Larry Flynt will expose Bombshell GOP Sex Scandal

[Mkultra]

Larry Flynt, editor and publisher of Hustler magazine, just told FOX Business Network’s Neil Cavuto that he’s “hoping to expose a bombshell” that will stand “Washington and the country on its head.” Within the next week or two, he says his magazine will expose a sex scandal of huge proportions involving a prominent United States Senator. Flynt refused to comment on the Senator’s political affiliation, but alluded that he or she is a Republican.



http://bigheaddc.com/2007/10/26/larry-flyn...te-sex-scandal/ (http://bigheaddc.com/2007/10/26/larry-flynt-teases-new-huge-gop-senate-sex-scandal/)

[spartan]

This should be great!

Dont be suprised though if people working for Hustler start to go missing and there property starts getting arson attacks :lol:

[Ismail]

Mkultra, what would you call yourself politically? I expect to see this on democrat sites, not RevLeft. (Or at least in ChitChat)

[Mkultra]

Im a conglomeration of everything that is Good with a social bias towards anarchy

[Red October]

Originally posted by [email protected] 30, 2007 04:17 pm
Mkultra, what would you call yourself politically? I expect to see this on democrat sites, not RevLeft. (Or at least in ChitChat)
I'm certainly not defending someone like mkultra, but I don't see a problem with this. Exposing the hypocrisy and general douchebaggery of the Republican party is fine with me. So is doing the same thing to the Democratic party.

[lvleph]

Originally posted by [email protected] 30, 2007 09:02 pm
Larry Flynt, editor and publisher of Hustler magazine, just told FOX Business Network’s Neil Cavuto that he’s “hoping to expose a bombshell” that will stand “Washington and the country on its head.” Within the next week or two, he says his magazine will expose a sex scandal of huge proportions involving a prominent United States Senator. Flynt refused to comment on the Senator’s political affiliation, but alluded that he or she is a Republican.



http://bigheaddc.com/2007/10/26/larry-flyn...te-sex-scandal/ (http://bigheaddc.com/2007/10/26/larry-flynt-teases-new-huge-gop-senate-sex-scandal/)
That is one way to sell more magazines. Tell everyone you are going to reveal something huge, and to find out what that is BUY MY MAG.

[bootleg42]

Mkultra, you tend to post ALOT of bourgeoisie theater news. Plus you're name makes me think you're one of the conspiracy theory nuts but is confused about what we're about. I remember a while back you did not even know what materialism was (a very basic thing). Does anyone else notice this from him/her???? Can someone question him to see what he/she's about????

[midnight marauder]

Can someone question him to see what he/she's about????

I think, in a word, metaphysics.

[SocialistMilitant]

Originally posted by [email protected] 30, 2007 09:17 pm
Mkultra, what would you call yourself politically? I expect to see this on democrat sites, not RevLeft. (Or at least in ChitChat)
Unfortunately, this is American politics whether we like it or not.

[ComradeR]

Mkultra the republicans and democrats are really no different from each other, just the rhetoric they use. Really look at history and you will see what I mean, they are both aggressive imperialists, anti-working class and pro bourgeoisie which is a given as they are both bourgeois parties. Don't get duped by this idea that the dems are somehow better or more pro-working class.

[Mkultra]

Originally posted by midnight [email protected] 31, 2007 04:22 am

Can someone question him to see what he/she's about????

I think, in a word, metaphysics.
metaphysics proves that the material world doesnt exist

[Mkultra]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31, 2007 07:11 am
Mkultra the republicans and democrats are really no different from each other, just the rhetoric they use. Really look at history and you will see what I mean, they are both aggressive imperialists, anti-working class and pro bourgeoisie which is a given as they are both bourgeois parties. Don't get duped by this idea that the dems are somehow better or more pro-working class.
I agree--the Clintons are neocon infiltrators in the Dem party and they pushed the Dems away from progressive enlightenment

[Mkultra]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31, 2007 03:58 am
Mkultra, you tend to post ALOT of bourgeoisie theater news. Plus you're name makes me think you're one of the conspiracy theory nuts but is confused about what we're about. I remember a while back you did not even know what materialism was (a very basic thing). Does anyone else notice this from him/her???? Can someone question him to see what he/she's about????
this name I use to remind people how far the fascists will go to try and control peoples minds

[LSD]

Mkultra the republicans and democrats are really no different from each other

No, they're different, it's just that the differences aren't that significant.

It is important, however, to keep in mind that bourgeois politicians do have real political disagreements. There isn't some "secret conspiracy" in which Democrats and Republicans only "pretend" to challenge one another.

It's just that all bourgeois politics ultimately serves the class interests of the rulling elite, regardless of the particular inclinations of the politican in question.

***

MK, ever heard of edit?

[Yazman]

Plus you're name makes me think you're one of the conspiracy theory nuts

I think it's ironic you're accusing him of being naive yet you refer to MK Ultra as a "conspiracy theory nut" thing. MK Ultra was a real program, it's already thoroughly documented as being historic fact.

[Mkultra]

alot of so called "conspiracys" usually end up get validated by history as true yet people continue to call people "nuts" who disagree with establishment propaganda

[Jazzratt]

Originally posted by Mkultra+October 31, 2007 06:47 pm--> (Mkultra @ October 31, 2007 06:47 pm)
[email protected] 31, 2007 07:11 am
Mkultra the republicans and democrats are really no different from each other, just the rhetoric they use. Really look at history and you will see what I mean, they are both aggressive imperialists, anti-working class and pro bourgeoisie which is a given as they are both bourgeois parties. Don't get duped by this idea that the dems are somehow better or more pro-working class.
I agree--the Clintons are neocon infiltrators in the Dem party and they pushed the Dems away from progressive enlightenment [/b]
The dems were never headed towards anything even resembling "progressive enlightenment". Remember Truman's party affiliations? What about Kennedy? Or Roosevelt?

It was the Democrats that supported slavery.

[spartan]

Has it not been the case, since the 70's at least, that the Democrats and Republicans have traded ideological places so to speak?

The usually Conservative south was a Democrat stronghold until the 70's when, due to the ideological changes, the Republicans inherited the south as there own stronghold.

This of course all goes back to the US civil war where the anti-slavery north, or union, was led by the elected Republican Government, whilst many in the south came from an openly Democrat background.

This of course has all changed as the Republicans seem to be the new old style Democrats with neo-Conservatism and Christian fundamentalism thrown in as well.

[Mkultra]

in the 1800s the Republicans started off as a Liberal anti slavery party--they were nothing like the Corporate Fascists of the GOP of today


and the southern Democrats during the civil rights era were called dixiecrats and after the left liberated the blacks they all switched to the Republican party to punish the Dems

[Jazzratt]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31, 2007 09:20 pm
in the 1800s the Republicans started off as a Liberal anti slavery party--they were nothing like the Corporate Fascists of the GOP of today
You know nothing of fascism, the current republican party don't even come close.


and the southern Democrats during the civil rights era were called dixiecrats and after the left liberated the blacks they all switched to the Republican party to punish the Dems

The point is that being liberal is no longer synonymous with progress, the time for that is long gone.

[Dimentio]

MKultra: Define "good".

[Mkultra]

Good is anything that makes you feel so right --provided its not too much an offense to God--thats the root of it at least. But it has many branches

its hard to answer that Q without writing a Novel

[Mkultra]

Originally posted by Jazzratt+October 31, 2007 09:45 pm--> (Jazzratt @ October 31, 2007 09:45 pm)
[email protected] 31, 2007 09:20 pm
in the 1800s the Republicans started off as a Liberal anti slavery party--they were nothing like the Corporate Fascists of the GOP of today
You know nothing of fascism, the current republican party don't even come close.


and the southern Democrats during the civil rights era were called dixiecrats and after the left liberated the blacks they all switched to the Republican party to punish the Dems

The point is that being liberal is no longer synonymous with progress, the time for that is long gone. [/b]
I agree--Our only Salvation rests in Revolutionary resistance to Authority

[ComradeR]

I agree--the Clintons are neocon infiltrators in the Dem party and they pushed the Dems away from progressive enlightenment
It's hardly a "neo-con infiltration" that has somehow perverted the Democrats, the Dems have been pulling this shit for as long as they have been in existence.

No, they're different, it's just that the differences aren't that significant.

It is important, however, to keep in mind that bourgeois politicians do have real political disagreements. There isn't some "secret conspiracy" in which Democrats and Republicans only "pretend" to challenge one another.

It's just that all bourgeois politics ultimately serves the class interests of the rulling elite, regardless of the particular inclinations of the politican in question.

I agree.

[bootleg42]

Mkultra..............what's your political ideology??? Like some of us here are communist (marxist-leninists, maoists, etc) and some of us here are anarchist. What are you?? Because you sound like either a democrat or someone who is really confused. And why do you always post bourgeoisie theater news????