Log in

View Full Version : Corporate War-Profiteer Moving HQ



SPK
12th March 2007, 04:18
No matter how you slice it, this is interesting. From today's edition of the New York Times:


Halliburton Moving C.E.O. From Houston to Dubai
By CLIFFORD KRAUSS

HOUSTON, March 11 — Halliburton, the big energy services company, said on Sunday that it would open a corporate headquarters in the United Arab Emirates city of Dubai and move its chairman and chief executive, David J. Lesar, there.

The company will maintain its existing corporate office here as well as its legal incorporation in the United States, meaning that it will still be subject to domestic laws and regulations.

Although the announcement of the new Dubai arrangement took many by surprise, Halliburton said that the move was part of a strategy announced in mid-2006 to concentrate its efforts in the Middle East and surrounding areas, where state-owned oil companies represent a growing source of business.

Halliburton, which was led by Vice President Dick Cheney from 1995 to 2000, is currently in the process of spinning off KBR, its military contracting unit, to focus on its business of drilling wells and maintaining fields for oil companies. The company did not say what implications the Dubai development might have for its military contracts. Lea Anne McBride, a spokeswoman for Mr. Cheney, referred questions about the company’s plans to Halliburton.

The Dubai announcement, which Halliburton made at a regional energy conference in Bahrain, comes at a time when the company is being investigated by the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission over allegations of improper dealings in Iraq, Kuwait and Nigeria. Halliburton has also agreed to pay billions of dollars in settlements in asbestos litigation.

Halliburton would not elaborate on Sunday on what the shift of its top executive might mean for some of the issues it faces. The move seemed to raise questions about whether Halliburton might gain tax advantages or other benefits.

A Halliburton spokeswoman, Melissa Norcross, referred inquiries to the company’s press release, saying in an e-mail message, “The C.E.O.’s job is global by nature. He will continue to remain attentive to our shareholders, clients and employees around the world.”

Ms. Norcross added, “As companies usually refer to the C.E.O.’s office as the corporate headquarters, that’s what we are doing. Basing the C.E.O. in Dubai to focus on our Eastern Hemisphere growth makes good business sense, as it is the center of our Eastern Hemisphere operations and a global business hub. We will maintain our company’s legal registration in the United States and we are not leaving Houston.”

The mayor of Houston, Bill White, was notified by telephone shortly before Halliburton made the announcement, according to a spokesman, Frank Michel.

“We don’t expect it will have a big impact on employment here,” Mr. Michel said. “We point out that Houston continues to be the center for the international oil and gas business.”

“Having a corporate headquarters is different than it used to be,” Mr. Michel added. “Executives spend a lot more time on airplanes, and we understand that.” He noted that Schlumberger, one of Halliburton’s top competitors, maintains offices in both Paris and Houston.

On the face of it, the decision to move Mr. Lesar abroad appears to point mainly to how the epicenters of the energy business are moving from the mature fields of North America to the younger fields of the Middle East and Africa. It also underscores the arrival of Dubai as a center for energy deal-making and commerce, a role once solidly filled by Houston.

“My office will be in Dubai, and I will run our entire worldwide operations from that office,” said Mr. Lesar, who holds the titles of chairman, chief executive and president, at a conference in Manama, Bahrain’s capital. “The Eastern Hemisphere is a market that is more heavily weighted toward oil exploration and production opportunities. Growing our business here will bring more balance to Halliburton’s overall portfolio.”

Halliburton is incorporated in Delaware and its stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Reuters reported that Mr. Lesar said Halliburton would like to list its shares on an exchange in the Middle East, which it could do while maintaining its listing in New York.

Halliburton reported a record $2.3 billion in profit last year and continues to be the dominant oil-field service company in North America, where it generates 60 percent of its operating income.

Over the last several years, an increasing amount of Halliburton’s business has shifted to places like Kuwait, Russia, Libya, Australia, Vietnam, and west and central Africa. And, mirroring trends in the energy business, its customer base is shifting from traditional Western oil companies to national oil companies in developing countries.

Some analysts who follow Halliburton said they did not think the relocation of Mr. Lesar reflected anything more than changes in the energy business.

“They are moving to the center of the Eurasian-African hemisphere and that’s where the bulk of the work is going to be in the future,” said Barbara Struck, an analyst with Energy Intelligence Group, a research firm.

She said she doubted the company was trying to evade laws in the United States. Halliburton has suffered several years of negative headlines, many having to do with its administration of a $16 billion deal to support American military operations in Iraq. Halliburton’s KBR subsidiary has been the subject of a number of investigations for mishandling billions of dollars of housing, food and fuel contracts for American troops and government officials operating in Iraq. Halliburton began spinning off KBR last year.

During Mr. Cheney’s tenure as chief executive, Halliburton bought a company that saddled it with asbestos claims. The company has agreed to pay nearly $5 billion in settlements.

Despite its recent problems, Halliburton posted record revenue, net income and margins last year.

Perhaps the biggest winner could be Dubai itself, one of seven emirates in the United Arab Emirates confederation, which has sought to establish itself as a regional commercial center on par with Singapore and Hong Kong. Most multinational companies, including Halliburton, have made Dubai a regional hub for their Middle Eastern business over the last decade.

Hassan M. Fattah contributed reporting from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and Rachel Mosteller from Houston.

Janus
14th March 2007, 04:08
It's quite understandable that certain politicians and Americans are angry/confused. However, such a move was more or less inevitable in an economic sense: moving closer to its market source with the added advantage of getting away from political and economic problems at home. This is definitely a growing trend for internationalist/global corporations particularly those who have greater market interests outside the US.

Guerrilla22
14th March 2007, 04:15
Haliburton is keeping its US offices, its just adding an office or part of its operation to Dubai. I guess it makes sense that a company that is in the business of war profiteering would want to move part of its operation to the Middle East.

SPK
16th March 2007, 07:42
What struck me about the article is that Halliburton just happened to make this move at the same time that the usa is going through its worst military / strategic defeat ever. The invasion of Iraq was designed, in part, to secure its oil reserves long-term for the amerikan imperialists: that isn’t going to happen, and the writing is on the wall.

This move will initially involve only the CEO and probably his key executive lackeys. It is small at this point, but I still cannot think of any historical precedent for this in the usa. Major oil companies here do not just up and move overseas. They have historically been joined at the hip to amerikan imperialism, which has conveniently overthrown governments and put military pressure on countries whenever resistance has spiked to Big Oil’s exploitation and plunder: this happened to Mossadegh in Iran in the 1950’s, when he attempted to nationalize oil resources there. The impending defeat in Iraq will seriously hinder the usa’s ability to wreak this kind of havoc in the future. Perhaps that is one overall reason for the move? Perhaps that portends a further disconnect or decoupling of these massive multinationals from their traditional henchmen in the Pentagon? I don’t have a firm opinion just yet, but the questions are reasonable.

Btw, the actual Halliburton division that is responsible for military contracts in Iraq – feeding the soldiers, building airbases, delivering fuel and supplies, etc. – is KBR, the old Kellogg, Brown, and Root. KBR is in the final stages of being spun off from Halliburton, basically at the demand of big investors: its profit levels which much lower than the oilfield service divisions, and that put downward pressure on the company’s stock price. So, by the time the new headquarters opens in Dubai, KBR will be a completely independent firm -- Halliburton will be purely energy and won’t get the day-to-day political heat that comes with servicing the amerikan armed forces in Iraq. Which will be useful, when its time to negotiate with the political elites and state oil firms in the middle east. :lol: