Log in

View Full Version : Make England a republic



Anonymous
22nd May 2002, 14:21
Wht d we have a royal family. They so much money(like 2 million just fro grounds keeping) and they a hanging on to this old British society that is gone now.

TC of Glockenspiel
22nd May 2002, 14:54
They seem like pure show to me - England claims to keep them for the same reason they didn't switch to the Euro - British pride and preservation of their values. Well ok that's not the only reason they didn't switch, but the royal family? Ol' Tony does most of the work...unless you call going onto British Television every now and then and saying something seemingly important; then receiving a million pounds for it of course.

guerrillaradio
22nd May 2002, 15:01
The primary reason we have a royal family is to divert attention away from politics. Fuck em I say.

TC of Glockenspiel
22nd May 2002, 16:22
They say in 50 years there'll be no more royal family. That's if William doesn't give it up first.

Menshevik
22nd May 2002, 17:42
It's just symbolism and traditon, they have no power.

Kez
22nd May 2002, 18:43
I agree with Menshevik 100% here

I dont think we should put any energy into aboloshing the queen as she is about as important as the shit that goes down my loo

Comrade Kamo

guerrillaradio
22nd May 2002, 21:39
Wow, me and Kamo agree on something!!! :o

(Edited by guerrillaradio at 9:40 pm on May 22, 2002)

Moskitto
22nd May 2002, 21:52
I want to be a citizen. That's why I oppose the monarchy. In Britain you're not a citizen, you're a subject.

RGacky3
23rd May 2002, 00:44
does it really matter wheather you are a citizen or subject, you get not more rights being a citizen its just a name.

RedRevolutionary87
23rd May 2002, 01:09
ya, they may not be important, but part of your tax money goes for upkeeping them...im in canada, i dont liek it either, like wtf!

god blast the queen!

TC of Glockenspiel
23rd May 2002, 09:38
How much of the power is actually in the Royal Family's hands?

Son of Scargill
23rd May 2002, 09:57
moskitto,may correct me on this one,but I think the Queen still has the power to dissolve parliament.But it is highly unlikely she will use this power,as there would then have to be a referendum,and if she loses,then she must go.
This law may have been amended,so don't trust me on this one.
Also,Prince Phillip has the power to racially abuse people,and sneer at the poor and still make them pay him taxes.

Unknown
23rd May 2002, 11:37
I thinck that the queen should move her rinkly ass over and start giving some of that cash she wipes her ass with to caharity and to the truley needey as that little cretin william did you know he said And i qouet
'do you still throw spears at each other' to the president of australiea WTF surely he cant be king WHAT IF>>>>> he dissolves parliament takes over and rules the country all because he got CLOPDED round his over sized head by his dads ears little ***** family imagin them in the real world HAHAHAH that william would of had his balls riped off and shoved in his ears

Kez
23rd May 2002, 11:59
I think it was philip the greek fuckhead who said that.

BOZG
23rd May 2002, 15:03
I think that the British monarchy should be completely abolished as it symbolises their past of colonialism.

Menshevik
23rd May 2002, 18:40
I'm sure that if most people had a chance to vote for the abolition of the monarchy, they would, but it really doesn't matter. With any luck they'll breed themselves out of power with too much inter-marriage.

Kez
23rd May 2002, 22:58
Well, heres some good news...
When the queen sleeps with the fishes (dies), who will come to power? Charles, who's charles marrying? Camila. Who like Camila? NO-ONE! who likes Charles, NOt many people.

so we wait for lizzy to go, then the people who once loved the monarchy will love to hate it.

Comrade Kamo

El Che
24th May 2002, 01:26
Indeed, if we believe that all men (and women too :P) are equal, then what are we to think about "monarcy"?

hobo
24th May 2002, 16:20
No-one has mentioned the Queen mums estate all of £50 to £60 million pounds which has come from the people and won't be taxed when it all goes to the Queens. She owned over £16 million pounds of jewlery for gods sake, just allowed to take the peoples money and spend it that. Her money taxed could build a hospital. The Russians knew how to get rid of monarchy, we're just asking them to leave.

Moskitto
24th May 2002, 18:50
The Queen has to approve laws although in practice she is unlikely to refuse laws. Also British nationals have to be loyal and serve the crown. Note that on a British passport it doesn't say "Citizen" it says "Subject." This means that MPs have to be loyal to the crown or be fined and lose their seat, effectively a ban on true republicans.

Also it is illegal to discuss the monarchy in parliament.

UK=Dictatorship.

Kez
24th May 2002, 22:20
Did anyone see the program with Tony Benn on saying how shit the queen was? and how he had to do vows protecting queen etc etc?

Comrade Kamo

James
26th May 2002, 10:21
I believe that the queen does do alot of charity work, "behind the scenes". But that doesn't make her any better, i mean like, shes got so much money shes giving it away to keep the levels down!!!

I agree with moskitto. We are slaves to her, be it just a name, we are still slaves. We should have the end of the royals after the queens dead.

Kez
26th May 2002, 16:12
The slave who doesnt want to break free of slavery deserves double slavery.

But are we really her slaves? looking at the picture? i think not, we are the slaves of the bourgieus govt, and it is those chains we must break

Comrade Kamo

BOZG
26th May 2002, 16:56
You are still slave to her in name.

peaccenicked
26th May 2002, 17:02
"I am a British subject, not proud of it, because I carry the burden of shame", these lyrics were sung by UB40 in the eighties.

Blasphemy
26th May 2002, 17:17
letting a person who contributes absolutely nothing to society spend all this money is outrageous. the money could be used for much better porpuses.

Menshevik
26th May 2002, 23:26
Doesn't the Royal Family have to pay taxes now?

Blasphemy
27th May 2002, 17:22
still, millions of pounds are wasted on them.

Anonymous
28th May 2002, 17:58
they cost so much of our money all for nothing. its all a joke. The queen also didnt pay taxes on some of the queen mothers (RIP) land and she got away with it.

hobo
28th May 2002, 18:09
The Queen agreed to pay some taxes but they are all fairly small and do not include income tax and the Queens £60 million wont be taxed either.

Anonymous
28th May 2002, 18:16
that is terrible. we pay for them goddammit!!!

hobo
28th May 2002, 21:03
Overthrow them and then make their Palace's into museums and homes for the homeless.

Anonymous
29th May 2002, 20:50
definately just turn the palace into a drug rehab center for junkies or something.```````''''''

hobo
29th May 2002, 20:55
If they did otherthrow them their homes would just be turned into Mcdonalds and Nike towns

Anonymous
29th May 2002, 21:04
could u imagine the palace with a huge neon 'M' on it~! a huge disgusting Mc.Donalds landmark.

lennon
30th May 2002, 22:29
The royals and the queen are a feudal hangover. However they do represent the summit axis of a class based hierarchal ( unequal ) society . How should we spend this bank holiday?????

Communist Monkey
31st May 2002, 15:32
The system sucks, just like the church, the monarchy is a way of controling the masses and trying to keep them happy

peaccenicked
31st May 2002, 15:39
CORONATION CORONACH
Tune: The Sash Words: Thurso Berwick



O, Scotland hesna got a King,
And hesna got a Queen.
For ye canny hae the saicint Liz
When the first yin's never been.

Chorus:
Nae liz the Twa, nae Lillibet the Wan,
Nae Liz will ever dae,
We'll mak oor land republican
In a Scottish breakaway.

Her man's cried the Duke o Edinbury,
He's wan o the Kiltie Greeks.
O, dinna blaw ma Kilts awa,
'Cos Lizzie weirs the breeks.

He's a handsome man an he looks like Don Juan,
He's beloved by the weaker sex,
But it disnae really matter a damn,
'Cos it's Lizzie signs the cheques.

Noo her sister Meg's got a bonnie pair o legs,
But she didnae want a German or a Greek,
Pair auld Peter wis her choice, but he didnae suit the boys,
So they sellt him up the creek.

Here, but Meg wis fly an she beat them by and by,
Wi Tony Hyphenated-Armstrong, ding! dong!
But behind the pomp an play, the question o the day,
Wis who the hell did Suzy Wong? yum! yum!

Sae here's tae the Lion, the bonny Rampant Lion,
An a lang streetch tae its paw,
Gie a Hampden Roar, an' we're oot the door:
- An ta-ta, ti Chairlie's maw.

thebigcom
1st June 2002, 00:18
the royal family is a joke. not only do they have no power, but they are a a reporters dream. they are constantly caught with drugs, loose women, and male prostitutes. even if they ever got power, the people would never have it.

Well in doubt
3rd June 2002, 02:24
hey Big com the royal family has nothing to do with running the country they are a symbol of England and adored by the people. when the queen died millions of people paid there respects.

timbaly
4th June 2002, 02:33
Their ONE and only purpose is to rack in big bucks from the tourists who come to see them plus they create a media frenzy so people will buy magazines just for the articles about their controversial actions

(Edited by timbaly at 7:37 am on June 4, 2002)

marxistdisciple
5th June 2002, 18:24
The royal family suck. They cost us millions in taxes every year to look after them, and most of them don't do anything at all (i.e. the extended family.) The fact a million people showed up to cellebrate this weekend makes me feel radically naucious. Every time I criticise them someone tells me how great they are. I watched the queen going around in a carriage made of gold, while people die starving and homeless in the street. What double standards we seem to have. Since the queen is supported from our taxes, does that means she pays tax on tax effectively? Then it comes round again i presume, she pays tax. some of that goes back to her, then she pays tax on that...etc. etc.. lol I could be mistaken.