Log in

View Full Version : Solidarity with Franco Turigliatto



blake 3:17
1st March 2007, 20:33
Solidarity with Franco Turigliatto
Sign this Appeal




Announcing he would resign rather than vote for the government motion in the Senate re-financing the military mission in Afghanistan, Franco Turigliatto declared, "I am against the war in Afghanistan and against the U.S. base in Vicenza." The loss of his vote meant a loss for the government leading to Romano Prodi offering his government’s resignation. The Rifondazione leadership is now threatening to take immediate action to expel Franco from the PRC. This international appeal for solidarity with Franco has now been launched:



Franco Turigliatto in the Senate“The executive of the PRC (Party of Communist Refoundation) has declared that the behaviour of Senator Franco Turigliatto is incompatible with the Party due to his abstention on the vote on the government’s foreign policy. For us this is a serious and erroneous decision.

First because this parliamentary act is completely consistent with the historical programme of the PRC as well as with the demands of the peace movements over the last few years. That a centre-left government can try to impose on its supporters a war mission such as that in Afghanistan or the doubling in size of a military base such as that in Vincenza seems to us to be a sign of myopia and the main cause of the current crisis.

But also because Turigliatto’s behaviour was accompanied with a spirit of seriousness and rectitude that should not be underestimated. In a political context in which a parliamentary seat is considered to have a value above all others, to resign from the Senate after forty years of political activity alongside the workers and after having participated in the construction of the PRC from the very beginning, seems to us to be an act which is both unprecedented and morally correct, even if we think that he should withdraw his resignation.

In parliaments, we need representation of the positions of a peace movement with "no ifs and no buts" : we need such a representation now on the threshold of the spring offensive in Afghanistan and against subordination to the foreign policy of the US. We need acts like this, even if they are complicated and difficult, in order to reduce the gap between established politics and society.

We express all our solidarity with Franco Turigliatto and our willingness to build with conviction a peace movement with "no ifs and no buts".

A first list of signatures will be added soon

To express your solidarity with Franco Turigliatto, send your signature to :

[email protected]

Link to International Viewpoint page. (http://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1220)

Louis Pio
1st March 2007, 20:46
Of course I support him. However i think the mandelite 4. international of which he is part is responsible for alot of their problems themselves. They supported the reformist wing in the rifonddazione communista and they voted for more troops so they wouldn't split the government.
I posted an article on this on this board which can be found here: On the fall Of Prodi and the trole of rifondazione (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=63326)
Btw the neostalinist part of rifondazione is playing a disgracefull part in all of this, they gone totally reformists, which really ain't no surprise

Wanted Man
1st March 2007, 21:09
What is a "neo-stalinist"? New buzzword? Are you a neo-Trotskyist? Why must a man who died in 1953 be dragged into this issue? For all of the perceived faults of the "Stalinist" left, approval of imperialist war is not one of them. Is the Dutch SP still a Maoist(or "neo-maoist" :rolleyes: ) party, even though it has gone reformist long ago? Let's stay on this planet.

Louis Pio
1st March 2007, 21:20
Nope, neo stalinist is the best word to describe those trends that still hold Stalin in highesteem but have abandoned most of their revolutionary rhetoric.
I could of course have called them fuckheads but me thinks that would also make you complain my friend.
Btw by this question you just disgraced the immortal Dio, I suggest you change your username ;)

Wanted Man
1st March 2007, 23:34
Originally posted by [email protected] 01, 2007 10:20 pm
I could of course have called them fuckheads but me thinks that would also make you complain my friend.
No, "fuckheads" is quite a good term for "leftists" who support sending troops.

Louis Pio
1st March 2007, 23:41
I agree wholeheartedly.
It came as a surpirise for me that he mandelites objected, in Brazil one of their members send troops against peasants, She was kicked out but it still shows what kinda people they have

Andy Bowden
2nd March 2007, 12:33
They supported the reformist wing in the rifonddazione communista and they voted for more troops so they wouldn't split the government.

:o

I didn't know they voted for more troops - do you have a link or any further information? I've always saw the USFI as being quite good, I was at their youth camp last year.

On the Rifondazione stuff its depressing to see a successful project of Left regroupment go so far into the shit. At the USFI camp the comrades there told me that Rifondazione was effectively dead, with no less than 5 factions being formed within the party.

Bertinotti, the Rifondazione leader also seems a right shit as well - hes the speaker of the house ffs!

Honggweilo
2nd March 2007, 13:46
Nope, neo stalinist is the best word to describe those trends that still hold Stalin in highesteem but have abandoned most of their revolutionary rhetoric.
A party which has almost a eurocommunist majority (dont mention being the inventors of it) is neo-stalinist? the PRC has also a major trotskists block aswell as a very large marxists-leninist block within it, but its definitly nothing near your denfinition of "neo-stalinism" :rolleyes:. The ML'ist block is definitly not the ones who lost their revolutionary practice. Its the eurocommunists who push through the reformist "european left party". Strangely also the anti-globalists (including anarchists) and trots with their "European Anti-capitalist Left" who are just as "parlementairy reformist" in this way as your "neo-stalinists" who support the "GUE/UNL".

Also their youth movement (Giovanni Comunisti) is so affraid of offending one of the parties internal factions that it only supports Palestine and the ELZN. This proves indeed how fractured the PRC is inside :(

Anyway, im glad the senators finally made a stance against discusting social-democratic neo-liberal policy. But you have to understand that their coalition is a unity front and the only temporary alternative against another 8 years of the extremely conservative and neo-fascist "House of Freedoms" of Berlesconni


(P.S; in the frontpage i saw the abbrevation of the topic as "Solidarity with Franco..." :ph34r: :lol: )