Log in

View Full Version : The New Stormont regime in six counties of Ireland



PRC-UTE
19th May 2007, 17:32
The New Stormont regime in the North of Ireland

“And this is hell, nor am I out of it”

John McAnulty

14 May 2007

A local cartoonist, Ian Knox, summed up the May 8th re-opening of the
Stormont executive in the North of Ireland as the coronation of the
sectarian bigot Ian Paisley, representing Martin McGuinness of Sinn Fein
as his consort. It was a deadly accurate satire. Tony Blair and Taoiseacht
Bertie Ahern led a deputation of B-list politicos from Europe and the US
to the coronation, each outdoing the other in the use of cliché. The media
played their part too, adopting the reverential terms reserved for royal
weddings to describe the marriage of the loyalist DUP and the former
republican movement, and supplying about the same level of analysis. Only
the bravest reporters had the nerve to remind us that the same experiment
had been tried 9 years before, with a great deal more support and in much
more auspicious circumstances.

However it is not the ballyhoo and razamatazz that will determine the
future of the new Stormont. It is the political foundations on which the
settlement rests. Even at this late stage most people are unaware of the
details of this political programme – in fact many details remain unknown,
the product of secret diplomacy.

The new Stormont rests on a tripod. The three legs are: The continuation
of British rule in Ireland and the denial of democracy. The restructuring
of sectarian privilege and the preservation in a modified form of the
original basis of the Northern state – ‘a Protestant parliament for a
Protestant people’. Finally the new society is to be established by a
reactionary social and economic offensive designed to smash the working
class.

Any description of the new structures would be incomplete if we did not
take into account one other crucial dimension – the frantic and absolute
support of the Irish bourgeoisie for the new order, tail-ended by the
former republicans of Sinn Fein.

British rule

Sinn Fein have successfully presented ‘local democracy’ as the alternative
to British rule. This is an absolute falsehood. The Stormont parliament,
rather than direct rule by British ministers, is the preferred method of
British rule, the goal of British policy over more than 3 decades. Britain
has been able to, and remains able to, turn off the switch at any time. It
has dissolved and re-established the local administration on a whole
series of occasions, rejigging rules, procedures, the conditions under
which the republicans can enter and the balance of power within the
chamber. The budget has been worked out in detail for the next ten years.
Any local wriggle room in this comic-opera assembly, with over 100 MLAs
and a raft of ministers to rule a population no bigger than that of a
small city, is negated by the fact that all decisions will be decided
beforehand in behind the scenes deals between Sinn Fein and the
Paisleyites.

Sectarian privilege

The programme of the old Stormont parliament, the programme that led to
the explosion of the troubles, was for sectarian privilege for
Protestants, with heavy discrimination against Catholics and a Protestant
militia and a legal system that negated democratic rights. The British
solution, summed up in the Good Friday agreement, was to provide for a
sectarian division of rights. There were no democratic rights, instead the
groups had supposedly equal communal rights as Catholic and Protestant. It
was a solution bound to fail. In a sectarian setup one group has to be
clearly top dog. The agreement led to a shift to the right within unionism
and a series of accommodations by Britain to meet the bigots demands,
leading finally to the collapse of the Good Friday agreement and it
replacement by the St Andrews schema.

The new assembly rests on total and absolute surrender by the republican
movement. Their arms are gone, their movement largely disbanded and they
have been forced to give absolute support to the sectarian state and to
the judiciary and state forces. The new arrangement shifts dramatically
towards Unionist supremacy, with no requirement on unionists to support
the join leadership, with each ministry countered with a scrutinizing
committee and the unionist majority able to block all decisions. The
republicans are left with a veto over the most extreme sectarian decisions
– a very thin one, given their desperation to be in power.

At the same time concessions to the Unionists have inserted sectarian
privilege at every level of society. The loyalist armed groups, still
armed and still involved in sectarian intimidation, are subsidised by the
state and integrated into civic society, being represented on the policing
boards and a whole series of unelected committees. The housing authorities
offer houses to Protestants in North Belfast at knock-down prices to
‘preserve the Protestant character of the area’ (the site of the
intimidation of the children of Holy Cross school). £30 million is
reserved in the Health service for Protestant illness. The Orange order,
still openly celebrating sectarian murder at its demonstrations, is free
to intimidate while Sinn Fein police the districts it intimidates. In the
last area it has been restricted, the Garvaghy road, the chair of the
residents committee Breandan MacCionnaith has just resigned from Sinn Fein
– a clear indication that the last restriction is to go. The supposedly
reformed police openly reject inquiry findings of their involvement in
sectarian murder, boycott the Ombudswoman’s office and call for an end to
all investigations of their bloody past. A special victims commissioner
has been appointed to establish that it was republican aggression that was
responsible for the troubles and to shower funds on former members of the
police and the local militias.

For all this the Paisleyites last demand, that they be given a red button
to eventually expel the republicans and end what they consider to be a
temporary arrangement, was not granted. They were however given more seats
on the Privy council, giving them automatic right to scrutinise continuing
British intelligence reports on the republicans.

Social and economic offensive

The attempt to make the North work politically is to be accompanied by
attempts to make it work economically. The current setup rests heavily on
public investment and employment by the British state. The plan is to
rationalise and privatise in the hope of attracting significant
transnational investment. In part the new dispensation is the outcome of a
detailed strategic plan designed by the British treasury, the ‘Review of
Public Administration’ (RPA). In part it comes from the DUP and Sinn Fein,
who have very similar economic policies and who are hammering out a
reactionary ‘Programme for government’ behind the scenes in committee
rooms.

This combined offensive has both a social and economic element. The RPA
was originally designed as a programme of rationalisation, to reduce the
number of councils and unify education and library services. It was then
modified to support and legitimise further sectarian division. So there
are to be seven councils, three, West of the Bann, will have built in
sectarian majorities for Sinn Fein. Three, East of the Bann have built-in
loyalist majorities. In the background the DUP are lobbying furiously for
new gerrymandered ward changes to give them control of the final council
in Belfast. Similarly the proposal to set up a single education authority
has been modified, with controlling bodies from the Catholic church and
the Grammar schools bolted on. A report on rationalisation of the schools
estate – the building and land in the education sector – instead of
proposing comprehensive and integrated schools – proposed that the
sectarian and social divisions remain and that different schools cooperate
within an area – it is even proposed that schools would share the same
site without the sects uniting! In the process genuine integrated schools
stand to loose out, with an increasing number of starts refused funding.
As already mentioned, the Health service finds itself forced to hand out
£30 million to Protestant patients only.

As part of the RPA, the number of workers employed in the ancillary staff
associated with schools and libraries will be cut sharply. Those retained
will face a sharp speedup in workrate and worse working conditions.
Classroom assistants and facilities for special needs will be specially
affected. The decision of the new executive to delay water charges simply
highlights the fact that the privatisation of the water service is well
under way with 500 highly skilled jobs within the service slashed as the
executive formed. A large swathe of the Northern civil service is to be
transferred to the public service, meaning that after a few years
protection wages and pensions will be cut. The overall plan is to slash at
least 30% off the public sector workforce and produce a low wage, business
friendly environment that will attract inward investment.

By far the most enthusiastic proponents of this view are Sinn Fein. They
have led the way in proposing a 12% corporation tax. The North will
prosper, they argue, if the workers pay the taxes and the bosses don’t.
One early casualty of the southern general election was their attempt to
rebadge themselves as Social Democrats, with proposals for a 5% increase
in corporation tax, a tax increase for ‘middle income earners’ earning
over 100,000 Euro and increased levels of public service. They dropped
these proposals at the start of the election and now stand as a party of
the right on economic issues, completely in support of the Thatcherite
programme of Fianna Fail in the South and urging the extension of this
rapacity to workers in the North.

The British have one final strategy for making sure that the new system
beds in. Using the conflict resolution principle that ‘no-one should be
left out.’ They have poured money into community organisations run by Sinn
Fein and the Loyalists. Very little reaches the communities. A ‘Civic
Forum’ of Trade unionists, Loyalists, NGOs and the religious has been set
up to advise the government as partners in the process.

Reality

There is no doubt that the reality of the new society will come as a shock
to workers. Catholic workers will find that they remain second class
citizens. Protestant workers will find that the authorities have handed
over control of their areas to Loyalist ‘community representatives’ whom
they have consistently rejected throughout the troubles. All will find
themselves facing major economic cutbacks and the destruction of public
services.

Support for the new order will come under strain quite quickly. The danger
is that the collapse in support will be to the right and that those who
loose faith in the Sinn Fein pipedream will turn to sectarian rivalry,
competing with the other community, and increasingly with migrants also
for increasing scarce resources.

Those who fight for a socialist alternative will have to begin now,
keeping in mind a number of key principles:

Target the British – the main purpose of Stormont is to make British rule
invisible – we consistently aim demands at the real rulers and begin to
reactivate a solidarity movement in Britain.

Oppose sectarianism – The British are building sectarianism into every
nook and cranny of the six counties, with the collaboration of the
majority of forces in civic society. Our aim should never be so poor as to
target the bigots alone – we must expose all, North and South, who are
complicit.

Build Rank and file opposition to the economic offensive – the trade union
leaderships are in partnership North and South of the border and
collaborate both in the economic and political offensive.

Build a 32 county movement. The Irish capitalists are the most
enthusiastic supporters of partition and the neoliberal offensive. The
only alternative to sectarian division is our common identity as members
of the Irish working class.