Jesus appears

[Connolly]

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t22/CPIreland/Jesus.jpg

Proof of Jesus's existence?

[RNK]

ROFLMFAO

It took me a second, but then I saw the "light". That is bloody beautiful. If that's not photoshopped, then I'd say it is definately proof of God's divinity, for it shows the true nature of Jesus Christ our Lord.

AN ASSHOLE! Hardy-har-har-har!

[Dr Mindbender]

thats gotta be photo-shopped :wacko:

[cormacobear]

Why isn't this in the anti-religious forum or are all the mods retards?

Fuck it I quit. Good bye I've spent years working for this site. You'd rather offend christians than work for socialism. Well fuck you socialism is more important to me than religion but apperantly not to this sites members.

You can find your own Labour causes and Oaxaca pleas. You obviously care more about yourselves than hummanity FUCK YOU !

My regrettable LAST POST!

[RNK]

"Oh noes! You took 30 seconds out of your revolutionary lives to enjoy a fucking joke about Jesus! HOW DARE YOU, YOU ARE NOT REVOLUTIONARIES, FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCKODFJIJDGDPFOG.sg.dfh.h..tfh.fjh..j..........fg h...."

Fucking spaz.

[Bilan]

Originally posted by [email protected] 02, 2007 07:36 pm
Why isn't this in the anti-religious forum or are all the mods retards?

Fuck it I quit. Good bye I've spent years working for this site. You'd rather offend christians than work for socialism. Well fuck you socialism is more important to me than religion but apperantly not to this sites members.

You can find your own Labour causes and Oaxaca pleas. You obviously care more about yourselves than hummanity FUCK YOU !

My regrettable LAST POST!
Chill out, maing. It's just a joke.
And come on...IT'S FUNNY!
You've got to be able to laugh at yourself (your beliefs, etc) sometimes.

[Marko]

Originally posted by Tierra y Libertad+August 02, 2007 01:55 pm--> (Tierra y Libertad @ August 02, 2007 01:55 pm)
[email protected] 02, 2007 07:36 pm
Why isn't this in the anti-religious forum or are all the mods retards?

Fuck it I quit. Good bye I've spent years working for this site. You'd rather offend christians than work for socialism. Well fuck you socialism is more important to me than religion but apperantly not to this sites members.

You can find your own Labour causes and Oaxaca pleas. You obviously care more about yourselves than hummanity FUCK YOU !

My regrettable LAST POST!
Chill out, maing. It's just a joke.
And come on...IT'S FUNNY!
You've got to be able to laugh at yourself (your beliefs, etc) sometimes. [/b]
Yeah. It is funny. And the pics I posted about Muhammad are funny too.

[Qwerty Dvorak]

Marko, your pictures seemed more like scathing attacks than humour. They weren't funny in the slightest. It didn't even appear that they were trying to come off as humour.

[Marko]

Originally posted by [email protected] 02, 2007 03:18 pm
Marko, your pictures seemed more like scathing attacks than humour. They weren't funny in the slightest. It didn't even appear that they were trying to come off as humour.
If it isn't funny that a man who is regarded as holy by a billion people has fucked a 9-year-old kid then what is?

Most people don't even know about Aisha's age.

Your picture about Jesus isn't really breaking a taboo. You think it is but it isn't today. That pic would have been funny 70 years ago but today it inspires no reactions.

[Lord Testicles]

Originally posted by [email protected] 02, 2007 10:36 am
Why isn't this in the anti-religious forum or are all the mods retards?

Fuck it I quit. Good bye I've spent years working for this site. You'd rather offend christians than work for socialism. Well fuck you socialism is more important to me than religion but apperantly not to this sites members.

You can find your own Labour causes and Oaxaca pleas. You obviously care more about yourselves than hummanity FUCK YOU !

My regrettable LAST POST!
lol, Oh the drama. :rolleyes:

How dare you insult our Lord! Fuck you internets! Fuck you!

[RNK]

Originally posted by Marko+August 02, 2007 01:28 pm--> (Marko @ August 02, 2007 01:28 pm)
[email protected] 02, 2007 03:18 pm
Marko, your pictures seemed more like scathing attacks than humour. They weren't funny in the slightest. It didn't even appear that they were trying to come off as humour.
If it isn't funny that a man who is regarded as holy by a billion people has fucked a 9-year-old kid then what is?

Most people don't even know about Aisha's age.

Your picture about Jesus isn't really breaking a taboo. You think it is but it isn't today. That pic would have been funny 70 years ago but today it inspires no reactions. [/b]
Get over it, you self-hating idiot. The difference is similar to a funny charicature of George W. Bush with giant ears and a stupid look, and a picture of Martin Luther King Jr. hanging from a tree with a noose around his neck. One is a comical jab at a piece of shit, the other, which may be funny to some fucked up racists and dumbasses, is an insulting and offensive attempt to subtly repress.

[BreadBros]

Originally posted by Marko+August 02, 2007 01:28 pm--> (Marko @ August 02, 2007 01:28 pm)
[email protected] 02, 2007 03:18 pm
Marko, your pictures seemed more like scathing attacks than humour. They weren't funny in the slightest. It didn't even appear that they were trying to come off as humour.
If it isn't funny that a man who is regarded as holy by a billion people has fucked a 9-year-old kid then what is?

Most people don't even know about Aisha's age.

Your picture about Jesus isn't really breaking a taboo. You think it is but it isn't today. That pic would have been funny 70 years ago but today it inspires no reactions. [/b]
Not really, because such things are common to all religions. In the Bible, Lot has sex with his daughters, which constitutes as incest, pedophilia and group sex all at once. So its not really that novel, and the only point you posted it up was because 1. You seem to dislike Muslims 2. You wanted to piss off or shock people. Thats not really funny, if anything its somewhat sad.

Also, you have a warped view of humor. Only transgressive acts are funny? Thats absurd. Most comedy movies are far far far from being transgressive in any way and yet millions still find them funny. I thought this photo was pretty funny, it made me chuckle, but not because I was "OMG! YES! THEY'RE BREAKING TABOOS ON THE DEPICTON OF JESUS!"....its just humorous that such a bizarre coincidence (a form similar to the shape of Jesus appearing on a dog's butt) would happen, and its quite cute.

[Black Dagger]

Originally posted by cormacobear
Why isn't this in the anti-religious forum or are all the mods retards?

Please dont use prejudiced language.

[Faux Real]

I'm not going to be able to sleep tonight...

Oh well, at least it isn't goatse. :lol:

[Never Give In]

Originally posted by BreadBros+August 02, 2007 10:18 pm--> (BreadBros @ August 02, 2007 10:18 pm)
Originally posted by [email protected] 02, 2007 01:28 pm

[email protected] 02, 2007 03:18 pm
Marko, your pictures seemed more like scathing attacks than humour. They weren't funny in the slightest. It didn't even appear that they were trying to come off as humour.
If it isn't funny that a man who is regarded as holy by a billion people has fucked a 9-year-old kid then what is?

Most people don't even know about Aisha's age.

Your picture about Jesus isn't really breaking a taboo. You think it is but it isn't today. That pic would have been funny 70 years ago but today it inspires no reactions.
Not really, because such things are common to all religions. In the Bible, Lot has sex with his daughters, which constitutes as incest, pedophilia and group sex all at once. So its not really that novel, and the only point you posted it up was because 1. You seem to dislike Muslims 2. You wanted to piss off or shock people. Thats not really funny, if anything its somewhat sad.

Also, you have a warped view of humor. Only transgressive acts are funny? Thats absurd. Most comedy movies are far far far from being transgressive in any way and yet millions still find them funny. I thought this photo was pretty funny, it made me chuckle, but not because I was "OMG! YES! THEY'RE BREAKING TABOOS ON THE DEPICTON OF JESUS!"....its just humorous that such a bizarre coincidence (a form similar to the shape of Jesus appearing on a dog's butt) would happen, and its quite cute. [/b]
How did a simply joking post turn in to a religious debate?

Fuck that, you guys get really serious over nothing.

[NorthStarRepublicML]

How did a simply joking post turn in to a religious debate?

i laugh a little but cormacobear does make a point .... i mean sure its ok to poke fun at religion, it's ok to have a friendly laugh about Jesus, and honestly it is amusing to me that every couple of months someone finds the likeness of jesus on a tortilla chip or a stain on a highway underpass ....

but seriously it sorta stops being funny when members here post intentionally offensive material concerning a group (such as Christians) on such a regular basis that even persons who appear to have been able to stomach the continued nonsensical anti-Christian rants (such as Cormacobear) are pushed to leave revleft .....

honestly is this how you want to be spending day after day .... posting pictures of animal assholes doctored to insult people?

i'm of the opinion that the left should avoid insulting people whenever necessary, disagree?

i know there are at least a handful of Christian Communists here and overall they have taken the continued slander very well, but as Cormacobear's post proves you can only alienate someone for so long until they pack it up and go home. now some of you might be thinking "good, let him go, in fact all the Christians on rev left should just leave and then we can bash Christianity all we want and laugh to each other about how funny we are and how stupid the Christians are"

well if that is what you believe then i pity you for your lack of study and your knack for burning bridges .... i will spare you the arguments that have been repeated so many times in defense of jesus as a progressive force, of the church as educators throughout history, of the catholics endorsement of evolution ... you have no doubt heard them before and yet continue to post flame bait such as this .....

anyway do as you will .....

[Never Give In]

Originally posted by [email protected] 10, 2007 10:45 pm

How did a simply joking post turn in to a religious debate?

i laugh a little but cormacobear does make a point .... i mean sure its ok to poke fun at religion, it's ok to have a friendly laugh about Jesus, and honestly it is amusing to me that every couple of months someone finds the likeness of jesus on a tortilla chip or a stain on a highway underpass ....

but seriously it sorta stops being funny when members here post intentionally offensive material concerning a group (such as Christians) on such a regular basis that even persons who appear to have been able to stomach the continued nonsensical anti-Christian rants (such as Cormacobear) are pushed to leave revleft .....

honestly is this how you want to be spending day after day .... posting pictures of animal assholes doctored to insult people?

i'm of the opinion that the left should avoid insulting people whenever necessary, disagree?

i know there are at least a handful of Christian Communists here and overall they have taken the continued slander very well, but as Cormacobear's post proves you can only alienate someone for so long until they pack it up and go home. now some of you might be thinking "good, let him go, in fact all the Christians on rev left should just leave and then we can bash Christianity all we want and laugh to each other about how funny we are and how stupid the Christians are"

well if that is what you believe then i pity you for your lack of study and your knack for burning bridges .... i will spare you the arguments that have been repeated so many times in defense of jesus as a progressive force, of the church as educators throughout history, of the catholics endorsement of evolution ... you have no doubt heard them before and yet continue to post flame bait such as this .....

anyway do as you will .....
I see. Well, I don't see that kind of picture alot so I laughed, it never got tiresome to me like it did to you guys. I completely agree with you, but what people find funny differs, and it's acceptable to have a little laugh all the time. Apparently the original poster found this picture funny and wanted to share it with us.

Also, the majority of posters I've seen on RevLeft are either Non-Religious or Atheist/Agnostic, so I could see some posters making fun of figures such as Jesus. I dunno, I just think that it should have been taken as a little joke.

[Bilan]

Originally posted by Marko+August 02, 2007 11:28 pm--> (Marko @ August 02, 2007 11:28 pm)
[email protected] 02, 2007 03:18 pm
Marko, your pictures seemed more like scathing attacks than humour. They weren't funny in the slightest. It didn't even appear that they were trying to come off as humour.
If it isn't funny that a man who is regarded as holy by a billion people has fucked a 9-year-old kid then what is?

Most people don't even know about Aisha's age.

Your picture about Jesus isn't really breaking a taboo. You think it is but it isn't today. That pic would have been funny 70 years ago but today it inspires no reactions. [/b]
There's a reaction about three posts above you. :P

[spartan]

where he belongs on a dogs arse that is

[spartan]

leftists who get offended by images that portray religious figures in a negative light are not true communists/anarchists/socialists. for religions and gods are merely a creation of humanity to satisfy humans own desires

[Saint Street Revolution]

Originally posted by [email protected] 17, 2007 12:55 am
leftists who get offended by images that portray religious figures in a negative light are not true communists/anarchists/socialists. for religions and gods are merely a creation of humanity to satisfy humans own desires
Are you applying that to be a Leftist you have to be an Atheist?

Because that is utter bullshit.

[spartan]

where did i apply that? im just saying we shouldnt waste our time with petty religious arguements.

[Saint Street Revolution]

No, you said:


leftists who get offended by images that portray religious figures in a negative light are not true communists/anarchists/socialists

I would take it that you said any Leftist who is offended by a religious figure in a negative light are pseudo-leftist. What if a Christian Communist finds this offensive, but his political views are solid and valid? Is he not a real Communist? That statement was unnecassary and blatantly wrong.

I would think any Christian who saw their Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, being shown on a dog's ass (and because this is obviously edited to look that way) would find that to be a stab at their Lord.

[RedStarOverChina]

Originally posted by Grandma [email protected] 19, 2007 05:26 pm
Are you applying that to be a Leftist you have to be an Atheist?

Hell, yeah!

Atheism is the foundation upon which radical thinking springs off.

Believing in a non-existent God who happens to forbid radical thinking is anti-left in the most serious sense.

Those who call themselves "religious lefties" are liars (either that or really confused).

[RedAnarchist]

Originally posted by RedStarOverChina+August 22, 2007 07:36 pm--> (RedStarOverChina @ August 22, 2007 07:36 pm)
Grandma [email protected] 19, 2007 05:26 pm
Are you applying that to be a Leftist you have to be an Atheist?

Hell, yeah!

Atheism is the foundation upon which radical thinking springs off.

Believing in a non-existent God who happens to forbid radical thinking is anti-left in the most serious sense.

Those who call themselves "religious lefties" are liars (either that or really confused). [/b]
What about Agnostics?

[RedStarOverChina]

I would take it that you said any Leftist who is offended by a religious figure in a negative light are pseudo-leftist. What if a Christian Communist finds this offensive, but his political views are solid and valid? Is he not a real Communist? That statement was unnecassary and blatantly wrong.

I would think any Christian who saw their Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, being shown on a dog's ass (and because this is obviously edited to look that way) would find that to be a stab at their Lord.

They would find the existence of a leftist movement "offensive".

They ARE against us no matter what! This IS a struggle against them (or to win them over) we are waging...Attacking their religion at every opportunity is what serious leftie do!

[RedStarOverChina]

What about Agnostics?

Engels called them "fence-sitters"...Which is very appropriate.

They dont believe in the religious bullcrap but they dont want to offend the religious either. Kinda like the "lefties" who sympathize with the religious.


Obvious, that's not the path of a revolutionary.

A revolutionary vigoriously attacks everything reactionary.

[Vinny Rafarino]

Originally posted by bleeding gums [email protected] 02, 2007 08:33 pm

Please dont use prejudiced language.
I certainly hope this is another joke.

If it isn't than it's completely retarded.

[RedAnarchist]

Originally posted by [email protected] 22, 2007 07:44 pm

What about Agnostics?

Engels called them "fence-sitters"...Which is very appropriate.

They dont believe in the religious bullcrap but they dont want to offend the religious either. Kinda like the "lefties" who sympathize with the religious.


Obvious, that's not the path of a revolutionary.

A revolutionary vigoriously attacks everything reactionary.
I consider myself an Agnostic because I dont believe that we can know god, not because I dont want to offend the bible bashers. I don't think god is relevant and we dont need him if he exists at all.

[RedAnarchist]

Originally posted by Vinny Rafarino+August 22, 2007 07:46 pm--> (Vinny Rafarino @ August 22, 2007 07:46 pm)
bleeding gums [email protected] 02, 2007 08:33 pm

Please dont use prejudiced language.
I certainly hope this is another joke.

If it isn't than it's completely retarded. [/b]
Are you just being trollish?

[Vinny Rafarino]

Nope.

I truly think that it's retarded to break someones balls for saying the word retard.

[Dean]

Originally posted by Marko+August 02, 2007 01:27 pm--> (Marko @ August 02, 2007 01:27 pm)
[email protected] 02, 2007 03:18 pm
Marko, your pictures seemed more like scathing attacks than humour. They weren't funny in the slightest. It didn't even appear that they were trying to come off as humour.
If it isn't funny that a man who is regarded as holy by a billion people has fucked a 9-year-old kid then what is?

Most people don't even know about Aisha's age. [/b]
What the fuck? That is disgusting and sad, not funny. If you saw a news report in which a cult forces 9 year old girls to marry much older men, would you still laugh?