ConfusedAntiCapitalists
7th August 2007, 02:35
From what I understand it's like this...and please correct me if I have it wrong.
1. The first stage (if the area isn't running in it's full industrial and productive capacities) is a sort of managed economy (State capitalist?) ...whose goal is to basically bring production and distribution to a level where there are no or as little shortage as possible...
2. Actual socialism...where the power is dissolved from the Party into the hands of the workers; and the wealth is distributed equally and class divisions begin to fade...and
3. Actual Communism..which as a stage of socialist development has a definition that is basically interchangable with anarchism...or some forms of it.
I understand this to be more of a Marxist belief..where the anarcho communist would either try to bypass, shorten or make as democratic as possible the first two stages...
Where am I wrong?
1. The first stage (if the area isn't running in it's full industrial and productive capacities) is a sort of managed economy (State capitalist?) ...whose goal is to basically bring production and distribution to a level where there are no or as little shortage as possible...
2. Actual socialism...where the power is dissolved from the Party into the hands of the workers; and the wealth is distributed equally and class divisions begin to fade...and
3. Actual Communism..which as a stage of socialist development has a definition that is basically interchangable with anarchism...or some forms of it.
I understand this to be more of a Marxist belief..where the anarcho communist would either try to bypass, shorten or make as democratic as possible the first two stages...
Where am I wrong?