Log in

View Full Version : Mccain: Rumsfeld Was One Of The Worst Sec. Of Def.



Guerrilla22
20th February 2007, 01:05
BLUFFTON, S.C. - Republican presidential candidate John McCain (news, bio, voting record) said Monday the war in Iraq has been mismanaged for years and former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld will be remembered as one of the worst in history.

"We are paying a very heavy price for the mismanagement — that's the kindest word I can give you — of Donald Rumsfeld, of this war," the Arizona senator told an overflow crowd of more than 800 at a retirement community near Hilton Head Island, S.C. "The price is very, very heavy and I regret it enormously."

McCain, the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, complained that Rumsfeld never put enough troops on the ground to succeed in Iraq.

"I think that Donald Rumsfeld will go down in history as one of the worst secretaries of defense in history," McCain said to applause.

The comments were in sharp contrast to McCain's statement when Rumsfeld resigned in November, and failed to address the reality that President Bush is the commander in chief.

"While Secretary Rumsfeld and I have had our differences, he deserves Americans' respect and gratitude for his many years of public service," McCain said last year when Rumsfeld stepped down.

On a two-day campaign swing in South Carolina, McCain fielded questions from the crowd for more than an hour and said the United States can succeed in Iraq with additional troops and a new strategy. McCain has been a strong proponent of using more troops and favors Bush's increase of some 21,500 U.S. forces in the nearly four-year-old war.

"I have been saying for 3 1/2 years that we would be in this sad situation and this critical situation we are in today," he said.

McCain's bid for president was sidetracked in South Carolina in 2000 after a victory in New Hampshire. George W. Bush won the primary here and went on to win the nomination and White House.

"In life, one of the worst things you can do is hold a grudge," he said. "I felt the important thing for me to do with my life was to move forward after we lost our race. You have seen other people who have lost who mire themselves in bitterness and self pity. That's not what my life is all about."

Some in the crowd were Bush supporters who have not yet decided on a 2008 candidate.

"It's too early to say," said Paul Baker, a retiree from Niagara Falls, N.Y., who has lived in South Carolina about four years. "I'm just going to wait it out and see what happens."

Andalou
20th February 2007, 01:07
Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know McCain's exact stance on various social issues? He seems to at least have the right idea about the war...

ComradeR
20th February 2007, 08:20
Originally posted by [email protected] 20, 2007 01:07 am
Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know McCain's exact stance on various social issues?
McCain is just another damn neocon no different then any of the others, nuff said.


He seems to at least have the right idea about the war...
Your joking right? McCain is a huge supporter of the war and has been one of the biggest supporters of the surge. This attack of his on Rumsfeld is nothing more then a political move to get more support for his presidential bid.

Guerrilla22
20th February 2007, 08:54
McCain is just another damn neocon no different then any of the others, nuff said.

he's definitely not a neo-con, however he came out against Roe v. Wade recently. he's fairly moderate, especially considering he's a republican, but he's reactionary none the less.



He seems to at least have the right idea about the war...

No, because he claims that the problem was not having enough troops to the job in the first place, not the actual decision to go to war. its just funny to here him trash on Rumsfeld.

CheRev
20th February 2007, 09:53
He's just saying this about Rumsfeld to distance himself from the Bush administration that he's been supporting all along. The reason Rumsfeld? Well, because he's already been discredited and attacking him makes little difference to the status quo. You don't see him attacking Bush, Cheney or Rice, and we all know how much they've fucked up!

RedAnarchist
20th February 2007, 09:56
Sounds like the American Gordon Brown to me (although Brown is not as reactionary) - trying to distance himself from the incumbent government to help his chances of winning the next US election.