the oil rent into developing the Venezuelan state's imperialist policy in the region.

This is the real face of "21st century socialism" promoted by Chavez and lauded by the Left, leftists, and "altermundialistas" [other-world-ists, supporters of the WSF], who seem to "drool" during their discussions on TeleSur, and who are sustained by the exploitation of the working masses, as is the entire bourgeois regime. The one difference is the "revolutionary" drivel, in the hope of confusing the proletarians inside and outside of Venezuela.

About the "reduction" of the working day

The "reduction" of the working day from 8 to 6 hours per day is considered in the constitutional reforms proposed by Chavez, along with other work-related "benefits", such as social security for the workers of the informal economy (which as in the rest of Latin America covers more than 50% of the labor force). These proposals, rather than seeking a real increase in the workers' quality of life, are the "cock-and-bull story", the big lie, with the hope of obtaining the support of the workers for the official proposal to reform the constitution.

The establishment has not said how this reduction in the working day will be realized; but many speculate that the un-worked hours will be utilized for political "formation" (indoctrination) or in so-called "socialist emulation" which the Fidelista cuban bourgeoisie invented so that the state could exploit the workers, with no pay. Furthermore, one of the objectives of the bourgeoisie (whether Chavista or not) is to discover how to charge taxes on the informal workers; by offering them the benefits of social security (which don't offer any real protection to the workers), the state will have greater control over them and will be able to impose taxes on them.

The principal objective of the constitutional reform (saturated with a big dose of hypocrisy, like every constitution in the world), is to strengthen the legal framework for greater state control over society, for more militarization, to legally justify the repression of the social movements, and to permit unlimited reelection of Chavez as president of the republic, among other things.

We can not lose sight of the fact that the Chavez government is a bourgeois government, in which the necessities and priorities of Capital prevail; in this sense, we can not be gullible (which we do not believe is your case), with respect to the Chavez government's search for the "greatest amount of social happiness", as the reformed text of the constitution puts it. It is precisely this deceitful propaganda that the Chavista movement pushes through their PR campaigns on the internal and international level, so that the workers of Venezuela and other countries will think that in Venezuela there is a real improvement in the living conditions of the workers and the population; this is the big lie sustained at the base by Chavista propaganda.

The capitalist crisis inexorably obligates every bourgeoisie, whether of the Right, the Center, or the Left, to attack the living conditions of the working class. In all of the countries where they have reduced the working day (France, Germany, etc.; including Venezuela, where at the beginning of the '90s they reduced the work day from 44 to 40 hours per week), this measure has not resulted in an improvement of the living conditions of the working class; completely to the contrary, the wages and social benefits have worsened, and precarious work has increased.

The intensification of the capitalist crisis will force the working class of Venezuela to fight against the state, as the oil, health, and education workers have done. In this way, positioned on its class terrain, the proletariat will be able to leave the trap of the political polarization which has kept its hands tied, and take part in the struggle of the world proletariat for the construction of real socialism.

Hoping we've responded to your questions,

the ICC.

19-11-07

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[1] Venezuela has the highest inflation in the region, with an annual average of 20% during the last three years.

[2] During a recent episode of "Alo, Presidente!", a Sunday program which stars Chavez, he saw that it was necessary to criticize those "revolutionaries" who live only for Hummers (which cost hundreds of millions of Bolivars) and 18-year-aged Whiskey. What Chavez did not say is that he has given use of the high oil profits to himself, his family, and his close friends. The "Bolivarian Revolution", which arose under the flag of fighting corruption, bathes in the waters of corruption.

Devrim

Herman
11th December 2007, 07:19
More ultra-leftist trash.

The article pits the bolivarian revolution against workers, when in fact, they are both becoming the same.

Yes, there are protest by workers.

Yes, there is criticism regarding social security.

I am the first to point these out.

However, we're talking about a country which had no social security or workers' benefits before the fifth republic.

It is not easy to build a socialist state, when there is the opposition and the US getting in the way.

The worker's nonetheless are right to demand higher wages and more benefits. There are several incompetent ministers which Chavez should replace.

IronColumn
11th December 2007, 18:43
Did the workers forget that their path was the same as the Bolivarian pseudo-revolution when they massively abstained from voting for Chavez state-capitalism and the rightwing opposition in the recent referendum?

Herman
11th December 2007, 22:01
Did the workers forget that their path was the same as the Bolivarian pseudo-revolution when they massively abstained from voting for Chavez state-capitalism and the rightwing opposition in the recent referendum?

You assume that the majority of those who abstained were workers. They were not.

KC
12th December 2007, 01:30
Actions like these are of the workers attempting to "push ahead" the revolution. Chavez is moving too slow in order to proceed from a more moderate point of view. Granted, the recent referendum would have moved things much faster if it had been passed, but a successful media campaign against it, and a lack of propaganda in support of it, caused it to fail.

Devrim
12th December 2007, 06:07
Originally posted by [email protected] 11, 2007 10:00 pm
You assume that the majority of those who abstained were workers. They were not.

Preliminary studies indicated that the NO won overwhelmingly in rich
and upper middle class areas and the YES in the poorest urban areas.
But the NO and YES fared badly in median income working class areas
where the abstention carried the day. Meanwhile the NO vote fared
very well in the relatively privileged labour aristocracy (oil workers,
for example) and peasant vote in small communities in the provinces.
The YES vote encountered many problems among youth.

Source: http://www.izquierda.info/modules.php?name...rticle&sid=4960

Devrim

Devrim
12th December 2007, 06:11
Originally posted by Herman+December 11, 2007 07:18 am--> (Herman @ December 11, 2007 07:18 am) More ultra-leftist trash.

The article pits the bolivarian revolution against workers, when in fact, they are both becoming the same.

[/b]

Zampanò
Actions like these are of the workers attempting to "push ahead" the revolution.

I don't think that there is a revolution is Venezuela. I don't think that they are building a socialist state as Herman claims. I think it is a capitalist state, and that it is attacking working class living standards.

Devrim

Entrails Konfetti
12th December 2007, 06:16
Devrim, I cant access that file directly.

Anyways, I did wonder about the "change in work" hours, I didn't think of the possibility, that basically the workers are to just work for free when outside work.

KC
12th December 2007, 06:16
I don't think that there is a revolution is Venezuela. I don't think that they are building a socialist state as Herman claims. I think it is a capitalist state, and that it is attacking working class living standards.

To be completely honest I'm not sure where I stand specifically on that.

Devrim
12th December 2007, 06:38
Originally posted by EL [email protected] 12, 2007 06:15 am
Devrim, I cant access that file directly.

It worked the first time I posted it (on another thread).

This is the article: http://www.izquierda.info/modules.php?name...rticle&sid=4960 (http://www.izquierda.info/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=4960)
Devrim

Devrim
12th December 2007, 06:41
Originally posted by Zampanò@December 12, 2007 06:15 am

I don't think that there is a revolution is Venezuela. I don't think that they are building a socialist state as Herman claims. I think it is a capitalist state, and that it is attacking working class living standards.

To be completely honest I'm not sure where I stand specifically on that.
I think that it is the crucial question when it comes to Venezuela.

Devrim

KC
12th December 2007, 06:49
I think that it is the crucial question when it comes to Venezuela.

Of course.

Louis Pio
12th December 2007, 07:07
I actually think the crucial question in Venezuela is that of the movement, but if one denies it's existence then of course it will lead to some very ultraleft conclusions or as we saw in another thread even downright support of the opposition (YSR)

Devrim
12th December 2007, 07:23
Originally posted by [email protected] 12, 2007 07:06 am
I actually think the crucial question in Venezuela is that of the movement, but if one denies it's existence then of course it will lead to some very ultraleft conclusions or as we saw in another thread even downright support of the opposition (YSR)
Which movement are you talking about, a movement that is at the head of a bourgeois state, and is attacking workers' living conditions?

If supporting workers defending their living conditions against attacks from capitalism, and the state is ultra left, what are the leftists supporting?

Devrim

black magick hustla
12th December 2007, 07:33
This doesn't proves much. In any revolution, there will be certain workers that will have it worse.

As I said in libcom, I am sure some workers had it worse in the starting stages of the russian revolution, as well as in the spanish revolution, etc.

The question arises if there is a genuine movement within the totality of the working class, not only just a sector of it.

YSR
12th December 2007, 09:12
Originally posted by Teis
I actually think the crucial question in Venezuela is that of the movement, but if one denies it's existence then of course it will lead to some very ultraleft conclusions or as we saw in another thread even downright support of the opposition (YSR)

Ah, cool snipe.

As I indicated in the other thread, the analysis I posted was basically a really shitty one, but it was the only one I could find at the moment.

But I stand behind what I said: if I was there, I wouldn't have voted yes. As Devrim points out, lots of working class people didn't either. Just because the working class isn't following your script doesn't mean they don't know what they're doing.

Louis Pio
12th December 2007, 11:02
Well my whole point is that I findt both Devrims and YSR's explanation of various reasons for abstention to be quite shitty and missing the point. Especially when YSR ends up giving support to some rich students from Venezuelas prestige University just because some of them happens to call themselves anarchist.

If we look at the occupied facotry movement and other front fighters of the Venezuelan working class they campaigned for the YES vote, the beurucrats didn't, they just did nothing since it would attack their power. So from my point of view at least the beurucrats and imperialists know what the deal is while Devrim and YSR is totally in the dark on the issue.

Entrails Konfetti
12th December 2007, 15:05
Still, none of the Chavistas explain why this "socialist" government is attacking the oil workers living conditions.

Devrim
12th December 2007, 15:09
Originally posted by [email protected] 12, 2007 11:01 am
Well my whole point is that I findt both Devrims and YSR's explanation of various reasons for abstention to be quite shitty and missing the point.
My point is that working class living standards are being attacked, and the working class didn't come out to vote for Chavez. I think there is probably a connection.

Devrim
12th December 2007, 15:12
Originally posted by [email protected] 12, 2007 07:32 am
This doesn't proves much. In any revolution, there will be certain workers that will have it worse.

As I said in libcom, I am sure some workers had it worse in the starting stages of the russian revolution, as well as in the spanish revolution, etc.


Yes, there is a huge difference though between workers deciding to make sacrifices for their revolution, and the bourgeoisie deciding that workers must make sacrafices for the nation.


The question arises if there is a genuine movement within the totality of the working class, not only just a sector of it.

The question does arise. I think the answer is no.

Devrim