PRC-UTE
9th January 2007, 01:04
The Plough
Vol. 4- No 1
January 8th Monday 2007
E-mail newsletter of the
Irish Republican Socialist Party
1) Editorial
2) Dying days of the Good Friday Agreement.
3) The Need for an Anti-Imperialist United Front
4) One Left United Front.
5) Statement from the DHKC (Revolutionary People's Liberation
Front) from Turkey:
6) From the media
a. People United Saving Hospitals
b. Cuba's infant mortality rate is lowest in Latin America
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Editorial
First revolutionary greetings to all our readers as we enter 2007.
This edition carries a number of articles on the necessity for a
coming together of anti -imperialists. Our first article warns of
the dangers of getting carried away by the whole debate on policing
which could simply descend into mindleass provo bashing. The second
article by former Sinn fein activist Philip Ferguson calls for
fraternal and comradely debate and dialogue between anti –
imperialists, a call The Plough is happy to endorse. The third
article is a timely remind to all of us of the necessity to win over
the masses in the struggle for without the unity of the masses the
struggle cannot succeed. So we need to create eventually a vehicle
that can bring together all those who consider themselves republican
sand socialists to win a majority of the people to socialist ideas
We also carry a statement from the DHKC on the hanging of Saddam
Hussein. It is clear he was executed because the Imperialist s feared
that he would reveal details of how the Imperialists used him in the
1980s to strengthen their influence in the Middle East. His crimes
were their crimes. The brutal suppression of the Kurds, the gassing
of villages, the wiping out of communists in Iraq were all events
applauded by the imperialists who supplied the technology, the
expertise, the training and the weapons to carry out these crimes.
We shed no tears for Saddam. His fate shows just how easily the
imperialists can use and abuse their allies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Dying days of the Good Friday Agreement.
When the Good Friday Agreement was reached in early 1998 the IRSP was
not in a strong position politically. We had just come through a
two years of internal turmoil as the rank and file of the
organisation fought to restore the party to its core principles,
which had been abandoned by a militaristic and suspect leadership. In
the process we had lost Gino Gallagher who laid the basis for the
implementation of the revolutionary principles for republican
socialism as laid down by Ta Power. We had just held our first Ard-
Feis for over 12 years. But while numerically small and considered by
other republicans to be "one man and a fax machine" we had a
republican socialist analysis of the politics of Ireland that has
been totally vindicated by the events of the last nine years.
We said that the Good Friday Agreement would not succeed. It would
not end discrimination, it would encourage sectarianism by
institutionalizing it and that it copper-fastened partition. We
called for a no vote in the subsequent referendum. We encouraged the
INLA to call its ceasefire as that referendum had made clear the
wishes of the vast majority of the people on the island was for
peace.
We argued face to face with them that the Provisional Sinn Fein
organisation did not have to take part in the power-sharing
executive. Instead they could have provided a solid republican
opposition to both the continued existence of partition and also lead
the fight back against privatization and neo-liberal economic
policies. We referred to that approach as the McCann option-named
after veteran socialist Eamon McCann, who had first put forward that
option.
However the provisionals rejected that approach, adopted a communal
approach( the antithesis of a republican position) claiming to
represent the nationalists (and the nationalists only) and sought
power. As a consequence they decommissioned all their weapons,
entered Stormont, worked British rule in the North, implemented
privatization policies, bowed the knee to USA war lord George Bush,
colluded in the doing away with the political status gained by the
heroic deaths of 10 hunger strikers and belittle and demeaned other
republicans who rejected their reformism.
Now as they ponder the prospect of supporting the Police Service of
Northern Ireland chickens are coming home to roost. Many of their
members who swallowed without protest the long procession of u-turns
now have reached the point of no return. A group of Concerned
Republicans (which the IRSP are involved in) has held two public
meeting on the issue of policing. For the first time in years Sinn
Fein have been forced to justify their position in public before
other republicans. Prominent members have resigned and are now
considering standing as independent republicans if an election is
held in March 2007. While some republicans and socialists may enjoy
the spectacle of seeing Sinn Fein in difficulties they also need to
take the long view. Short term provo- bashing will not win people to
a principled position but only alienate possible future allies in the
struggle against Imperialism
An important aspect of the policing debate is that it is almost
entirely a Provisional Sinn Fein matter. The basic question posed is
do Sinn Fein republicans implement British justice and policing? As a
consequence of the Good Friday Agreement it was always going to come
down to this. The leadership of Sinn Fein has answered that question
in the affirmative at their last Ard-Comhairle meeting. The IRSP,
Republican Sinn Fein and 32 County Sovereignty Movement all reject
the Sinn Fein (provisional) position
If a Sinn Fein Ard Feis endorses the PSNI it is the price they are
paying so that arch bigot, and hater of Catholics, Ian Paisley can
become First Minister. Paisley in fact has now got a veto over
whether there will be power sharing in the North. People should never
forget that many years ago Paisley was a strong supporter of direct
rule from Westminster. So even if Sinn Fein accept positions on the
Policing Board and local district partnerships, the DUP still hold
the winning cards. They can now have Paisley as First Minister or
prevent Sinn Fein from sharing power by forcing Britain to a long
period of direct rule. Either way they can claim success to their
followers.
Some success for the peace process, some success for Sinn Fein's
strategy.
What we are now witnessing in the North of Ireland is the dying days
of the Good Friday Agreement. Nine years after its acceptance it
still has not been implemented and has now been superseded by the St.
Andrews Agreement which neither Sinn Fein nor the DUP signed up to.
The IRSP has held its position consistently over the past ten years.
In all the excitement generated by the policing debate and the fall
out from it, it would be a major mistake for the IRSP to abandon its
clear principled republican socialist party building approach for
short-term electoral advantage. Of course we should support whole-
heartedly those who have a similar position to ourselves. But before
supporting other candidates we need to remember the long term
position of the Irish working class will not be advanced by
unprincipled alliances.
(G Ruddy)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
The Need for an Anti-Imperialist United Front
In a November 23, 2006 article entitled, "Not Too Late for a United
Front", Mick Hall noted "There is little doubt that former members of
the Provisional Republican Movement now make up one of the largest
political factions within northern nationalism"
(http://lark.phoblacht.net/MH1011206g.html).
As well as all the people who have left as individuals over the past
decade, there is Republican Sinn Fein, the 32-County Sovereignty
Movement, the IRSM, Socialist Democracy and independent socialist-
republicans such as Bernadette McAliskey and the people grouped
around The Blanket and Fourthwrite. Outside Ireland there are also
friends of Irish freedom who have been discarded by, or had already
seen through, the Adams cabal atop New Sinn Fein.
Indeed, the number of what could be described as genuine anti-
imperialists is quite impressive and significant. Mick Hall also
rightly noted, however, "Yet their inability to come together to
combat their nemesis, even in a small way, has all but left the
playing field clear for the opportunistic politics of Gerry Adams'
SF."
Indeed, I think it could be argued that the divisions amongst the
anti-imperialist opponents of Adams' Surrenderist politics are the
biggest single thing that New Sinn Fein has going for it.
What is urgently needed is open, comradely discussions among the anti-
imperialist forces with the aim of forming some kind of united
front. No-one need abandon their particular views and there could be
full freedom of action and expression for each group within such a
united front.
One of the first challenges of such a united front could be to pose
an alternative to the Surrenderistas of New Sinn Fein in the next
Stormont elections. I cannot see why it should not be possible to
put together an impressive abstentionist argument, political platform
and candidates posing a convincing critique of New Sinn Fein on every
level – its policies on the national question and on social and
economic issues. Although Mick Hall favours taking seats in Stormont,
most of the forces which could be united for an anti-imperialist
platform should have little trouble agreeing to run on an
abstentionist basis.
Within a basic set of points which everyone in the united front could
agree upon, each current would be free to raise their own specific
The way to form such a united front for be for representatives of the
anti-imperialist organisations to begin meeting and discussing
working towards establishing such a front, agreeing a basic, minimum
platform which was consistent with everyone's principles and then
organising an open conference with the aim of attracting as many
people as possible. The platform would be circulated and discussed
publicly before the conference and presented for endorsement, along
with any additions or amendments, which groups or individuals
attending the conference wished to put forward.
The conference as a whole could also either select candidates for the
Stormont elections or the participating groups could agree to a
slate, with each group selecting its own candidates, and additional
places on the slate being left open for nominations from the floor at
the conference.
Elections in the South are due around mid-2007. Discussions between
the components of the anti-imperialist left could also take place
about an approach to these elections, although agreement might be
much more difficult as some groups have an abstentionist principle in
relation to Leinster House and others don't. If agreement could not
be reached on the anti-imperialist left regarding a platform for
Leinster House, then each group would have to 'do its own thing'.
However, that is no reason why collaboration should or could not be
fruitfully pursued in relation
to the northern elections and at least discussions take place about
possibilities for collaboration in the 26 counties.
Philip Ferguson
Ex-Sinn Fein; former organiser, Irish Anti-Extradition Committee
(now resident in New Zealand)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
One Left United Front.
I think Gerry Ruddy is right (The Plought vol 3-40) In relation to
the debate on policing it is useful for republicans to remember what
the function of the police in a capitalist society is. It is to
ensure capitalist social order. But, every single person is
different from the other. So there is a chance of arguing even with
an enemy to make him see your point of view.
I don't deny the militant struggle, I think our only way to a united
socialist Ireland is by being militant-with words and our emotions,
with a general strike, with the power to the people movement-not with
guns. We have to get 51% of the population ready for a new struggle
in which everyone has his or her place, because we believe in the
unity of the masses.
I think that even our mothers, fathers, sisters, friends are part of
the capitalist society till we talk to them to make them see the
truth. A minority can't win the battle, that's why I would say : Win
the Police, Army, Lawyers, Students, etc like the Movement in Nepal
has done. Even we know they have not established a new system, but
all these named people in these jobs were won in the struggle of the
Nepali People against exploitation and Separation. The whole Nation
has fought for Democracy and Justice not only a few revolutionaries
who are violent. No, there were peasants-sisters and staff officers
as well included.
I do not say vote. I do not say vote for G. Adams. All I say is that
the struggle for a united Social Ireland can only be won in a process
of connecting to all other parties who call themselves Socialist or
Communists. Only in strong unity we are able to talk to different
people from different views to connect them with our Republican
Socialism. Take the SWP and all other Left Movements into a United
Left,-
one movement instead of 45 different movements.
One Left United Front with the democratical Centralism as a guidance
can be effective
Thank you very much for your Time,
Manu Kumar Loganey
(Alles für Alle/Todo para todos/Everything for Everyone)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Statement 366 from the DHKC (Revolutionary People's Liberation
Front) from Turkey:
Date: December 31, 2006
Saddam's execution is not the victory of imperialism but its defeat.
With a new year for the world, with the Muslim peoples preparing for
the Feast of Sacrifice, American imperialism confronted humanity with
the sight of a legitimate head of state hanging from a gallows.
The Head of State of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was condemned by an
American puppet court and executed by a puppet government. The images
of Saddam on the gallows were not only of the execution of an
individual, they were a picture of justice and law being drawn to the
gallows, with the occupations being carried out and imperialist
banditry pursued with announcements of "lists of terrorist
groups"and "axes of evil".
This picture tells the peoples of the world that they must not
believe in fantasies.
Saddam Hussein's murder on the gallows contradicts all the false
reasoning about "democratic imperialism", all the claims that
American imperialism has "brought Iraq democracy".
We live in a world without justice and law; we have no road otherthan
to resist and fight for law and justice. The peoples of the world
need bread and water; so it is clear that even these will not be
guaranteed while in the shadow of the imperialist occupiers. The
imperialist bandits are making this clear to us personally.
The imperialist banditry, which rains bombs from the skies, runs Abu
Ghraib, turns villages and markets into lakes of blood and finally
puts up a gallows, shows that: THERE IS NO LAW UNDER OCCUPATION!
The law of the occupation is tyranny and massacres. There is no law
or justice under an occupation. In no way was it a "legal judgement"
as has been claimed, nor could it be. The judgement was illegitimate
in itself. If an occupation is illegitimate and unacceptable, then it
follows that the courts it establishes are the same.It is sophistry
to claim that Saddam was judged by an "Iraqi court" and "executed by
Iraqis".
To legitimise an execution and the occupation and cover up the crimes
of American imperialism is simple, coarse and humiliating demagogy.
Saddam Hussein's judicial killing is illegal, outside the law and
illegitimate. Those who killed Saddam are collaborators and partners
in crime of the occupying forces and the occupation.
The meaning of the gallows in Baghdad is clear: not to openly come
out against the murder of Saddam, not to curse without hesitation
those who brought him to the gallows, to use sentences with "but"
and "however" in them is to legitimise the execution and do the work
of imperialism.
IF IT PUTS UP GALLOWS BY THE THOUSAND, AMERICAN IMPERIALISM WILL NOT
SAVE ITSELF FROM DEFEAT!
Imperialism is being defeated in Iraq. For all their mighty military
forces, they cannot make a resisting people submit. All their
military and political plans are being frustrated by peoples in
resistance. By executing Saddam they are trying to turn defeat into
victory. But they will not succeed. Because the peoples
of the Middle East are in a great, historic and mass resistance, not
limited to one person or one organisation.
Iraq's Head of State Saddam Hussein did not give in to imperialism
from the very start of the occupation, he showed respect for the
peoples' will to resist and was a part of the resistance. Saddam also
committed crimes against his people, but the imperialists and their
collaborators could not judge him. The court the imperialists set up
to judge Saddam was a court which sought to legitimise imperialist
interests. Saddam behaved at that court in the way a head of state of
an occupied country should, and maintained his courage and held his
head high on the gallows.
All the world knows that Saddam's execution was not a sign of
imperialism's power but its powerlessness; The court set up to
execute Saddam was a comedy and an image, not of justice but of
injustice. Imperialism will not gain strength from it. On the
contrary, every new massacre of imperialism, every new illegality
will turn Iraq into an even deeper swamp for it. Collaborators with
American imperialism are being defeated as they sink in this swamp.
Now special commissions are being set up to find "the least harmful"
way of withdrawing from Iraq. They will not find it! Because the
Iraqi people and the peoples are continuing to resist, despite the
provocations, torture and massacres, despite the gallows...
Wherever they are in the world, victory will belong to those who
resist tyranny by whatever means!
DEVRİMCİ HALK KURTULUŞ CEPHESİ
(REVOLUTIONARY PEOPLE'S LIBERATION FRONT)
"A victory in any country over imperialism is our victory; just as
any
country's defeat is a defeat for all of us."
Cuba Update News
It is the official govt response to the annual UN resolution re the
economic blockade.
"Report by Cuba on Resolution 59/11 of the United Nations General
Assembly"
http://www.granma.cu/bloqueo/infome-ingles.pdf
__________________________________________________ _______________
>From the Media
Cuba's infant mortality rate is lowest in Latin America
http://www.dominicantoday.com/app/article.aspx?id=21172
Havana.– In 2006, Cuba had the lowest infant mortality rate in its
history and of all Latin America, putting it in second place behind
Canada for the Americas as a whole, according to a health ministry
report.
Cuba's infant mortality rate was 5.3 deaths per 1,000 births in
2006,compared to 5.8 per 1,000 in 2005, making it "the leader in
Latin America "in the category, said the report quoted in the
official newspaper Granma.
"Within the Americas, only Canada had a lower rate than Cuba," said
the health ministry, stressing that Cuba "is among the world's 30
nations with the lowest death rate for children between birth and one
year of age."
Since 1995, Cuba's infant mortality rate dropped by 43.6 percent,
Granma said. In 1960, at the start of Cuban leader Fidel Castro's
Communist Revolution, the infant mortality rate stood at 37.3 per
1,000.
The health ministry attributed the current low rate to three new
types of medical exams that detect health-threatening genetical
abnormalities and
advances in pediatic medicine and pre-natal care.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Force TUC to call NHS demo
People United Saving Hospitals holds national meeting
PUSH (People United Saving Hospitals), an umbrella organisation made
up of Keep Our NHS Public groups and anti-privatisation campaigns,
has called for a national demonstration in London on 3 March to show
the opposition to the NHS "reforms" being carried out by the Labour
government.
PUSH was formed by the Nuneaton Peoples Protest Group and seven other
anti-privatisation groups to bring together different anti-
privatisation campaigns in order to share information and
experiences, deliver solidarity, and put pressure on the TUC to call
a national demonstration against NHS privatisation, cuts and
closures. Push held its.
At the first national meeting of PUSH, held in Coventry on 10
December, many speakers highlighted the need for a co-ordinated
national fight-back against privatisation. They also listed the
enormous numbers of ward closures, staff and budget cuts being forced
through by Labour and the NHS Trusts tasked with carrying out their
neo-liberal reforms.
There was strident criticism of the trade union bureaucracy from all
the attendees, who regarded the TUC's failure to organise action
against the crisis facing the NHS as a criminal betrayal of the
health service and the working class, which depends upon it.
There was widespread agreement about the need for a national
demonstration to act as a focus for all the local campaigns and to
bring the reality of NHS privatisation and workers' anger against it
home to the Labour government. The need for a national demonstration
will be a crucial weapon to help organise communities to oppose
privatisation, and will provide a focal point for those working class
areas that do not yet have a local campaign.
(from Workers Power 18/12/06)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
What's On?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
We Won't Pay Campaign - No to Water Charges - No to Water
Privatisation
Upcoming Meetings
North Belfast
Public Meeting
7.30pm Indian Community Centre
Wednesday 10th January
Ormeau Rd - South Belfast
Meeting
7pm Ballynafeigh Community House, Ormeau Rd
Thursday 11th January
West Belfast
Public Meeting
7pm Conway Mill 5/7 Conway St, off the Falls Rd
Thursday 11th January
More meetings are being organised in Cregagh Rd, Tullycarnett,
Markets & Lower Ormeau, Belvoir, Newry, Lisburn Road, Finaghy and
Rathcoole for January. Details will be sent out as soon as venues are
confirmed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
ANTI-WAR IRELAND NOTICE
An event in Dublin for your diary. Caoimhe will also speak in
Belfast, Cork, Galway and Derry. More details later.
Caoimhe Butterly to Speak in Dublin on 20th January
dublin miscellaneous news report
[email protected]
Report-back on her months in Lebanon
Caoimhe Butterly, who has spent the past five months in Lebanon and
who experienced the results of Israel's onslaught last year, will be
back in Ireland briefly at the end of January. During her visit, she
will speak on her experiences in Lebanon (in both Beirut and the
South) and will be highlighting projects that she is currently
involved with (including a film project about life in the wake of the
Israeli bombardment and invasion).
Her first talk will be in Dublin at a public meeting jointly
organised by Anti-War Ireland (AWI), Irish Anti-War Movement (IAWM)
and the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC). The meeting
will be chaired by Raymond Deane of the IPSC.
When: Saturday, 20th January at 2pm
Where: Teachers' Club, Parnell Square, Dublin
This should be a very interesting meeting and should people some
sense of what the Lebanese people have suffered, and continue to
suffer, as a result of Israeli imperialist aggression.
Admission is free and all are welcome!
In addition, Caoimhe will later speak at Anti-War Ireland public
meetings in Belfast and Cork; at a Derry Anti-War Coalition meeting
in Derry city; and at a public meeting in Galway hosted by the EcoSoc
of NUI, Galway. More details on these meetings will be posted later.
Vol. 4- No 1
January 8th Monday 2007
E-mail newsletter of the
Irish Republican Socialist Party
1) Editorial
2) Dying days of the Good Friday Agreement.
3) The Need for an Anti-Imperialist United Front
4) One Left United Front.
5) Statement from the DHKC (Revolutionary People's Liberation
Front) from Turkey:
6) From the media
a. People United Saving Hospitals
b. Cuba's infant mortality rate is lowest in Latin America
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Editorial
First revolutionary greetings to all our readers as we enter 2007.
This edition carries a number of articles on the necessity for a
coming together of anti -imperialists. Our first article warns of
the dangers of getting carried away by the whole debate on policing
which could simply descend into mindleass provo bashing. The second
article by former Sinn fein activist Philip Ferguson calls for
fraternal and comradely debate and dialogue between anti –
imperialists, a call The Plough is happy to endorse. The third
article is a timely remind to all of us of the necessity to win over
the masses in the struggle for without the unity of the masses the
struggle cannot succeed. So we need to create eventually a vehicle
that can bring together all those who consider themselves republican
sand socialists to win a majority of the people to socialist ideas
We also carry a statement from the DHKC on the hanging of Saddam
Hussein. It is clear he was executed because the Imperialist s feared
that he would reveal details of how the Imperialists used him in the
1980s to strengthen their influence in the Middle East. His crimes
were their crimes. The brutal suppression of the Kurds, the gassing
of villages, the wiping out of communists in Iraq were all events
applauded by the imperialists who supplied the technology, the
expertise, the training and the weapons to carry out these crimes.
We shed no tears for Saddam. His fate shows just how easily the
imperialists can use and abuse their allies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Dying days of the Good Friday Agreement.
When the Good Friday Agreement was reached in early 1998 the IRSP was
not in a strong position politically. We had just come through a
two years of internal turmoil as the rank and file of the
organisation fought to restore the party to its core principles,
which had been abandoned by a militaristic and suspect leadership. In
the process we had lost Gino Gallagher who laid the basis for the
implementation of the revolutionary principles for republican
socialism as laid down by Ta Power. We had just held our first Ard-
Feis for over 12 years. But while numerically small and considered by
other republicans to be "one man and a fax machine" we had a
republican socialist analysis of the politics of Ireland that has
been totally vindicated by the events of the last nine years.
We said that the Good Friday Agreement would not succeed. It would
not end discrimination, it would encourage sectarianism by
institutionalizing it and that it copper-fastened partition. We
called for a no vote in the subsequent referendum. We encouraged the
INLA to call its ceasefire as that referendum had made clear the
wishes of the vast majority of the people on the island was for
peace.
We argued face to face with them that the Provisional Sinn Fein
organisation did not have to take part in the power-sharing
executive. Instead they could have provided a solid republican
opposition to both the continued existence of partition and also lead
the fight back against privatization and neo-liberal economic
policies. We referred to that approach as the McCann option-named
after veteran socialist Eamon McCann, who had first put forward that
option.
However the provisionals rejected that approach, adopted a communal
approach( the antithesis of a republican position) claiming to
represent the nationalists (and the nationalists only) and sought
power. As a consequence they decommissioned all their weapons,
entered Stormont, worked British rule in the North, implemented
privatization policies, bowed the knee to USA war lord George Bush,
colluded in the doing away with the political status gained by the
heroic deaths of 10 hunger strikers and belittle and demeaned other
republicans who rejected their reformism.
Now as they ponder the prospect of supporting the Police Service of
Northern Ireland chickens are coming home to roost. Many of their
members who swallowed without protest the long procession of u-turns
now have reached the point of no return. A group of Concerned
Republicans (which the IRSP are involved in) has held two public
meeting on the issue of policing. For the first time in years Sinn
Fein have been forced to justify their position in public before
other republicans. Prominent members have resigned and are now
considering standing as independent republicans if an election is
held in March 2007. While some republicans and socialists may enjoy
the spectacle of seeing Sinn Fein in difficulties they also need to
take the long view. Short term provo- bashing will not win people to
a principled position but only alienate possible future allies in the
struggle against Imperialism
An important aspect of the policing debate is that it is almost
entirely a Provisional Sinn Fein matter. The basic question posed is
do Sinn Fein republicans implement British justice and policing? As a
consequence of the Good Friday Agreement it was always going to come
down to this. The leadership of Sinn Fein has answered that question
in the affirmative at their last Ard-Comhairle meeting. The IRSP,
Republican Sinn Fein and 32 County Sovereignty Movement all reject
the Sinn Fein (provisional) position
If a Sinn Fein Ard Feis endorses the PSNI it is the price they are
paying so that arch bigot, and hater of Catholics, Ian Paisley can
become First Minister. Paisley in fact has now got a veto over
whether there will be power sharing in the North. People should never
forget that many years ago Paisley was a strong supporter of direct
rule from Westminster. So even if Sinn Fein accept positions on the
Policing Board and local district partnerships, the DUP still hold
the winning cards. They can now have Paisley as First Minister or
prevent Sinn Fein from sharing power by forcing Britain to a long
period of direct rule. Either way they can claim success to their
followers.
Some success for the peace process, some success for Sinn Fein's
strategy.
What we are now witnessing in the North of Ireland is the dying days
of the Good Friday Agreement. Nine years after its acceptance it
still has not been implemented and has now been superseded by the St.
Andrews Agreement which neither Sinn Fein nor the DUP signed up to.
The IRSP has held its position consistently over the past ten years.
In all the excitement generated by the policing debate and the fall
out from it, it would be a major mistake for the IRSP to abandon its
clear principled republican socialist party building approach for
short-term electoral advantage. Of course we should support whole-
heartedly those who have a similar position to ourselves. But before
supporting other candidates we need to remember the long term
position of the Irish working class will not be advanced by
unprincipled alliances.
(G Ruddy)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
The Need for an Anti-Imperialist United Front
In a November 23, 2006 article entitled, "Not Too Late for a United
Front", Mick Hall noted "There is little doubt that former members of
the Provisional Republican Movement now make up one of the largest
political factions within northern nationalism"
(http://lark.phoblacht.net/MH1011206g.html).
As well as all the people who have left as individuals over the past
decade, there is Republican Sinn Fein, the 32-County Sovereignty
Movement, the IRSM, Socialist Democracy and independent socialist-
republicans such as Bernadette McAliskey and the people grouped
around The Blanket and Fourthwrite. Outside Ireland there are also
friends of Irish freedom who have been discarded by, or had already
seen through, the Adams cabal atop New Sinn Fein.
Indeed, the number of what could be described as genuine anti-
imperialists is quite impressive and significant. Mick Hall also
rightly noted, however, "Yet their inability to come together to
combat their nemesis, even in a small way, has all but left the
playing field clear for the opportunistic politics of Gerry Adams'
SF."
Indeed, I think it could be argued that the divisions amongst the
anti-imperialist opponents of Adams' Surrenderist politics are the
biggest single thing that New Sinn Fein has going for it.
What is urgently needed is open, comradely discussions among the anti-
imperialist forces with the aim of forming some kind of united
front. No-one need abandon their particular views and there could be
full freedom of action and expression for each group within such a
united front.
One of the first challenges of such a united front could be to pose
an alternative to the Surrenderistas of New Sinn Fein in the next
Stormont elections. I cannot see why it should not be possible to
put together an impressive abstentionist argument, political platform
and candidates posing a convincing critique of New Sinn Fein on every
level – its policies on the national question and on social and
economic issues. Although Mick Hall favours taking seats in Stormont,
most of the forces which could be united for an anti-imperialist
platform should have little trouble agreeing to run on an
abstentionist basis.
Within a basic set of points which everyone in the united front could
agree upon, each current would be free to raise their own specific
The way to form such a united front for be for representatives of the
anti-imperialist organisations to begin meeting and discussing
working towards establishing such a front, agreeing a basic, minimum
platform which was consistent with everyone's principles and then
organising an open conference with the aim of attracting as many
people as possible. The platform would be circulated and discussed
publicly before the conference and presented for endorsement, along
with any additions or amendments, which groups or individuals
attending the conference wished to put forward.
The conference as a whole could also either select candidates for the
Stormont elections or the participating groups could agree to a
slate, with each group selecting its own candidates, and additional
places on the slate being left open for nominations from the floor at
the conference.
Elections in the South are due around mid-2007. Discussions between
the components of the anti-imperialist left could also take place
about an approach to these elections, although agreement might be
much more difficult as some groups have an abstentionist principle in
relation to Leinster House and others don't. If agreement could not
be reached on the anti-imperialist left regarding a platform for
Leinster House, then each group would have to 'do its own thing'.
However, that is no reason why collaboration should or could not be
fruitfully pursued in relation
to the northern elections and at least discussions take place about
possibilities for collaboration in the 26 counties.
Philip Ferguson
Ex-Sinn Fein; former organiser, Irish Anti-Extradition Committee
(now resident in New Zealand)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
One Left United Front.
I think Gerry Ruddy is right (The Plought vol 3-40) In relation to
the debate on policing it is useful for republicans to remember what
the function of the police in a capitalist society is. It is to
ensure capitalist social order. But, every single person is
different from the other. So there is a chance of arguing even with
an enemy to make him see your point of view.
I don't deny the militant struggle, I think our only way to a united
socialist Ireland is by being militant-with words and our emotions,
with a general strike, with the power to the people movement-not with
guns. We have to get 51% of the population ready for a new struggle
in which everyone has his or her place, because we believe in the
unity of the masses.
I think that even our mothers, fathers, sisters, friends are part of
the capitalist society till we talk to them to make them see the
truth. A minority can't win the battle, that's why I would say : Win
the Police, Army, Lawyers, Students, etc like the Movement in Nepal
has done. Even we know they have not established a new system, but
all these named people in these jobs were won in the struggle of the
Nepali People against exploitation and Separation. The whole Nation
has fought for Democracy and Justice not only a few revolutionaries
who are violent. No, there were peasants-sisters and staff officers
as well included.
I do not say vote. I do not say vote for G. Adams. All I say is that
the struggle for a united Social Ireland can only be won in a process
of connecting to all other parties who call themselves Socialist or
Communists. Only in strong unity we are able to talk to different
people from different views to connect them with our Republican
Socialism. Take the SWP and all other Left Movements into a United
Left,-
one movement instead of 45 different movements.
One Left United Front with the democratical Centralism as a guidance
can be effective
Thank you very much for your Time,
Manu Kumar Loganey
(Alles für Alle/Todo para todos/Everything for Everyone)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Statement 366 from the DHKC (Revolutionary People's Liberation
Front) from Turkey:
Date: December 31, 2006
Saddam's execution is not the victory of imperialism but its defeat.
With a new year for the world, with the Muslim peoples preparing for
the Feast of Sacrifice, American imperialism confronted humanity with
the sight of a legitimate head of state hanging from a gallows.
The Head of State of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was condemned by an
American puppet court and executed by a puppet government. The images
of Saddam on the gallows were not only of the execution of an
individual, they were a picture of justice and law being drawn to the
gallows, with the occupations being carried out and imperialist
banditry pursued with announcements of "lists of terrorist
groups"and "axes of evil".
This picture tells the peoples of the world that they must not
believe in fantasies.
Saddam Hussein's murder on the gallows contradicts all the false
reasoning about "democratic imperialism", all the claims that
American imperialism has "brought Iraq democracy".
We live in a world without justice and law; we have no road otherthan
to resist and fight for law and justice. The peoples of the world
need bread and water; so it is clear that even these will not be
guaranteed while in the shadow of the imperialist occupiers. The
imperialist bandits are making this clear to us personally.
The imperialist banditry, which rains bombs from the skies, runs Abu
Ghraib, turns villages and markets into lakes of blood and finally
puts up a gallows, shows that: THERE IS NO LAW UNDER OCCUPATION!
The law of the occupation is tyranny and massacres. There is no law
or justice under an occupation. In no way was it a "legal judgement"
as has been claimed, nor could it be. The judgement was illegitimate
in itself. If an occupation is illegitimate and unacceptable, then it
follows that the courts it establishes are the same.It is sophistry
to claim that Saddam was judged by an "Iraqi court" and "executed by
Iraqis".
To legitimise an execution and the occupation and cover up the crimes
of American imperialism is simple, coarse and humiliating demagogy.
Saddam Hussein's judicial killing is illegal, outside the law and
illegitimate. Those who killed Saddam are collaborators and partners
in crime of the occupying forces and the occupation.
The meaning of the gallows in Baghdad is clear: not to openly come
out against the murder of Saddam, not to curse without hesitation
those who brought him to the gallows, to use sentences with "but"
and "however" in them is to legitimise the execution and do the work
of imperialism.
IF IT PUTS UP GALLOWS BY THE THOUSAND, AMERICAN IMPERIALISM WILL NOT
SAVE ITSELF FROM DEFEAT!
Imperialism is being defeated in Iraq. For all their mighty military
forces, they cannot make a resisting people submit. All their
military and political plans are being frustrated by peoples in
resistance. By executing Saddam they are trying to turn defeat into
victory. But they will not succeed. Because the peoples
of the Middle East are in a great, historic and mass resistance, not
limited to one person or one organisation.
Iraq's Head of State Saddam Hussein did not give in to imperialism
from the very start of the occupation, he showed respect for the
peoples' will to resist and was a part of the resistance. Saddam also
committed crimes against his people, but the imperialists and their
collaborators could not judge him. The court the imperialists set up
to judge Saddam was a court which sought to legitimise imperialist
interests. Saddam behaved at that court in the way a head of state of
an occupied country should, and maintained his courage and held his
head high on the gallows.
All the world knows that Saddam's execution was not a sign of
imperialism's power but its powerlessness; The court set up to
execute Saddam was a comedy and an image, not of justice but of
injustice. Imperialism will not gain strength from it. On the
contrary, every new massacre of imperialism, every new illegality
will turn Iraq into an even deeper swamp for it. Collaborators with
American imperialism are being defeated as they sink in this swamp.
Now special commissions are being set up to find "the least harmful"
way of withdrawing from Iraq. They will not find it! Because the
Iraqi people and the peoples are continuing to resist, despite the
provocations, torture and massacres, despite the gallows...
Wherever they are in the world, victory will belong to those who
resist tyranny by whatever means!
DEVRİMCİ HALK KURTULUŞ CEPHESİ
(REVOLUTIONARY PEOPLE'S LIBERATION FRONT)
"A victory in any country over imperialism is our victory; just as
any
country's defeat is a defeat for all of us."
Cuba Update News
It is the official govt response to the annual UN resolution re the
economic blockade.
"Report by Cuba on Resolution 59/11 of the United Nations General
Assembly"
http://www.granma.cu/bloqueo/infome-ingles.pdf
__________________________________________________ _______________
>From the Media
Cuba's infant mortality rate is lowest in Latin America
http://www.dominicantoday.com/app/article.aspx?id=21172
Havana.– In 2006, Cuba had the lowest infant mortality rate in its
history and of all Latin America, putting it in second place behind
Canada for the Americas as a whole, according to a health ministry
report.
Cuba's infant mortality rate was 5.3 deaths per 1,000 births in
2006,compared to 5.8 per 1,000 in 2005, making it "the leader in
Latin America "in the category, said the report quoted in the
official newspaper Granma.
"Within the Americas, only Canada had a lower rate than Cuba," said
the health ministry, stressing that Cuba "is among the world's 30
nations with the lowest death rate for children between birth and one
year of age."
Since 1995, Cuba's infant mortality rate dropped by 43.6 percent,
Granma said. In 1960, at the start of Cuban leader Fidel Castro's
Communist Revolution, the infant mortality rate stood at 37.3 per
1,000.
The health ministry attributed the current low rate to three new
types of medical exams that detect health-threatening genetical
abnormalities and
advances in pediatic medicine and pre-natal care.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Force TUC to call NHS demo
People United Saving Hospitals holds national meeting
PUSH (People United Saving Hospitals), an umbrella organisation made
up of Keep Our NHS Public groups and anti-privatisation campaigns,
has called for a national demonstration in London on 3 March to show
the opposition to the NHS "reforms" being carried out by the Labour
government.
PUSH was formed by the Nuneaton Peoples Protest Group and seven other
anti-privatisation groups to bring together different anti-
privatisation campaigns in order to share information and
experiences, deliver solidarity, and put pressure on the TUC to call
a national demonstration against NHS privatisation, cuts and
closures. Push held its.
At the first national meeting of PUSH, held in Coventry on 10
December, many speakers highlighted the need for a co-ordinated
national fight-back against privatisation. They also listed the
enormous numbers of ward closures, staff and budget cuts being forced
through by Labour and the NHS Trusts tasked with carrying out their
neo-liberal reforms.
There was strident criticism of the trade union bureaucracy from all
the attendees, who regarded the TUC's failure to organise action
against the crisis facing the NHS as a criminal betrayal of the
health service and the working class, which depends upon it.
There was widespread agreement about the need for a national
demonstration to act as a focus for all the local campaigns and to
bring the reality of NHS privatisation and workers' anger against it
home to the Labour government. The need for a national demonstration
will be a crucial weapon to help organise communities to oppose
privatisation, and will provide a focal point for those working class
areas that do not yet have a local campaign.
(from Workers Power 18/12/06)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
What's On?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
We Won't Pay Campaign - No to Water Charges - No to Water
Privatisation
Upcoming Meetings
North Belfast
Public Meeting
7.30pm Indian Community Centre
Wednesday 10th January
Ormeau Rd - South Belfast
Meeting
7pm Ballynafeigh Community House, Ormeau Rd
Thursday 11th January
West Belfast
Public Meeting
7pm Conway Mill 5/7 Conway St, off the Falls Rd
Thursday 11th January
More meetings are being organised in Cregagh Rd, Tullycarnett,
Markets & Lower Ormeau, Belvoir, Newry, Lisburn Road, Finaghy and
Rathcoole for January. Details will be sent out as soon as venues are
confirmed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
ANTI-WAR IRELAND NOTICE
An event in Dublin for your diary. Caoimhe will also speak in
Belfast, Cork, Galway and Derry. More details later.
Caoimhe Butterly to Speak in Dublin on 20th January
dublin miscellaneous news report
[email protected]
Report-back on her months in Lebanon
Caoimhe Butterly, who has spent the past five months in Lebanon and
who experienced the results of Israel's onslaught last year, will be
back in Ireland briefly at the end of January. During her visit, she
will speak on her experiences in Lebanon (in both Beirut and the
South) and will be highlighting projects that she is currently
involved with (including a film project about life in the wake of the
Israeli bombardment and invasion).
Her first talk will be in Dublin at a public meeting jointly
organised by Anti-War Ireland (AWI), Irish Anti-War Movement (IAWM)
and the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC). The meeting
will be chaired by Raymond Deane of the IPSC.
When: Saturday, 20th January at 2pm
Where: Teachers' Club, Parnell Square, Dublin
This should be a very interesting meeting and should people some
sense of what the Lebanese people have suffered, and continue to
suffer, as a result of Israeli imperialist aggression.
Admission is free and all are welcome!
In addition, Caoimhe will later speak at Anti-War Ireland public
meetings in Belfast and Cork; at a Derry Anti-War Coalition meeting
in Derry city; and at a public meeting in Galway hosted by the EcoSoc
of NUI, Galway. More details on these meetings will be posted later.