Latest liberal myth: Ron Paul for Net Neutrality

[Cheung Mo]

He's not...But I see tons of ignorant social liberals claim that he's on the people's side on this issue.

[bootleg42]

How can there be "Net Neutrality" when not everyone in the world can afford to pay for excess to the internet?????

That's not neutral. That only supports the notion that those with more money can be on the net and probably be on it longer.

[Cheung Mo]

Arguing that Net Neutrality does not go far enough is not the same as arguing that it's a bad thing.

[PRC-UTE]

Originally posted by [email protected] 18, 2007 09:28 pm
How can there be "Net Neutrality" when not everyone in the world can afford to pay for excess to the internet?????

That's not neutral. That only supports the notion that those with more money can be on the net and probably be on it longer.
Right, the net represents a small percentage of the world's people, especially those who've time to spend on it...

[dty06]

Ron Paul is also a racist, but that's besides the point.

There are only a couple of candidates that I would actually vote for that are running in the major parties, but they have so little chance of being on the ballot anyway that i'll either be writing someone in for 2008 or i'll be really, really drunk the entire day, and simply won't vote.

[Killer Enigma]

Ron Paul is also a racist, but that's besides the point.
Support that with substantive evidence or gtfo omGz!!!1111

[Dimentio]

I would have voted for Jonathon Sharkey if I had lived in the USA.

[bootleg42]

Originally posted by [email protected] 20, 2007 07:27 pm
Ron Paul is also a racist, but that's besides the point.
Not wanting to defend him and make him look good but actually he's not racist, he's ETHNOCENTRIC.

He claims that he has no problem with immigration (referring to latino population to the U.S.) but he wants them to fit into "american customs" and live "like americans". He basically wants them to not speak spanish anymore and to basically live like middle class white people.

It just sounds more ethnocentric rather than racist. BUT being ethnocentric can be more dangerous than being racist so he's a big danger when it comes to the race problem in the United States of America.

Also it's hilarious how he blame collectivism as the cause of racism. His logic there really makes him look.........REALLY FUCKING STUPID.