For Communism to Succeed it Needs....

[Capitalist Lawyer]

It needs this (http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/03/more_on_the_bab_1.html) in order to be a reality.

Without actually reading the whole post, my thought is that attractive women don’t join fringe movements. After all, good looking women gain so much benefit from the status quo, why would they want to change anything? That’s why at a Libertarian party, a communist organization, Nazi rally or at an atheist rally, all the women in attendance are ugly, if you see any women at all.

This is why women are slaves to wearing the same brands of clothes as other women, why women are more likely to be religious, and why women are a lot less likely to be members of any sort of oddball movement (for example the Revolutionary Left or the Ayn Rand Institution).

So, in other words...if you want to get the ladies, ditch the communism or the extreme libertarianism and hook up with the Republicans or the Democrats.

You may have some luck with the Green Party, but it's a gamble. But moreso than the Ron Paul/Libertarian movement.

[Jazzratt]

Stop posting stupid shite. You may as well be typing "I'm a stupid **** please ban me".


Without actually reading the whole post

Did the polysyllables scare you?


my thought is that attractive women don’t join fringe movements.

Prove it.


After all, good looking women gain so much benefit from the status quo,

Yeah, unless they happen to live in a country under the thumb of islamic fundamentalism, or happen to be working class, or happen to have to put up with misogynistic shits like you, or happen to be from an ethnic minority, or happen to be homosexual. Yeah then they have loads to gain from the status quo, on average less than their male counterparts. Oh whoops looks like you were talking out of your arsehole.


That’s why at a Libertarian party, a communist organization, Nazi rally or at an atheist rally, all the women in attendance are ugly, if you see any women at all.

You what? Are you seriously contending that all women involved in radical movements are ugly? Do you want to back up that stupendously stupid ad hominem with, I don't know, some proof.


This is why women are slaves to wearing the same brands of clothes as other women,

They aren't though and saying it as if it were fact doesn't make it so, try again.


why women are more likely to be religious,

What an odd assertion, presumably you have some kind of study or other reliable source - preferably sources - you could cite which come from anything other than the dark recesses of your colon.


and why women are a lot less likely to be members of any sort of oddball movement (for example the Revolutionary Left or the Ayn Rand Institution).

The fact that you mention the Ayn Rand Institute in a post where you posit that women do not involve themselves in politics has produced enough irony to rupture my brain.


So, in other words...if you want to get the ladies, ditch the communism or the extreme libertarianism and hook up with the Republicans or the Democrats.

Considering that your misogynistic shite indicates you're probably a virgin I think we can feel free to discount any advice you give us on how to "get the ladies".

[RedAnarchist]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 21, 2007 12:45 am
It needs this (http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/03/more_on_the_bab_1.html) in order to be a reality.

Without actually reading the whole post, my thought is that attractive women don’t join fringe movements. After all, good looking women gain so much benefit from the status quo, why would they want to change anything? That’s why at a Libertarian party, a communist organization, Nazi rally or at an atheist rally, all the women in attendance are ugly, if you see any women at all.

This is why women are slaves to wearing the same brands of clothes as other women, why women are more likely to be religious, and why women are a lot less likely to be members of any sort of oddball movement (for example the Revolutionary Left or the Ayn Rand Institution).

So, in other words...if you want to get the ladies, ditch the communism or the extreme libertarianism and hook up with the Republicans or the Democrats.

You may have some luck with the Green Party, but it's a gamble. But moreso than the Ron Paul/Libertarian movement.
Wow. I don't even know where to begin with this misogynistic shit thats been dumped onto the forum. Are you actually that superficial that you think that having a lot of attractive women in our movements would suddenly improve our chances of a social revolution? Or are you just bored and want to annoy us?

If we have people joing up just because of good-looking women, then we will be reduced to a movement full of shallow airheads and perverts. I would rather that any attratcive woman who was a revolutionary leftist did so because of class conciousness and not just because someone encouraged her so that she could act like bait for childish people such as Capitalist Lawyer.

[RevMARKSman]

Originally posted by [email protected] 20, 2007 07:14 pm
Stop posting stupid shite.
Best post ever.

Seriously, though...um...I have nothing much to add to the discussion. Continue.

[Dr Mindbender]

Yep what Red Anarchist said, mysoginistic chauvinist shite.

The reason 'attractive' women in the aesthetic sense become cappie glamour girls is because of their material conditioning int that they are easier to manipulate through financial bribery under the existing status quo. This has nothing to do with their politics and does not prove that they are 'less likely' to be leftist per se.People are not 'born leftist'. They form their politics and their attitudes through life experiences and exposure to social reality.

[RNK]

I was just at a protest today, and I must say, most of the women there were fucking hot. Especially the anarchist girls. For some reason, most of them have incredibly nice bodies.

Please be banned now.

[Labor Shall Rule]

I have met some pretty hot activist girls, so I don't know what you are talking about.

[Rhino Thunder Pants]

My mum is a pretty hot activist then again so is my dad...

[Capitalist Lawyer]

Prove it.

It's called, "common sense". Or do I have to prove that water is wet too?


Yeah, unless they happen to live in a country under the thumb of islamic fundamentalism

The main point of the theory (if you read the article; you clearly did not) is that in order for a "fringe movement" to gain any momentum, it needs "babes".

What's the latest on the revolutionary left?


or happen to be working class, or happen to have to put up with misogynistic shits like you, or happen to be from an ethnic minority, or happen to be homosexual. Yeah then they have loads to gain from the status quo, on average less than their male counterparts.

Nonsensical emotional ranting.

Women fare much better than men in western nations.
Homosexuals are treated like equals and aren't threatened with imprisonment.
Ethnic minorities fare better here in the USA than in any other nation.

And why is being an ethnic minority such a bad thing in your eyes? Don't you think "poor white trash" have any hardships to deal with as well?


You what? Are you seriously contending that all women involved in radical movements are ugly? Do you want to back up that stupendously stupid ad hominem with, I don't know, some proof.

Common sense dictates.

Good looking women are much too "busy" partying, working as pharmaceutical sales reps, and enjoying the benefits of being attractive than to devote their time to FRINGE political causes.


They aren't though and saying it as if it were fact doesn't make it so, try again.

Apparently, you have never had a girlfriend that wasn't an "oddball".

(note the quotation marks)


What an odd assertion, presumably you have some kind of study or other reliable source - preferably sources - you could cite which come from anything other than the dark recesses of your colon.

+Women + More +Religious +Men (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=women+more+religious)


The fact that you mention the Ayn Rand Institute in a post where you posit that women do not involve themselves in politics has produced enough irony to rupture my brain.

It was just another name for the Libertarian Party.

Calm down, Mr. Potty Mouth.


Considering that your misogynistic shite indicates you're probably a virgin I think we can feel free to discount any advice you give us on how to "get the ladies".

No argument of substance, just incessant name calling.

How immature.


If we have people joing up just because of good-looking women, then we will be reduced to a movement full of shallow airheads and perverts. I

Good looking women are "airheads"? And men are just blatant perverts?

Who's being sexist here?


They form their politics and their attitudes through life experiences and exposure to social reality.

Thanks for proving my point.

What life experiences would cause an attractive person who benefits from the status quo to join a fringe movement like a Libertarian or Communist or even a Nazi movement?

[Axel1917]

I have yet to see any proof about no attractive girls being in "fringe movements."

And since when was communism all about getting girls?

I also agree with what Red_Anarchist said.

[Pawn Power]

I disagree with the premise of this "point" on the basis that I would not agree with what CL would deem "attractive" (i.e. see Chubby Chasers thread).

[Capitalist Lawyer]

I think that I have previously pointed out that atheists tend to be ugly in the past. Ugly people are more likely to adhere to contrarian views because they receive less benefit from the status quo. So atheists, libertarians, communists, and any other weird type of movement, has a disproportionate share of ugly people.

You're either communist because of guilt or because you truly hate the status quo.

You're either libertarian because of misanthropy or because you truly hate the status quo.

[RedAnarchist]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 21, 2007 03:45 am

If we have people joing up just because of good-looking women, then we will be reduced to a movement full of shallow airheads and perverts. I

Good looking women are "airheads"? And men are just blatant perverts?

Who's being sexist here?


Don't twist my words, because you know what I meant - that people would see these attractive people and join up just because of them.

[R_P_A_S]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 20, 2007 11:45 pm
It needs this (http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/03/more_on_the_bab_1.html) in order to be a reality.

Without actually reading the whole post, my thought is that attractive women don’t join fringe movements. After all, good looking women gain so much benefit from the status quo, why would they want to change anything? That’s why at a Libertarian party, a communist organization, Nazi rally or at an atheist rally, all the women in attendance are ugly, if you see any women at all.

This is why women are slaves to wearing the same brands of clothes as other women, why women are more likely to be religious, and why women are a lot less likely to be members of any sort of oddball movement (for example the Revolutionary Left or the Ayn Rand Institution).

So, in other words...if you want to get the ladies, ditch the communism or the extreme libertarianism and hook up with the Republicans or the Democrats.

You may have some luck with the Green Party, but it's a gamble. But moreso than the Ron Paul/Libertarian movement.
hey capitalist public-pretender.. i read as far as saying that "pretty woman" don't join the movement and I stopped.

shut the fuck up.

[Coggeh]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 21, 2007 02:59 am
I think that I have previously pointed out that atheists tend to be ugly in the past. Ugly people are more likely to adhere to contrarian views because they receive less benefit from the status quo. So atheists, libertarians, communists, and any other weird type of movement, has a disproportionate share of ugly people.

You're either communist because of guilt or because you truly hate the status quo.

You're either libertarian because of misanthropy or because you truly hate the status quo.
Piss off and die u scum fuck conservative ****.


Our ideology doesnt have to have some blonde d-cup to seem attractive if you want that go join the republicans ...its a pity the conservatives believe in abstinence so all your blonde bimbos mean nothing.

[Qwerty Dvorak]

How many times has the administration had to advise you all not to feed the trolls? I suspect this thread will be closed shortly, and perhaps CapitalistLawyer banned (perhaps). The claims made here are utterly ridiculous and quite sexist, implying that all women are selfish for some reason. They are also inconsistent with reality (especially that remark about atheists; it actually makes no sense at all, even if we accept your premise that all women are purely self-interested. Pretty much all the attractive girls I know are atheists).

[Matty_UK]

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1/brakke123/riotgirl.jpg

'nuff said, seriously.

I know plenty of hot leftists, and in fact some of the girls on this forum who have posted photos in the Commie Club are pretty fine, I must say. (and some of the guys as well, chimx is hawt)

And besides from your statement that "fringe" groups don't have attractive members being completely wrong, most of the leftist activities I've been involved in aren't limited to ideologues and usually have normal people who are affected by whatever specific problem is being campaigned about. (like immigrants who may be deported for example) I think you're assuming none of us can possibly be ordinary socially adept people, and I also think you probably haven't met any leftists outside the net.

And I think your post shows a hell of a lot of contempt for women.

[Matty_UK]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 21, 2007 02:59 am
I think that I have previously pointed out that atheists tend to be ugly in the past. Ugly people are more likely to adhere to contrarian views because they receive less benefit from the status quo. So atheists, libertarians, communists, and any other weird type of movement, has a disproportionate share of ugly people.
Bullshit. The few strongly religious people I know from my generation are unattractive losers with poor social skills, yet some of the hottest girls I know are atheists.

And atheism isn't contrarian for god's sake, especially in western europe where most people I know are atheists or agnostic.

[Capitalist Lawyer]

Don't twist my words, because you know what I meant - that people would see these attractive people and join up just because of them.

Point clearly missed, again.

People wouldn't join up simply because of the attractive women but rather it would make the fringe movement appear to be more legit and less fringe.


The few strongly religious people I know from my generation are unattractive losers with poor social skills, yet some of the hottest girls I know are atheists.

Being strongly religious is fringe behavior. Being casually religious is not, and I'm betting that's where you'll find the best looking people.

A woman at a present day fringe left-wing protest rally:

http://www.zombietime.com/how_berkeley_can_you_be/135-3575_IMG.JPG

And I'm sure you'll find ugly women at fringe right-wing rallies as well.

[Capitalist Lawyer]

'nuff said, seriously.

Thanks for proving my point.

[Matty_UK]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 21, 2007 01:06 pm

'nuff said, seriously.

Thanks for proving my point.
You don't think that girl is hot?

[Capitalist Lawyer]

You don't think that girl is hot?

We're not having a "horny teenager discussion" here, ok?

Do you understand the point I'm making?

Please read this article. (http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/03/more_on_the_bab_1.html)

[Forward Union]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 20, 2007 11:45 pm
So, in other words...if you want to get the ladies, ditch the communism or the extreme libertarianism and hook up with the Republicans or the Democrats.


I haven't been single for about 3 years, and in that time I have been with several people. In various relationship forms. I havent had to ditch comunism either.

I was told that being politicaly radical can be an attractive quality, but I don't think it matters, I think it's an entirely subjective thing.


And I'm sure you'll find ugly women at fringe right-wing rallies as well.

Im sure that's true. Im sure you'll find ugly women at centrist political gatherings, non-political gatherings, and well, everywhere. You will probably also find really attractive ones as well. But it really is irrelivant.

Besides I can't be bothered to put effort into this thread, if you are bored with revleft please just stop posting. All that will happen is you will be banned.

[PigmerikanMao]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 20, 2007 11:45 pm
It needs this (http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/03/more_on_the_bab_1.html) in order to be a reality.
French artist Eugène Delacroix?

[RedAnarchist]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 21, 2007 01:50 pm

Don't twist my words, because you know what I meant - that people would see these attractive people and join up just because of them.

Point clearly missed, again.

People wouldn't join up simply because of the attractive women but rather it would make the fringe movement appear to be more legit and less fringe.

So attractive people are the mainstream, therefore most people are attractive?

[The Advent of Anarchy]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 20, 2007 11:45 pm
It needs this (http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/03/more_on_the_bab_1.html) in order to be a reality.

Without actually reading the whole post, my thought is that attractive women don’t join fringe movements. After all, good looking women gain so much benefit from the status quo, why would they want to change anything? That’s why at a Libertarian party, a communist organization, Nazi rally or at an atheist rally, all the women in attendance are ugly, if you see any women at all.

This is why women are slaves to wearing the same brands of clothes as other women, why women are more likely to be religious, and why women are a lot less likely to be members of any sort of oddball movement (for example the Revolutionary Left or the Ayn Rand Institution).

So, in other words...if you want to get the ladies, ditch the communism or the extreme libertarianism and hook up with the Republicans or the Democrats.

You may have some luck with the Green Party, but it's a gamble. But moreso than the Ron Paul/Libertarian movement.
Matty_UK pwned you. :lol:

Anyways, there were and are beautiful communist and anarchist girls. Hell, how about that EZLN girl with the rifle on the Tribute to Beautiful People?

Anyways, if anyone is serious about Communism or Anarchism, they wouldn't leave their movement for some hot girl.

Really, you're an idiot.

[Jazzratt]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 21, 2007 02:45 am

Prove it.

It's called, "common sense". Or do I have to prove that water is wet too?
Ah so you've got nothing.


Nonsensical emotional ranting.

Nothing emotional about it, it's quite obvious that if a woman is working class then they have more to gain from the destruction of the status quo than they do from maintaining it.


Women fare much better than men in western nations.

What are you smoking and can I have some?


Homosexuals are treated like equals and aren't threatened with imprisonment.

Not threatened with imprisonment, no, but they're far from being treated as equals. Equals don't get nailbombed by skinheads, equals don't have mainstream church groups attacking them and their lifestyle and equals are not regarded with suspicion in the way that homosexuals are in America.


Ethnic minorities fare better here in the USA than in any other nation.

Stop making wild assertions and start dying of ebola.


And why is being an ethnic minority such a bad thing in your eyes? Don't you think "poor white trash" have any hardships to deal with as well?

Do you know what institutional racism is scumfuck? Poor white people do have hardships to deal with, that is obvious, especially in nations where they're in the minority. In all countries ethnic minorities tend to be given a hard rap because it helps the national bourgeois divide the proletariat.


Common sense dictates.

No it doesn't, your misogyny might, but not common sense.


Good looking women are much too "busy" partying, working as pharmaceutical sales reps, and enjoying the benefits of being attractive than to devote their time to FRINGE political causes.

You're quite out of touch with women aren't you?


Apparently, you have never had a girlfriend that wasn't an "oddball".

(note the quotation marks)

What is the relevance of this?


+Women + More +Religious +Men (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=women+more+religious)

I really cannot be bothered to wade through that lot and tell you why each one is wrong, suffice to say quite a lot of the tests were carried out by groups with an agenda and of course used very dodgy demographic information.


It was just another name for the Libertarian Party.

That takes it's name from a woman who was involved in "fringe" politics that some people argue is attractive.


Calm down, Mr. Potty Mouth.

Die in a fire.


No argument of substance, just incessant name calling.

How immature.

This from the **** who was enough of a presumptuous and immature cock grinder to tell us what we should do to "get" women.

I'm done with you, troll.

[Random Precision]

I can't believe that anyone on the forum is taking this seriously enough to argue about it. This is nothing but an attempt to push our buttons.

[Saint Street Revolution]

Originally posted by [email protected] 21, 2007 04:45 pm
I can't believe that anyone on the forum is taking this seriously enough to argue about it. This is nothing but an attempt to push our buttons.
Agreed. Why is there two pages of discussion on this?

[NorthStarRepublicML]

Why is there two pages of discussion on this?

BEST thread EVER!

HA!

it was my lack of a right arm, facial yeast infection, and prehensile tail that got me into fringe groups ....

actually, i completely disagree .... except in Jazzaratt's case .... what a dog!

[Dean]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 21, 2007 02:45 am
The main point of the theory (if you read the article; you clearly did not) is that in order for a "fringe movement" to gain any momentum, it needs "babes".

What's the latest on the revolutionary left?
Plenty of hot girls?

I have been to plenty of protests where I can't keep my eyes off of the multitudes of lovely women about. This articles claims that the anti-war movement has few hot girls, and yet the last one I went to was full of a lot of hot girls that were around their college - age years, as well as peopel from all ages, men and women both hot and ugly.

Regardless, the argument that a movement needs hot women to succeed is stupid. It is, as others have said here, a form of misogeny.

[Capitalist Lawyer]

I have been to plenty of protests where I can't keep my eyes off of the multitudes of lovely women about. This articles claims that the anti-war movement has few hot girls, and yet the last one I went to was full of a lot of hot girls that were around their college - age years, as well as peopel from all ages, men and women both hot and ugly.

I'll repeat it again.

The anti-war movement is not a fringe movement.

Rallying to destroy capitalism, religion, or ethnic minorities or attending a "God Hates Fags" demonstration is a fringe movement.

[LuXe]

Man oh man...

All I know is women love the fact that I'm a commie. Its a chick magnet.

This is just crap, and does not proove shit other than the fact that communist women are average beauty.

You seem to presume that ll women are wgoist *****es who want some cash on their pants, not all women are dumb and ignorant you know.

[TC]

Originally posted by MattyUK+--> (MattyUK)
And I think your post shows a hell of a lot of contempt for women.
[/b]

actually i thought the original post was kind of funny and, while crude, clearly not meant to be taken seriously.

whereas I thought the serious and rigorous defense on the part of male leftists that "their women" are beautiful was somewhat sexist. The appropriate response I think would have been that leftist women are smarter not that they're better looking, or that its totally irrelevant.

Btw, its creepy to continue to post that picture of that random masked girl.


Originally posted by NorthStarCompass"ML"+--> (NorthStarCompass"ML")
it was my lack of a right arm, facial yeast infection, and prehensile tail that got me into fringe groups ....
[/b]

Got you into "fringe groups"? Uh, I don't think your googlesites hosted "Peoples Republic of the North Star" even qualifies as a "fringe group", thats just a fantasy that you've made for yourself :mellow:



[email protected]

Regardless, the argument that a movement needs hot women to succeed is stupid.

No, but it probably helps.

Hot men too.

Why do you think the Cubans stuck Che's photo on everything? It uh, wasn't cause of his marxist theoretical contributions.


Capitalist Lawyer
The anti-war movement is not a fringe movement.

Rallying to destroy capitalism, religion, or ethnic minorities or attending a "God Hates Fags" demonstration is a fringe movement.

The anti-war movement is not a fringe group...however the anti-war movement in both the US and UK is directed by organizations who publicly declare that they want to destroy capitalism (not just ANSWER but also UJP, UPJ, Stop the War, NION, Troops Out Now, new SDS, The World Can't Wait; all of their organizing activists are anti-capitalists of various sorts)..so you have some category confusion I think.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

Originally posted by TragicClown
actually i thought the original post was kind of funny and, while crude, clearly not meant to be taken seriously.

Then why has Capialist Lawyer not said so?

And in any case, this is Opposing Ideologies, not Chit-Chat.

[Herman]

I guess communism will never work without attractive women...

I have been shot down...

[Matty_UK]

Originally posted by [email protected] 22, 2007 12:30 pm
actually i thought the original post was kind of funny and, while crude, clearly not meant to be taken seriously.

whereas I thought the serious and rigorous defense on the part of male leftists that "their women" are beautiful was somewhat sexist. The appropriate response I think would have been that leftist women are smarter not that they're better looking, or that its totally irrelevant.

Btw, its creepy to continue to post that picture of that random masked girl.
What do you mean "continue" to post that picture? That's the only time I've posted it.

Capitalist Lawyer seems to take that link seriously. And there's nothing sexist about trying to refute his claim that leftists are uglier than average, especially as it's the most obviously weak part of his argument based as it is on apparently one photo from that silly link. Easier to disagree in that way than get into a longer and stupider argument about whether or not the success of a political movement depends on the attractiveness of it's members.

[LuXe]

Actually, this person has to be a troll.

[Capitalist Lawyer]

And there's nothing sexist about trying to refute his claim that leftists are uglier than average, especially as it's the most obviously weak part of his argument based as it is on apparently one photo from that silly link.

I have also stated that devout Libertarians tend to be ugly on average as well.


The anti-war movement is not a fringe group...however the anti-war movement in both the US and UK is directed by organizations who publicly declare that they want to destroy capitalism (not just ANSWER but also UJP, UPJ, Stop the War, NION, Troops Out Now, new SDS, The World Can't Wait; all of their organizing activists are anti-capitalists of various sorts)..so you have some category confusion I think.

To be sure, there are hot left-wingers out there at the anti-war rallies, but they are generally the exception that proves the rule.

In the 1960s, it was the rule. When Jane Fonda joined the effort, the whole movement caught on and became even more popular.

And I'll even bet that you're more likely to find women (attractive and non-attractive) at leftist rallies than you would at right-wing/libertarian ones.

Clever marketing also helps too and I think the communists have much cooler looking symbols than libertarians, the liberals or nazis.

This may explain why the "Orange Revolution" was so successful in the Ukraine.


No, but it probably helps.

Hot men too.

Why do you think the Cubans stuck Che's photo on everything? It uh, wasn't cause of his marxist theoretical contributions.

Exactly.

All one has to do is compare the anti-Syrian rallies:

http://www.willisms.com/archives/victorysigngirl.gif

To the mostly all male pro-Syrian rallies:

http://www.willisms.com/archives/pinkshirt1.gif


Which side would you rather be on? Today, it seems like the babes are not involved in politics (in the USA), but if you were a betting man...the Democrats would probably be your best bet.

[Don't Change Your Name]

This is an extremely dumb thread. This is like trying to make conclusions about the meaning of life arguing about women's shoes.

[NorthStarRepublicML]

Btw, its creepy to continue to post that picture of that random masked girl.

TC, this time we agree on something ...

Edit: opps missed this little swipe at me ....


Uh, I don't think your googlesites hosted "Peoples Republic of the North Star" even qualifies as a "fringe group", thats just a fantasy that you've made for yourself

HA! ...

go fuck yourself TC

[Lamanov]

Most of the girls in CC (I've only seen their photos) are actually very good looking.

There's an actual counterproof.

[LuXe]

Like I have said, commies drag all the chicks. The "romanticism" of revolution is something they pick up on and they love the "regellious" types.

Belive me, its personal experience.

You wouldnt know this of course, (Capitalist lawyer) since you are neither communist nor revolutionary.

I have been and seen one leftist commnuist gathering (for ages 16+) here, and the hot/not ratio is actually above average.

Not only is Capitalist Lawyer a troll, he doesnt know his shit either, like most trolls.

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

Arguably the Republican Party is more "successful" than the RCP right?

If that is the case, why does the Republican Party (and most mainstream bourgeouis political parties for that matter) consist of ugly old men?

[Marsella]

@ Capitalist Lawyer:

Generally, your argument suggests that good looking people tend towards succeeding and thus the status quo. Whereas ugly looking people tend towards revolutionary movements.

I asked this of you before: if success depends on good looks, then why do capitalists maintain they succeeded by their hard work? Because looking good ain't hard work. I might also point out that in your first post you said you got a pay rise because you worked hard. Shouldn't you have stated that you got a pay rise because you look good?

Revolutionaries/fringe movements are a minority. But beautiful people are a minority. This doesn't add up.

I'd also add that in Australia church-goers are a minority. But this doesn't necessarily dictate that atheists are ugly people.

Lastly: check out redwatch. That site has a wide variety of good looking/average/ugly people. But I've noticed that it does actually feature quite a few good looking reds - even the Nazis can't keep their eyes of em.

[Ahura Mazda]

Originally posted by [email protected] 24, 2007 02:13 pm
Arguably the Republican Party is more "successful" than the RCP right?

If that is the case, why does the Republican Party (and most mainstream bourgeouis political parties for that matter) consist of ugly old men?
To be faior, they also have ann coulter. I mean, she's a woman, though is is ugly.

[Capital Punishment]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 20, 2007 07:45 pm
It needs this (http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/03/more_on_the_bab_1.html) in order to be a reality.

Without actually reading the whole post, my thought is that attractive women don’t join fringe movements. After all, good looking women gain so much benefit from the status quo, why would they want to change anything? That’s why at a Libertarian party, a communist organization, Nazi rally or at an atheist rally, all the women in attendance are ugly, if you see any women at all.

This is why women are slaves to wearing the same brands of clothes as other women, why women are more likely to be religious, and why women are a lot less likely to be members of any sort of oddball movement (for example the Revolutionary Left or the Ayn Rand Institution).

So, in other words...if you want to get the ladies, ditch the communism or the extreme libertarianism and hook up with the Republicans or the Democrats.

You may have some luck with the Green Party, but it's a gamble. But moreso than the Ron Paul/Libertarian movement.
You simply are too tied up in societial standards of beauty...

Many women don't join "oddball" movements because society teaches them to play their role instead of realizing their potential as human beings...

And finally, who are you to judge who is attractive to someone else? Fuck off

[Dr Mindbender]

meh.

The CL's all out of ammunition.

Did i hear a toilet flush? ;) :lol:

[Dean]

Originally posted by [email protected] 22, 2007 06:02 pm
Edit: opps missed this little swipe at me ....


Uh, I don't think your googlesites hosted "Peoples Republic of the North Star" even qualifies as a "fringe group", thats just a fantasy that you've made for yourself

HA! ...

go fuck yourself TC
Yeah, that's pretty shitty TC.

[Zoot Allures]

"Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included."- Marx

[Capitalist Lawyer]

Generally, your argument suggests that good looking people tend towards succeeding and thus the status quo. Whereas ugly looking people tend towards revolutionary movements.

I didn't say that nor did the article. I said they don't join fringe movements. These can be reactionary as hell or revolutionary as hell.

Read about the Orange Revolution and the Cedar Revolution in the Ukraine and in Lebannon.

Did you even read the article?

And you may also wonder why Yoga is ever more popular now than it was in the 1980s.


And finally, who are you to judge who is attractive to someone else? Fuck off

Oh yeah, Mr. I Don't Ever Judge a Woman's Attractiveness.

AKA: Mr. Perfect.


To be faior, they also have ann coulter. I mean, she's a woman, though is is ugly.

Staunch Republicanism is fringe.


I asked this of you before: if success depends on good looks, then why do capitalists maintain they succeeded by their hard work? Because looking good ain't hard work. I might also point out that in your first post you said you got a pay rise because you worked hard?

It doesn't depend upon "good looks" unless you're in an industry that is heavily looks based. And I don't just mean modeling or pro-sports.


Shouldn't you have stated that you got a pay rise because you look good

I think you missed my point.

Looking good and being average wouldn't hurt but in my industry, performance and character is everything.

If you're bland or ugly and have the personality of a rusty nail, then you can still find success in this economy.

Choose your line of work wisely.

[Capital Punishment]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 27, 2007 06:40 pm

And finally, who are you to judge who is attractive to someone else? Fuck off

Oh yeah, Mr. I Don't Ever Judge a Woman's Attractiveness.

AKA: Mr. Perfect.


Of course I judge women, don't be ridiculous. That last part was supposed to be a bit tongue-in-cheek you know.. Regardless, different men have different tastes

Now I can't speak for all women, but most I know are simply apolitical, not just repulsed by left wingers.

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

Originally posted by [email protected] 24, 2007 02:13 pm
Arguably the Republican Party is more "successful" than the RCP right?

If that is the case, why does the Republican Party (and most mainstream bourgeouis political parties for that matter) consist of ugly old men?
This point had not been answered. Concession accepted, Capitalist Lawyer.

As for the other point, bullshit about attractive women not being drawn to revolutionary movements. Your pictures of unattractive fringe moevement members does not negate the pictures of attractive female fringe movement members.

Now fuck off with this shit.

[hajduk]

IT NEEDS TO GIVE WORKING CLASS WISDOM AND KNOWLEDGE TO MADE SUCCES

[Comrade Rage]

Originally posted by STJ+September 05, 2007 01:50 pm--> (STJ @ September 05, 2007 01:50 pm)
Capitalist [email protected] 20, 2007 11:45 pm
It needs this (http://www.willisms.com/archives/2005/03/more_on_the_bab_1.html) in order to be a reality.

Without actually reading the whole post, my thought is that attractive women don’t join fringe movements. After all, good looking women gain so much benefit from the status quo, why would they want to change anything? That’s why at a Libertarian party, a communist organization, Nazi rally or at an atheist rally, all the women in attendance are ugly, if you see any women at all.

This is why women are slaves to wearing the same brands of clothes as other women, why women are more likely to be religious, and why women are a lot less likely to be members of any sort of oddball movement (for example the Revolutionary Left or the Ayn Rand Institution).

So, in other words...if you want to get the ladies, ditch the communism or the extreme libertarianism and hook up with the Republicans or the Democrats.

You may have some luck with the Green Party, but it's a gamble. But moreso than the Ron Paul/Libertarian movement.
BAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [/b]
Seriously.

Stop wasting our time Cappie Lawyer. BTW how many leftist rallies have you ever attended. :rolleyes:

[AtteroDominatus]

...you never even explained what you deemed beautiful, you swine. Plenty of people find those women hot and just because you lack the second braincell necessary to see past a woman's cleavage doesn't mean other people don't. get some balls and grow up. i hope an 'ugly' woman runs you over with her car tomorrow, but i think it would even soil the tires of her car. so just do yourself a favor and make friends playing russian roulette with an automatic. kthx.

[Robert]

Most of the girls in CC (I've only seen their photos) are actually very good looking.

Let's have a look.

[Schrödinger's Cat]

I've met and befriended quite a few beautiful women at our local university's socialist and direct democracy organizations. Beautiful and smart. That's something you won't regularly find in the Republican and Democratic Party.

[Schrödinger's Cat]

Thanks for proving my point.

How so? That girl is cute. Unless she has a Glasgow smile, I think she's more beautiful than half of the women you posted, you sexist (and racist) fool.

[Revolutionary Youth]

Wow, this thread is damn old and somebody bother dig it up?

[Schrödinger's Cat]

Damn, I didn't check the date. :cursing: You win this time, Capitalism.

[Pogue]

...you never even explained what you deemed beautiful, you swine. Plenty of people find those women hot and just because you lack the second braincell necessary to see past a woman's cleavage doesn't mean other people don't. get some balls and grow up. i hope an 'ugly' woman runs you over with her car tomorrow, but i think it would even soil the tires of her car. so just do yourself a favor and make friends playing russian roulette with an automatic. kthx.

Why the fuck did you necro this?

I don't understand these people who trawl to some year old thread and think its clever to post in it, even when the OP has been banned from the forum for over a year

[AtteroDominatus]

wasn't looking at times. only following related threads.

[TheCultofAbeLincoln]

My mum is a pretty hot activist then again so is my dad...

Dude your mom is fucking fine.

[Pirate Utopian]

Dude your mom is fucking fine.
Oh yeah. High five! :cool:

[TheCultofAbeLincoln]

Right back at ya