Log in

View Full Version : look at this racist rant..



R_P_A_S
5th February 2007, 19:39
someone on my space posted a bulletin.. check this out..

______________

You call me "Cracker", "Honkey", "Whitey", "Gringo" and you think it's OK.

...But when I call you Kike, Towelhead, WOP, Camel Jockey, Gook, nigg or Chink you call me a racist.

-You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? :rolleyes:

-You have the United Negro College Fund.

-You have Martin Luther King Day.

-You have Black History Month.

-You have Cesar Chavez Day.

-You have Yom Hashoah

-You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi

-You have the NAACP.

-You have BET.


-If we had WET(white entertainment television) ...we'd be racist.

-If we had a White Pride Day... you would call us racist.

-If we had white history month... we'd be racist.

-If we had an organization for only whites to "advance" our lives... we'd be racist.

-If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships...you know we'd be racist.

-In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights...you would call us racist.

-Did you know that some high school students decided to make a club for only the white students because the other ethnicities had them... they all got sent to court for being racist but the african-american, Latino, and Asia clubs were not even questioned.

-You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.



I am white.

I am proud.

But, you call me a racist.



Why is it that only whites can be racists?


Now watch, I'll be a racist for posting this

So what? No one will re-post this for fear of being called racist.

Hampton
5th February 2007, 19:49
This was posted here. (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=61541)

EwokUtopia
6th February 2007, 00:51
WET would be the shittiest channel ever created. What would it consist of? The Dick Van Dyke marathon followed by Birth of a Nation, some Leave it to Beaver, and of course a tad of Triumph of the Will?

Jazzratt
6th February 2007, 01:21
Originally posted by [email protected] 06, 2007 12:51 am
WET would be the shittiest channel ever created. What would it consist of?
Most of TV is WET.
(I know it's cliche, but it's true)

EwokUtopia
6th February 2007, 01:42
I mean blatant WET.

BET is white owned. It harms the black community by propogating negative images of black culture like gangstas, pimps, ho's, and senseless avarice (Get rich or die). BET is WET

lenin_fresh
10th February 2007, 04:16
I just found out MTV owns BET. Maybe they should change the name to WET.

OneBrickOneVoice
10th February 2007, 05:42
Because White people have:

--enslaved Africans
--unleashed crusades upon the Arabs
--committed genocide of the Native Americans
--run sweat/slave shops in Latin America and Asia

and are the race of oppression. So this guy should shut the fuck up.

Sand Castle
14th February 2007, 19:07
Originally posted by [email protected] 10, 2007 05:42 am
Because White people have:

--enslaved Africans
--unleashed crusades upon the Arabs
--committed genocide of the Native Americans
--run sweat/slave shops in Latin America and Asia

and are the race of oppression. So this guy should shut the fuck up.
But it doesn't make what he claims the other races do any more fair than what white people have done in the past. I believe the whole racial entertainment thing is a trick by the capitalists, not to cause fights among races, but to bring in more money through seperation of the races by appealing to the interests of certain groups within a race.

JimSachsen
25th February 2007, 22:17
-If we had a White Pride Day... you would call us racist.

St. Patrick's Day?

I suppose for many people it's just an excuse to get drunk...

RNK
27th February 2007, 14:31
Find him and shoot him. That's all I have to say.

Rollo
27th February 2007, 14:46
Originally posted by [email protected] 28, 2007 12:31 am
Find him and shoot him. That's all I have to say.
Reading through all your posts you should take it a bit lower.

Saying things like " blow up the car, kill this guy etc " is extreme and will almost definetely have you investigated.

Redmau5
27th February 2007, 16:05
Originally posted by [email protected] 25, 2007 10:17 pm

-If we had a White Pride Day... you would call us racist.

St. Patrick's Day?

I suppose for many people it's just an excuse to get drunk...
St. Patrick's Day is hardly equal to a 'White Pride Day'. It's a celebration of the patron saint of Ireland, and an excuse for a piss-up.

RASHskins
28th February 2007, 07:08
This guy is an ass buit he has one point. IF a black guy was racist to another race lets say chinese i would still not put up with that racism is still racism so lets get that outa the way. This guy however takes it way to far and is a piece of shit.

Black Dagger
28th February 2007, 07:46
Originally posted by [email protected] 28, 2007 05:08 pm
This guy is an ass buit he has one point. IF a black guy was racist to another race lets say chinese i would still not put up with that racism is still racism so lets get that outa the way. This guy however takes it way to far and is a piece of shit.
What this guy is saying has nothing to do with the example you just cited; he's not 'taking it too far' - he's just spouting racist bullshit period.

Chicano Shamrock
28th February 2007, 08:38
The sad thing is that people who believe in "white pride" don't seem to understand that there is no such thing as "white culture". I have Irish culture and history. Others may have English culture. They aren't the same thing. Being white has nothing to do with skin color. There are white Mexicans, Iranians and Chinese but does that make them white? It is a place in society and not a culture.

The term cracker comes from the slave master that used to whip the slaves. When the whip lashed them it made a "crack" noise and thus the master was the cracker.

Now that we have established that being white is the standing in society of the owners and masters you can look at the list that someone made. The person talks off a white pride day but everyday the people in the country are feeling the pride of whitey by being subjected to white laws and white police. The owners own the TV channels and thus there is no need for a white channel because they all already are. BET used to be black owned. Now it is owned by Viacom and it unleahes a foul perversion of black culture.

He talks about a white history month but last time I took a history class we never learned about Malcom X, Marcus Garvey, Emiliano Zapata. No instead we learned about how Columbus was a very good man and how the natives to North America were uncivilized.

Overall we must not let the differences in cultures divide our comrades. Don't forget your history but at the same time remember that there is no white culture.

patch_rojas
7th March 2007, 12:10
hasn't this been like a some sort of norm or generalization that white people are rascists ? just like a muslim is to a terrorist.. although i dont believe that all white people are rascists, nor are all muslims terrorists. i hate the whole generalization thing.

Black Dagger
7th March 2007, 13:37
Originally posted by [email protected] 07, 2007 10:10 pm
hasn't this been like a some sort of norm or generalization that white people are rascists ? just like a muslim is to a terrorist.. although i dont believe that all white people are rascists, nor are all muslims terrorists. i hate the whole generalization thing.
Who's generalising? Where?

RNK
7th March 2007, 14:11
Yeah, sure, there's a Black History month. What some idiots fail to realize is that the rest of the 11 months are WHITE history months.

patch_rojas
7th March 2007, 22:34
Originally posted by black [email protected] 07, 2007 01:37 pm

Who's generalising? Where?
no i just mean that some people have this type of mentality of generalization.

Adam Rand
10th March 2007, 01:29
Originally posted by [email protected] 05, 2007 07:39 pm
someone on my space posted a bulletin.. check this out..

______________

You call me "Cracker", "Honkey", "Whitey", "Gringo" and you think it's OK.

...But when I call you Kike, Towelhead, WOP, Camel Jockey, Gook, nigg or Chink you call me a racist.

-You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? :rolleyes:

-You have the United Negro College Fund.

-You have Martin Luther King Day.

-You have Black History Month.

-You have Cesar Chavez Day.

-You have Yom Hashoah

-You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi

-You have the NAACP.

-You have BET.


-If we had WET(white entertainment television) ...we'd be racist.

-If we had a White Pride Day... you would call us racist.

-If we had white history month... we'd be racist.

-If we had an organization for only whites to "advance" our lives... we'd be racist.

-If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships...you know we'd be racist.

-In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights...you would call us racist.

-Did you know that some high school students decided to make a club for only the white students because the other ethnicities had them... they all got sent to court for being racist but the african-american, Latino, and Asia clubs were not even questioned.

-You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.



I am white.

I am proud.

But, you call me a racist.



Why is it that only whites can be racists?


Now watch, I'll be a racist for posting this

So what? No one will re-post this for fear of being called racist.
Though obviously with racist intention it brings up a point that might be overlooked due to the more blatant white racism nowadays. Equality should be for all. Racism is bad in any way. And there are black and hispanic racists...though it is hardly to the discomfort of the white population in western cultures, it should, like the more common racism, not be tolerated.

Black Dagger
10th March 2007, 05:37
Originally posted by Adam Rand+--> (Adam Rand)
Though obviously with racist intention it brings up a point that might be overlooked due to the more blatant white racism nowadays.[/b]

What point is that?


Adam Rand
And there are black and hispanic racists..

Of course, but thats like bringing up the fact that there are anti-hetero gay people in a discussion about homophobia, what exactly is the point beyond diversion, distraction etc from the focus on HOMOPHOBIA? Its not like we dont know that Black etc. racists exist, what we do know however is that white supremacy is what is killing and oppressing people all over the world today, not 'black racists'.

Adam Rand
10th March 2007, 10:31
Originally posted by black rose+March 10, 2007 05:37 am--> (black rose @ March 10, 2007 05:37 am)
Originally posted by Adam [email protected]

Though obviously with racist intention it brings up a point that might be overlooked due to the more blatant white racism nowadays.

What point is that?


Adam Rand
And there are black and hispanic racists..

Of course, but thats like bringing up the fact that there are anti-hetero gay people in a discussion about homophobia, what exactly is the point beyond diversion, distraction etc from the focus on HOMOPHOBIA? Its not like we dont know that Black etc. racists exist, what we do know however is that white supremacy is what is killing and oppressing people all over the world today, not 'black racists'. [/b]
That there are also other sorts of racism which should be fought....I thought that was rather obvious in my post.



Not really, since this is about that rant...which brings up a good point, though being entirely racist. It is oftentimes overlooked by people because the oppression by whites is so much more blatant. To entirely ignore it is nonsensical though, I feel.

Black Dagger
10th March 2007, 11:31
That there are also other sorts of racism which should be fought....I thought that was rather obvious in my post.

Im not questioning the need to attack racism from ANY source, but putting an emphasis on so-called 'black racism' in a discussion such as this is missing the point. 'Black racists' as a group dont have anything approaching the power in society as white racists.

This power is the real teeth behind white racism that just isnt replicated for so-called 'black racism' etc., a bigot in and of themselves cant really do much, but when the structures of society reflect and reinforce a bigots POV, oppressing certain groups based on the colour of their skin racism takes it most powerful form.


Originally posted by AR
It is oftentimes overlooked by people because the oppression by whites is so much more blatant. To entirely ignore it is nonsensical though, I feel.

Im not saying we should ignore it, but its about keeping that realisation in perspective. I.E. No racism should not be tolerated, but so-called 'black racism' etc. should by no means be the focus of the anti-racist struggle (that would be a completely disproportionate/non-sensical focus), as i explained above, white racism, white supremacy is the most dangerous and damaging racist phenomenon in the world today - and that should be our main target.

Adam Rand
10th March 2007, 11:35
Originally posted by black rose+March 10, 2007 11:31 am--> (black rose @ March 10, 2007 11:31 am)
That there are also other sorts of racism which should be fought....I thought that was rather obvious in my post.

Im not questioning the need to attack racism from ANY source, but putting an emphasis on so-called 'black racism' in a discussion such as this is missing the point. 'Black racists' as a group dont have anything approaching the power in society as white racists.

This power is the real teeth behind white racism that just isnt replicated for so-called 'black racism' etc., a bigot in and of themselves cant really do much, but when the structures of society reflect and reinforce a bigots POV, oppressing certain groups based on the colour of their skin racism takes it most powerful form.


AR
It is oftentimes overlooked by people because the oppression by whites is so much more blatant. To entirely ignore it is nonsensical though, I feel.

Im not saying we should ignore it, but its about keeping that realisation in perspective. I.E. No racism should not be tolerated, but so-called 'black racism' etc. should by no means be the focus of the anti-racist struggle (that would be a completely disproportionate/non-sensical focus), as i explained above, white racism, white supremacy is the most dangerous and damaging racist phenomenon in the world today - and that should be our main target. [/b]
Yes, I agree with that, but since the topic was about this rant and I thought the idea should not be ignored I just stated that.