Life after death

[Political_Chucky]

I was looking at this site Life After Death (http://lifeafterdeath.info/) and it discusses possible paths after we die and tries to explain common ideas in both a religion and scientific sense. Take a look and post what you think. I'll post in a little bit.

[wtfm8lol]

Originally posted by [email protected] 12, 2007 06:56 pm
I was looking at this site Life After Death (http://lifeafterdeath.info/) and it discusses possible paths after we die and tries to explain common ideas in both a religion and scientific sense. Take a look and post what you think. I'll post in a little bit.
great website? i'd say its pretty shitty.

[Coggeh]

I only read the final thoughts and it asks for you to disprove religion and says alternative answers are not visable ........ well if thats the case , why don't they prove god exists.......Its a petty solution they alot of people believe because their afraid of no life after death and they need an explanation to everything so they make up some random thing and add to it every so often .

[Political_Chucky]

Well I say its a great source because its making you think of the different possibilities. No one has the proof whether or not god is plausible or not.

[razboz]

Originally posted by [email protected] 12, 2007 07:11 pm
Well I say its a great source because its making you think of the different possibilities. No one has the proof whether or not god is plausible or not.
mmmh science has proof that god is not plausible. Common sense does also.

[wtfm8lol]

mmmh science has proof that god is not plausible.

and even better yet: unnecessary

[Political_Chucky]

Originally posted by razboz+February 12, 2007 11:28 am--> (razboz @ February 12, 2007 11:28 am)
[email protected] 12, 2007 07:11 pm
Well I say its a great source because its making you think of the different possibilities. No one has the proof whether or not god is plausible or not.
mmmh science has proof that god is not plausible. Common sense does also. [/b]
Well science proves that RELIGIONS god(christianity, islam,) is not possible, but does not rule out the possibility of A god. Let me hear your proof that A god, not the god, cannot exsist. I'm not saying that I do believe in that, but both of you are already assuming the article is concluding that religion is rite. Its not saying that, its trying to point out all the possible routes and theories that could be. Your only argueing one part of this person's article.