Originally posted by
[email protected] 12, 2007 05:41 pm
Is having Labor unions necessary in a leftist society?
Well, what's meant by a "leftist" society?
'Cause this board is titled "revolutionaryleft" and based on discussion among "leftists" a lot of members start thinking that means more than it does in the real world....
In a situation where workers hold political power, unions will still be necessary. Because there will still be the danger of the workers' government, and the administration of the economy, becoming bureaucratically corrupted. Unions help defend the immediate economic interests of the workers and can be one form of counterbalance and limit on any bureaucracy that begins growing up in other organizations.
It's interesting to look at some of the points Lenin made in the "trade union controversy" in the early USSR. He pointed out that it wasn't advisable to completely merge the trade unions with the state, even though it was a workers' state, because it was also a workers' state in a mostly-peasant country, with a significant degree of bureaucratic degeneration....the unions were needed to counter that.
Now, when we get to the point where there are no classes in society, there'll be no more need for organizations of class struggle, including unions.