apathy maybe
26th January 2007, 01:18
I've just started reading The Communist Movement in the Arab World by a Tareq Y. Ismael. It is available on line at http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=108865253
On page 3 the author considers what Marx and Engels wrote on the subject. He presents them as being eurocentric (and to me bordering on racism).
"For both, the dominant characteristic of the Arab world was a backwardness rooted in colonial domination and perpetuated by oppressive tradition." (Op. cite.)
"Simply stated, the objective conditions of Arab society worked against the development of any mode of production other than the Asiatic mode, which was the embodiment of underdevelopment and backwardness. According to Marx, no progress whatsoever could develop from the Asiatic mode of production, and Western intervention was the only possible way out of the impasse." (Op cit.)
"In the final analysis, one can accurately say that the greatest flaw of Marx and Engels in their analysis of the Middle East was the “extent to which they inherited virtually en bloc a traditional European discourse on Asia. " (Op cit.)
So what do people think of this?
On page 3 the author considers what Marx and Engels wrote on the subject. He presents them as being eurocentric (and to me bordering on racism).
"For both, the dominant characteristic of the Arab world was a backwardness rooted in colonial domination and perpetuated by oppressive tradition." (Op. cite.)
"Simply stated, the objective conditions of Arab society worked against the development of any mode of production other than the Asiatic mode, which was the embodiment of underdevelopment and backwardness. According to Marx, no progress whatsoever could develop from the Asiatic mode of production, and Western intervention was the only possible way out of the impasse." (Op cit.)
"In the final analysis, one can accurately say that the greatest flaw of Marx and Engels in their analysis of the Middle East was the “extent to which they inherited virtually en bloc a traditional European discourse on Asia. " (Op cit.)
So what do people think of this?