Log in

View Full Version : Anarchists and Trots in the Spanish Civil War



Marko
31st July 2007, 21:38
Lessons of People's War in Spain 1936-1939
Progressive Labor, Vol. 9, No. 5 (Oct.-Nov. 1974), 106-116.
http://www.plp.org/pl_magazine/pws.html



...
Communists Organize For Victory

After being transported from Morocco by Hitler's planes, the Army of Africa advanced rapidly north through the open country of central Spain, pushing back the poorly armed and inexperienced militias of the Popular Front. As the militias retreated toward Madrid, however, resistance stiffened. The PCE urged the Republican government, headed by "left" Socialist fatmouth Francisco Largo Caballero, to organize fortification of the city. His reply: "Spaniards might fight from behind trees, but never from trenches."(31) Minister of War as well as Prime Minister, Largo displayed his dazzling incompetence only during specified hours; he would sign papers only between 8:30 and 9:00 A.M., and left orders not to be disturbed after 10:00 P.M.!(32) On November 6, the government formalized its abdication of responsibility for defense of the capital and moved to Valencia. All the ministers except the communists left with Largo Caballero, taking even the records of the Ministry of War.(33) On the 9th, as fierce fighting raged in the city, Largo sent a messenger to Madrid for the silverware he had left behind, but received only the reply that "we who have remained in Madrid are still eating."(34)

Largo had left the defense of the capital to Miaja, an incompetent Republican general of doubtful loyalty, and to a Defense Junta of trade union and Popular Front representatives. Fortunately, Soviet General Goriev, nominally Miaja's advisor, was on hand to handle the military planning of the defense.(35)

The even more important political side of the mobilization of the city's population was led by the PCE. At the start of the rebellion, La Pasionaria's broadcasts and speeches called for the resolute defense of Madrid: "They shall not pass!" "Madrid will be the tomb of Fascism!" Since then, the PCE had organized to make this a reality. Their famous Fifth Regiment had recruited over 60,000 militiamen (half PCE members), which soon became the backbone of the People's Army. Modeled on the Soviet Red Army of Russian civil war days, the 5th Regiment had a system of political commissars responsible for the political understanding of the troops and commanders, and who acted as commanders themselves when the need arose. Tens of thousands of workers were trained in the Regiment, including the soon to be famous commanders Lister (a quarryman), Modesto (a woodcutter) and El Campesino ("The Peasant"). Barracks, commissary, and training schools were organized, as well as committees to look after families of recruits. Discipline came hard and a special company was organized as an example. The commissar of the 5th Regiment described this company to a journalist:

"We called it the "Steel Company" and made stringent requirements. To join this company a man must know something of arms, must have good health and must be guaranteed by some group as a determined anti-fascist. For this company we established special slogans designed to create an iron unity. 'Never leave a comrade, wounded or dead, in the hands of the enemy' was one of these. 'If my comrade advances or retreats without orders, I have the right to shoot him', was another.

How Madrid laughed at that. The Spaniard is such an individualist that nobody will accept such discipline, they said. Then our first Steel Company--mostly Communists and metalworkers--paraded through the city: it made a sensation. After that we created twenty-eight such companies of picked men, besides the ordinary muster of our regular Fifth Regiment militia."(36)

Partly because of the seriousness and effectiveness with which the communists organized the militias, membership in the PCE, JSU (United Socialist Youth) and the PSUC (United Socialist Party of Catalonia, also affiliated with the Comintern) soared: from 30,000 at the beginning of the war to 200,000 at the end of 1936 to 1,000,000 by June, 1937.(37)

Foreign volunteers recruited largely by communist parties were organized into communist-led International Brigades. About 40,000 served in the Brigades, as many as 17,000 at any one time.(38) Like the Fifth Regiment, the Internationals were famous for their discipline and courage. Hemingway described the hill in Teruel defended by the German exiles of the Thaelmann Brigade as "a position that they sold as dearly as any position was sold in any war."(39) The Internationals played a significant role in the early days of the fighting when troops with any sort of training were scarce, and fought well throughout. Their recruitment was an act of internationalism enormously appreciated by the Spanish workers. In the later part of the war, many Spaniards were recruited to the Brigades. Foreigners were withdrawn in 1938 in a vain effort to secure League of Nations action against German and Italian intervention. By that time, however, there were many crack units in the People's Army.

As Fascist troops approached Madrid, Communists assumed the functions of the departed civil servants; radio, leaflets and banners urged the workers of Madrid to dig trenches and build barricades. Workers' districts were organized block by block; 5th Regiment leaflets gave advice on battling tanks and house-to-house fighting.(40)

On November 7th, Franco's troops, expecting an easy victory, assaulted the city from the west, southwest, and northwest, but were repulsed by the hard-pressed militias, particularly the Fifthh Regiment, in hand-to-hand fighting. For the 8th, the defenders prepared for renewed attacks, which they knew would come throughout the University City. The Fascist forces intentionally avoided attacking through the working-class districts "heavily seeded with Communist workers."(41)

Resistance was furious in the University, with workers and Fascist troops occupying different floors of the same building. In some places rifles were so scarce that workers waited under cover until those with arms had been shot, then rushed out to pick up the guns and fight on.(42) In the afternoon, the vanguard of the recently constituted 11th International Brigade marched up the Gran Via, singing the Internationale. Crowds cheered the volunteers of the Edgar Andre (Belgian), Dombrowski (Polish) and Commune de Paris (French) battalions, shouting "United Proletarian Brothers," the motto of the Asturias revolt of 1934. Many believed the Brigades to be Russian and gave vivas for "los russos."

By nightfall, the much-needed machine guns of the Edgar Andres were in positions in the Hall of Philosophy in the University, and other brigades were distributed to vital points. Twice on the next day the Moroccan Tabors broke through militia lines at the Toledo and Princes Bridges, but were driven back with heavy losses.(43) In the evening, the Internationals outflanked the Moroccans in the Casa de Campo, driving them back with enormous losses.(44)

From November 8th to the 15th, nine militia units came from other areas to aid Madrid. One, the 3,000-man Anarchist column from the Aragon Front, deserves mention for its example of Anarchist military organization. The column was led by Buenaventura Durruti, whose demands for an independent section of the front "so that their achievements could not then be claimed by other units" were supported by the Anarchist Minister of Justice.(45)

The Anarchists were given a sector in the University City, with artillery and air support, but refused to attack. The next day, the Fascists attacked and the Anarchists broke and ran, abandoning a key bridge and positions in the University. Counterattacks by exhausted militiamen and Internationals regained some of the lost territory; lines thus established were to remain the same until the end of the war. Ashamed of the performance of his men, Durruti tried to persuade them not to leave Madrid but was shot and killed by one of them.(46)

Aragon and Catalonia: Anarchists and Trotskyites Play at Revolution

The Trotskyite POUM (Workers Party of Marxist Unification) was formed in October, 1935 by the fusion of two sects led by renegades from the PCE. Their activities were largely confined to Catalonia. Until their suppression in May, 1937, the POUM acted as an adjunct to the Anarchist Federation of Iberia (FAI) and the labor federation (CNT) which the FAI led. Vitriolic in their attacks on "Stalinists,"(47) the POUM merely offered friendly advice to the Anarchists, who held "similar ideas concerning hopes and perspectives on the revolution."(48)

After the Fascist rising, the FAI-CNT was the strongest political force in Catalonia, dominating the Anti-Fascist Militias committee. This Committee held the real power in Barcelona for the first year of the war, although the Generalitat continued to have some influence in the countryside.(49)

Under Anarchist leadership, workers' committees took over the factories in Barcelona and established agricultural collectives in rural areas, in some cases by force.(50) A number of foreign-owned plants were not confiscated; 87 British enterprises were protected by agreement with the British Consulate.(51)

Sources sympathetic to the Anarchists claim that their industrial experiments were successful, particularly in the arms industries,(52) and were sabotaged by the lack of credit from the central government. Conflicts with the central government did exist, but a more accurate explanation of the causes of industrial failures in Catalonia is given by Abad de Santillan, Anarchist member of the Militias Committee:

"We have not organized the economic apparatus which we had planned. We have been satisfied with throwing out the proprietors from the factories and putting ourselves in them, as committees of control. There has been no attempt at connections, there has been no coordination of the economy in due form. We have worked without plans and without real knowledge of what we were doing."(53)

Abad de Santillan thought that this situation was improving at the end of 1936, but noted that 15,000-20,000 workers were still collecting wages without working.(54) The fact is that the individualistic and muddle-headed FAIists were incapable of giving the leadership that would have enabled the working class to organize industry effectively.

After the defeat of the Fascist rising in Barcelona, Anarchists and POUMists organized militias which "fought" on the Aragon front. Their military accomplishments were truly amazing: they made a demonstration in the direction of Zaragoza, the capital of Aragon, and settled in to trade occasional shots with the Fascists. New York Times correspondent Herbert Matthews was told by a POUM militiaman from the "Lenin" Division at Huesca that

"We used to play football with the Fascists down there on the plain. They were good fellows. They invited us to spend the weekend in Saragossa and Jaca, and promised they'd let us come back."(55)

Huesca had been virtually surrounded by the inactive Catalan militias for 11 months when a major attempt was made to capture the city by newly-organized People's Army forces.(56) The lull had been put to better use than football games by the Fascists, who had built substantial fortifications. The attack failed.(57)

Internationals relieving Anarchist troops on the Ebro Riber a year after the beginning of the war found no fortifications, and positions a full two kilometers from Fascist lines.(58) Exactly two casualties had been admitted to the nearby military hospital in the previous three months.(59) Anarchist militias had elevated chaos into a political principle. A leaflet distributed in Aragon stated that:

"We do not recognize military formations because this is the negation of Anarchism. Winning the war does not mean winning the revolution. Technology and strategy are important in the present war, not discipline which presupposes a negation of the personality."(60)

If in nothing else, Durruti was certainly right when he lamented that "War is made by soldiers, not by Anarchists."(61)

The Internationals also found a peasant population embittered against Republican forces by the Anarchist seizures. The commissar of the Lincoln Brigade found one farmer incredulous that he was offered money for food instead of worthless script.(62) The sullen attitudes of the Aragon farmers contrasted markedly with the enthusiastic support that had met the People's Army forces outside Anarchist-controlled areas.(63)

On the Fascist side, the Aragon front was very weakly held: a Franco historian says that the Fascists were able to remove forces from that front to attack Madrid.(64) POUMists and their defenders have excused their criminal footdragging by the lack of arms for POUM and FAI-CNT forces, claiming that communists withheld Soviet material from Aragon.(65) Orwell, for example, explains their failure to attack, despite the desires of the rank-and-file militiamen, by the lack of artillery and maps, the difficult terrain, and the fact that there was only one machine gun for every fifty men.(66) With the same material difficulties--including one machine gun per fifty men--the communist-led 35th Division forced the Ebro River in July, 1938, advanced 25 kilometers, captured 4 towns and 2500 prisoners.(67) The POUM leaders' attitude is amply summed up by a remark Orwell quotes from his POUM commander Georges Kopp: "This is not war, it is comic opera with an occasional death."(68) As we have seen, things weren't so comic on the Madrid front.

Still, it must be said that the material shortages on the Aragon front do have a sinister explanation--but not the one the red-baiters offer. After the war, FAIist Abad de Santillan obliged us with a frank confession:

"If all the leaders of the Libertarian (anarchist) organizations had ever seriously resolved to send all their armament, their war material and their best men to the front--the war would easily have been over in a few months…We can no longer conceal the fact that while, at the front itself, we had by 30,000 rifles (and perhaps as many as 24 batteries, 200 heavy guns), in the rear, in the power of the organizations, we had an additional 60,000 rifles with more ammunition than was ever in the proximity of the enemy."(69)

The intended purpose of these arms the anarchists kept from the front was combat with the other parties after the victory over Franco,(70) although the occasion never arose.

In fact, the opportunity for the supreme act of treachery did not come to the POUM or the Catalan Anarchists, but to Corp Commander Cipriano Mera, the highest ranking Anarchist officer in Spain. Mera's contribution to Fascism came in 1939, when General Casado ran a coup against the Republican government to prevent further resistance to the Fascists. Communist commanders led their troops against Casado to put down the coup, but Mera brought his troops to Casado's support and the PCE troops were defeated.(71)

The Trots Lose Their Playground

In Catalonia in late '36 and early '37, the disorganization of production, inflation, lack of serious prosecution of the war, and growth of the communist parties (PCE and PUSC) combined to weaken and discredit the POUM and the FAI. Faced with the clear failure of their utopian theories, the Anarchist movement began to disintegrate. In September, '36, the FAI-CNT compromised their grotesquely anti-political principles and entered the Catalan Generalitat, along with the PUSC and Catalan Nationalist parties, with one delegate from the POUM.(72) Attacking the "Stalinists" for their advocacy of the Popular Front, the POUM was only too happy to be included in this one. Their incredibly sophistical defense of this action was that the "petty bourgeoisie" was collaborating with them, rather than vice-versa!(73)

In March, 1937, the central government ordered the confiscation of arms from the political parties(74); in Barcelona, measures were taken to curb the numerous street murders by the "uncontrollables"--thugs who had attached themselves to the FAI(75) -- and to disband the militia "police." The CNT and POUM declined to surrender arms or submit to the draft.(76)

Numerically insignificant, unable to build a base among workers and discredited by their "sheer inefficiency and incompetence all along the line,"(77) the political bankruptcy of the POUM was complete. Dropping any pretense of fighting the Fascists, the POUM decided for an all-out battle against the communists instead.

On May 3, 1937, Catalan police chief Rodriguez Sala and the Generalitat representative for the Telephone Exchange went to the Exchange’s censorship department to complain of anarchist interference with government phone calls. Anarchist militiamen, who had held the exchange since the start of the war, fired from an upper floor. Brief fighting ensued, which was stopped by an FAI leader. Rumors of a "provocation" spread among CNT members and barricades were erected throughout the city. As sporadic fighting began between CNT and PUSC members, POUM leaders proposed to FAI-CNT leaders that communists be expelled from the government and "Stalinist" influence be eliminated in Catalonia once and for all.(78) The POUM was turned down flat.(79) Supported only by a small Anarchist group called the "Friends of Durriti" and a section of the Libertarian Youth, the POUM called for the overthrow of the Generalitat and the establishment of a Revolutionary Junta. Anarchist leaders attempted to secure truce in the barricade fighting and eventually did so, after several false starts. The arrival of 4,000 Assault Guards from Valencia assured that it would continue. Total casualties were reported as 400 killed, 1,000 wounded.(80)

In the central government, the PCE demanded the suppression of the POUM for these crimes. Largo Caballero refused, but this was the last straw even for members of his own party. Largo was ousted and Socialist Juan Negrin became Prime Minister. The POUM was suppressed, and about 40 POUMists arrested. Treacherous POUM leader Andres Nin was apparently executed by Soviet agents, small retribution for the deaths in Barcelona.(81) Other POUMists were held for trial on charges of espionage, treason, fomenting the fighting in Barcelona, and removing troops under their command from the front to Barcelona. At the trial, the POUMists denied they had helped to provoke the fighting, conveniently "forgetting" the articles in their own newspaper, La Batalla.(82) They even denied commanding the troops that had left the front at Heusca, some of them forced to return to the lines by the threat of bombing their buses.(83) POUM "political secretary" Julian Gorkin was able to "remember" that La Batalla had reprinted a Fascist leaflet attacking the government which had been dropped over the lines. When Don Jose Gomis Soler, the public prosecutor, asked Gorkin why the source of the fascist leaflet was referred to in the tiniest type below the proclamation, Gorkin laughingly said: "This is a mere typographical matter."(84)

The accused were found innocent of espionage and treason; all except one were found guilty of the other charges and sentenced to various terms.

Were the POUM Leaders Franco's Agents?

The POUM leaders were accused by the PCE of being in the pay of Franco, and some of the incidents reported above indicate why this was plausible and widely believed in Republican Spain.(85) Plainly, the POUM earned their money, even if they didn't collect it.

On May 11, 5 days after the fighting began, Faupel, Hitler's ambassador to Franco, wrote:

"Concerning the disorders in Barcelona, Franco has told me that the street fighting was provoked by his agents. Nicholas Franco has confirmed this report, informing me that they have a total of 13 agents in Barcelona. Some time ago one of them had reported that the tension between Anarchists and Communists in Barcelona was so great that it could well end in street fighting. The Generalissimo told me that at first he doubted this agent's reports, but later they were confirmed by other agents. Ordinarily he didn't intend to take advantage of the possibility until military operations had been established in Catalonia. But since the Reds had recently attacked Teruel to aid the Government of Euzcadi (the Basque provinces), he thought the time was right for the outbreak of disorders in Barcelona. In fact, a few days after he had received the order, the agent in question with three or four of this men, succeeded in provoking shooting in the streets which later led to the desired results."(86)

Soon after the May fighting, a number of Franco agents were caught in Barcelona, and implicated Nin--perhaps for their own reasons.(87)

Some Catalan Anarchists openly expressed their Fascist sympathies. After the war, Abad de Santillan had praise for Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera, founder of the Fascist Falange Espanola:

"Despite the difference which separated us, we can understand this "spiritual kinship" with Jose Antonio, who after all was a fighter and a patriot in search of solutions for his country…Spaniards of his stature, patriots such as he are not dangerous. They are not the enemy. As for changing the destiny of Spain, there had been, before July, 1936, diverse attempts to align with us. If an accord had been tactically feasible, it would have been according to the desires of his father, Primo de Rivera (dictator of Spain under the monarchy)."(88)

Such are the political degenerates lionized by phony leftists who attack and slander communists.
http://www.plp.org/pl_magazine/pws.html

chimx
31st July 2007, 22:37
You are not going to encourage historical discussion by just copying and pasting texts that you yourself haven't written.

black magick hustla
31st July 2007, 22:46
whats with stalinists always pasting articles from their nearest ideological cop

Marko
31st July 2007, 22:46
Originally posted by [email protected] 31, 2007 11:37 pm
You are not going to encourage historical discussion by just copying and pasting texts that you yourself haven't written.
Oh, the article doesn't say the truth because I didn't write it myself. :D

syndicat
31st July 2007, 23:39
We have here the usual Stalinist falsification:

All the ministers except the communists left with Largo Caballero, taking even the records of the Ministry of War.

This is incorrect. It was only the anarchists who opposed the move of the government to Valencia. The anarchists had just joined the government and said the ministers should be out on the frontlines. The rest of the ministers, including the Communists, looked at them like they were madmen.

Maybe this claim is based on the Communist role in the formation of the Madrid Defense Junta, which the PCE did control after the national government moved to Valencia.


Largo had left the defense of the capital to Miaja, an incompetent Republican general of doubtful loyalty, and to a Defense Junta of trade union and Popular Front representatives.

Conveniently fails to note that the Communists controlled the Madrid Defense Junta.

Their famous Fifth Regiment had recruited over 60,000 militiamen (half PCE members), which soon became the backbone of the People's Army. Modeled on the Soviet Red Army of Russian civil war days, the 5th Regiment had a system of political commissars responsible for the political understanding of the troops and commanders, and who acted as commanders themselves when the need arose.

Commissars didn't come into existence til after the battle of Madrid (Oct-Nov 1936), with the recreation of a hierarchical army in November. The PCE did gain control of the "commissars" and they used this to impose party control on the army. Since the majority of the militia members were Socialists and anarchists, this had the effect of demoralizing the army over time. It was an expression of the PCE's sectarianism and their drive for one-party power.


Partly because of the seriousness and effectiveness with which the communists organized the militias, membership in the PCE, JSU (United Socialist Youth) and the PSUC (United Socialist Party of Catalonia, also affiliated with the Comintern) soared: from 30,000 at the beginning of the war to 200,000 at the end of 1936 to 1,000,000 by June, 1937.

This is an exaggeration, tho it is an oft-quoted figure. What the Communists gained from was that after the country's gold reserves were sent to Russia the Soviets had a lock on the flow of arms, and gained a great deal of prestige and influence from this. Also the Communists were busy organizing the middle strata (lawyers, managers, shop keepers, cops, landowning famers) against the workers revolution. by mid-1937 the PCE itself had 250,000 members. it's particularly worthwhile looking more closely at the JSU (United Socialist Youth). most of the youth in the Socialist youth group were followers of the leftwing. some of the leaders however were secret Communists who were wined and dined on a trip to Moscow. they were able to get the Socialist youth to agree to a merger with the much smaller Communist youth. there was supposed to be a congress of the merged organization to determine its politics. the Communists on the merged administrative committee made sure that never happened. so the Communists' control of the JSU (which had 350,000 members) wasn't based on democratic approval of the members.


The Anarchists were given a sector in the University City, with artillery and air support, but refused to attack. The next day, the Fascists attacked and the Anarchists broke and ran, abandoning a key bridge and positions in the University. Counterattacks by exhausted militiamen and Internationals regained some of the lost territory; lines thus established were to remain the same until the end of the war. Ashamed of the performance of his men, Durruti tried to persuade them not to leave Madrid but was shot and killed by one of them.

More Stalinist lies. The unit that fled was not an anarchist unit, and the angle of the bullet that hit Durruti indicates it couldn't have come from his own people. This is all discussed in detail in Abel Paz's biography of Durruti, available from AK Press.


Sources sympathetic to the Anarchists claim that their industrial experiments were successful, particularly in the arms industries,(52) and were sabotaged by the lack of credit from the central government. Conflicts with the central government did exist, but a more accurate explanation of the causes of industrial failures in Catalonia is given by Abad de Santillan, Anarchist member of the Militias Committee:

"We have not organized the economic apparatus which we had planned. We have been satisfied with throwing out the proprietors from the factories and putting ourselves in them, as committees of control. There has been no attempt at connections, there has been no coordination of the economy in due form. We have worked without plans and without real knowledge of what we were doing."

Confusion of different things. The expropriated Spanish industries could not be linked together into a planned economy due to the opposition of the Communists and the failure of the CNT to overthrow the government. Efforts by the CNT to merge industries and move to a higher level of planning were bitterly opposed by the Communists. this fight is discussed in the oral history, "Blood of Spain".

But this is a separate issue from the lack of resources for Catalonia's arms industry, which was due to Stalinist opposition to resources going to the anarchists. Given that Catalonia had 70% of Spain's manfucaturing capacity, not providing Catalonia with funds to buy equipment etc for arms manufacture undermined the war effort.

Abad de Santillan thought that this situation was improving at the end of 1936, but noted that 15,000-20,000 workers were still collecting wages without working.(54) The fact is that the individualistic and muddle-headed FAIists were incapable of giving the leadership that would have enabled the working class to organize industry effectively.

more bullshit. the fascists had captured about a third of Spain. Catalonia's industry produced mainly for the Spanish market. with the fascists in control of a third of the country, Catalonia's industrys lost about 30% of their market. these people could have been employed in war production....but that would have required the funds for investment in war industries which the anarchists requested from the Caballero government. instead the government sent Spain's gold reserves to Russia.


The Internationals also found a peasant population embittered against Republican forces by the Anarchist seizures. The commissar of the Lincoln Brigade found one farmer incredulous that he was offered money for food instead of worthless script.(62) The sullen attitudes of the Aragon farmers contrasted markedly with the enthusiastic support that had met the People's Army forces outside Anarchist-controlled areas.

more Stalinist lies. after Communist general Lister forcibly broke up the collectives and overthrew the elected workers government of Aragon in 1937, 70% of the collectives were reformed despite the presence of hostile Communist controlled troops. the people who were against the land seizures were the big landowners and more affluent landowning farmers -- who supported the right wing before the civil war. by giving land back to these landowners, the Communists strengthened the rural bourgeoisie.

both the UGT and CNT land worker unions throughout Spain agreed on the need to reduce the amount of land any farmer ciontrollled to only what he could farm himself, to eliminate wage labor in the countryside. The UGT farm worker union was controlled by the Left Socialists. this agreement on land policy was the basis of the alliance between the Left Socialists and anarchosyndicalists during the civil war. the Communists were generally only supported by the minority of more affluent landowning farmers. in Valencia for example the landowning farmers had been supportes of the Autonomist Party before the civil war -- a fascist political party. during the civil war it was these farmers who the Communists organized. the workers supported the CNT and UGT, not the Communists. that's why only 40% of the members of the Communist Party were working class.


Still, it must be said that the material shortages on the Aragon front do have a sinister explanation--but not the one the red-baiters offer. After the war, FAIist Abad de Santillan obliged us with a frank confession:

"If all the leaders of the Libertarian (anarchist) organizations had ever seriously resolved to send all their armament, their war material and their best men to the front--the war would easily have been over in a few months…We can no longer conceal the fact that while, at the front itself, we had by 30,000 rifles (and perhaps as many as 24 batteries, 200 heavy guns), in the rear, in the power of the organizations, we had an additional 60,000 rifles with more ammunition than was ever in the proximity of the enemy."

i don't know if this is a quote taken out of context or what. What de Santillan is referring to is the weapons held by the CNT neighborhood defense organizations in Catalonia and elsewhere. This was mere small arms. This was not the heavy guns, tanks and aircraft needed to defeat a modern professional army. So De Santillan's quote here is ridiculous on its face. Moreover, the weapons held by the workers mass organizations were essential to maintain and defend worker power. They would never had been able to expropriate industry without holding a de facto armed monopoly by the working class organizations in Catalonia.

What the Stalinists wanted was all the arms in the hands of hierarchical army and police bodies, so they could use their control over those bodies to dominate the working class. That was the Communists' longterm strategy.


In March, 1937, the central government ordered the confiscation of arms from the political parties(74); in Barcelona, measures were taken to curb the numerous street murders by the "uncontrollables"--thugs who had attached themselves to the FAI(75) -- and to disband the militia "police." The CNT and POUM declined to surrender arms or submit to the draft.

the allegation of murders by members of the FAI is more Stalinist lies. the arms in the hands of the mass organizations of the working class were a necessary condition of working class power.


On May 3, 1937, Catalan police chief Rodriguez Sala and the Generalitat representative for the Telephone Exchange went to the Exchange’s censorship department to complain of anarchist interference with government phone calls. Anarchist militiamen, who had held the exchange since the start of the war, fired from an upper floor. Brief fighting ensued, which was stopped by an FAI leader. Rumors of a "provocation" spread among CNT members and barricades were erected throughout the city. As sporadic fighting began between CNT and PUSC members, POUM leaders proposed to FAI-CNT leaders that communists be expelled from the government and "Stalinist" influence be eliminated in Catalonia once and for all.

This is a complete misdescription. The telephone system in Spain had been owned by the American multinational ITT. In July 1936 the CNT union of telephone workers expropriated it and placed it under worker self-management. So it wasn't "anarchist militiamen" but the union of the telephone workers that ran the telephone system.

Moreover, Salas didn't go for no consultation, they attacked a whole series of telephone exchanges in a coordinated assault, with the intent of taking over control of the telephone system for the state. it so happened that on an upper floor of the telephone exchange there was a machine gun and the Communist-controlled police thus ran into opposition to their armed takeover.


In the central government, the PCE demanded the suppression of the POUM for these crimes. Largo Caballero refused, but this was the last straw even for members of his own party. Largo was ousted and Socialist Juan Negrin became Prime Minister.

What is not said here is that the Socialist party was badly split between the conservative social democrats, who were based in the middle classes, and the Left Socialists, who had working class support. It was the anarcho-syndicalists and the Left Socialists who voted against the suppression of the POUM. also what this Stalinist fails to mention is that the PCE also demanded suppression of the CNT -- the majority labor organization in Spain


At the trial, the POUMists denied they had helped to provoke the fighting, conveniently "forgetting" the articles in their own newspaper, La Batalla.(82) They even denied commanding the troops that had left the front at Heusca, some of them forced to return to the lines by the threat of bombing their buses.

note that this sectarian tale is inconsistent. on the one hand it says the POUM's support in Catalonia was "insignificant" and then the next moment it blames a massive general strike and working class seizure of control on this "insignficant" group. In reality the seizure of the city was the work of the CNT neighborhood defense groups who had probably 30,000 rifles, and the CNT union organization had probably 400,000 members in Catalonia.

moreover, there were several militia divisions that left the lines in Aragon to go to Barcelona, including two or three CNT divisions. they were persuaded to return by appeals of the CNT national committee.


"Concerning the disorders in Barcelona, Franco has told me that the street fighting was provoked by his agents. Nicholas Franco has confirmed this report, informing me that they have a total of 13 agents in Barcelona. Some time ago one of them had reported that the tension between Anarchists and Communists in Barcelona was so great that it could well end in street fighting.

mere hearsay. an entire general strike is provoked by 13 hidden agents? Gimme a break. there is a much simpler explanation: the Communist controlled police attacked a worker controlled institution that was one of the gains of the revolution. workers had seen their revolutionary gains under attack for some time. now a Communist-instigated violent assault on the worker-run telephone system. it's easy to see why this would provoke an organized working class counterattack.

De Santillan had his naive aspects. he could take seriously if he wants the leftist verbiage of Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera -- not so different than other "pro-worker" "left" fascists in Italy and Germany. but that would merely indicate his naivete.

it would not indicate any "fascist sympathies."

Morpheus
3rd August 2007, 19:33
Originally posted by [email protected] 31, 2007 09:46 pm
whats with stalinists always pasting articles from their nearest ideological cop
It's easier than thinking for yourself.

RevSouth
3rd August 2007, 22:51
This is disgusting falsification. Disgusting. The pro-Stalin forces neutered the revolution with their support for bourgeois democracy instead of the radical workers that they should have. The U.S.S.R. supported troops were also much better armed and equipped, seeing as Stalin didn't see it fit to provide the Anarchists or P.O.U.M. with arms. The Spanish who rose up in revolution were better than the petit-bourgeois, as well as bourgeois, Communists who came in and ruined the workers state. The U.S.S.R. was counterrevolutionary as far as the Spanish Civil War is concerned, in my book.

It was infighting the destroyed the Republicans, and infighting that will kill Leftists again if bastards like Marko have his way. Which he won't.

ComradeR
4th August 2007, 09:28
Originally posted by [email protected] 03, 2007 09:51 pm
This is disgusting falsification. Disgusting. The pro-Stalin forces neutered the revolution with their support for bourgeois democracy instead of the radical workers that they should have. The U.S.S.R. supported troops were also much better armed and equipped, seeing as Stalin didn't see it fit to provide the Anarchists or P.O.U.M. with arms. The Spanish who rose up in revolution were better than the petit-bourgeois, as well as bourgeois, Communists who came in and ruined the workers state. The U.S.S.R. was counterrevolutionary as far as the Spanish Civil War is concerned, in my book.

It was infighting the destroyed the Republicans, and infighting that will kill Leftists again if bastards like Marko have his way. Which he won't.
Agreed, Stalin sabotaged the revolutions in both Spain and Greece and sold those workers out to the fascists just to placate the capitalist powers. However in Spain you cannot just lay the blame just on one side or the other, the anarchists were ultimately in a way just as responsible for the defeat as Stalin. They failed to crush the bourgeois state when they had the chance, and they never mobilized the territories under their control for total war which would have allowed them to break the hold Stalin had on their war effort.

PRC-UTE
4th August 2007, 20:05
There's sadly two positions here: one that the Stalinists are completely falsifying what happened, and another that the anarchists and Trots were incompetent or worse, a fifth column. :rolleyes:

My sympathies lie with the workers who tried to make a revolution. But I can't also help but have massive respect for the evil "stalinists" who fought the fash so heroically. I also don't think we need to pretend that the militia system and workers' organisations performed flawlessly. Though they did prevent the initial fascist uprising from being completely successful, they couldn't defeat the nationalist army either.

no one here, unless I'm very mistaken, grew up in and fought with either side. There's no reason we need to uncritically defend either side. This excessive cheerleading should be replaced with a more thoughtful discussion.

Xiao Banfa
6th August 2007, 10:44
I agree with PRC-UTE. Stalins' position that the petty-bourgeoisie and some of the national bourgoise shouldn't be alienated from the anti-fascist side by pursuing immediate socialisation of the economy was correct.

Herman
6th August 2007, 11:52
no one here, unless I'm very mistaken, grew up in and fought with either side. There's no reason we need to uncritically defend either side. This excessive cheerleading should be replaced with a more thoughtful discussion.

My grandfather fought for the republic, but you are correct in that no one fought with either side.

I agree with you on this. I tend to be pro-PCE, but no one was perfect and there were many factors which led to the eventual defeat of all leftists in general.

Kléber
24th November 2009, 08:48
Attacking the "Stalinists" for their advocacy of the Popular Front, the POUM was only too happy to be included in this one. Their incredibly sophistical defense of this action was that the "petty bourgeoisie" was collaborating with them, rather than vice-versa!(73)

Actually, Trotsky criticized the POUM and the Anarchists for joining the government. The POUM were not Trotskyist. They broke with Trotsky.

zimmerwald1915
24th November 2009, 09:02
Actually, Trotsky criticized the POUM and the Anarchists for joining the government.
And quite rightly too.