Anarchism 101 on YouTube. Introduction to anarchis

[madhatterz]

short introduction series to anarchism presented on you tube sweeeeet and short ....spread the link around and remember to rate the video too :ph34r:

http://www.3monkeyz.net/Forum/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=518

Peace
madhatterz
www.3monkeyz.net

[FatJack4391]

Looks alright, but for basically for people under the age of 14 interested in Anarchism. Because if you're older than that then you should have enough sense and resources to go look at something that explains it a lot better and more in depth than two three minute videos.

Also, you didn't explain the whole revolution and no private property part of anarchism. Which is kinda just as big as freedom, and no private property should be included in those freedoms. See, that's the part where most people are turned off by these types of philosphies, cause they like their many, expensive things. And that's why it takes a lot more than a few youtube videos to explain this. Nor do I doubt you will be able to explain it fully, ever in youtube. you could have 100 videos at 3 minutes each, and still won't be good enough.

But at least ya gave them advice to go seek knowledge on their own. Perhaps include some links to crimethinc and infoshop as well?

[Noah]

I think they're very good videos for youth, people who can't be bothered reading and just to draw people in...I like the music too!!

[colorlessman]

Be objective and accurate. Primitivists are critics of technology not advocates of a "non-civilized" society.

Other than that, your videos are great, simple, and straighforward. The background music maintains attention.

[Pirate Utopian]

The movies do not really tell what happens with average people under Anarchism, yes some intellectuals are Anarchists and therefore wont go out and plunder and rob but that doesnt mean that alot of people would in fact wouldnt go out and start chaos.
Just a question, not slander.

[Jazzratt]

Originally posted by [email protected] 07, 2007 01:20 pm
Be objective and accurate. Primitivists are critics of technology not advocates of a "non-civilized" society.
Actually they criticise civilisation as well, so it's quite accurate to say they advocate a system whereby there is none. It's entirely accurate.