Log in

View Full Version : Thougts on Milosevic?



che118
11th June 2007, 15:22
Like to hear what you guys think. My family currently living in Serbia and the balkans idolise :mellow: him

People's Councillor
11th June 2007, 16:26
Ubernationalist fucktard.

Maybe I'll calm down enough to post rationally on him later, but he really makes me angry.

Pirate Utopian
11th June 2007, 16:30
Reactionary ultranationalist killer, plain and simple.

In what ways does your family idolise this guy?

Nothing Human Is Alien
11th June 2007, 18:12
Some folks in the different countries that made up Yugoslavia remember him fondly for trying to keep the republic (under which they had much better standards of living, and general conditions were much better, etc.) together.

People's Councillor
11th June 2007, 18:16
The thing is, he undermined the Republic by using the Yugoslav People's Army to advance purely Serbian interests.

Janus
11th June 2007, 19:40
I don't think you'll find anyone on this forum who supports the man.

Milosevic (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=64367&hl=Milosevic)
Milosevic (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=47261&hl=Milosevic)
Milosevic (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=43884&hl=Milosevic)

Ismail
11th June 2007, 19:43
I know a man who has learned Serbian. That is how dedicated he is on the issue of Milošević and Kosovo. He believes that Kosovars engaged in ethnic genocide against Serbians, etc. He even went to Milošević's funeral when he visited Serbia. He is also very critical of Trotskyists, etc if you're curious.

Avtomat_Icaro
11th June 2007, 19:48
Well Yugoslavia was a multi ethnic state, then you get the various groups who turn uber nationalistic and start killing each other off. Crimes happened on both sides and its not something I would support simply because one of them had the nametag "socialist".

However in the Western world they will try as hard as possible to ignore the crimes commited by the other sides and just blame everything on the "socialist" Serbians. <_<

Wanted Man
11th June 2007, 20:07
Originally posted by [email protected] 11, 2007 07:43 pm
I know a man who has learned Serbian. That is how dedicated he is on the issue of Milošević and Kosovo. He believes that Kosovars engaged in ethnic genocide against Serbians, etc. He even went to Milošević&#39;s funeral when he visited Serbia. He is also very critical of Trotskyists, etc if you&#39;re curious. He&#39;s right. Even Wikipedia is quite open about this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo#Kosovo_after_the_war

Of course, the fact that Kosovo has undergone a worse "ethnic cleansing" than ever before, under the watchful eye of the NATO, is kept rather quiet in the media. Check out Michael Parenti:

http://www.michaelparenti.org/yugoslavia.html
http://www.michaelparenti.org/Milosevic.html

RedStarOverChina
11th June 2007, 21:59
It is important to remember that NATO vastly exaggerated the deaths under Milosevic...I think they only proved the death of a couple hundreds of people. NATO, however, exaggerated the number greatly to justify the subsequent war that cost the lives of 200,000+ people.

Nothing Human Is Alien
11th June 2007, 22:30
The thing is, he undermined the Republic by using the Yugoslav People&#39;s Army to advance purely Serbian interests.

What started the war in the Balkans? Do you know?


I don&#39;t think you&#39;ll find anyone on this forum who supports the man.

Think again.

Honggweilo
12th June 2007, 04:53
Originally posted by Dick Dastardly+June 11, 2007 07:07 pm--> (Dick Dastardly @ June 11, 2007 07:07 pm)
Ismail
@June 11, 2007 07:43 pm
I know a man who has learned Serbian. That is how dedicated he is on the issue of Milošević and Kosovo. He believes that Kosovars engaged in ethnic genocide against Serbians, etc. He even went to Milošević&#39;s funeral when he visited Serbia. He is also very critical of Trotskyists, etc if you&#39;re curious. He&#39;s right. Even Wikipedia is quite open about this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo#Kosovo_after_the_war

Of course, the fact that Kosovo has undergone a worse "ethnic cleansing" than ever before, under the watchful eye of the NATO, is kept rather quiet in the media. Check out Michael Parenti:

http://www.michaelparenti.org/yugoslavia.html
http://www.michaelparenti.org/Milosevic.html [/b] The speech on NATO interests and the breaking up of the yugoslavian nation is very well portraid in one of parenti&#39;s speeches which is freely available on torrent;

http://onebigtorrent.org/details.php?id=1696&hit=1

Also the book called "Monopoly" by Michel Collon in great reference material

also some excripts of his works

http://www.questionsquestions.net/docs04/iraq_partition.html

Demogorgon
12th June 2007, 08:06
Originally posted by Compań[email protected] 11, 2007 05:12 pm
Some folks in the different countries that made up Yugoslavia remember him fondly for trying to keep the republic (under which they had much better standards of living, and general conditions were much better, etc.) together.
Well people were certainly better off (for the most part obviously) before Yugoslavia broke up, but I am not sure if you can really dexcribe Milosovic&#39;s actions as trying to keep the republic together so much as trying to force all the countries in the republic (which were previously equal partners) under Serbian domination. Tito, the man was not.

I doubt he has much support outside of Serbia. I have spoken to a few Croation&#39;s abut him and they regard him as a large part of the reason why things got worse and fell apart, rather than as a man who tried to save Yugoslavia.

redcannon
12th June 2007, 08:35
i think he&#39;s a motherfucker who got to die in his dreams while others died in agony

NewEast
12th June 2007, 14:26
I&#39;m slowly building an archive of all the articles posted on Pravda1917-2007 (see signature).

Here are seven articles defending Milosevic:
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Revolutionary_P...hp?showforum=15 (http://z7.invisionfree.com/Revolutionary_Pravda/index.php?showforum=15)