Spirit of Spartacus
15th April 2007, 03:42
http://www.econ.utah.edu/~ehrbar/akmc.pdf
I found this annotated version of Marx's Capital. The guy basically explains it almost sentence-by-sentence.
Do you think this should be used as a reference work when studying Capital?
I see two potential problems...
First, this guy uses his own translation from the German. He presents the German and English text side-by-side, but still, its his own translation.
Note that this translation is different from the one we see in the marxists.org version of Capital (that version was edited by Engels himself!)
Second, this guy is providing detailed explanations based on his own understanding of Kapital.
Wouldn't it be a bad idea for first-time readers to be influenced by one particular strand of thought?
So basically, this question is directed towards those members who have actually read Capital volume 1 and "understand" it.
Do you think this annotated version is a good thing to use?
I found this annotated version of Marx's Capital. The guy basically explains it almost sentence-by-sentence.
Do you think this should be used as a reference work when studying Capital?
I see two potential problems...
First, this guy uses his own translation from the German. He presents the German and English text side-by-side, but still, its his own translation.
Note that this translation is different from the one we see in the marxists.org version of Capital (that version was edited by Engels himself!)
Second, this guy is providing detailed explanations based on his own understanding of Kapital.
Wouldn't it be a bad idea for first-time readers to be influenced by one particular strand of thought?
So basically, this question is directed towards those members who have actually read Capital volume 1 and "understand" it.
Do you think this annotated version is a good thing to use?