Log in

View Full Version : capitalism versus socialism



A.J.
18th January 2007, 20:17
Capitalism versus socialism: The great debate revisited
http://www.globalre search.ca/
index.php?context= viewArticle& code=PET20040628 &articleId= 780
by Prof. James Petras

Global Research, June 28, 2004
Rebelion

The debate between socialism and capitalism is far from over. In fact
the battle of ideas is intensifying. International agencies,
including the United Nations, the International Labor Organization
(ILO), the Food and Agricultural Organization, the World Health
Organization and reports from NGO's, UNESCO and independent experts
and regional and national economic experts provide hard evidence to
discuss the merits of capitalism and socialism.

Comparisons between countries and regions before and after the advent
of capitalism in Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Europe as well as
a comparison of Cuba and the ex-communist countries provide us with
an adequate basis to draw some definitive conclusions. Fifteen years
of "transition to capitalism" is more than adequate time to judge the
performance and impact of capitalist politicians, privatizations,
free market policies and other restoration measures on the economy,
society and general welfare of the population.

Economic Performance: Growth, Employment and Poverty

Under communism the economic decisions and property were national and
publicly owned. Over the past 15 years of the transition to
capitalism almost all basic industries, energy, mining,
communications, infrastructure and wholesale trade industries have
been taken over by European and US multi-national corporations and by
mafia billionaires or they have been shut down. This has led to
massive unemployment and temporary employment, relative stagnation,
vast out-migration and the de-capitalization of the economy via
illegal transfers, money laundering and pillage of resources.

In Poland, the former Gdansk Shipyard, point of origin of the
Solidarity Trade Union, is closed and now a museum piece. Over 20% of
the labor force is officially unemployed (Financial Times, Feb. 21/
22, 2004) and has been for the better part of the decade. Another 30%
is "employed" in marginal, low paid jobs (prostitution, contraband,
drugs, flea markets, street venders and the underground economy). In
Bulgaria, Rumania, Latvia, and East Germany similar or worse
conditions prevail: The average real per capita growth over the past
15 years is far below the preceding 15 years under communism
(especially if we include the benefits of health care, education,
subsidized housing and pensions). Moreover economic inequalities have
grown geometrically with 1% of the top income bracket controlling 80%
of private assets and more than 50% of income while poverty levels
exceed 50% or even higher. In the former USSR, especially south-
central Asian republics like Armenia, Georgia, and Uzbekistan, living
standards have fallen by 80%, almost one fourth of the population has
out-migrated or become destitute and industries, public treasuries
and energy sources have been pillaged. The scientific, health and
educational systems have been all but destroyed. In Armenia, the
number of scientific researchers declined from 20,000 in 1990 to
5,000 in 1995, and continues on a downward slide (National
Geographic, March 2004). From being a center of Soviet high
technology, Armenia today is a country run by criminal gangs in which
most people live without central heat and electricity.

In Russia the pillage was even worse and the economic decline was if
anything more severe. By the mid 1990's, over 50% of the population
(and even more outside of Moscow and St. Peterburg - formerly
Leningrad) lived in poverty, homelessness increased and universal
comprehensive health and education services collapsed. Never in peace-
time modern history has a country fallen so quickly and profoundly as
is the case of capitalist Russia. The economy was "privatized" - that
is, it was taken over by Russian gangsters led by the eight
billionaire oligarchs who shipped over $200 billion dollars out of
the country, mainly to banks in New York, Tel Aviv, London and
Switzerland. Murder and terror was the chosen weapon of "economic
competitiveness" as every sector of the economy and science was
decimated and most highly trained world class scientists were starved
of resources, basic facilities and income. The principal
beneficiaries were former Soviet bureaucrats, mafia bosses, US and
Israeli banks, European land speculators, US empire-builders,
militarists and multinational corporations. Presidents Bush (father)
and Clinton provided the political and economic backing to the
Gorbachov and Yeltsin regimes which oversaw the pillage of Russia,
aided and abetted by the European Union and Israel. The result of
massive pillage, unemployment and the subsequent poverty and
desperation was a huge increase in suicide, psychological disorders,
alcoholism, drug addiction and diseases rarely seen in Soviet times.
Life expectancy among Russian males fell from 64 years in the last
year of socialism to 58 years in 2003 ( Wall Street Journal, 2/4/
2004), below the level of Bangladesh and 16 years below Cuba's 74
years (Cuban National Statistics 2002). The transition to capitalism
in Russia alone led to over 15 million premature deaths (deaths which
would not have occurred if life expectancy rates had remained at the
levels under socialism). These socially induced deaths under emerging
capitalism are comparable to the worst period of the purges of the
1930's. Demographic experts predict Russia's population will decline
by 30% over the next decades (WSJ Feb 4, 2004).

The worst consequences of Western supported "transition" to
capitalism are still to come over the next few years. The
introduction of capitalism has totally undermined the system of
public health, leading to an explosion of deadly but previously well-
controlled infectious diseases. The Joint United Nations Program on
HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) published a comprehensive empirical report which
found that in Eastern Europe and Central Asia…"infection levels are
growing faster than anywhere else, more than 1.5 million people in
the region are infected today (2004) compared to 30,000 in 1995" (and
less than 10,000 in the socialist period). The infection rates are
even higher in the Russian Federation, where the rate of increase in
HIV infection among young people who came of age under the Western-
backed 'capitalist' regimes between 1998-2004 is among the highest in
the world.

A big contributor to the AIDS epidemic are the criminal gangs of
Russia, Eastern Europe, the Balkans and Baltic countries, who trade
in heroin and each year deliver over 200,000 'sex-slaves' to brothels
throughout the world. The violent Albanian mafia operating out of the
newly "liberated" Kosova controls a significant part of the heroin
trade and trafficking in sex-slaves throughout Western Europe and
North America. Huge amounts of heroin produced by the US allied war
lords of "liberated" Afghanistan pass through the mini-states of
former Yugoslavia flooding Western European countries. The newly
'emancipated' Russian Jewish mafia oligarchs have a major stake in
the trafficking of drugs, illegal arms, women and girls bound for the
sex- industry and in money-laundering throughout the US, Europe and
Canada (Robert Friedman, Red Mafiya ,2000). Mafia billionaires have
bought and sold practically all major electoral politicians and
political parties in the self-styled "Eastern democracies" , always in
informal or formal alliance with US and European intelligence
services.

Economic and social indicators conclusively document that "real
existing capitalism" is substantially worse than the full employment,
moderate growth, welfare states that existed during the previous
socialist period. On personal grounds -in terms of public and private
security of life, employment, retirement, and savings -the socialist
system represented a far safer place to live than the gang-controlled
capitalist societies that replaced them. Politically, the communist
states were far more responsive to the social demands of workers,
provided some limits on income inequalities, and, while accommodating
Russian foreign policies interests, diversified, industrialized and
owned all the major sectors of the economy. Under capitalism, the
electoral politicians of the ex-communist states sold, at bargain
prices, all major industries to foreign or local monopolies,
fostering monstrous inequalities and ignore worker health and
employment interests. With regard to ownership of the mass media, the
state monopoly has been replaced by foreign or domestic monopolies
with the same homogenous effects. There is little question that an
objective analysis of comparative data between 15 years of capitalist
'transition' and the previous 15 years of socialism, the socialist
period is superior on almost all quality of life indicators.

Let us turn now to compare Cuban socialism to the newly emerging
capitalist countries of Russia, Easter Europe and south-central Asia.

Cuban socialism was badly hit by the turn to capitalism in the USSR
and Eastern Europe. Industrial production and trade fell by 60% and
the daily caloric intake of individual Cubans fell by half.
Nevertheless infant mortality in Cuba continued to decline from 11per
1000 live births in 1989 to 6 in 2003 (comparing favorably to the
U.S.). While Russia spends only 3.8% of its GNP on public healthcare
and 1.5% on private care, the Cubans spend 16.7%. While life
expectancy among males declined to 58 years in capitalist Russia, it
rose to 74 years in socialist Cuba. While unemployment rose to 21% in
capitalist Poland, it declined to 3% in Cuba. While drugs and
criminal gangs are rampant among the emerging capitalist countries,
Cuba has initiated educational and training programs for unemployed
youth, paying them salaries to learn a skill and providing job
placement. Cuba's continued scientific advances in biotechnology and
medicine are world-class while the scientific infrastructure of the
former communist countries has collapsed and their scientists have
emigrated or are without resources. Cuba retains its political and
economic independence while the emerging capitalist countries have
become military clients of the US, providing mercenaries to service
the US empire in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq. In contrast to
Eastern Europeans working as mercenary soldiers for the US in the
Third World, 14,000 Cuban medical workers serve some of the poorest
regions in Latin America and Africa in cooperation with various
national governments that have requested their skills. There are more
than 500 Cuban medical workers in Haiti. In Cuba, most industries are
national and public with enclaves of private markets and joint
ventures with foreign capital. In ex-communist countries, almost all
basics industries are foreign-owned, as are most of the mass media
and "culture industries". While Cuba retains a social safety net for
basic foodstuff, housing, health, education and sports, in the
emerging capitalist countries the "market" excludes substantial
sectors of the unemployed and underpaid from access to many of those
goods and services.

Comparative data on economy and society demonstrate that "reformed
socialism" in Cuba has greatly surpassed the performance of the
emerging capitalist countries of Eastern Europe and Russia, not to
speak of Central Asia. Even with the negative fall-out from the
crisis of the early 1990's, and the growing tourist sector, Cuba's
moral and cultural climate is far healthier than any and all of the
corrupt mafia- ridden electoral regimes with their complicity in
drugs, sex slavery and subordination to U.S. empire building. Equally
important while AIDS infects millions in Eastern Europe and Russia,
Cuba has the best preventive and most humane treatment facilities in
the world for dealing with HIV. Free anti-viral drugs, humane cost-
free treatment and well-organized, extensive public health programs
and health education explains why Cuba has the lowest incidence of
HIV in the developing world despite the presence of small-scale
prostitution related to tourism and low incomes.

The debate over the superiority of socialism and capitalism continues
because what has replaced socialism after the collapse of the USSR is
far worse on every significant indictor. The debate continues because
the achievements of Cuba far surpass those of the emerging capitalist
countries and because in Latin America the emerging social movements
have realized changes in self-government (Zapatistas) , in
democratizing land ownership (MST Brazil) and natural resource
control (Bolivia) which are far superior to anything US imperialism
and local capitalism has to offer.

The emerging socialism is a new configuration which combines the
welfare state of the past, the humane social programs and security
measure of Cuba and the self-government experiments of the EZLN and
MST. Wish us well!

Global Research Articles by James Petras

OneBrickOneVoice
18th January 2007, 22:55
great article comrade. Also keep in mind that socialist Cuba is doing far better off than it's capitalist counterparts; Jamaica, DR, Haiti, and Panama across the board from education and literacy, to housing and sanitation.

Louis Pio
18th January 2007, 23:28
In some areas they are doing better than USA

Rawthentic
19th January 2007, 02:35
Yeah, "socialist" :huh: Cuba is one of the most progressive nations in the world.

Thats interesting, A.J, you posting something on socialism since you're a Stalinist reactionary.

Karl Marx's Camel
19th January 2007, 18:55
Discussion:

http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=48175&hl=napoleon


Under communism

The author sure has a "liberal" definition of communism.