Dimentio
23rd June 2007, 20:05
I think I have seen some distortions here in the image of fascism, or more particularily, nazism, which could make it hard to realise what it is when you well encounter it. A lot of users seems to have that idea that nazists in general are pro-US, endorse the war in Iraq and are just a step beyond republicans. While that might be true for typical southern racists and some evangelicals, we must not forget that nazism is primarily a conspirationist and idealist petty-bourgeoisie doctrine which is both anti-worker and anti-banker. Most nazis hate the USA, hate the west, hate modern culture, and so on.
That is a distinction from modern conservatives, neo-liberals and neo-libertarians, who endorse the west, USA, and Israel. It is so to say quite unlikely that the multi-national corporations today would support a new Hitler. Rather, if the situation gets more radical, they would most likely opt for supranational solutions since neither fascism or nazism offers any solution to what they want to achieve today.
Modern day nazism is a consequence of social exclusion and economic globalisation, just like for example islamism. One could argue that the islamists have a lot more of legitime reasons to exist, but they are in fact mobilising support due to the same form of ressentiment.
Another important aspect, noted from recent elections throughout Europe, is that socialism have weakened and in itäs place, social-conservative fascism have managed to infiltrate traditional worker-class voting areas. The reason why Le Pen and Sarkozy have managed to win support is not because anti-fascists have failed to beat up their supporters, but because their image of reality corresponds more to what workers in former industrial areas see around themselves.
That is a distinction from modern conservatives, neo-liberals and neo-libertarians, who endorse the west, USA, and Israel. It is so to say quite unlikely that the multi-national corporations today would support a new Hitler. Rather, if the situation gets more radical, they would most likely opt for supranational solutions since neither fascism or nazism offers any solution to what they want to achieve today.
Modern day nazism is a consequence of social exclusion and economic globalisation, just like for example islamism. One could argue that the islamists have a lot more of legitime reasons to exist, but they are in fact mobilising support due to the same form of ressentiment.
Another important aspect, noted from recent elections throughout Europe, is that socialism have weakened and in itäs place, social-conservative fascism have managed to infiltrate traditional worker-class voting areas. The reason why Le Pen and Sarkozy have managed to win support is not because anti-fascists have failed to beat up their supporters, but because their image of reality corresponds more to what workers in former industrial areas see around themselves.